Citations

Abstract Introduction: Immune suppression is a major component of lymphoma pathogenesis. Recent advances in lymphoma treatment have been immunotherapy. We present the preliminary results of our clinical trial testing 2 vaccine strategies in patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The primary objective is to determine the safety and feasibility of the vaccine approaches and secondary objectives are to describe clinical responses and identify corresponding immune changes. Methods: Autologous mature dendritic cells (mDC) were manufactured from leukapheresed cells of NHL pts. For patients with tumor lymph nodes deemed amenable to cryoablation by interventional radiologist (arm A), they received cryoablation of a node and injection of mDC into the cryoablated node followed by another 1 to 7 intratumoral mDC injections. Remaining patients had a tumor excised to generate tumor lysate ex vivo. mDC were pulsed with tumor lysate during DC maturation (arm B; DC-TL). The DC-TL vaccines were injected intradermally for 4 to 8 doses. Patients are monitored for one year after vaccines for adverse events and systemic tumor response. Correlative studies include cellular immune phenotype of peripheral blood and T cell intracellular cytokine productions. Planned accrual is 10 patients per arm (total = 20). Results: To date, 10 patients have accrued to arm A and 5 patients to arm B (Table 1). All pts tolerated vaccine treatments without major adverse events. Of the 10 evaluable patients, there were 1 CR (arm B: 1 / 4; total: 1/6) and 4 PR (arm A: 3/6; arm B: 1 / 4; total: 4/10) for an ORR of 50% for both arms (Figure 1). Time to next treatment ranged from 6.5 to 25 months (Figure 2). Correlative studies suggest that immune changes can be used as prognostic biomarkers to predict response. These include changes in vaccine induced cytokine secretion, and in the number and composition of the immune system. In addition, preliminary analysis of >40 immune phenotypes using flow cytometry and hierarchical clustering suggest there are characteristic immune system responses in patients responding to vaccine. Conclusions: Both cryoablation and intratumoral mDC vaccination are feasible and safe in NHL. Treatment responses may correlate with immune system changes. Biosystems analysis method can be used to develop novel assays as predictive biomarkers of treatment response and used to develop novel protocols that allow treating to response. Table 1. Patient Demographics Arm A (n = 10) Arm B (n = 5) Total (n = 15) Age (median, rage) 64 (55 – 80) 60 (31 – 86) 63 (31 – 86) Gender (M/F) 6/4 2/3 8/7 Histology (n, %) Follicular Marginal zone DLBCL 10 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 3 (60%) 1 (20%) 1(20%) 13 (86.6%) 1 (6.7%) 1 (6.7%) Stage (N, %) II III IV 1 (10%) 1 (10%) 8 (80%) 2 (40%) 1 (20%) 2 (40%) 3 (20%) 2 (13.3%) 10 (66.7%) No of prior Tx (mean, range) 2.4 (0-8) 3.2 (0-7) 2.7 (0-8) FLIPI (n, %) 0-1 2 ≥ 3 1 (10%) 2 (20%) 7 (70%) 1 (20%) 2 (40%) 2 (45%) 2 (13.3%) 4 (26.7%) 9 (60%) Positive GELF criteria (n, %) 4 (40%) 1 (20%) 5 (30%) Figure 1. Waterfall plot. Figure 1. Waterfall plot. Figure 2. Time to next treatment. Figure 2. Time to next treatment. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: Patients (pts) with refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) have poor outcomes with currently available therapies, with a complete response (CR) rate of 8%, a partial response (PR) rate of 18%, and median overall survival (OS) of 6.6 months (mo) as demonstrated in the 635 pt SCHOLAR-1 meta-analysis (Crump, ASCO 2016; abstract 7516). ZUMA-1 is the first multicenter trial of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in refractory, aggressive NHL (NCT02348216). The phase 1 portion of ZUMA-1 showed ongoing CRs at 12+ mos in 43% of pts (Locke, ESMO 2016; abstract 1048O). The pivotal phase 2 portion of ZUMA-1 comprises 2 cohorts based on tumor type: DLBCL (cohort 1) and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma or transformed follicular lymphoma (cohort 2). Here, we present results of a prespecified interim analysis from cohort 1. Methods: Pts received a target dose of 2 × 106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg after a low-dose conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) and fludarabine (30 mg/m2) daily for 3 days. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) per 2007 IWG criteria. Key secondary endpoints include duration of response, frequency of adverse events (AEs), and levels of CAR T cells and serum cytokines. Key inclusion criteria include age ≥18 years, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-1, and refractory disease defined as progressive disease or stable disease as best response to last line of therapy, or disease progression ≤12 mos after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Pts must have received a prior anti-CD20 antibody and an anthracycline-containing regimen. A prespecified interim analysis was to be conducted to determine early efficacy with a nominal alpha level of 0.017 in 50 treated pts in cohort 1 with a minimum follow-up of 3 mos. Results: In total, 111 