Citations

BACKGROUNDOxaliplatin in combination with either 5‐fluorouracil or capecitabine is commonly used as first‐line therapy for patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma. The addition of irinotecan improves survival in other gastrointestinal tumors but at the cost of hematologic toxicity. The authors performed a phase 2 cooperative group study (North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0543, Alliance) using genotype‐dosed capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (gCAPIRINOX), with dosing assigned based on UDP glucuronosyltransferase family 1 member A1 (UGT1A1) genotype to test: 1) whether the addition of irinotecan would improve outcomes; and 2) whether UGT1A1 genotype‐based dosing could optimize tolerability.METHODSPreviously untreated patients with advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma received irinotecan (day 1), oxaliplatin (day 1), and capecitabine (days 2‐15) in a 21‐day cycle and were dosed with gCAPIRINOX according to UGT1A1*28 genotypes (6/6, 6/7, and 7/7).RESULTSA total of 33 patients (17 with the 6/6 genotype, 10 with the 6/7 genotype, and 6 with the 7/7 genotype) were enrolled from October 2007 to November 2013; 73% were male, with a mean age of 64 years (range, 41‐77 years). Location of the primary tumor included the duodenum (58%), jejunum (30%), and ileum (9%). The regimen yielded a confirmed response rate of 37.5% (95% confidence interval, 21%‐56%), with a median progression‐free survival of 8.9 months and a median overall survival of 13.4 months. Neither hematologic toxicity (grade ≥3 in 52.9%, 30.0%, and 33.3%, respectively, of the 6/6, 6/7, and 7/7 genotype groups) nor tumor response rate (41.2%, 33%, and 33%, respectively) were found to differ significantly by UGT1A1 genotype.CONCLUSIONSUGT1A1 genotype‐directed dosing (gCAPIRINOX) appears to be feasible with favorable rates of hematologic toxicity compared with prior 3‐drug studies in unselected patients. Larger studies would be needed to determine the regimen's comparability to oxaliplatin and capecitabine (CapeOx) alone or if response/toxicity differs among patients with different UGT1A1 genotypes. Cancer 2017;123:3494‐501. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

INTRODUCTION: The Pregnancy Reasonably Excluded Guide (PREG) questionnaire is based on traditional methods of excluding pregnancy including sterilization, menopause, and the World Health Organization criteria. The PREG has been validated and shows a 99-100% negative predictive value for pregnancy (Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2013: adapted from the world health organization selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2nd edition. MMWR Recomm Rep 2013; 62:1‒60.). Pregnancy testing in our outpatient surgical settings varied by provider. This study compared utilization of pregnancy tests in the outpatient gynecologic surgery setting after implementation of universal PREG administration. METHODS: All women undergoing outpatient gynecologic surgery were prospectively evaluated between March and September 2016. Administration of the PREG to women 18-49, excluding those undergoing procedures related to pregnancy, was implemented in July and rates of pregnancy testing pre- and post-implementation were compared using Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS: 369 patients underwent an outpatient gynecologic procedure during the study period (excluding a two week washout period after implementation). In the pre-implementation group, 136 met inclusion criteria with 45 pregnancy tests performed (33.1%). After implementation, 80 patients met inclusion criteria and 17 pregnancy tests were performed as indicated by PREG response (21.3%), demonstrating over one third reduction in pregnancy test administration (p = 0.086). No pregnancy tests were positive and no false negative evaluations were identified. Physician and nursing staff requested continued use of the PREG after the trial. CONCLUSION: PREG administration on admission for outpatient gynecologic surgery consistently and effectively identifies patients in whom pregnancy testing improves the value of care.

INTRODUCTION: Postpartum hemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. There are multiple known risk factors, including induction of labor. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was completed with review of nulliparous women undergoing labor induction at term, from July 2006 to May 2011. Baseline maternal variables and risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage were assessed. All combinations of methods of induction were sequential rather than concurrent. The need for additional uterotonics (beyond routine oxytocin) was used as a surrogate for postpartum hemorrhage. Variables were evaluated for an association with additional uterotonic use based on fitting logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 785 women were included in the study. Additional uterotonics were required for 84/785 (11%) of women. Based on univariate analysis, only birth weight and presence of meconium were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with additional uterotonic use, while method of induction approached statistical significance (p=0.06). The mean (SD) birth weight was 3668 (584) vs. 3463 (500) grams in those with and without additional uterotonic use. Multivariate analysis showed an increased risk of additional uterotonics with higher birth weight (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.44 per 500 gram increase in birth weight; 95% CI 1.15, 1.82) and use of Foley plus oxytocin (aOR 4.40; 95% CI 1.36, 14.23). CONCLUSION: In our model, higher birth weight and induction method of Foley followed by oxytocin were associated with increased need for additional uterotonics. This data adds detail to previous studies that have broadly identified induction of labor as a risk factor for postpartum hemorrhage.

