Citations

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with systemic inflammation and potential cardiovascular complications. This meta-analysis evaluates long-term cardiovascular risks in IBD. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for studies examining cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and thromboembolic risks in IBD. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: Fifty-three studies comprising 1,406,773 patients were analyzed. IBD was linked to increased risk of ischemic heart disease (aHR 1.25; p = 0.001) myocardial infarction (aHR 1.25; p = 0.01), acute coronary syndrome (aHR 1.43; p < 0.00001), heart failure (aHR 1.24; p < 0.00001), atrial fibrillation (aHR 1.20; p < 0.00001), and stroke (aHR 1.13; p < 0.00001). Elevated risks were also observed for peripheral arterial disease (aHR 1.41; p < 0.00001), diabetes mellitus (aHR 1.40; p < 0.00001), venous thromboembolism (aHR 1.98; p < 0.00001), deep vein thrombosis (aHR 2.85; p = 0.0004), and pulmonary embolism (aHR 1.98; p = 0.03). Importantly, IBD was associated with increased cardiovascular (aHR 1.14; p = 0.03) and all-cause mortality (aHR 1.53; p < 0.00001). Conclusions: IBD patients face higher risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes, thromboembolic disease, and mortality, necessitating early cardiovascular risk assessment and targeted interventions in this population.

Abstract Introduction: Elranatamab (Elra) is a bispecific antibody (BsAb) targeting BCMA that is approved for patients with triple class exposed relapsed refractory myeloma (RRMM) on the basis of the MagnetisMM-3 phase 2 trial. For BCMA naïve patients, an overall response rate (ORR) of 61.0% and median progression free survival (PFS) of 17.2m was observed with a median overall survival (OS) of 24.6m. However, efficacy and safety information in the real world is lacking. Methods: This was an international retrospective study of patients with RRMM treated with Elra monotherapy outside of clinical trials. Data was collected through the International Myeloma Foundation Immunotherapy Database from 7 countries (UK, USA, Canada, Greece, Spain, Czech Republic and Singapore). High-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCA) were defined as 1q+, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), and/or del(17p). Response was assessed using IMWG consensus criteria. Patient characteristics were summarized by frequency (percentage) or median (range). PFS, OS were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and reported with 95% confidence intervals. Results: 79 patients were included. Median age was 67 years (range: 41-95y) with 20% ≥75 years. Racial distribution was: 75% White, 16% Black/African American, 8% Asian/Pacific. 55% were ECOG performance status (PS) 1-2. Patients received a median of 5 prior lines (range 1-11), and 35% were BCMA exposed (9% CAR-T, 5% ADC, 7% BsAb, 8% BsAb plus CAR-T, 4% ADC plus BsAb). Of those with available data, 45% had HRCA,13% had extramedullary disease (EMD) and 32% had penta-drug refractory RRMM. Overall, 48% would not have been eligible for the MagnetisMM-3 trial. Median follow-up was 6.3m (range 0.5-35.0). ORR was 53% (PR 11%, VGPR 33%, CR 8%, sCR 1%) and 67% for BCMA naïve patients. Responses were significantly lower for BCMA exposed patients (ORR 31%) but did not differ by age (51% &lt;75yrs vs 60% ≥75yrs). On univariate analysis, prior BCMA exposure, platelets &lt;50, presence of HRCA and penta-refractoriness were significantly associated with a lower response rate. PFS for the whole cohort at 6 and 12m was 64% (95%CI, 54-77%) and 52% (40-67%); for BCMA naïve patients, it was 77% (65-90%) and 67% (54-84%), respectively. Within the whole cohort, PFS was shorter for: BCMA exposed (median 4.0m vs not reached (NR)), platelets &lt;50 (2.0 vs 21.7m), HRCA (7.2m vs NR), penta-refractory (4.3m vs NR). PFS did not differ significantly by EMD, PS, age, or creatinine clearance. OS for the whole cohort at 6 and12m was 74% (64-85%) and 58% (45-74%); for BCMA-naïve patients, it was 80% (43-85%) and 70% (57-87%), respectively. Within the whole cohort, OS was shorter for: BCMA exposed (median 10.3m vs NR), platelets &lt;50 (4.3m vs NR), HRCA (10.7m vs NR) and penta-refractory (10.3m vs