pts from 22 institutions were enrolled and leukapheresed, and 101 pts received KTE-C19. As of August 24, 2016, 51 pts in cohort 1 were eligible for analysis. Median age was 58 years (range, 25-76), 73% were male, 71% had ECOG PS 1, 78% were refractory to ≥2 lines of therapy, 20% relapsed ≤12 mos of ASCT, and 61% were treated with ≥3 lines of prior therapy. KTE-C19 was successfully manufactured in 99% of pts enrolled. Average turnaround time from apheresis to receipt of KTE-C19 at the clinical site was 17.4 days. With an ORR of 76%, the study met the primary endpoint (P<0.0001; exact binomial test comparing observed ORR to a historical control assumption of 20%), with 47% CRs and 29% PRs. 92% of responses occurred within the 1st mo, and 39% of pts had ongoing responses (CR in 33%) at 3 mos. Responses were seen across key covariates, including refractory subgroup (refractory to chemotherapy=76%, relapse post ASCT=80%). Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival at 1 and 3 mos were 92% and 56%, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs were neutropenia (67%), anemia (39%), thrombocytopenia (29%), febrile neutropenia (27%), and encephalopathy (24%). Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic events occurred in 20% and 29% of pts, respectively. There was 1 grade 5 KTE-C19-related event of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. CAR T cells expanded within 14 days of KTE-C19 infusion, and peak expansion was associated with ongoing response at mo 3 (P=0.008). Pts who developed grade ≥3 neurological events had increased serum levels of IL-15 (P=0.0002), IL-6 (P=0.003); IL-10 (P=0.009) and IP-10 (P=0.0003). Cytokines/chemokines returned to baseline levels in most pts by day 28. Data from 93 pts with at least 1 mo of follow-up at the data cutoff will be presented. Conclusions: ZUMA-1 is the first reported multicenter trial of CAR T cell therapy in pts with refractory aggressive NHL. KTE-C19 induced a nearly 6-fold higher CR rate compared to historical outcomes in SCHOLAR-1. Efficacy strongly associated with peak CAR T levels. Central manufacturing, logistics, and AE management were successfully implemented across 22 sites, most with no prior CAR T therapy experience. Results from cohort 2 of ZUMA-1 are also presented (Abstract #998). KTE-C19 demonstrated significant clinical benefit in pts with no curative treatment options. Supported in part by funding from The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Therapy Acceleration Program®. Drs Neelapu and Locke contributed equally to this study. Disclosures Neelapu: Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Locke:Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Miklos:pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Jacobson:Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siddiqi:Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau. Lin:Mayo Clinic: Employment; Janssen: Research Funding. Timmerman:Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kite Pharma, Valor Biopharmaceuticals, Janssen: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Genmab, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Goy:COTA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen/Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research funding for clinical trials through institution, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research funding for clinical trials through institution; Acerta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Other: Research funding for clinical trials through institution. Smith:Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Spectrum: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria. Deol:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Avivi:Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical center: Consultancy, Other: consultancy to :BMS Roche. Westin:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ProNAi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chavez:Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Levy:Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Five Prime Therapeutics: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Corvus: Consultancy; Dynavax: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Reagan:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Bot:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rossi:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Navale:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jiang:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Aycock:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Elias:Kite: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wiezorek:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Go:Kite Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Abstract Introduction Outcomes have improved in treating lymphoid malignancies but relapse remains an ongoing issue. The mTOR inhibitor, everolimus (RAD) and lenalidomide (LEN) have both shown clinically significant activity as single agents in patients with relapsed and refractory (R/R) Hodgkin (HL) and non-Hodgkin (NHL) lymphomas. The low toxicity