Carlson, Karen

Abstract Background Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare, indolent B-cell malignancy accounting for ~1% of all lymphoid neoplasms. While purine analogs remain the standard first-line therapy, the increasing use of combination regimens and targeted agents has expanded the therapeutic landscape. Data on long-term outcomes in real-world practice remain limited. Methods This is a retrospective, multicenter cohort study. We included 104 patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of HCL who had at least one oncology visit from January 1, 2010, to July 17, 2025. Patients diagnosed prior to 2010 were left-truncated to account for survivorship bias. Data were abstracted from electronic medical records. Key outcomes included treatment patterns, response rates, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results The median age at diagnosis was 56.9 years (range 32.1–83.8), and 80% were male. Most patients (77%) were diagnosed during or after 2010. The most frequent frontline therapies were cladribine (63%), cladribine with rituximab (12%), rituximab monotherapy (9.7%), vemurafenib-based regimens (7.7%), splenectomy with or without interferon (3.8%), interferon monotherapy (2.9%), and other (1.9%). The overall complete response (CR) rate to first-line therapy was 63%, with 15% achieving a partial response (PR) and 22% having stable or no response. For patients receiving cladribine with rituximab first-line (n = 12), 92% had a CR. For patients receiving cladribine monotherapy first-line (n = 65), 63% had a CR and 12% had a PR. For patients receiving rituximab monotherapy first-line (n = 10), 50% had a CR and 20% had a PR. For patients receiving vemurafenib-based regimens first-line (n = 8), 75% had a CR. Among the 39 patients who received second-line therapy, the most common regimens included cladribine (31%), rituximab (26%), cladribine plus rituximab (18%), and vemurafenib-based regimens (13%). The CR rate after second-line therapy was 72%. For patients receiving cladribine with rituximab second-line (n = 7), 86% had a CR and 14% had a PR. For patients receiving cladribine monotherapy second-line (n = 12), 67% had a CR. For patients receiving rituximab monotherapy second-line (n = 10), 80% had a CR and 10% had a PR. For patients receiving vemurafenib-based regimens second-line (n = 5), 40% had a CR and 20% had a PR. Among the 17 patients who received third-line therapy, the most common regimens included rituximab (41%), cladribine (18%), and vemurafenib-based regimens (18%). The CR rate after third-line therapy was 50%. For patients receiving rituximab monotherapy third-line (n = 7), 43% had a CR and 14% had a PR. For patients receiving cladribine monotherapy third-line (n = 3), 33% had a CR. For patients receiving vemurafenib-based regimens third-line (n = 3), 67% had a CR and 33% had a PR. Overall, treatment-related hospitalizations for first-line therapy occurred in 27% of patients. 50% of patients receiving first-line cladribine with rituximab had treatment-related hospitalizations. 25% of patients receiving first-line vemurafenib-based treatment had treatment-related hospitalizations. 23% of patients receiving first-line cladribine monotherapy had treatment-related hospitalizations. 20% of patients receiving first-line rituximab monotherapy had treatment-related hospitalizations. Overall, after a median follow-up of 6.6 years (range 0.1–46), estimated OS was 96.6% at 5 years, 85.7% at 10 years, and 80.3% at 15 years. The median OS was 24.5 years [95% CI: 18.3, not reached]. Estimated PFS was 95.1% at 1 year, 89.9% at 3 years, 74.8% at 5 years, and 50.8% at 10 years. Median PFS was 12.2 years [95% CI: 7.0, not reached]. Estimated OS for first-line cladribine monotherapy was 100% at 5 years and 86.5% at 10 years. Estimated OS for first-line vemurafenib-based treatment was 85.7% at 5 years and 85.7% at 10 years. Conclusions This large real-world cohort provides important insights into the long-term management of HCL. Cladribine-based regimens remain the predominant first-line approach, with high response rates and durable remissions. However, treatment-related toxicity is common. Outcomes in later lines remain favorable, particularly with re-treatment using purine analogs or combination regimens. These findings underscore the importance of individualized treatment planning and the continued need for real-world evidence to inform care in rare hematologic malignancies.

Background: Outcomes of patients with AML have remained poor despite the availability of cytotoxic chemotherapy, hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and targeted therapies. HMAs, such as azacitidine, in combination with Bcl-2 inhibitors like venetoclax have demonstrated response rates of 67% in newly diagnosed AML and 21% in relapsed/refractory (RR) AML (DiNardo et al. Blood 2019 and Am J Hematol 2018). While the combination of azacitidine and venetoclax is efficacious in AML, preclinical studies indicate potential mechanisms of drug resistance including overexpression of MCL-1, an anti-apoptotic protein (Konopleva et al. Cancer Cell. 2006). Pevonedistat is a first in class inhibitor of Nedd8 activating enzyme that has demonstrated activity against AML (Swords RT et al. Blood. 2010). Pevonedistat induces NOXA, a pro-apoptotic protein leading to neutralization of MCL-1 inducing apoptosis (Wang et al. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017). Preclinical studies evaluating the combination of pevonedistat and venetoclax against AML cell lines have demonstrated synergistic effect (Knoor KL et al. Cell Death Differ. 2015). Hence, we hypothesize that the addition of pevonedistat to the combination of azacitidine and venetoclax would enhance the therapeutic efficacy by overcoming resistance to apoptosis. Study design and methods: This is an investigator-initiated phase Ib study evaluating the safety of pevonedistat, azacitidine and venetoclax. Patients aged 18 years or above with morphologically documented AML (de novo, secondary or therapy-related), ECOG performance status 0-2 and adequate organ function are eligible for the study. Major exclusion criteria are patients with isolated extramedullary relapse, hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) within 100 days of enrollment, active acute GVHD, veno-occlusive disease, acute promyelocytic leukemia, liver cirrhosis and severe liver impairment. While the dose escalation phase is available only for patients with RR-AML, the dose expansion phase can also include newly diagnosed AML patients who are ineligible for intensive induction. The study is planned to be conducted at Medical College of Wisconsin, Mayo Clinic and University of Pennsylvania. The primary endpoint is to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and toxicity profile of pevonedistat, azacitidine and venetoclax. The secondary endpoints include determination of response rates, duration of response, survival and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory endpoints include correlation of response rates with AML genomic profile, correlation of pretreatment levels of BCL2, BCLXL, MCL1, BAX or BAK with response, determination of changes in NOXA (PMAIP1) mRNA and protein expression pre-and post-pevonedistat treatment, evaluation of BH3 mimetic profiling on bone marrow samples by flow cytometry and assessing the sensitivity of leukemia and leukemic stem/progenitor cells to pevonedistat ex vivo. The study will follow 3+3 design with dose escalation (Arms A and B), de-escalation in case of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (arms Z and Y) and dose expansion phase (figure 1). Patients will be entered sequentially to each dose level, starting with dose level 0. The DLT observation period for dose-escalation will be 1 cycle. The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) will be defined as the highest dose level at which none of the first 3 treated subjects, or no more than 1 of the first 6 treated subjects experiences a DLT. A minimum of 9 and a maximum of 24 patients will be needed for the dose escalation phase and 6 patients for the dose expansion phase. Response rate, duration of response and exploratory endpoints will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier method will be used to determine survival. Disclosures Guru Murthy: Cardinal Health Inc.: Honoraria. Michaelis:Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Macrogeneics: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; JAZZ: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board, uncompensated, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; ASTEX: Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding. Abedin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria; Helsinn Healthcare: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Research Funding; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Runaas:Agios: Honoraria; Blueprint Medicine: Honoraria. Atallah:Jazz: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy.