Citations

AbstractBackgroundWe developed the Institute on Methods and Protocols for Advancement of Clinical Trials in ADRD (IMPACT‐AD) to address the shortage of qualified investigators with adequate training and expertise to conduct Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and AD Related Dementias (ADRD) clinical trials.MethodWe describe the experience of the first two years of funding of the IMPACT‐AD course, specifically the rates of applications to the course, descriptive summaries of the accepted trainees, and the measures of participant satisfaction and learning.ResultOver the first two years of the course, we received 195 eligible applications to the course. Most (n = 121, 62%) applicants were female and nearly half self‐reported as being African American/Black, Asian, or Pacific Islander race and/or Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Forty‐one applicants (21%) indicated that they were the first in their family to attend collegeOf 69 total trainees accepted to the course (36% acceptance rate), a majority (n = 44, 64%) were female. Twenty‐eight (41%) self‐reported as being African American/Black, Asian, or Pacific Islander race and eleven (16%) were of Hispanic ethnicity. Fourteen trainees (20%) identified as being the first person in their family to attend college. Among trainees, 24 (35%) were MDs, 30 (43%) were PhDs, and 9 (13%) held master’s degrees.Course lecture topics were rated, on average, as “essential” or “valuable” by 98% of trainees. Across lecture topics, on average, 48% of trainees rated their prior knowledge of topics as “very strong” or “strong,” and 11% of trainees rated their prior knowledge as “weak.” Overall, 52% of trainees evaluated their change in knowledge based on the lectures as “very much increased,” 46% as “somewhat” or “slightly” increased, and 2% as “no change.” Results were similar for the two tracks. Based on pre‐ and post‐course assessments, trainees improved their knowledge of covered content (from 62% to 79% correct responses on knowledge assessments).ConclusionThe IMPACT‐AD course is achieving its mission of educating and diversifying the next generation of ADRD trialists.We thank Dr. Laurie Ryan and Dr. Kristina McLinden from the National Institute on Aging for their key contributions in leadership and scientific guidance of IMPACT‐AD.

Controversy remains regarding which approach is better, laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) or open appendectomy (OA). A 5-year retrospective review of patients undergoing appendectomy was performed to compare the outcomes of LA and OA using standard statistical methods ( P < 0.05). LA was performed in 207 and OA in 100 patients (conversion 6.7%). Females underwent LA more frequently than males (81.7% vs 51.9%; P = 0.0001). LA patients were older (30.2 years vs 25.7 years; P = 0.03), with no differences in body mass index (BMI) (27.9 kg/m 2 vs 25.5 kg/m 2 ; P = 0.06) or operative times (51.1 minutes vs 51.5 minutes; P = 0.84).’ LA patients required less analgesics (19.2 mg vs 31.5 mg; P = 0.01), and shorter hospital stays (27.2 hours vs 53.1 hours; P = 0.0001). Operating room charges were higher for LA ($3839 vs $2528; P = 0.0001), with no difference in total hospital charges ($8801. vs $9147; P = 0.14). Complications between LA and OA were similar (3.6% vs 8%; P = 0.12). Converted patients were older, required more analgesia, and had higher morbidity, length of stay, and hospital charges. LA is the procedure of choice for appendicitis regardless of age, sex, BMI, or degree of appendiceal inflammation. LA is as safe and quick to perform as OA with lower analgesic requirements, length of stay, and no difference in total charges.