and differing mechanisms of action were explored further by combining these active agents. A phase I/II clinical trial of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD) and lenalidomide (LEN) was designed to explore the tolerability, toxicity and to determine the MTD of this combination for Phase II study. The phase I data is reported here. Methods This Phase I/II trial for patients with R/R lymphoid malignancy opened at Mayo Clinic between January 2011 and May 2013 and utilized a standard cohort of 3+3 design to determine the MTD of the combination. Eligibility required age≥18, biopsy proven relapsed or refractory NHL or HL, ECOG PS 0, 1 or 2, measurable disease, Hb >9g/dl, ANC ≥1200/uL, platelet ≥ 50,000/uL, creatinine ≤1.5xULN and willingness to sign informed consent. Women of child bearing potential had pregnancy testing and all patients followed recommendations for contraception. Dose limiting toxicity was defined in cycle 1 as Gr 4 neutropenia ≥7days or platelets ≤ 25,000 ≥7days, grade 4 infection or grade ≥3 non-Heme toxicity at least possibly related to treatment per CTCAE v4.0. The starting dose (level 0) was RAD 5mg daily + LEN 10 mg/d X 21d in a 28-day cycle. Results Twenty-five patients were enrolled on the phase I portion and 23 are evaluable for analysis. The median age was 63 years (23-82) and 18 (78%) were male. Sixty-five percent had stage IV disease and 43% had 4 or more prior treatments (1- ≥5) including stem cell transplantation in 39%. Histologies included HL (n=3) and NHL (n=20)(DLBCL = 11, FL-III = 2, LPL = 3, MCL = 1, MF = 1, and other = 2). Two DLTs (rash, Gr4 neutropenia) were reported at the starting dose (level 0) and the protocol was amended for DLT definition change. At dose level -1 (RAD 5mg daily + LEN 5mg/d X 21d) a DLT (Gr4 neutropenia) was seen in only 1 of 6 patients so the study was re-opened to dose level 0 and 3 additional patients were treated without developing a DLT. At dose level +1 (RAD 5 mg daily + LEN 15mg/d X 21d) 1 Gr3 rash occurred and 2 patients experienced Gr4 neutropenia. Therefore the MTD was determined to be RAD 5mgdaily + LEN 10 mg/d X 21d. At least 1 Gr≥3 adverse event was seen in 91% of patients. The most common Gr≥3 toxicities were neutropenia (57%), leucopenia (52%), thrombocytopenia (39%), fatigue (22%), and anemia (13%). Eight of 23 patients (35%) had Gr≥3 infection. Five patients discontinued study due to adverse events. One death on study occurred due to disease progression. Three patients continue on therapy. Responses have been seen in 4 patients and 10 patients have stable disease, encouraging signs in this heavily pretreated population. Conclusions This phase I/II trial of everolimus and lenalidomide in malignant lymphoma shows the combination to be tolerable with neutropenia as the main dose limiting toxicity. The MTD of this combination is RAD 5mg daily and LEN 10 mg/d X 21 d. Encouraging responses were seen. The phase II study has opened with 2 patients accrued to date. Updated results will be presented. This trial is sponsored by Novartis and Celgene Disclosures: Reeder: Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding. Off Label Use: lenalidomide and everolimus are not approved for treatment of lymphoma. Nowakowski:Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Witzig:Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Background The international prognostic score (IPS) (Hasenclever et al., NEJM 1988) uses 7 factors (age> 45, male sex, hemoglobin<10.5, stage IV, leukocytosis > 15,000, and lymphopenia< 600) to predict a 5 year freedom from progression (FFP) of 42%-84% and overall survival (OS) of 56%-89% for patients with advanced HL. Constructed from a retrospective analysis of patients treated before 1992, the IPS continues to be the most commonly used risk stratification index for advanced HL. Recent studies suggest that the predictive range of the IPS has narrowed due to improved outcomes of patients treated with current therapy (Moccia et al. JCO 2012). In this report we prospectively evaluated the ability of the individual components of the IPS to predict outcome in patients enrolled on the US Intergroup trial E2496. Methods All seven IPS (IPS-7) variables were recorded for all patients at study entry. FFP was defined as the time from study entry to disease progression or relapse; deaths that occurred during remission that were not preceded by disease progression/relapse were censored. OS was defined as the time from study entry to death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to construct survival curves. Univariate and multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed using Cox proportional-hazards models. We subsequently constructed an alternative prognostic score utilizing the factors which were significant on MVA (PS-3). Results From 1996-2006, 854 patients with advanced HL, were randomized to treatment with either ABVD or Stanford V, with no significant differences in outcome (Gordon et al, JCO 2013). While the IPS-7 remained prognostic it did not stratify the lowest risk patients (0-1 risk factor) or patients with 3-5 risk factors, as its predictive range was narrowed