Citations

e15641 Background: CC pts with biliary stents or catheters are prone to have obstruction/infection and studies show 20-40% present with fever/or jaundice requiring urgent treatment for which there is no uniform guideline. We aimed to develop an expert panel consensus on this topic using the modified RAND/UCLA Delphi process to rate treatment appropriateness. Methods: We recruited 13 physician experts from relevant specialty, geography, and practice settings. Patient scenarios were developed and panelists rated the therapies before and after a face-to-face discussion. The appropriateness of various therapies was rated on a 1-9 scale and classified as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain. Scenarios with > 2 ratings of 1-3 (inappropriate) and > 2 ratings of 7-9 (appropriate) were considered to have disagreement and were not assigned an appropriateness rating. Results: Panelists were from all US regions (92%) and the UK (8%); had practiced for a mean 16.5 years (4-33 years). Panelists rated 480 scenarios before the meeting, but re-rated only 288 clinical scenarios as they felt that ongoing treatment with chemotherapy did not influence decision-making. Disagreement decreased from 37.5% before the meeting to 10.4% after. Consensus statements are summarized in the table below. Conclusions: The Delphi process produced consensus guidelines to fill an unmet need in urgent management of ascending cholangitis in pts with CC. (Support: The Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation). [Table: see text]

TPS4138 Background: Apatinib is an orally administered, highly selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR-2 that has been studied in many clinical trials, primarily in China, treating various solid tumors. Based on the results of the Chinese Phase 3 study, apatinib was approved in China for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC), but apatinib has yet to be evaluated in a randomized placebo-controlled study in the rest of the world. ANGEL is a multinational, placebo controlled, Phase 3 study investigating the efficacy and safety of apatinib in advanced GC patients in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. Methods: Main eligibility criteria include patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction for whom at least 2 prior lines of standard chemotherapy had failed, ECOG performance status ≤ 1, and disease progression < 6 months after last chemotherapy treatment. Approximately 459 patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive continuous 28-day cycles of apatinib 700 mg or a matched placebo daily with best supportive care until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Stratification factors include geographic region (Asia vs. North America/Europe), disease measurability, prior ramucirumab treatment, and treatment therapy line (3rd or 4th). Primary endpoint is overall survival (OS) in the intent-to-treat population, and secondary endpoints are progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), quality of life, and safety. The primary analysis of OS will be conducted in intention-to-treat population using a stratified log-rank test at the two-sided alpha = 0.05 level of significance. If the primary analysis of OS is statistically significant, then PFS and ORR will be analyzed. All other secondary efficacy endpoints will be analyzed using two-sided tests at the alpha = 0.05 level of significance. Enrollment opened Feb 2017. Clinical trial information: NCT03042611.

4073 Background: Durvalumab and tremelimumab, investigational monoclonal antibodies against PD-L1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoints, respectively, have shown efficacy in monotherapy and offer promise in combination for patients (pts) with HCC. This is a phase I/II, open-label, randomized study of durvalumab combined with tremelimumab in unresectable HCC. Methods: Phase I part of this study is a safety run-in cohort treated at the recommended phase II doses of the durvalumab/tremelimumab combination (20 and 1 mg/kg IV Q4W respectively for 4 doses followed by 20 mg/kg Q4W durvalumab alone) in pts with unresectable HCC with or without concomitant HBV or HCV infection who progress on, are intolerant to, or have refused sorafenib therapy. Secondary objectives include evaluation of antitumor activity. Here we present results of a preplanned analysis from the completed phase I part of the study. Results: As of 10 January 2017, 40 pts have been enrolled (11 HBV+, 9 HCV+, 20 uninfected). 30% had no prior systemic therapy; 93% were Child Pugh Class A. 24 (60%) had ≥1 treatment-related AE; 20% had ≥1 grade ≥3 related AE. Most common (≥15%) treatment-related AEs: fatigue (20%), increased ALT (18%), pruritus (18%), and increased AST (15%). Most common grade ≥3 related AE was asymptomatic increased AST (10%). 24 pts have discontinued treatment: 3 due to treatment-related AEs (grade 3 pneumonitis, grade 3 colitis/diarrhea, asymptomatic grade 4 elevated AST and ALT), 16 due to progressive disease, 4 due to death unrelated to treatment (cardiac arrest, variceal bleed, progressive disease, probable HCC rupture), and 1 other (pt entered hospice care). 40 pts were evaluable for response at ≥16 weeks follow-up. Conclusions: No unexpected safety signals with durvalumab and tremelimumab were seen in this unresectable HCC population. Clinical activity observed predominantly in uninfected pts though interpretation limited by small subsets. Enrollment to the phase II portion of the study is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02519348. [Table: see text]

e12522 Background: Trastuzumab is widely used in management of HER2+ breast cancer patients. A known adverse effect of trastuzumab use is cardiac dysfunction, which can often be reversed with cessation of therapy. Our objectives were to 1) assess if trastuzumab can be safely administered to breast cancer patients with reduced cardiac function and 2) identify patient characteristics that predict susceptibility to trastuzumab-induced cardiac dysfunction. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on female patients seen at Mayo Clinic for HER2+ breast cancer and treated with trastuzumab for localized or metastatic disease between January 1, 2000 and August 31, 2015. Eligibility criteria included documentation of and results from at least one echocardiogram prior to and at least one after trastuzumab initiation. Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) of 53% or more was considered normal. Any LVEF reduction of 10% or more was considered significant. Among patients with normal EF, age strata of < 45, 45-60, and > 60 at time of trastuzumab initiation were used to assess risk factors for clinically diagnosed cardiac dysfunction (defined as EF < 53 or abnormal strain and physical symptoms of heart failure (HF)). Results: We identified 335 women (mean age 53.3, with 25.3% age < 45, 44.5% age 45-60, and 30.1% age > 60) who had normal LVEF (median EF 64, range: 53-75) and 23 women (mean age 53.4, with 30.4% age < 45, 43.5% age 45-60, and 26.1% age > 60) who had low LVEF at baseline (median EF 52, range: 25-52). Approximately a third (34.3%) of women with normal LVEF prior to initiation of therapy had at least one subsequent echocardiogram showing a drop of 10% or a low LVEF ( < 53). Approximately a quarter (26%) of women with low LVEF at baseline had a 10% drop in LVEF. HF incidence increased with age. Predictive factors for trastuzumab-induced cardiac dysfunction were obesity and history of coronary artery disease (CAD) across all age strata, and chest irradiation (IR) for those aged 45-60 only. Conclusions: Our results suggest that trastuzumab can be administered in women with reduced cardiac function at no greater risk than in those with preserved cardiac function. Some women with no obesity, history of CAD, or history of chest IR may not need echocardiograms during trastuzumab therapy.