DeJong, Stephanie R.

Abstract Background Abnormal uterine bleeding requires the investigation of the endometrium. Histology is typically used but there remains room for the improvement and use of cytology. Methods Women presenting for clinically indicated office endometrial biopsy were prospectively enrolled. Tao endometrial brushing and office endometrial biopsy were performed, and surgical procedure if clinically indicated. Tao brush cytology specimens were blindly reviewed by up to three pathologists, consensus obtained, and scored as: benign, atypical (favor benign), suspicious, positive for malignancy, or non‐diagnostic. Cytology and histology were compared to surgical pathology to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values to detect AH (atypical hyperplasia) or EC (endometrial cancer). Results Clinical indications of 197 enrolled patients included postmenopausal bleeding (90, 45.7%), abnormal uterine bleeding (94, 47.7%), and abnormal endometrium on ultrasound without bleeding (13, 6.6%). Of the 197 patients, 185 (93.9%) had cytology score consensus and a total of 196 (99.5%) had consensus regarding cytology positivity. Surgical pathology diagnoses (N = 85) were 13 (15.3%) FIGO grade 1 or 2 EC, 3 (3.5%) AH, and 69 (81.2%) benign endometrium. Sensitivity and specificity to detect EC or AH were 93.7% and 100%, respectively, via endometrial biopsy; 87.5% and 63.8%, respectively, via endometrial cytology when scores of malignancy, suspicious, or atypical were considered positive. Conclusions In a high‐risk population, Tao brush endometrial cytology showed high sensitivity to detect AH and EC comparable to biopsy histology when considering scores of malignancy, suspicious, atypical, and non‐diagnostic. Revisiting the potential value of endometrial cytology in the contemporary era of endometrial diagnostic workup is warranted.

INTRODUCTION: The Pregnancy Reasonably Excluded Guide (PREG) questionnaire is based on traditional methods of excluding pregnancy including sterilization, menopause, and the World Health Organization criteria. The PREG has been validated and shows a 99-100% negative predictive value for pregnancy (Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2013: adapted from the world health organization selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2nd edition. MMWR Recomm Rep 2013; 62:1‒60.). Pregnancy testing in our outpatient surgical settings varied by provider. This study compared utilization of pregnancy tests in the outpatient gynecologic surgery setting after implementation of universal PREG administration. METHODS: All women undergoing outpatient gynecologic surgery were prospectively evaluated between March and September 2016. Administration of the PREG to women 18-49, excluding those undergoing procedures related to pregnancy, was implemented in July and rates of pregnancy testing pre- and post-implementation were compared using Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS: 369 patients underwent an outpatient gynecologic procedure during the study period (excluding a two week washout period after implementation). In the pre-implementation group, 136 met inclusion criteria with 45 pregnancy tests performed (33.1%). After implementation, 80 patients met inclusion criteria and 17 pregnancy tests were performed as indicated by PREG response (21.3%), demonstrating over one third reduction in pregnancy test administration (p = 0.086). No pregnancy tests were positive and no false negative evaluations were identified. Physician and nursing staff requested continued use of the PREG after the trial. CONCLUSION: PREG administration on admission for outpatient gynecologic surgery consistently and effectively identifies patients in whom pregnancy testing improves the value of care.