due to improved clinical outcomes (Fig 1a and 2a). Table 1 shows the univariate and multivariate analysis for IPS-7 and outcomes. In contrast to the original IPS-7, on MVA, only two factors, hemoglobin and stage were significant for FFP, and three factors for OS: hemoglobin, stage, and age. We then evaluated a new 3 factor score (PS-3) utilizing variables significant on the MVA. The PS-3 was significant for both FFP (p=0.0001) and OS (p<.0001) and clearly separated patients into 4 distinct risk groups with either: 0, 1, 2 or 3 risk factors. The five year FFP was 83%, 74%, 68%, and 63% and OS was 95%, 85%, 75%, and 52% for patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3 risk factors, respectively (Table 2, Fig 1b and 2b). Conclusion In E2496, for patients with advanced HL, the PS-3 may stratify patients more clearly compared to IPS-7 and provide a simpler model to assess risk. Studies comparing PS-3 with IPS-7, and are ongoing. The incorporation of novel biomarkers and biologic factors into PS-3, as well as validation with other data sets is warranted. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: The proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib (BTZ) is an efficient treatment option for both, newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Despite the effectiveness, most patients eventually acquire drug resistance for reasons not fully understood Materials and methods: To better understand BTZ resistance mechanism we used a CRISPR library (GeCKO V2) targeting 19052 human genes, trying to identify genes responsible for BTZ resistance. CRISPR sgRNAs targeting the ERN1-XBP1 pathway were used as positive controls. We first infected RPMI 8226 myeloma cell line expressing Cas9 with the CRISPR library packaged into lenti-vectors and selected for resistance to BTZ. Surviving cells were subjected to next generation sequencing. Based on the initial screen results we constructed a second CRISPR sgRNA library including 31 genes, each gene targeted with four sgRNAs. After the second round screening and subsequent sequencing, we selected the top 20 genes for individual validation. Results: Proteasome regulatory gene PSMC6 was identified as the only reproducible gene conferring BTZ resistance. Interestingly, the same gene was independently found by a second group using a CRISPR approach (Sheffer M et al. ASH Abstract 273, 2014). Resistance was reproducible using a PSMC6 knockout by three individual CRISPR sgRNAs targeting exonic regions and one pair of SgRNA targeting intron region flanking exon for the deletion of exon one. PSMC6 knockout was verified by PCR and Sanger sequencing. Sensitivity to BTZ was rescued by over expression of PSMC6 cDNA in RPMI 8226 cells harboring a deletion of PSMC6 exon 1. MM cells lacking PSMC6 also developed resistance against Carfilzomib. Resistance was reproduced on a second MM cell line, KMS11. We did not see any significant difference of toxicity in PSMC6 deleted cells for other chemicals tested (tunicamycin, staurosporine, dexamethasone and melphalan). We demonstrated that the sensitivity of chymotrypsin-like activity of proteasome against BTZ was significantly reduced in cells lacking PSMC6. Consequently, MM cells without the PSMC6 gene were relatively resistant to apoptosis induced by BTZ, which was verified by Western blot for caspase 8 degradation and luminescent assay for caspase 3/7 activities. Clinically we could not correlate the PSMC6 expression level with the outcome of BTZ treatment in BTZ naive patients using publically available gene expression data. We initially used CRISPR sgRNAs targeting ER stress pathway (ERN1 and XBP1) as a positive control. However we could not derive any resistant cells from the experiment. We also could not identify any sgRNAs targeting the ERN1-XBP1 pathway from our whole exome screen and next generation sequencing. Since this contradicts published data, we decided to knockout ERN1 and XBP1 genes individually. Clones of cells with successful knockout of ERN1 in three cell lines (RPMI 8226, KMS11 and JJN3) and XBP1 in two cell lines (RPMI 8226 and KMS11) were tested for response to BTZ and Carfilzomib , however we did not find any drug response difference between the knockout and parent cells. We also found that the ERN1-XBP1 knockout cells did not show difference in response to ERN1 specific inhibitors (4u8C and STF-038010) and ER stress inducers (tunicamycin and thapsigargin) compared to parental cells. Conclusions: Human multiple myeloma cells lacking the PSMC6 gene develop significant resistance to apoptosis induced by BTZ. We have however not found a correlation of PSMC6 expression levels with outcome to BTZ treatment in BTZ naïve patients. We are therefore currently investigating the PSMC6 mutation rate in relapsed MM patients after proteasome treatment. In contrast to previous reports showing that progenitor MM cells lacing XBP-1 or ERN-1 invoked BTZ resistance, we were not able to demonstrate a change in sensitivity after full CRISPR knock out of either ERN1 or XBP1. It has long been believed that ERN1-XBP1 pathway plays an important role for MM treatment, leading to the development of ERN1 specific inhibitors. However, we demonstrated that the toxicity of two ERN1-specific inhibitors appears independent of the ERN1-XBP1 pathway. We also demonstrated that the toxicity of two important ER stress inducers, tunicamycin and thapsigargin, is independent of the ERN1-XBP1 pathway. Disclosures Stewart: Celgene: Consultancy; Oncospire Inc.: Equity Ownership; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy.