Background: There is growing interest in white matter (WM) imaging with positron emission tomography (PET). Objectives: We studied the association of cognitive function in late multiple sclerosis (MS) with cortical and WM Pittsburgh compound-B PET (PiB-PET) binding. Methods: In the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, 24 of 4869 participants had MS (12 underwent PiB-PET). Controls were age and sex matched (5:1). We used automated or semi-automated processing for quantitative image analyses and conditional logistic regression for group differences. Results: MS patients had lower memory ( p = 0.03) and language ( p = 0.02) performance; smaller thalamic volumes ( p = 0.003); and thinner temporal ( p = 0.001) and frontal ( p = 0.045) cortices on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) than controls. There was no difference in global cortical PiB standardized uptake value ratios between MS and controls ( p = 0.35). PiB uptake was lower in areas of WM hyperintensities compared to normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) in MS ( p = 0.0002). Reduced PiB uptake in both the areas of WM hyperintensities ( r = 0.65; p = 0.02) and NAWM ( r = 0.69; p = 0.01) was associated with decreased visuospatial performance in MS. Conclusion: PiB uptake in the cortex in late MS is not different from normal age-matched controls. PiB uptake in the WM in late MS may be a marker of the large network structures’ integrity such as those involved in visuospatial performance.

Outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in elderly patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy is challenging. Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) can be effective in these patients but responses are usually short‐lived. The majority of patients will either have stable disease or progress through therapy. We hereby describe the outcome of these patients at our institution after they fail HMAs. The data on 56 AML patients at Mayo Clinic, Rochester were reviewed. Patients were considered for our study if they received HMA as frontline therapy for their AML. Out of 56 patients, 15 (27%) patients received azacitidine (AZA) and 41 (73%) received decitabine. Complete remission was found in 10 (18%), with overall response of 28% and median response duration of 10 months. Thirteen (81%) out of 16 responders relapsed. Therefore 53 patients were included in the primary or secondary failure analysis with a median overall survival (OS) of 2 months after the date of failure. Out of 53 patients, 12 (23%) received subsequent treatments. None of the 12 patients who got first salvage therapy achieved remission. Five out of the 12 patients received second salvage therapy, 2 (40%) of which achieved CR. Median OS for patients who received subsequent salvage therapies was better than those who did not receive any subsequent therapy after failing HMA (9.5 vs. 2 months, P = .0009). Outcome for patients who have primary or secondary failure is very poor. Our study provides important historical data for future novel therapies, which are sorely needed for these patients.

OBJECTIVEPrimary osteosarcoma of the spine is a rare osseous neoplasm. While previously reported retrospective studies have demonstrated that overall patient survival is impacted mostly by en bloc resection and chemotherapy, the continued management of residual disease remains to be elucidated. This systematic review was designed to address the role of revision surgery and multimodal adjuvant therapy in cases in which en bloc excision is not initially achieved.METHODSA systematic literature search spanning the years 1966 to 2015 was performed on PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify reports describing outcomes of patients who underwent biopsy alone, neurological decompression, or intralesional resection for osteosarcoma of the spine. Studies were reviewed qualitatively, and the clinical course of individual patients was aggregated for quantitative meta-analysis.RESULTSA total of 16 studies were identified for inclusion in the systematic review, of which 8 case reports were summarized qualitatively. These studies strongly support the role of chemotherapy for overall survival and moderately support adjuvant radiation therapy for local control. The meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant benefit in overall survival for performing revision tumor debulking (p = 0.01) and also for chemotherapy at relapse (p < 0.01). Adjuvant radiation therapy was associated with longer survival, although this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06).CONCLUSIONSWhile the initial therapeutic goal in the management of osteosarcoma of the spine is neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by en bloc marginal resection, this objective is not always achievable given anatomical constraints and other limitations at the time of initial clinical presentation. This systematic review supports the continued aggressive use of revision surgery and multimodal adjuvant therapy when possible to improve outcomes in patients who initially undergo subtotal debulking of osteosarcoma. A limitation of this systematic review is that lesions amenable to subsequent resection or tumors inherently more sensitive to adjuvants would exaggerate a therapeutic effect of these interventions when studied in a retrospective fashion.