NR). Univariate regression analysis demonstrated that prior BCMA exposure, platelets &lt;50 and penta-refractoriness were significantly associated with a worse PFS and OS, and HRCA predicted poorer survival CRS was observed in 41% of patients (grade(G)1: 35%, G2: 5%, ≥G3: 0%) with most occurring with the first step up dose (SUD): SUD1: 29%, SUD2: 15%, full dose: 4%. Tocilizumab was used in 20% and steroids in 3%. ICANS was observed in 4 cases (5%): G1: 2, G2: 1, G4: 1. Treatment was with steroids (n=3) and tocilizumab (n=2). G3-4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 19% and 14% required platelet transfusions. G3-4 neutropenia occurred in 25% with overall 31% requiring GCSF. Infections were reported in 33 (42%) patients with median time to infection of 41 days. A total of 94 infection episodes were observed over 581 personal months. There were 2 infection-related deaths reported (1 had IVIG, 1 did not). 64% had hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG &lt; 400mg/dl) and IVIG was given in 65% of patients. Conclusions: In this first international real world analysis, Elranatamab achieved a response rate of 67% and a 12m PFS of 67% in BCMA naïve patients, similar to the MagnetisMM-3 trial despite almost half not meeting trial eligibility. However, prior BCMA exposure, platelets &lt;50, high risk cytogenetics and penta refractory status were predictors of poorer outcomes. Acknowledgements: The International Myeloma Foundation, International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG)

Abstract Introduction: Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) was approved in the United States for the treatment of CLL in 3/2024 for patients who have received two prior lines of therapy including a covalent BTK inhibitor and a BCL-2 inhibitor. Data regarding outcomes of liso-cel is limited to reports from the registrational TRANSCEND-CLL 004 clinical trial which had strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. This work investigates the real-world efficacy and safety of liso-cel for patients with CLL and its efficacy in specific sub-populations. Methods: This is a multi-institutional retrospective study (Collaborative Assessment of Real-World Evidence of Lisocabtagene Maraleucel in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL [CARE CAR-T CLL]) of patients with CLL who received commercial liso-cel in the United States. Patients with Richter transformation were excluded. Response was defined by iwCLL criteria. Patients who did not undergo a marrow biopsy but met other criteria for a complete response (CR) were categorized as unconfirmed CR (CRu). CRS and ICANS were graded per ASTCT criteria. Results: A total of 30 patients were identified with a median age of 67 years (range 44 – 80). Twenty of thirty patients (67%) had either del17p and/or mutated TP53, and 8/30 (27%) had complex karyotype (≥ 3 abnormalities) at time of liso-cel infusion. Patients received a median of 6 prior lines of therapy (range 1 - 12), and 24 (80%) were previously treated with chemotherapy. All patients had previous exposure to a covalent BTK inhibitor and a BCL-2 inhibitor. Twenty-seven (90%) of patients had prior exposure to pirtobrutinib. Twenty-nine patients (96.7%) received bridging treatment that was stopped after leukapheresis with 1 patient in CR and 25 patients in PR at time of liso-cel. Eighteen patients (60%) were treated with pirtobrutinib as the last line of treatment prior to liso-cel. Median length of time on pirtobrutinib prior to liso-cel infusion was 4 months (interquartile range [IQR], 2 – 8 months). Twelve (66.7%) patients stopped pirtobrutinib between leukapheresis and lymphodepletion, and 6 continued after liso-cel. Best CR/CRu rate was 60.0% (CR, n = 17/30; CRu, n = 1/30), and best overall response rate (ORR) was 83.3% (25/30) with median time to best response of 30 days (IQR, 28 – 30 days). Of the 18 patients who received pirtobrutinib as their last line of therapy, 13 (72%) achieved a CR/CRu. Meanwhile, of the 12 patients who did not receive pirtobrutinib as their last line of therapy, only 5 (28%) achieved a CR. Measurable residual disease testing (MRD) by flow cytometry was done in 14/30 patients, and 9 patients (64%) had achieved undetectable MRD (uMRD). MRD by next