Abstract The peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte/monocyte ratio at diagnosis (ALC/AMC-DX) predicts survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, a limitation of the ALC/AMC-DX is its inability to sequentially assess the host/tumor interaction during treatment. Therefore, we studied the ALC/AMC ratio, as a surrogate marker of host immunity (i.e., ALC) and tumor microenvironment (i.e., AMC), at each RCHOP treatment cycle as a predictor for clinical outcomes. From 2002 until 20011, 107 DLBCL patients originally diagnosed, treated with six cycles of RCHOP, and followed at Mayo Clinic qualified for the study. Using the receiver operating characteristic and internally validated using the k-fold cross validation; an ALC/AMC ratio ≥ 1.1 was identified as the cut-off value at each RCHOP treatment cycle to discriminate for the binary clinical outcome of death/survival. Univariate analysis revealed the ALC/AMC ratio ≥ 1.1 at each RCHOP treatment cycle was a predictor for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). To explore whether the patterns of ALC/AMC ratio recovery during the RCHOP treatment cycles had a prognostic value, we performed an unsupervised hierarchical clustering on the studied ALC/AMC ratio and identified four patient clusters, A-D. Eighty percent of patients in cluster C had an ALC/AMC ratio ≥ 1.1 during all the cycles, the other 20% had an ALC/AMC ratio ≥1.1 in one cycle; in cluster D patients, the ALC/AMC ratio was ≥ 1.1 between cycles 2 and 5 and none had an ALC/AMC ratio < 1.1; in cluster A patients, 73% of patients only had an ALC/AMC ratio ≥ 1.1 in one cycle and 27% in two cycles; and cluster B patients had 85% of patients with an ALC/AMC ratio < 1.1 during all the cycles. Inferior OS and PFS were progressively observed in clusters of patients with fewer cycles achieving an ALC/AMC ratio ≥ 1.1. Patients in clusters C had superior outcomes compared with patients in clusters B. Thus, we dichotomized patients into patients with an ALC/AMC ratio ≥ 1.1 during any cycle versus patients with an ALC/AMC ratio < 1.1 during all cycles. By multivariate analysis, the stratification of patients into ALC/AMC ≥ 1.1 during any cycle versus ALC/AMC < 1.1 during all cycles was an independent predictor for OS [Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.02, 95% CI (0.006-0.08), p< 0.0001], and PFS [HR = 0.06, 95% CI (0.02-0.15, p< 0.0001] when compared with the International Prognostic index The median OS for patients with an ALC/AMC ratio ≥ 1.1 during any cycle versus patients with an ALC/ACM ratio < 1.1 during all cycles was not reached versus 1.7 years with 5 years OS rates of 97% (95% CI, 90%-99%) versus 0%, p< 0.0001, respectively. The median PFS for patients with an ALC/AMC ratio ≥ 1.1 during any cycle versus patients with an ALC/AMC ratio < 1.1during all cycles was not reached versus 0.9 years with 5 years PFS rates of 83% (95% CI, 72%-90%) versus 0%, p< 0.0001, respectively. The ALC/AMC ratio during RCHOP treatment cycles is a predictor for survival and provides a platform to develop therapeutic modalities to manipulate the ALC/AMC ratio during chemotherapy to improve clinical outcomes in DLBCL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: AMD3100 (plerixafor)+G-CSF (A+G) was generally safe and more effective in mobilizing CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells compared to placebo+G-CSF (P+G) in a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study conducted in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). In the intent-to-treat analysis, 78/148 (53%) patients in the P+G group and 20/150 (13%) patients in the A+G group failed to mobilize ≥ 2 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg, p<0.0001. Of these failure patients, 52 in the P+G group and 10 in the A+G group consented to enter into the rescue arm of the study. This abstract reports the outcomes of these rescue patients. Methods: Patients enrolled in the Phase III study who failed to mobilize ≥2 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg could enter into the rescue arm of the study and receive A+G. The patient’s treatment assignment in the study remained blinded. Following a rest period of ≥7 days, patients were given G (10 μg/kg/day) subcutaneously (SQ) for 4 days. In the evening around 10PM on Day 4, patients were given a dose of A (240 μg/kg SQ). On Day 5, all patients returned to clinic to receive a morning dose of G before apheresis. Patients continued to receive the evening dose of A followed by morning dose of G and apheresis the next day for up to a total of 4 aphereses or until ≥5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg were collected. Pooled cells were allowed for