Abstract Background: Large deletions involving the beta globin complex are relatively rare. They can be categorized generally into five groups by deletion size and/or location: 1) beta zero thalassemia (BZT); 2) delta beta thalassemia (DBT); 3) hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin (HPFH); 4) gamma delta beta thalassemia (GDBT); and 5) epsilon gamma delta beta thalassemia (EGDBT). These deletions are not well understood but often have significant clinical impact, either when present alone or in combination with other hemoglobin mutations. In this study, we analyze phenotypic and molecular data on a large number of cases with deletions in the beta globin gene complex to better classify these five groups of deletions as they occur in isolation. Methods: A query of the routine clinical testing patient files from the Mayo Clinic Metabolic Hematology and Molecular Genetics Laboratories from 2010 to 2015 identified 179 patients with a deletion confirmed by a Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) assay. Twenty-four probes sets were placed from the 5' locus control region (LCR) to the 3' hypersensitivity region, spanning the beta globin gene complex. Using a Luminex LX200 flow cytometer, a gene dosage ratio was calculated for each probe set using the median fluorescent intensity value collected. The size and location of the deletion and patient phenotype were compared. Results: Of the 179 total cases, the following large deletions were identified: beta gene (HBB) (n = 47), delta (HBD) through HBB (n = 105), A-gamma (HBG2) through HBB (n = 20), and locus control region (LCR) through HBB (n = 7). One case had a deletion involving the LCR epsilon with the rest of the complex left intact. A subset (n = 60) of cases had compound hemoglobin mutations that altered the phenotype. The BZT cases had relatively high Hb A2 levels and variable Hb F levels consistent with promotor region loss. The main differences between DBT and HPFH included Hb F and Hb A2 levels. GDBT cases presented with median Hb F levels higher than that observed in DBTs, normal Hb A2, and microcytic anemia. EGDBT cases had variable features according to age of the patient and Hb F level; severe microcytic anemia was observed in neonates, milder microcytic anemia in young children, and microcytosis without anemia in an adult case. The phenotypic features of 119 patients with isolated large deletions are compiled in table 1. Conclusion: In general, all five categories of large deletions in an isolated heterozygous state can present with microcytic anemia and are typically benign with the exception of transient severe microcytic anemia in neonatal EGDBT cases. Although phenotypes associated with large deletions involving the beta globin gene complex are frequently distinctive, significant phenotypic overlap can be seen in a subset of cases. These cases require molecular analysis due to their clinical importance when in combination with another beta globin gene complex mutation for an adequate diagnosis and treatment approach. Table 1. Deletion type Age n HbF (%) HbA2 (%) Hb (g/dL) MCV (fL) RBC (10^12/L) RDW (%) MCH (pg/cell) BZT 20 6.3 (0.6-94.4) 6.8 (3.4-11.6) 11.1 (8.3-14.5) 65.4 (60.8-77.2) 5.4 (4.2-6.2) 19.2 (16.6-21.2) 20.9 (18.3-25.7) DBT 56 10.6 (2.7-22.4) 2.7 (2.5-3.1) 11.7 (8.6-14.4) 68.9 (61.3-83.5) 5.3 (4.1-7.3) 21.4 (18.2-26.8) 21.6 (19.9-39.2) HPFH 23 25.9 (17.6-39.7) 2.0 (1.5-2.4) 11.6 (8.1-16.7) 78.4 (60.2-101.9) 4.4 (3.0-6.3) 17.5 (14.1-22.3) 25.4 (17.6-29.7) GDBT 14 13.3 (8.2-19.0) 2.6 (1.8-2.7) 11.0 (8.6-14.1) 72.5 (57.9-82.1) 5.1 (3.5-6.2) 20.6 (17.4-23.5) 22 (17.9-25.1) EGDBT* 28 Y 1 0.3 3 13.3 59.4 6.9 15.4 19.2 1-4 Y 3 0.9 (0-1.6) 3.2 (2.9-3.5) 9.5 (8.8-13.3) 57.8 (57.6-59.4) 5.2 (4.9-6.9) 16.6 (15.4-17.4) 18.5 (18.1-19.2) <6 month 2 21.4 (14.8-27.9) 2.6 (2.2-2.9) 6.3 (6.0-6.6) 61.3 (59.9-62.6) 3.4 (3.3-3.3) 21.5 (21.2-21.7) 18.4 (18.1-18.7) medians, (min, max); *stratified by age Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Deletional HPFH Vs. Delta Beta Thalassemia: Closing in on a Possible Hb F Silencer Location
Abstract Background: The control of hemoglobin F (Hb F) expression has proven an elusive puzzle with several postulated but not mutually exclusive hypotheses. A silencing mechanism hypothesis, which predicts the existence of a regulatory element that suppresses HbF expression, has been supported by recent investigations into a 3.5 kb region upstream from the delta globin gene (HBD). To test this hypothesis, we have investigated our historical case files in a tertiary care high-throughput clinical laboratory and compared the patient phenotype (Hgb, MCV, MCH, RDW, Hb F %, and flow cytometry Hb F distribution) with the status of this 3.5 kb region. Methods: A query of clinical testing patient files from Mayo Clinic Metabolic Hematology Laboratory yielded 179 patients confirmed by Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) to contain large deletions located within the epsilon through beta globin genes. Of these, 27 unrelated patients with breakpoints between the pseudobeta (HBBP1) and HBD genes were identified. Four additional MLPA probe pairs were placed in this region and the patient phenotypes were compared. Results: The interior two (of the four added) probes between HBBP1 and HBD stratified all 27 cases. The other two (flanking) probes were never discriminatory, thus refining the area of interest to 2.4 kb. Sixteen cases showed breakpoints within hg19 g.5260154-5259135 (5' region) and eleven cases showed breakpoints within hg19 g.5259136-5257692 (3' region) upstream of HBD. Patients who displayed a phenotype of HPFH (n = 9) contained breakpoints in the 5' region whereas those with a delta beta thalassemia (DBT) phenotype (n = 11) were associated with breakpoints in the 3' region. A subset (n = 7) with breakpoints in the 5' region had indefinite phenotypic features, but of these, all but one showed homocellular Hb F distribution. Conclusion: Our molecular and phenotypic correlation of 27 patients with large deletional breakpoints between HBBP1 and HBD supports the hypothesis of a silencing element located upstream of HBD and further narrows the area that segregates many HPFH and DBT patient phenotypes from 3.5 kb to 2.4 kb. Several potential silencing effectors with binding sites in this region include HDAC1, GATA1 and H3K27me3; interestingly, the BCL11A binding site may be outside of the regulatory area. Table 1. Phenotypic data of patients with deletions between HBBP1 and HBD. Case Age/Sex Hb F Hb A2 Hb X Hgb RBC MCV MCH MCHC RDW Hb F Flow (Y) (%) (%) (%) (g/dL) ( 10^12/L) (fL) (pg/cell) (hg/cell) (%) 3' Region 1 47 M 25.5 2.1 16.7 6.3 81.4 26.7 32.8 15.7 H 2 5 M 28.3 2.4 12.5 4.9 74.6 25.4 34 15.9 H 3 24 F 30.3 1.7 11.6 4.23 92.7 27.4 29.6 15.2 H 4 9 F 36.3 2.2 S = 62 13.1 5.2 69.9 NA NA 14.8 5 24 F 37.3 2.1 C = 61 12.9 5.1 72.9 25.5 35 14.3 6 3 M 39.7 2.1 12.4 4.4 88.7 28.1 31.7 16.3 7 27 F 40.2 3.4 S = 56 12.2 4.4 79.7 27.8 34.9 15 8 16 M 43.7 2.2 S = 54 15.9 6.8 71.5 23.5 32.9 14.1 9 7m M 100.0* 0.0 12.8 4.8 76 26.5 34.9 16.8 3' Region 10 28 F 20.9 2 10.11 4.4 70.9 22.7 32.1 19 H 11 64 M 21.4 2.3 10.51 4.1 81.1 25.8 31.8 18.1 12 2.5 M 24 2.1 10.21 5.3 59.4 19.3 32.5 20.9 H 13 58 F 24 2.1 9.51 4.4 72.2 21.5 29.8 17.7 H 14 14 F 25.4 1.5 10.81 4.9 69.4 22 31.8 17.6 H 15 52 F 26.9 1.8 8.42 3.6 72 23.5 32.7 19.4 T 16 34 M 38.7 1.7 S = 60 11.4 4.7 71.6 NA NA 21.6 5' Region 17 24 F 2.7 2.9 12.3 6.1 62.2 20 32.2 18.2 18 32 F 6.1 2.7 10.2 5.1 61.3 19.9 32.5 19.3 19 27 F 7.2 2.9 11 5.1 72.9 21.7 29.8 19.9 20 29 F 7.8 2.7 10.2 4.7 72.2 21.7 30 20.5 21 15 M 7.8 2.5 12.7 6.2 64.7 20.4 31.5 21.2 22 42 M 7.8 3.1 10.6 4.9 75.1 21.5 28.6 23.7 23 60 M 10.1 2.5 11 4.5 74.8 24.7 33 23.4 24 41 M 10.7 2.8 8.6 4.1 73.3 21.2 29 26.8 25 30 F 11.5 2.7 12.1 5.5 67.4 21.9 32.5 21.8 26 25 F 13.2 2.8 12.1 5.3 68.4 22.8 33.3 21.6 27 3 F 18.3 2.6 11.9 5.79 63.6 20.6 32.3 22.7 T Normal values <1 2-3.3 0 H = homocellular; T= heterocellular; I = indeterminate; *homozygous deletion -- = no deletion; + = deletion present (all alpha deletions were single -3.7 kb 'rightward' deletions) 1 = Suspected Fe deficiency; 2 = recent transfusion Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.