generation sequencing (NGS) was done in 17 patients, and 7 (41%) patients had uMRD. Twenty-seven of 30 patients (90%) were alive at time of data collection. Median follow-up was 3.3 months (IQR, 1.2 – 8.9 months). Twenty-six patients (87%) experienced any grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and 3 patients experienced grade 3 CRS (10%). Twelve patients (40%) experienced any grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and 4 patients (13%) experienced grade 3 ICANS. There were no grade 4 or 5 CRS or ICANS. One patient experienced grade 3 immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome (IEC-HS). At day 30, patients had a median absolute neutrophil count of 1.7K/μL (IQR, 0.8 – 3.6K/μL), hemoglobin of 11.7 g/dL (IQR, 8.6 – 13.1 g/dL), and platelet count of 72K/μL (IQR, 29 – 119K/μL). Conclusion: Real-world analysis of liso-cel for patients with relapsed/refractory CLL showed CR and ORR of 60.0% and 83.3%, respectively. Despite having a heavily pre-treated and chemotherapy-exposed population and with over half the patients having high-risk features, these response rates are higher than what was described in the TRANSCEND-CLL 004 clinical trial. These results are limited by the short follow-up period and the variability in response assessment typical of a retrospective study. As we increase our sample size, we will also be interested if the use of the non-covalent BTK inhibitor pirtobrutinib prior to liso-cel is associated with a higher CR rate, mimicking the findings of the sub-cohort analysis of TRANSCEND-CLL 004 where the concurrent use of ibrutinib led to higher CR rates. Further updates and patients from additional collaborators will be presented at the meeting.

Abstract Background: BCMA- and GPRC5D-targeting immunotherapies including CART cell therapy and Bispecific antibodies are currently approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma. However, clinical outcomes after dual antigenic exposure remain undefined. Herein we report the first report of BCMA-GPRC5D dual targeted multiple myeloma (DEMM). Methods: We conducted a retrospective multi-center study of RRMM patients treated with both BCMA- and GPRC5D-targeted treatments (TT) (CAR T, bispecific antibodies, ADCs) between November 1, 2022, and July 1, 2025. Outcomes included PFS1 (post-dual exposure), and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier estimates and event-free probabilities were calculated. Results: One hundred and fifty patients who underwent TCE treatments were included and 49 patients met the criteria for inclusion. Median age was 65 years, 22.4% had creatinine clearance &lt;=30 and ECOG 2 or greater was present in 22.2%; 57% had high-risk cytogenetics (IMWG 2016), and 60.5% were penta-refractory. Patients received a median of 6 prior lines of therapy (LOT) before 1st TCE and 9 prior LOT before DEMM. 65.3% received 1 TCE, 30.6% received 2 TCE and 4.1% received 3 TCE before DEMM. Similarly, 67.3% received 1 BCMA, 24.5% received 2 BCMA TT and 4.1% received 3 BCMA TT before DEMM. Prior TT included- BCMA CART (57.1%), BCMA Bispecific (57.1%), BCMA ADC (18.4%), other TCE (10.2%). The last dual exposure was GPRC5D Bispecific in 91.8%, BCMA Bispecific in 6.1% and BCMA CART in 2%. The median followup post relapse was 3.4 months (range 0.0-16 mos). The median PFS during the last dual exposure TT was 3.98 months (95% CI: 2.96–6.70). 32.7% did not receive any subsequent LOT and died due to progressive disease. 67.3% of patients had progressive MM and received next LOT. Median PFS1 was 1.77 months (95% CI: 1.28–6.21) with 3-, 6-, and 12-month event-free probabilities of 44%%, 19% and 0% respectively. Median OS was 5.7 months (95% CI: 2.53-12.16) for DEMM from the time of refractoriness to dual antigenic targets. Conclusions: Patients dual-exposed to BCMA- and GPRC5D-directed therapies have a poor prognosis, 32.7% had not received further treatment and in those who received treatment the PFS1 was less than 2 months and an OS of 5.7 months from progression. This reflects an area of high unmet need for the patients that are dual-exposed to BCMA- and GPRC5D-directed therapies. Further data on the cohort will be updated at the meeting. Acknowledgements include, the International Myeloma Foundation, IMWG.