transplantation. Results: After rescue therapy, 33/52 (63%) patients who previously failed P+G and 4/10 (40%) patients who previously failed A+G collected ≥2 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Seven of the 33 patients who previously failed with P+G collected ≥ 5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Six of the ten A+G patients and 46/52 P+G patients were transplanted. Median time to PMN engraftment was Day 10 and Day 11 for the A+G and P+G groups, respectively. Median time to platelet engraftment was Day 22 and Day 20 for the A+G and P+G groups, respectively. One patient in the P+G group never had platelet counts > 50,000 and was counted as a failure to engraft, even though the patient was clinically stable through 6 months post-transplant. In the re-mobilized group, 9 patients died (2 patients were never transplanted and 7 patients had disease progression). Grafts were durable for ≥100 days in all 6 rescued A+G patients and all 41 rescued P+G patients who engrafted. The predominant adverse events were mild gastrointestinal effects (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain) and injection site reactions. There were no drug-related serious adverse events reported in these re-mobilized patients. Conclusions: The addition of AMD3100 to G-CSF successfully mobilized sufficient stem cells for transplant in 63% of NHL patients who previously failed mobilization with G-CSF alone. The high success rate is consistent with the Compassionate Use Protocol experience. AMD3100 was generally well tolerated. The 40% success rate in the patients who previously failed AMD3100+G-CSF suggests that re-mobilization with the same combination is a potentially useful strategy for similar patients.

Abstract Background: Large deletions involving the beta globin complex are relatively rare. They can be categorized generally into five groups by deletion size and/or location: 1) beta zero thalassemia (BZT); 2) delta beta thalassemia (DBT); 3) hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin (HPFH); 4) gamma delta beta thalassemia (GDBT); and 5) epsilon gamma delta beta thalassemia (EGDBT). These deletions are not well understood but often have significant clinical impact, either when present alone or in combination with other hemoglobin mutations. In this study, we analyze phenotypic and molecular data on a large number of cases with deletions in the beta globin gene complex to better classify these five groups of deletions as they occur in isolation. Methods: A query of the routine clinical testing patient files from the Mayo Clinic Metabolic Hematology and Molecular Genetics Laboratories from 2010 to 2015 identified 179 patients with a deletion confirmed by a Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) assay. Twenty-four probes sets were placed from the 5' locus control region (LCR) to the 3' hypersensitivity region, spanning the beta globin gene complex. Using a Luminex LX200 flow cytometer, a gene dosage ratio was calculated for each probe set using the median fluorescent intensity value collected. The size and location of the deletion and patient phenotype were compared. Results: Of the 179 total cases, the following large deletions were identified: beta gene (HBB) (n = 47), delta (HBD) through HBB (n = 105), A-gamma (HBG2) through HBB (n = 20), and locus control region (LCR) through HBB (n = 7). One case had a deletion involving the LCR epsilon with the rest of the complex left intact. A subset (n = 60) of cases had compound hemoglobin mutations that altered the phenotype. The BZT cases had relatively high Hb A2 levels and variable Hb F levels consistent with promotor region loss. The main differences between DBT and HPFH included Hb F and Hb A2 levels. GDBT cases presented with median Hb F levels higher than that observed in DBTs, normal Hb A2, and microcytic anemia. EGDBT cases had variable features according to age of the patient and Hb F level; severe microcytic anemia was observed in neonates, milder microcytic anemia in young children, and microcytosis without anemia in an adult case. The phenotypic features of 119 patients with isolated large deletions are compiled in table 1. Conclusion: In general, all five categories of large deletions in an isolated heterozygous state can present with microcytic anemia and are typically benign with the exception of transient severe microcytic anemia in neonatal EGDBT cases. Although phenotypes associated with large deletions involving the beta globin gene complex are frequently distinctive, significant phenotypic overlap can be seen in a subset of cases. These cases require molecular analysis due to their clinical importance when in combination with another beta globin gene complex mutation for an adequate diagnosis and treatment approach. Table 1. Deletion type Age n HbF (%) HbA2 (%) Hb (g/dL) MCV (fL) RBC (10^12/L) RDW (%) MCH (pg/cell) BZT 20 6.3 (0.6-94.4) 6.8 (3.4-11.6) 11.1 (8.3-14.5) 65.4 (60.8-77.2) 5.4 (4.2-6.2) 19.2 (16.6-21.2) 20.9 (18.3-25.7) DBT 56 10.6 (2.7-22.4) 2.7 (2.5-3.1) 11.7 (8.6-14.4) 68.9 (61.3-83.5) 5.3 (4.1-7.3) 21.4 (18.2-26.8) 21.6 (19.9-39.2) HPFH 23 25.9 (17.6-39.7) 2.0 (1.5-2.4) 