Citations

Purpose: Mohs micrographic surgery with immunohistochemistry allows for same-day comprehensive margin assessment of melanoma in situ prior to subspecialty reconstruction. This study describes the oncologic and reconstructive outcomes of eyelid and periorbital melanoma in situ and identifies risk factors for complex reconstructive demands. Methods: Retrospective case series of all patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery with immunohistochemistry for melanoma in situ affecting the eyelids or periorbital region from 2008 to 2018 at a single institution. Tumors were assigned to the eyelid group if the clinically visible tumor involved the skin inside the orbital rim. Reconstructive variables were compared between the eyelid and periorbital cohorts. Results: There were 24 eyelid and 141 periorbital tumors included. The initial surgical margin for all tumors was 5.34 ± 1.54 mm and multiple Mohs stages were required in 24.2% of cases. Eyelid tumors included more recurrences (p = 0.003), and the average defect size was larger (14.0 ± 13.3 cm2 vs. 7.7 ± 5.4 cm2, p = 0.03). Risk factors for complex reconstruction included: initial tumor diameter >2 cm (odds ratio [OR]: 3.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.95–7.57) and eyelid involved by initial tumor (OR: 4.88, 95% CI: 1.94–12.28). At an average follow-up of 4.8 years, there were no melanoma-related deaths and 1 local recurrence (0.6% recurrence rate). Conclusions: Mohs micrographic surgery with immunohistochemistry achieves excellent local control rates for periocular melanoma in situ. An initial surgical margin of 5 mm is frequently insufficient to achieve clear margins. The resulting defects are large, and the complexity of reconstruction can be predicted by tumor size and clinical involvement of eyelid skin.

Abstract Facial feminization surgery (FFS) improves gender dysphoria. The brows and eyes are crucial in perceived gender, yet brow and eyelid surgeries are relatively underutilized. This study aimed to determine rates of brow and eyelid surgeries as part of FFS and characterize pre- and postoperative periocular features. We conducted a retrospective review to identify all patients with the diagnosis of gender dysphoria who underwent FFS at a single academic institution from 2019 to 2022. Thirty-four patients comprising 38 surgical cases were included. Twelve (35%) eyelid surgeries and 27 (79%) brow lifts were performed. Baseline eyelid measurements did not differ between brow lift and nonbrow lift cases. Those undergoing brow lift and eyelid surgery were older in age (p = 0.022), had a higher rate of negative canthal tilt (p = 0.050), and smaller baseline margin-reflex distance 1 (p = 0.014) than patients who had brow lift alone. Brow lift increased tarsal platform show (p ≤ 0.001) and lash-to-brow distance (p ≤ 0.001), and upper blepharoplasty increased tarsal platform show (p = 0.01). Rates of brow lift are high at our institution, and patients are appropriately selected for eyelid surgery in FFS. Brow lift and upper blepharoplasty can feminize anatomical features when using standards described for cisgender cohorts. The impact of periocular features on gender perception in transgender patients warrants further study.

Purpose: To investigate patterns in oculoplastic surgery telemedicine visits at our institution during the pandemic period. Methods: Retrospective chart review of all patients who had a virtual consultation with the oculoplastic surgery service at Mayo Clinic Rochester between March 1, 2020, and March 1, 2021. Results: There were a total of 148 patients. Mean age was 65 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62–68). The mean driving distance to the medical center was 468 kilometers (95% CI: 352–586) and 15 (10%) patients came from states with no practicing American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) members. Out of the 205 virtual visits, 35 (17%) were new, 45 (22%) were return, and 125 (61%) were postoperative. Conversion rate to surgery was 60%. A comparison between type of virtual visits (new vs. return vs. postoperative) revealed that a diagnosis of eyelid malposition was most frequent in postoperative visits ( p = < 0.001), skin malignancy was most frequent in new visits ( p = 0.009), and orbital tumors ( p = 0.018) and thyroid eye disease ( p = < 0.001) were most frequent in return visits. Most virtual encounters had supportive media attached including external photographs in 127 (62%) visits and other imaging or testing in 18 (9%) visits. The average virtual visit lasted 18 min (95% CI: 14–22) with technical difficulties noted in 9 (4%) visits. Unanticipated conversion to in-person visits was noted in three (1%) cases. Conclusions: A wide range of oculoplastic surgery conditions was managed virtually during the COVID-19 pandemic. Utilization of initial virtual visit versus follow-up care varied by diagnosis. Virtual visits may improve access to oculoplastic subspecialty care for patients from underserved areas.