Abstract Introduction: Epcoritamab (epco) and glofitamab (glofit) are bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with multiply relapsed or refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Though response rates are relatively high, most patients (pts) eventually experience progression of disease (POD). We sought to investigate the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes following POD post-BsAb for r/r LBCL Pts, as this has not previously been described. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study including 21 US centers evaluating pts with r/r LBCL receiving commercially available epco or glofit between 2023 and 2025. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were extracted from medical records. Efficacy and survival outcomes were assessed by site investigators and included overall response rate (ORR), complete and partial response (CR, PR) rates, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method. Results: As of May 15, 2025, a total of 312 pts with r/r LBCLs were treated with BsAb, of whom a total of 168 (53.8%) pts experienced POD [104 of 193 (53.8%) treated with prior epco and 64 of 119 (53.8%) treated with prior glofit]. Pts with POD had a median age at BsAb start of 67 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58-76), most were male (68.4%), and the most common histology was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (n=122 [71.8%]). Sixty-seven of 168 pts (39.9%) with POD after BsAb had experienced primary refractory disease defined as failure to achieve PR or CR to frontline therapy. A total of 102 (60.7%) pts with POD to BsAb had received chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy prior to BsAbs, with 33.3% of these pts being refractory to CAR T and 30.4% progressing within 6 months of CAR T-cell infusion. The median time to progression following BsAb start was 48 days. Following POD, 70 pts received no further anti-lymphoma therapy. Among 98 pts receiving subsequent therapy, 85 initially received systemic therapy and 13 initially received local therapy with radiation (concurrently with systemic therapy in 8 pts). The most commonly-used next line of systemic therapies included: loncastuximab tesirine in 19 pts (ORR 16.7%, all PR); commercial CAR T in 11 pts (ORR 50% [CR 36.4%, PR 18.2%); tafasitamab with lenalidomide in 7 (no responses); and other chemotherapy in 46 pts (ORR 27.6% [CR 24.1%]). The median follow-up time from POD was 9.2 months among survivors (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.8-13.3). Among those who initiated subsequent-line therapy following BsAbs, the median progression-free survival (PFS2) was 1.9 months (95% CI 1.5-2.4) and median overall survival (OS) from initiation of subsequent-line therapy was 3.9 months (95% CI 2.4-5.5). The estimated 1-year OS following initiation of next therapy was 12%. Conclusions: We report the outcomes of largest cohort of pts with POD post-BsAbs in r/r LBCL. Progression events occurred early after initiation of single agent BsAbs, and almost half of pts who progressed did not receive subsequent therapy. For those who received standard subsequent-line therapy after POD, response rates and survival outcomes were poor. Pts with POD after BsAB should be strongly considered for clinical trials of novel therapeutics or combination therapies.

Abstract Background Etentamig is a second-generation B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3 bispecific antibody that has shown promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Etentamig possesses a unique combination of 2 high-affinity BCMA binding domains, coupled to a low-affinity CD3 binding domain that have been shown to reduce the negative impact of soluble BCMA (sBCMA), decrease risk for cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and drive sustained T-cell activation with reduced immune exhaustion in preclinical models of MM (Blood 2023;142 [suppl 1]:4666). Here, we describe correlative biomarker analyses from Phase 1 (NCT03933735) and Phase 1b (NCT05650632) clinical trials of etentamig in RRMM designed to assess the impact of sBCMA on clinical response and pharmacodynamic changes in proinflammatory cytokines, and T-cell redistribution, activation, proliferation, and exhaustion. Methods Peripheral blood and serum samples from patients with RRMM enrolled in Phase 1 and Phase 1b open-label studies who received etentamig monotherapy were collected at baseline, on treatment, and at disease progression. The Phase 1b study consisted of dose-optimization (DO) and dose-expansion (DE) phases. During DO, patients received a single step-up dose (SUD) of intravenous etentamig (2 or 4 mg) on Cycle (C) 1 Day (D) 1, followed by the target dose of 60 mg on D4. In DE, based on DO findings, patients received the recommended etentamig SUD (2 mg) on C1D1, followed by 60 mg on D4 with modified dexamethasone predosing. Samples were analyzed by flow cytometry for immune cell populations, Luminex® for cytokines, and electrochemiluminescence for sBCMA. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells and bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC) at baseline and on-treatment were subjected to single-cell Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes sequencing (scCITEseq) and single-cell T-cell receptors (scTCR) / B-cell receptors clonality analyses. Results While baseline serum sBCMA levels did not correlate with clinical response to etentamig at the selected dose level of 60 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) with 2 mg SUD, a reduction in sBCMA levels over time was associated with best International Myeloma Working Group response. Etentamig treatment led to a rapid and transient increase of proinflammatory cytokines and promoted T-cell redistribution, activation, and proliferation. Maximum reduction in peak levels of CRS-related cytokines, including (interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor–a), were observed in DE compared with DO and 60 mg Q4W without SUD. Peak induction levels of proinflammatory cytokines during C1 correlated with occurrence of CRS (≥Grade [G] 1) as well as clinical response across dose levels. A modified dexamethasone premedication schedule of 2 mg/60 mg Q4W cohort for C1 resulted in significantly reduced baseline levels of IL-6 and key macrophage-associated cytokine/chemokines (eg, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and macrophage inflammatory protein-3 beta). Incidence of CRS was lowest in the 2 mg/60 mg Q4W cohort (26% G1, 4% G2, 0% ≥G3). Higher T-cell to myeloma cell ratio in BMMCs at baseline correlated with better response to etentamig. scCITEseq and scTCR analysis revealed that at baseline, responders also had greater CD8+ T-cell cytotoxic activities, increased TCR clonality, and elevated inflammatory signatures in T-cells from both peripheral blood and bone marrow. Etentamig at a dosage of 60 mg Q4W resulted in significant clonal expansion of CD8+ effector T-cells and enhanced gene expression signatures related to activation and cytotoxicity in both CD8+ T effector and natural killer cells. Along treatment cycles, responders maintained their T-cell fitness, high clonality, and low T-cell exhaustion levels. Frequency of baseline CD4+ or CD8+ T-cell exhaustion (programmed cell death receptor 1+/ T cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 +) did not impact clinical response at optimal dose level of 2 mg/60 mg Q4W etentamig. Conclusions Responses to etentamig were independent of baseline sBCMA levels and resulted in rapid and transient proinflammatory cytokine production that promoted robust T-cell redistribution, activation, and proliferation indicating that the optimal dose of etentamig (2 mg/60 mg Q4W) maximizes its clinical potential as a convenient, safe, and effective therapy for MM.

Abstract Disclosure: H. Ahmad: None. M. Kakakhel: None. A. Ullah: None. M. Saeed: None. J. Ikram: None. A. Qadeer: None. M. Khawar: None. H. Jawad: None. S. Haider: None. R. Haider: None. F. Ahmed: None. R.W. Kirchoff: None. Background: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the destruction of insulin-producing cells in the pancreas. It is a global health concern with regional variation in incidence and prevalence. This study aims to analyze the regional incidence and prevalence of T1DM among adolescents and young adults (15-39 years) from 1990 to 2021 in 26 regions. Methods: Global Burden of Disease (GBD) data for 2021 were analyzed to assess regional incidence and prevalence of T1DM among adolescents and young adults. The Annual Average Percentage Change (AAPC) was calculated to evaluate trends from 1990 to 2021, with statistical significance determined using p-values. Results: In 2021, middle socio-demographic index (SDI) has the highest incidence (54541) as well as prevalence (1.86 million), followed by Low-middle SDI (I: 48416, P: 1.80 million) and South Asia (I: 46310, P: 1.73 million). Oceania has the lowest incidence (356) as well as prevalence (12885), followed by Andean Latin America (I: 911, P: 31954) and Caribbean regions (I: 1214, P: 54610), respectively. The largest increase in AAPC of incidence was showed by Southern Latin America (2.23, CI: 2.11-2.30), High-income Asia Pacific (2.22, CI: 2.18-2.26), and Western Europe (1.80, CI: 1.73-1.84) regions, while Western Europe (1.72, CI: 1.66-1.75), Eastern Europe (1.64, CI: 1.63-1.66), and Australasia (1.38, CI: 1.36-1.40) showed largest increase in AAPC of prevalence. The Caribbean region had the greatest decline in AAPC of prevalence (-0.11, CI: -0.08 to -0.12) followed by Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa (-0.07, CI: -0.06 to -0.09) and Central Latin America (-0.04, CI: -0.02 to -0.07). There was no region with decline in incidence. All AAPC values were statistically significant (p &lt; 0.000001). Conclusion: Middle SDI region exhibited the highest incidence and prevalence, highlighting the vulnerability of these populations, while Oceania and Andean Latin America bore the least burden. Notably, several regions, particularly in Europe, experienced substantial increases in both incidence and prevalence, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. Conversely, some regions, such as the Caribbean, showed encouraging declines in prevalence, suggesting that effective prevention and control strategies can be implemented. These findings underscore the importance of tailored approaches to address the evolving burden of T1DM. Presentation: Saturday, July 12, 2025

Abstract Disclosure: M. Kakakhel: None. S. Cheema: None. R. Haider: None. R. Noor: None. S. N.l: None. S.M. Irshad: None. A. Ullah: None. H. Jawad: None. A. Nawaz: None. M. Khawar: None. A. Qadeer: None. H. Ahmad: None. R. Alcaraz: None. F. Ahmed: None. Background: Bone density and structure-related disorders, such as osteoporosis and related fractures, significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality, particularly among aging populations. Monitoring temporal trends and geographic variations in mortality is essential to inform targeted public health interventions. In this study, we aimed to examine temporal and geographic variations in mortality associated with bone density and structure-related disorders in the United States from 1999 to 2022. Methods: Using ICD-10 codes M80-M85, this retrospective ecological study utilized mortality data extracted from the CDC WONDER database for the years 1999-2022. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) were calculated and stratified by demographic variables (age, sex, and race/ethnicity) and geographic regions. Temporal trends were analyzed using Joinpoint regression to estimate annual percent changes (APCs). Geographic variations were visualized using choropleth maps, and subgroup analyses were performed to explore disparities. Statistical significance was set at p &lt; 0.05. Results: Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) for bone density and structure-related disorders decreased overall from 1999 to 2019, with a subsequent rise observed in 2020 and 2022. Joinpoint regression revealed a significant negative trend from 2007-2016 (APC = -7.46%, p &lt; 0.000001), followed by a positive reversal from 2019-2022 (APC = 3.78%, p = 0.013). Both males and females experienced declines in mortality, but females had a slightly higher APC of -3.10% compared to -2.82% for males. Asian/Pacific Islander groups exhibited the most pronounced decrease in mortality (APC = -11.92%, p &lt; 0.000001) from 2009-2015, with a positive rebound in recent years. Black or African American populations had the smallest decline (APC = -1.35%). The Southern U.S. experienced the steepest decline in mortality from 2010-2016 (APC = -10.92%, p &lt; 0.000001), followed by a strong positive trend from 2019-2022 (APC = 6.61%, p &lt; 0.000001). Conversely, the West and Northeast regions showed milder trends with less pronounced reversals. Older age groups (65-74, 75-84) showed significant decreases in mortality, particularly the 65-74 group, which reversed to a positive trend (APC = 6.97%) from 2019-2022. The highest number of deaths occurred at the decedent’s home (3,330 in 2022). Subgroup analyses indicated significant temporal shifts in the mortality patterns across different racial/ethnic groups and geographic regions. Hispanic/Latino and Asian/Pacific Islander populations exhibited an increase in mortality rates post-2019, particularly in 2020. Conclusion: From 1999 to 2022, mortality from bone density and structure-related disorders in the U.S. exhibited significant temporal and geographic variations. These findings highlight the need for targeted public health strategies. Presentation: Monday, July 14, 2025

Abstract Disclosure: M. Kakakhel: None. S. Fatima: None. H. Ahmad: None. A. Ibrahim: None. W. Rahman: None. R. Haider: None. H. Jawad: None. A. Qadeer: None. M. Khawar: None. F. Ahmed: None. J. Ikram: None. R. Kirchoff: None. Background: Across the world, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a major health problem for teenagers and young people. This study aims to examine the incidence and prevalence of T1DM by gender in the 15-39 age range between 1990 and 2021. Methods: We analyzed data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) to evaluate incidence and prevalence rates of T1DM in each gender from 1990 to 2021. The Annual Percentage Change (APC) and The Annual Average Percentage Change (AAPC) was used to assess trends, with p-values determining the statistical significance. Results: From 1990 to 2021, the global prevalence of