11.6 (8.1-16.7) 78.4 (60.2-101.9) 4.4 (3.0-6.3) 17.5 (14.1-22.3) 25.4 (17.6-29.7) GDBT 14 13.3 (8.2-19.0) 2.6 (1.8-2.7) 11.0 (8.6-14.1) 72.5 (57.9-82.1) 5.1 (3.5-6.2) 20.6 (17.4-23.5) 22 (17.9-25.1) EGDBT* 28 Y 1 0.3 3 13.3 59.4 6.9 15.4 19.2 1-4 Y 3 0.9 (0-1.6) 3.2 (2.9-3.5) 9.5 (8.8-13.3) 57.8 (57.6-59.4) 5.2 (4.9-6.9) 16.6 (15.4-17.4) 18.5 (18.1-19.2) <6 month 2 21.4 (14.8-27.9) 2.6 (2.2-2.9) 6.3 (6.0-6.6) 61.3 (59.9-62.6) 3.4 (3.3-3.3) 21.5 (21.2-21.7) 18.4 (18.1-18.7) medians, (min, max); *stratified by age Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Introduction Non-Hodgkin lymphoma responds to single agents such as cyclophosphamide, combination therapy such as CVP and immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab. There is no consensus on the optimal treatment for relapsed low grade or mantle cell lymphoma. Based on the success and tolerability of combining alkylating agents with proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma, a phase II clinical trial of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (R-CyBor-D) was designed to explore the efficacy and safety of this combination in relapsed low grade and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Methods This trial enrolled relapsed patients at Mayo Clinic from October 2008 to March 2014. Eligibility required age≥18; biopsy proven follicular grades 1 or 2 lymphoma (FL), MCL, small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia, marginal zone B-cell lymphoma, or Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM); life expectancy >3 months; ECOG PS 0, 1 or 2; measurable disease; Hb ≥8g/dl, ANC ≥1200/uL, platelet ≥75,000/uL, creatinine ≤1.5xULN, total bilirubin ≤1.5xULN, alkaline phosphatase ≤3xULN, AST ≤3xULN; and willingness to sign informed consent. Women of child bearing potential had pregnancy testing and all patients followed recommendations for contraception. Treatment included rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and oral cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2, IV bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2, and oral dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in a 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued two cycles beyond best response or a maximum of 12 cycles. Allopurinol 300 mg on days 0-14 for the first cycle was strongly recommended. Results 21 patients were enrolled prior to study closure due to slow accrual. Bortezomib was initially given on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 in the first 16 patients, but was subsequently modified to days 1, 8, 15, and 22 due to significant peripheral neuropathy (PN). Median age was 69 years (range 51-80) and 13 (62%) were male. 62% had stage IV disease and 17 (81%) had 2 or more prior treatments with 3 (14%) having prior autologous stem cell transplantation. Histologies included FL-I (n=6), FL-II (n=2), MCL (n=8), and WM (n=5). Patients completed a median of 4 cycles of treatment (range 1-12), discontinuing due to 9 (43%) completion per protocol, 4 (19%) progression, 5 (24%) adverse events, 1 (5%) patient refusal, and 2 (10%) other reasons. Median follow-up is 32.8 months (0.9-54.8). CR or PR as best response was observed in 13 (62%, 95% CI 38-82%; 4 CR [19%], 9 PR [43%]) patients. By histology, CR or PR was observed in 7 (88%) FL patients (4 CR, 3 PR); 2 (25%) MCL patients (both PR), and 4 (80%) WM patients (all PR). CR or PR was observed in 10/16 (62%; 4 CR, 6 PR) before and 3/5 (60%; all PR) after the change in bortezomib schedule. Among 13 patients with CR or PR, median duration of response was 25.9 months (95% CI 8.0-not reached). Median PFS and OS were 11.6 months (95% CI 3.8-not reached) and 54.8 months (95% CI 24.6-54.8), respectively. At least one Gr≥3 adverse event at least possible related was observed in 14 (67%) patients, the most common being leucopenia (7, 33%), neutropenia (7, 33%), thrombocytopenia (6, 29%), anemia (5, 24%), PN (5, 24%), and fatigue (3, 14%). Peripheral sensory neuropathy at least possibly related was Gr1, Gr2, and Gr3 in 5 (24%) patients each, with a lower rate observed for patients after the change in bortezomib schedule (before 13/16 [81%] Gr≥1, after 2/5 [40%] Gr≥1). Among 14 patients who completed a baseline and at least one post-baseline FACT/GOG-NTX additional concerns questionnaire, 10 (71%) reported clinically meaningful (≥3-point) worsening in patient-reported neurotoxicity (8/11 [73%] before and 2/3 [67%] after the change in bortezomib schedule). Conclusions Our results suggest R-CyBor-D is a safe and effective combination in patients with relapsed low grade and mantle cell lymphomas. High response rates were seen in FL and WM. The majority of significant AE’s were hematologic. However, sensory neuropathy was common with twice weekly dosing of bortezomib and lessened with weekly dosing. Determination of optimal treatment regimens in this population remains an unmet need. Additional clinical trials including larger patient numbers are necessary to confirm these observations. This trial was sponsored by Millennium Disclosures Off Label Use: bortezomib was used in combination therapy to treat relapsed