Citations

ABSTRACTBackgroundIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are the most commonly identified pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Incidentally detected IPMNs are common among liver transplant recipients. The risk of IPMN progression to pancreatic cancer in transplant recipients and the impact of immunosuppression on the risk of malignant transformation of IPMN are unclear.MethodsIn this retrospective study of consecutive liver transplant recipients across Mayo Clinic over a 13‐year period, patients were assessed for possible IPMN by automated chart review. Pancreatic cystic lesions were characterized as suspected IPMNs based on imaging criteria. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the association between IPMN progression (the development of cancer or worrisome features) and clinical and immunosuppression regimen characteristics.ResultsOf 146 patients with suspected IPMNs, progression occurred in 7 patients (2 cases of IPMN‐associated cancer and 5 cases of worrisome features) over an average follow‐up of 66.6 months. Immunosuppression type, medication number, and tacrolimus trough levels were not associated with IPMN progression (p > 0.05). Combined kidney and liver transplantation (p = 0.005) and pretransplant cholangiocarcinoma (p = 0.012) were associated with IPMN progression.ConclusionIPMN progression is rare after liver transplantation even over an extended follow‐up period. The findings were notable for the absence of an association between IPMN progression and immunosuppression regimen. Larger studies are needed given the low incidence.

Background Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are uncommon cerebral lesions that can cause significant neurological complications. Surgical resection is the gold standard for treatment, but endovascular embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are viable alternatives. Objective To compare the outcomes of endovascular embolization versus SRS in the treatment of AVMs with Spetzler-Martin grades I–III. Methods This study combined retrospective data from 10 academic institutions in North America and Europe. Patients aged 1 to 90 years who underwent endovascular embolization or SRS for AVMs with Spetzler-Martin grades I–III between January 2010 and December 2023 were included. Results The study included 244 patients, including 84 who had endovascular embolization and 160 who had SRS. Before propensity score matching (PSM), complete obliteration at the last follow-up was achieved in 74.5% of the SRS group compared with 57.8% of the embolization group (OR=0.47; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.48; P=0.01). After propensity score matching, SRS still achieved significantly higher occlusion rates at last follow-up (78.9% vs 55.3%; OR=0.32; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.90; P=0.03). Hemorrhagic complications were higher in the embolization group than in the SRS group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance after PSM (13.2% vs 2.6%; OR=5.6; 95% CI 0.62 to 50.47; P=0.12). Similarly, re-treatment rate was higher in the embolization group (10.5% vs 5.3%; OR=2.11; 95% CI 0.36 to 12.31; P=0.40) compared with the SRS group. Conclusion Our findings indicate that SRS has a significantly higher obliteration rate at last follow-up compared with endovascular embolization. Also, SRS has a higher tendency for fewer hemorrhagic complications and lower re-treatment rate. Further prospective studies are needed.

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex, aprepitant, and fosaprepitant are increasingly used perioperatively. These medications may interfere with the effectiveness of hormonal contraception. This study assessed anesthesia providers’ use of sugammadex and aprepitant, their knowledge of interactions with hormonal birth control, and patient counseling practices to identify possible knowledge gaps or opportunities for practice improvement. METHODS: In January 2023, an electronic survey was distributed to all anesthesia providers at Mayo Clinic sites (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Mayo Clinic Florida, and Mayo Clinic Health System hospitals). The survey included 32 questions assessing providers’ use of sugammadex and aprepitant, their knowledge of the medications’ interactions with hormonal contraceptives (HC), their perceptions regarding education of these interactions during training, and their perioperative patient counseling practices. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 337 of 1092 (31%) providers completed the survey. While almost all respondents (324; 96%) knew that sugammadex may interfere with oral contraceptive effectiveness, only 158 (47%) knew about aprepitant’s potential contraceptive interference. Only 176 providers (52%) knew the recommended duration for alternative contraceptive methods after use after sugammadex, and 119 providers (35%) knew the recommended duration after aprepitant exposure. Most respondents considered the interference of these perioperative drugs with HCs to be clinically relevant (sugammadex, 217, 64%; aprepitant, 191, 58%). Despite the common belief that the decision between these medications and alternatives should be shared between provider and patient, most providers reported rarely engaging in such shared decision-making (SDM) in practice. Most providers recognized the need for preoperative discussions on sugammadex (280, 83%) and aprepitant (257, 76%), yet 184 providers (73%) never or rarely discussed contraception use before surgery for aprepitant, and 135 (36%) never or rarely did so for sugammadex. Lastly, many providers believed that the interference between sugammadex, aprepitant, and HC was poorly taught during training. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study highlight the need for increased education and awareness among anesthesia providers regarding drug interactions with HCs during the perioperative period. To facilitate SDM, it is imperative that providers discuss alternative medications and the potential need for additional contraception methods after drug administration and communicate the risks with patients preoperatively to enable informed and SDM. The patient’s preferences should be accounted for, especially if they are unwilling or unable to use an alternative contraceptive for 7 to 30 days, thereby avoiding the complexities and burdens of altering birth control methods.

Background:Facial proportions and contours influence perceptions of beauty and youthfulness. In particular, the shape and definition of the midface and lower face impact the overall appearance of the face.Methods:This review provides anatomical evidence to support a holistic approach to facial analysis and rejuvenation that starts with assessment and treatment of the midface and lower face to create an aesthetically desirable facial balance.Results:The cheek and chin can be considered “anchors” or starting points within full-face treatment because of the noticeable impact of their treatment on the definition and contour of the entire face. Age-related changes in the cheek and chin affect overall facial appearance and can produce unintended facial emotional attributes such as looking tired, angry, or sad. Patients seek facial aesthetic treatment typically for a global improvement such as revitalization or genderization of facial features. Best practices in aesthetics have evolved from treatment of individual areas to a holistic paradigm that uses multimodal therapy to improve overall facial emotional attributes. Hyaluronic acid fillers are useful for volume replacement and smoothing abrupt transitions that develop with age throughout the midface, chin, and jaw. A combination of hyaluronic acid filler for volume restoration and sodium deoxycholate and/or onabotulinumtoxinA for volume reduction where appropriate may optimize lower facial contour.Conclusions:This review highlights the importance of facial angles and contours as well as the significance of panfacial assessments and treatment, focusing on the relationships within areas of the face, specifically the midface and lower face, to optimize results.

Purpose of review Pediatric cochlear implantation has evolved considerably over the past three decades to include more patients at earlier ages with greater degrees of residual hearing. As an extension, a significant focus of research over the past decade has surrounded preservation of existing acoustic hearing. Recent findings Multiple studies published within the last 5 years demonstrate aidable acoustic hearing preservation in 60–90% of pediatric patients, with 40–60% experiencing complete hearing preservation following cochlear implantation. Durability of preserved hearing varies among patients, with some patients losing residual hearing within 1 year of surgery whereas others maintain acoustic hearing through at least 5 years of follow-up. Speech outcomes appear superior among patients with preserved acoustic hearing, particularly in the presence of background noise. Several recent studies suggest a music appreciation advantage in children with preserved acoustic hearing following cochlear implantation. Summary Hearing preservation rates during cochlear implantation in children matches, if not often exceeds, hearing preservation rates observed among adults. Preservation of acoustic hearing during cochlear implantation confers multiple advantages for the pediatric population. Beyond improved speech understanding and music appreciation, minimizing intracochlear trauma and resultant scarring facilitates potential future regenerative treatments or revision surgery.

Bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis lead to a 4-fold increase in mortality. Immune dysfunction in cirrhosis further increases the risk of bacterial infections, in addition to alterations in the gut microbiome, which increase the risk of pathogenic bacteria. High rates of empiric antibiotic use contribute to increased incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms and further increases in mortality. Despite continous advances in the field, major unknowns regarding interactions between the immune system and the gut microbiome and strategies to reduce infection risk and improve mortality deserve further investigation. Here, we highlight the unknowns in these major research areas and make a proposal for a research agenda to move toward improving disease progression and outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and infections.

Recent advancements in disease modeling for myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary artery disease (CAD) have significantly enhanced our understanding of cardiovascular pathology and therapeutic development. This review comprehensively reviews the integration of in vivo and in vitro approaches to better model and study these conditions. We specifically focus on cutting-edge in vitro techniques, such as cardiac organoids, engineered heart tissues, and patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which allow for detailed exploration of cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in MI and CAD. These models provide insights into ischemic injury, myocardial remodeling, and the effects of potential therapeutic interventions at a cellular level. In parallel, we discuss advances in the in vivo models, including genetically modified mice and large animal models, which offer valuable information on disease progression, cardiac function, and response to treatments within a more complex physiological context. By bridging these in vivo and in vitro approaches, researchers can gain a more comprehensive understanding of disease mechanisms, validate experimental findings, and accelerate the development of effective therapies. This review highlights recent progress, identifies current limitations, and proposes strategies for future research to enhance the translation of model-based discoveries into clinical practice for MI and CAD.

AbstractObjectiveTransgender and gender‐diverse (TGD) individuals have a gender identity or expression that differs from the sex assigned to them at birth. They are an underserved population who experience health care inequities. Our primary objective was to identify if there are treatment differences between TGD and cisgender lesbian/gay/bisexual/queer (LGBQ) or heterosexual individuals presenting with abdominal pain to the emergency department (ED).MethodsRetrospective observational cohort study of patients ≥12 years of age presenting to 21 EDs within a health care system with a chief complaint of abdominal pain between 2018 and 2022. TGD patients were matched 1:1:1:1 to cisgender LGBQ women and men and cisgender heterosexual women and men, respectively. Propensity score matching covariates included age, ED site, mental health history, and gastrointestinal history. The primary outcome was pain assessment within 60 min of arrival. The secondary outcome was analgesics administered in the ED.ResultsWe identified 300 TGD patients, of whom 300 TGD patients were successfully matched for a total cohort of 1300 patients. The median (IQR) age was 25 (20–32) years and most patients were treated in a community ED (58.2%). There was no difference between groups in pain assessment within 60 min of arrival (59.0% TGD vs. 63.2% non TGD, p = 0.19). There were no differences in the number of times pain was assessed (median [IQR] 2 [1–3] vs. 2 [1–4], p = 0.31) or the severity of pain between groups (5.5 [4–7] vs. 6 [4–7], p = 0.11). TGD patients were more likely to receive nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (32.0% vs. 24.9%, p = 0.015) and less likely to receive opioids than non‐TGD patients (24.7% vs. 36.9%, p = <0.001). TGD and nonbinary patients, along with LGBQ cisgender women (24.7%) and heterosexual cisgender women (34%), were less likely to receive opioids than LGBQ cisgender men (54%) and heterosexual cisgender men (42.3%, p < 0.01).ConclusionThere was no difference in frequency of pain assessment, regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation. More cisgender men, compared to TGD and cisgender women, received opioids for their pain.