Abstract Gliomas are genomically heterogeneous tumors that may harness a convergent and therapeutically targetable set of metabolic pathways. At present, the metabolic landscape of in situ human gliomas remains incompletely characterized, hampering translational progress. To that end, we are leveraging the previously untapped potential of high molecular weight microdialysis to determine the global extracellular metabolic profiles of live human gliomas. Under an investigational device exemption, HMW microdialysis (&lt; 100 kDa) was performed at 2.0 μL/min in an initial discovery cohort of five patients in glioma and adjacent brain during neurosurgical resection; a subsequent cohort of five patients was independently analyzed to critically evaluate results from the discovery group. Untargeted metabolomics via ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry revealed over 300 named metabolites and five drugs from only 20 μL of microdialysate, representing a short and feasible 10 minutes of intraoperative collection time. Enrichment analysis of each patient’s tumor vs. brain ranked extracellular metabolome highlighted marked metabolic convergence within the most aggressive regions of molecular diverse tumors (FDR = 0). Pathway analysis revealed significant enrichment for large neutral amino acid pathways, including valine, leucine, and isoleucine biosynthesis (p=1.6E-9) and degradation (p=0.001) and glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism (p=4.7E-5). Notably, this amino acid signature was not as abundantly present in nonenhancing tumor when compared to enhancing tumor (Average tumor/brain: 1.9x vs. 4.3x, respectively), suggesting upregulation of neutral amino acid transporters in enhancing tumor or delivery from plasma into the CNS via a disrupted BBB. Interestingly, guanidinoacetate (GAA) was our most highly conserved and upregulated metabolite (128.9x in tumor vs. brain). Given its co-production with ornithine, the precursor to protumorigenic polyamines, we posit that GAA may serve as a biomarker of increased ODC activity in live human gliomas. In conclusion, intraoperative HMW microdialysis feasibly offers improved opportunities to perform glioma metabolic biomarker and therapeutic discovery.

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma diagnostic criteria have been redefined with the 5th edition of WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system. Glioblastomas are defined as IDH wildtype diffuse astrocytic glioma tumors with one of the following features: microvascular proliferation, or necrosis, or TERT promoter mutation, or EGFR gene amplification, or +7/-10 chromosome copy number changes. The aim of this study is to establish the impact of extent of resection in overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (WT), WHO grade 4 (WHO 2021). METHODS Systematic literature search was performed using the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify studies comparing OS and PFS after gross total resection (GTR) vs subtotal resection (STR) or biopsy for glioblastoma IDH-WT. Prognostic hazard ratios (HR) for OS and PFS were analyzed using a random-effects model. RESULTS We identified 1439 publications. Nine studies met inclusion/exclusion criteria. 788 patients underwent GTR out of 1818. The meta-analysis showed a significant increase in OS and PFS duration when undergoing GTR for glioblastoma IDH-WT with a median OS of 20 months 95% CI (17-25) compared to 12 months 95% CI (9-15) for STR or biopsy and a median PFS of 11 months 95% CI (9-12) for GTR compared to 7 months 95% CI (5-7) for STR or biopsy respectively. GTR showed a 49% significant reduction of mortality risk HR=0.51 95%CI (0.42-0.59) and a 44% significant reduction of progression risk HR=0.56 95%CI (0.41-0.71) compared to STR or biopsy. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review indicates that GTR may be associated with improved OS and PFS compared to STR or biopsy for Glioblastoma, IDH-WT, WHO grade 4 (WHO 2021). However, this is limited by variable study design and significant clinical and methodological heterogeneity among studies.

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) has dismal outcome of 14-16 months. One of the challenges of drug development in GBM is lack of requisite circulating-free (cfDNA) in blood samples to develop biomarker driven targeted therapy trials. The Exablate focused ultrasound with circulating microbubble resonators uses the concept of real-time imaging to treat small target spots focusing energy in a non-invasive manner, thereby disrupting the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBBD) with potential to increase cfDNA in blood. METHODS LIBERATE is a prospective, multi-center, self-controlled pivotal ongoing clinical trial in subjects with suspected GBM evaluating the safety and effectiveness of Exablate Model 4000 to disrupt BBB to achieve a greater proportion of cfDNA in samples taken post-BBB disruption as compared to the sample taken before BBBD. Fifty eligible subjects with suspected GBM who are scheduled to undergo brain tumor resection or biopsy at 10 centers in the U.S. will participate in this study. The primary endpoint is defined for each subject as ratio between his/her cfDNA amount found in the blood sample 1-hour post-BBBD procedure compared to the cfDNA amount found in the blood sample collected pre-BBBD procedure. This study proposes to demonstrate that on average there is at least 2-fold increase in cfDNA (measured by central laboratory) at 1 hour post BBBD. Confirmatory secondary analysis will evaluate correlation between patterns obtained in panel of biomarkers evaluated in the resected tumor tissue and/or biopsy sample and blood sample collected 1-hour post-BBBD. Exploratory endpoints will include: (1) sensitivity of detection of known somatic mutations in the circulating blood samples (circulating tumor DNA) before and after BBBD, (2) time of greatest yield of cfDNA in the samples collected post BBBD blood samples (at 30 min, 1-hour, 2-hour and 3-hour) to determine time of greatest yield, (3) correlation of biomarkers between the imaging and the post-BBBD biomarker samples. (NCT05383872)