low grade lymphomas and Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia. Bergsagel:Novartis: Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; OncoEthix: Research Funding; MundiPharma: Research Funding. Tiedemann:Janssen: Honoraria. Reeder:Millennium, Celgene, Novartis: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: It is now well established that the immune modulator (IMiD) drugs thalidomide (Thal), lenalidomide (Len) and pomalidomide (Pom) bind a specific pocket in the protein, cereblon (CRBN) that is required for MM cytotoxicity after IMiD treatment. Recently, we reported 46 CRBN binding proteins which were altered by Len, two of which were the transcription factors Ikaros (IKZF1) and Aiolis (IKZF3), important regulators of B and T cell development. Others had previously reported the same finding and went further by demonstrating that following binding of IMiD drugs, CRBN accumulates and accentuates the ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation of these two binding proteins. The resulting degradation and depletion of IKZF proteins has the simultaneous effect of downregulating IRF4 and MYC leading to MM cell death while simultaneously enhancing transcription of interleukin 2 and activating the immune compartment. Methods: To further explore this phenomenon and its relationship to drug sensitivity we first created two stable MM cell lines (H929IKZF1Luc, 8226IKZF1Luc) expressing an IKZF1-luciferase (luc) fusion gene and tested for sensitivity to Len alone and in combination with dexamethasone (Dex), bortezomib (Bor) or the histone deacetylase inhibitor SAHA. Next, we constructed an adenoviral vector expressing IKZF1-luc and used this to transfect 16 MM cell lines, confirmed expression and tested sensitivity to Len by MTT (Figure 1). Results: We first examined the stable cell lines and measured luc expression after exposure to all three IMiD drugs. With all IMiD drugs luc dramatically decreased in sensitive H929 cells. IKZF1 depletion was both time and dose dependent. Using this surrogate marker cell line assay, luc is most efficiently degraded by Pom which is twice as potent as Len, but a thousand times more potent than Thal (Concentration of drug required to reduce luc expression by 50%, Pom: 4.9nM, Len: 10.2 nM, and Thal: 4,795 nM). We then tested all 16 cell lines with Len 2uM for 5 hours and show a strong correlation of IKZF-luc depletion with sensitivity. Figure 1: Luc levels 5 hours after Len treatment at 2uM. We divided the cell lines into three groups: 1) Len resistant: 8226, KMS12PE, My5, SKMM2, JJN3, FR4, H112; 2) Len intermediate response: EJM, OPM2, U266, KMS18; 3) Len sensitive: H929, MM1.S, MM1.R, KMS11, XG1; Figure 1:. Luc levels 5 hours after Len treatment at 2uM. We divided the cell lines into three groups: 1) Len resistant: 8226, KMS12PE, My5, SKMM2, JJN3, FR4, H112; 2) Len intermediate response: EJM, OPM2, U266, KMS18; 3) Len sensitive: H929, MM1.S, MM1.R, KMS11, XG1; We next performed western blots on 9 MM cell lines and demonstrate that IKZF1 levels were lowest in 3 of 5 resistant MM cell lines and normal in all 4 sensitive lines studied. The cell line (FR4) with the lowest levels of IKZF1 harbors a damaging mutation of IZKF1 as well as a translocation which upregulates IRF4, an IKZF target. Of the remaining two resistant lines one has low levels of Cereblon. In one line the mechanism of IMiD resistance could not be established. Finally, we were curious about the dichotomy of the IMiD biology which seemingly has an absolute requirement for a functional proteasome for successful IMiD cytotoxicity which is at variance with clinical reports of synergy between the IMiDs and the proteasome inhibitors (PIs) Bor and carfilzomib (Car). To explore this, we treated the 8226IKZF1Luc cell line with Len alone or in combination with increasing concentrations of Bor (6 nM) or Car (40nM) and found that both totally blocked IKZF1 fusion protein degradation promoted by Len, beginning as soon as 1 hour at 100nM Bor or after 3 hours at 40nM treatment. Conversely, in low concentration of Bor (<4nM) no IKZF1 degradation blocking was observed in the Luc assay and Bor remained lethal to the MM cells. In that light with lower levels of Bor (<3nM) even varying the sequencing of MM cell exposure to the two drug classes did not block cytotoxicity. Other MM active drug Dex or SAHA, blocking the aggresome, had no significant inhibition for Len-induced IKZF1 fusion protein degradation. Conclusion: These results validate the central role for the CRBN-IKZF-IRF4 axis proteins in IMiD response and show a strong correlation of IZKF1 expression and the ability to degrade IKZF1 with sensitivity. Our data provide interesting and perhaps disconcerting biologic data suggesting that the timing and dosing of clinical use of IMiDs and PI treatment in combination should be carefully evaluated to prevent antagonism of effect but suggest in vitro that a therapeutic window exists at which proteasome inhibitors can be active without blocking IMiD activity. Disclosures Stewart: Sanofi: Consultancy; Array BioPharma: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Research Funding.