T1DM was found to be increased steadily for both genders, with the highest rates recorded in 2021: 247.32 per 100,000 for females and 246.47 per 100,000 for males. Incidence rates in 2021 showed a contrasting pattern, with males exhibiting higher rates (7.18 per 100,000) compared to females (5.98 per 100,000). AAPC analysis showed that males exhibit a faster rise in both prevalence and incidence compared to females over the study period. The difference in AAPC between males and females is more pronounced for prevalence (+0.3748%) compared to incidence (+0.1956%), with all AAPC values being statistically significant (p &lt; 0.000001). Following the APC analysis, other significant trends were revealed. Male incidence experienced the greatest increase during 2015-2021, with an APC of +1.9033% (p &lt; 0.000001), whereas female incidence increased most between 2011 and 2014 (APC = +1.3050%; p &lt; 0.000001). In contrast, the most significant decline in incidence was observed in females during 1990-1992, with an APC of +0.1665% (p = 0.006799), which was the lowest increase in the dataset. For prevalence, males exhibited the highest increase during 2015-2021, with an APC of +1.3938% (p &lt; 0.000001), whereas females had their peak increase during 2006-2009, with an APC of +0.8957% (p &lt; 0.000001). The slowest increase in prevalence for females occurred during 2014-2019, with an APC of +0.4591% (p &lt; 0.000001). Conclusion: The prevalence and incidence of T1DM among people aged 15-39 increased significantly between 1990 and 2021, with a greater increase in males. This highlights the need for gender-specific strategies in T1DM prevention and management, and research into the factors driving these disparities. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Abstract Disclosure: M. Kakakhel: None. S. Fatima: None. H. Ahmad: None. M. Khan: None. A. Rai: None. A. Qadeer: None. R. Haider: None. M. Khawar: None. U. Habib: None. H. Jawad: None. J. Ikram: None. F. Ahmed: None. R. Kirchoff: None. Introduction: Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) is a disease that affects people all over the world. This condition causes significant morbidity, as measured by Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) and mortality rates, and its severity varies worldwide. The purpose of this study is to examine trends in T1DM-related death rates and DALYs across 26 geographical areas from 1990 to 2021 in order to provide a current picture of the disease's consequences and identify regional differences. Methods: This study examined DALYs and mortality rates per 100,000 people in individuals aged 15-39 years using data from the Global Burden of Disease Study from 1990 to 2021. Trends were assessed using the Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC), with p-values used to define statistical significance. The study examined 26 regions with varied socioeconomic development indices (SDI). Using confidence intervals to account for data uncertainty, DALYs and mortality were examined to investigate the disease burden across time. Results: In 1990, the Middle SDI region had the highest DALYs at 298,352 (95% CI: 256,144 -349,670), which reached 382,857 (95% CI: 213,704-317,664) by 2021 (AAPC = 0.15, P-value &lt; 0.000001). The region with the highest DALYs in 2021 was the Low-Middle SDI, with 419,772 (95% CI: 344,307- 495,496) cases (AAPC = -2.93, P-value = &lt;0.000001). From 1990 to 2021, Oceania consistently had the lowest DALYs of 1,895 (95% CI: 1,264-2,577) and 4,210(95% CI: 3,011-5,724), respectively (AAPC= 0.15, P-value = 0.0004). Mortality rates in 1990 were highest in the Middle SDI area with 3,758 deaths (95% CI: 3,343-4,332) (AAPC= -1.23, P-value = &lt;0.000001), but by 2021, South Asia had the highest mortality rate at 5,189(95% CI: 4,272-6,087) (AAPC= -0.49). Oceania had the lowest mortality rate of 25 deaths (95% CI 145-35) (AAPC = 0.193, P-value = &lt;0.0004) in 1990, whereas Australasia had the lowest mortality rate of 28 deaths (95% CI 26-29) in 2021 (AAPC = -0.93, P-value = &lt;0.000001). Conclusion: From 1990 to 2021, the global burden of type 1 diabetes—as indicated by DALYs and death rates—underwent a substantial shift, with significant rises in several regions. DALYs were highest in the Middle SDI region in 1990 but have migrated to the Low-Middle SDI region by 2021, reflecting shifting healthcare issues and demographics. Mortality rates followed a similar pattern, with South Asia and the Low-Middle SDI regions experiencing the highest rates in 2021. Over both time periods, however, Oceania and Australasia consistently had the lowest DALYs and death rates. These findings emphasise the critical need for targeted interventions in high-burden areas. Addressing these differences is crucial for decreasing the global burden of T1DM. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025