Background: Eyelid ptosis may present with upper lid dermatochalasis and brow ptosis. When indicated, ptosis correction (PC) is advocated during upper blepharoplasty (UB). In this study, the authors aimed to report their outcomes following UB and PC. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent UB from November of 2018 to March of 2020 was performed. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and revisions were recorded. Cox regression was performed to assess predictors of revision. Results: Overall, 278 patients with 533 UB were included. The mean patient age was 67.3 years. The mean follow-up was 8.3 months. In 169 cases (31.7%), a brow lift was performed. UB and PC were performed in 109 cases (20.5%), of which 60 (55%) involved Müller muscle conjunctival resection and 49 (45%) were levator repairs. New dry eye symptoms lasting 3 months or longer occurred in 4 cases (0.8%), all of which resolved. The revision rate was 3.8% after UB (residual skin [ n = 11], hypertrophic scar [ n = 4], and Herring law–related ptosis [ n = 1]) versus 9.2% after UB and PC (overcorrection [ n = 4], residual skin [ n = 4], and asymmetry [ n = 2]). Multivariable analysis demonstrated increased revision rates after UB and PC ( P = 0.008). There was no difference in revision rates between different techniques of PC. Conclusions: In this study of 278 patients presenting for dermatochalasis, up to 21% of cases required ptosis correction in addition to upper blepharoplasty. Ptosis correction is a safe procedure when combined with upper blepharoplasty, regardless of technique used. The revision rate in our series was 9.2% after the combined procedure, which is greater than the revision rate of upper blepharoplasty only but comparable to that in the literature. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Purpose: This study investigates how Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects the outcomes of ptosis repair. We hypothesized that patients with OSA have an increased rate of reoperation after ptosis repair. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients age >18 from the Mayo Clinic who underwent ptosis repair by levator advancement or Müller muscle-conjunctiva resection between 2018 and 2021. Outcomes were measured at 1 to 3 months of follow-up with surgical failure defined as asymmetry or unsatisfactory eyelid height requiring revision surgery within 1 year. Results: A total of 577 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was a statistically significant difference in surgical failure between patients with OSA and those without (20.5% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.02). Patients with OSA showed a statistically significant difference in risk of revision by a factor of 1.70 (95% CI: 1.06–2.07). Revisions were attributed to unsatisfactory eyelid height in 72.6% of patients and eyelid asymmetry in 21.1%. All patients who had revision surgery had satisfactory outcomes. On logistic regression analysis, when adjusting for age and sex, OSA was significantly associated with ptosis revision (p = 0.007). Conclusions: OSA increases risk of surgical failure and need for revision surgery in patients undergoing blepharoptosis repair but is not a sole risk factor.

Background: The transorbital approaches (TOAs) have acquired growing notoriety, thanks to their ability to offer alternative corridors to the skull base. However, the limited access and the unfamiliarity with this surgical perspective make recognition of key landmarks difficult, especially for less experienced surgeons. The study wants to offer a detailed description of the anatomy to comprehend the potential and limitations of TOAs. Methods: Measurements of the orbit region and the surrounding areas were performed on two hundred high-resolution CT scans and thirty-nine dry skulls. Five specimens were dissected to illustrate the TOA, and one was used to perform the extradural clinoidectomy. Three clinical cases highlighted the surgical applications. Results: A step-by-step description of the key steps of the TOA was proposed and a comparison with the transcranial anterior clinoidectomy was discussed. The mean work distance was 6.1 ± 0.4 cm, and the lateral working angle increased 20 ± 5.4° after removing the lateral orbital rim. Conclusions: TOAs are indicated in selected cases when tumor involves the lateral portion of the cavernous sinus or the middle skull base, obtaining a direct decompression of the optic nerve and avoiding excessive manipulation of the neurovascular structures. Comprehension of surgical anatomy of the orbit and its surrounding structures is essential to safely perform these approaches.

Background: Corticosteroid therapy is often employed in thyroid eye disease (TED), but its efficacy is variable. Teprotumumab and tocilizumab have been considered as effective alternatives. This study aims to evaluate their clinical outcomes and safety in patients with steroid-resistant TED. Methods: A retrospective case–control study was conducted between 2018 and 2022 within a national multicenter health system. Thirty-seven patients with moderate to severe steroid-resistant TED treated with teprotumumab or tocilizumab (cases) were compared with steroid-naïve patients treated with similar therapy (controls). Due to lack of steroid-naïve patients treated with tocilizumab, a control subgroup for tocilizumab was not included in the analysis. Demographic and clinical characteristics were described. Proptosis, diplopia, clinical activity score (CAS), and disease severity (European Group on Graves' orbitopathy classification) were evaluated at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 52 after therapy initiation. Results: Thirty-one patients received teprotumumab (13 cases and 18 controls) and 6 received tocilizumab (cases). The mean age was 57 years (standard deviation ±14.3), median duration of TED was 11.5 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.2–17.7), and median excess proptosis was 4 mm (IQR: 2–8) above the upper limit of normal for sex and race. At week 24, in the teprotumumab cases, 81% had proptosis response (reduction of ≥2 mm), 45.5% resolution of diplopia, 85.7% disease inactivation (CAS <3), and 58.3% reverted to mild disease severity. There were comparable results in teprotumumab controls, with no significant differences between subgroups. In the tocilizumab cases, 50% had a proptosis response, 16.7% resolution of diplopia, 100% disease inactivation, and 75% returned to mild disease. In the teprotumumab cases, there was a trend toward worsening proptosis and diplopia between weeks 24 and 52. In the same time frame, the tocilizumab cases had a trend toward worsening diplopia, disease activity, and severity. In the teprotumumab subgroup, 46.2% experienced otic changes and 23.1% hyperglycemia. In the tocilizumab subgroup, there were no reported adverse events. Conclusions: Teprotumumab and tocilizumab improved inflammation in patients with moderate to severe TED who had failed previous steroid therapy. Additionally, the teprotumumab cases demonstrated similar improvement in proptosis and diplopia to the teprotumumab controls. Further evaluation, particularly regarding the long-term response and side effect profile, of these medications in steroid-resistant TED is needed.

We present clinical and imaging predictors of ocular injuries that required medical management versus surgical intervention in cases of orbital fractures. From 2014 to 2020, a retrospective review of patients with orbital fractures who received ophthalmologic consultation and computed scan (CT) analysis at a level I trauma center was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients with confirmed orbital fracture on CT and ophthalmology consultation. Patient demographics, associated injuries, comorbidities, management, and outcomes were collected. Two hundred and one patients and 224 eyes (11.4% bilateral orbital fractures) were included. Overall, 21.9% of orbital fractures presented with a significant concomitant ocular injury. Associated facial fractures were present in 68.8% of eyes. Management included surgical treatment in 33.5% of eyes and ophthalmology-directed medical treatment in 17.4%. On multivariate analysis, clinical predictors of surgical intervention were retinal hemorrhage (OR=4.7 (1.0–21.0), P=0.0437), motor vehicle accident injury (OR=2.7 (1.4–5.1), P=0.0030) and diplopia (OR=2.8 (1.5–5.3), P=0.0011). Imaging predictors of surgical intervention were herniation of orbital contents (OR=2.1 (1.1–4.0), P=0.0281) and multiple wall fractures (OR=1.9 (1.01–3.6), P=0.0450). Predictors of medical management were corneal abrasion (OR=7.7 (1.9–31.4), P=0.0041), periorbital laceration (OR=5.7 (2.1–15.6), P=0.0006), and traumatic iritis (OR=4.7 (1.1–20.3), P=0.0444). We demonstrated a 22% incidence of concomitant ocular trauma in orbital fracture patients at our level I trauma center. Predictors of the surgical intervention included multiple wall fractures, herniation of orbital contents, retinal hemorrhage, diplopia, and motor vehicle accident injury. These findings emphasize the importance of a multidisciplinary team in managing ocular and facial trauma.

Purpose: To present 5 cases of alemtuzumab-induced thyroid eye disease (AI-TED) and review the literature to highlight the natural history, severity, and outcomes as compared with conventional thyroid eye disease (TED). Methods: A multi-institutional retrospective case series of patients with AI-TED was compiled. Chart review evaluated for clinical characteristics, imaging findings, and treatment for AI-TED. Additionally, a comprehensive review of the literature identified all previously published cases of AI-TED. Results: Five new patients with AI-TED were included in this series. The average clinical activity score on presentation was 2.8 (range 1–4) and reached an average peak of 5.0 during the active phase of the disease (4–7). Patients were treated medically with selenium (40%) or monoclonal antibodies including teprotumumab or tocilizumab (40%). Surgical treatment with orbital decompression for compressive optic neuropathy was performed on 2 (40%) patients. Combined with 11 previously reported cases, these 16 patients with AI-TED had an average clinical activity score on presentation of 3.3. The average length of the AI-TED phase was 14.0 months, and all patients were treated with medical and/or surgical interventions for their disease. Conclusions: Clinical and imaging findings in AI-TED mirror that of conventional TED, however, AI-TED may present with greater severity. AI-TED may develop many months after Graves’ disease; therefore, providers should be aware of this association and monitor patients for the development of severe TED.