Abstract The relative inaccessibility of a patient’s glioma throughout their disease course precludes individualized insights into tumor biology and responses thereof to therapeutic challenge. We propose that serial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples can be used to perform glioma espionage in the form of biomarker discovery for analytes that are sensitive to tumor burden (for monitoring) and candidate therapies (for biological impact). To that end, we are routinely leveraging neurosurgical access to the CNS to collect CSF samples intraoperatively and from chronically implanted Ommaya reservoirs for longitudinal CSF access (NCT04692337, NCT04692324). Global proteomic analysis of CSF was performed on the Somalogic platform – an aptamer-based technology for highly sensitive and specific analysis of over 7,000 proteins. Using each patient’s ranked protein list (glioma vs. 3 control patients), enrichment analysis was performed in a discovery cohort of five patients to identify conserved proteins of glioma. To reveal candidate glioma monitoring, further enrichment analysis was performed to identify proteins that decreased with resection and increased with recurrence, using two sets of paired patient samples. Forty-four proteins met these enrichment criteria; this candidate high-grade glioma proteomic signature was highly significantly enriched in an independent cohort of twelve glioma patients (FDR=0 for all patients). The HGG signature decreased in abundance following resection in serial samples from two other patients, confirming decreased tumor burden. Top proteins included LANC2, DPYL3, Sorcin, Integrin A1B1, and lactate dehydrogenase (FC of glioma vs. control: 145.3x, 113.9x, 78.0x, 71.6x, and 62.7x, respectively). Interestingly, despite having explicitly chosen samples with little-to-no hemoglobin in the discovery cohort, this HGG signature was highly enriched for plasma-like proteins (FDR=0), suggesting a potential biological impact of blood-brain barrier disruption on the glioma extracellular proteome. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that the glioma extracellular proteome can feasibly be accessed to perform biomarker discovery (“espionage”) via serially-acquired CSF samples.

Abstract Diffuse gliomas are aggressive brain tumors that lack effective therapies. Despite advances in the molecular characterization of gliomas, targeted treatments have failed to improve patient outcomes to date. Here, we employed a functional genomics approach to rapidly identify therapeutic vulnerabilities and provide a strategy to individualize patient treatment. Our process combined comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic tumor profiling, custom algorithms and visualization software for data integration, and preclinical 3-dimensional ex vivo models (mcancers) for drug screening to assess response to therapeutic agents targeting specific molecular alterations. A total of 32 cases, including 5 oligodendrogliomas (1 primary and 4 recurrent), 5 astrocytomas (1 primary and 4 recurrent), and 22 glioblastomas (5 primary and 17 recurrent), were included in the study. Immunohistochemistry and integrated genomics confirmed that mcancers maintain key molecular alterations, including mutations, chromosomal rearrangements and focal amplifications, cellularity, and heterogeneity, faithfully recapitulating the original tumor. A total of 119 single drugs and 183 combinations were tested, including a panel of 26-brain penetrant targeted agents (18 single drugs and 8 combinations) that was curated to target common glioma oncogenic pathways and was tested across all cases. A strong correlation was observed between therapeutic vulnerabilities of glioma mcancers to targeted agents (EGFR, MET, PDGFR, HDAC inhibitors, etc.) and clinical experience. Single agent activity of panel compounds in the ex vivo setting was generally poor, with only 35% mCancers exhibiting &gt; 70% growth inhibition at Cmax. In contrast, combination strategies, especially ones including epigenetic drugs, were significantly more effective (affecting 22 out of 32 mCancers), underscoring the molecular complexity of gliomas and the need for clinical trials testing combination treatments. Our data identified a number of novel combination treatments with significant efficacy across glioma subtypes and molecular profiles, suggesting that our functional genomics pipeline can guide treatment selection and inform clinical trial enrollment for gliomas.