Citations

ABSTRACT Background Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) carries a poor prognosis with a median survival of less than 12 months. Key molecular features include histone H3 mutation (K27M) and AKT pathway dysregulation. There is currently no curative treatment. Methods This is a Phase I study of vorinostat and temsirolimus in newly diagnosed (Stratum 1) and progressive (Stratum 2) DIPG (NCT02420613). The primary aims are to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and toxicities. A modified 3 + 3 design was used to establish the MTD, where the first three patients were assigned the first dose level regardless of stratum. Stratum 1 received radiotherapy with vorinostat, followed by up to 10 cycles of vorinostat and temsirolimus. Stratum 2 received up to 12 cycles of vorinostat and temsirolimus. Vorinostat was administered at a fixed dose of 230 mg/m 2 daily on Days 1–8, and temsirolimus was administered on Days 1 and 8 at 25 mg/m 2 (Dose level 1) or 35 mg/m 2 (Dose level 2). Results Six patients were enrolled, three in each stratum. No dose‐limiting toxicity was observed, and most adverse effects were limited to Grades 1 or 2, including fatigue, myelosuppression, hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, elevated creatinine, nausea, vomiting, and headache. One patient experienced Grade 3 leukopenia. In the study, the MTD with acceptable toxicity was vorinostat 230 mg/m 2 and temsirolimus 35 mg/m 2 . Conclusions Overall, the combination of temsirolimus and vorinostat is well‐tolerated and safe, prompting the need for larger studies to investigate its efficacy.

Background: Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disorder characterized by non-caseating granulomas in various organs. While cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is clinically rare, it has significant implications, including heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. Speckle-tracking echocardiography has emerged as a promising tool for detecting subclinical myocardial dysfunction, which is cost-efficient and readily available. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate differences in functional echocardiographic parameters between patients with CS and extracardiac sarcoidosis (ECS) to improve early recognition and management. Methods: A comprehensive search of major bibliographic databases was conducted to identify studies up to December 2024. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs were pooled using the inverse-variance random-effect model. Results: Seven studies with 478 patients with sarcoidosis (CS: 159 and ECS: 319) were included. Patients with CS had a significant reduction in left ventricular global longitudinal strain (MD: −2.73; 95% CI: −4.09, −1.38; p < 0.0001) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (MD: −0.59; 95% CI: −1.12, −0.05; p = 0.03) compared to patients with ECS. No significant differences in the LV global circumferential strain, interventricular septum thickness, left ventricular ejection fraction, E/A ratio, E/E’ ratio, LV end-diastolic diameter, and LV end-systolic diameter were noted. Conclusions: LV GLS and TAPSE are promising parameters for the early detection of cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis, with significant prognostic implications. Although STE provides a cost-effective and accessible alternative to CMR and FDG-PET, further research is needed to standardize its use and validate diagnostic cut-offs.

Background: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common occurrence in patients with heart failure (HF), and its role in disease progression has gained attention in recent years. While TR can worsen the clinical outcomes in HF patients, its impact on gender, racial and socioeconomic factors remains largely unexplored. With growing evidence supporting the role of percutaneous interventions for the treatment of significant TR, understanding these disparities is more crucial than ever. Methods: Data was extracted from the National Inpatient and National Readmission 2016 - 2020 Databases. We used ICD-10 code I50 to identify the patients primarily admitted for HF and subdivided the cohort into two groups based on presence or absence of TR. We performed multivariable Logistic regression analysis to determine odds of in-hospital mortality and multivariable Cox regression analysis to assess 30- and 90-day hospital readmission in HF patients with and without TR. All the analyses were adjusted for age, gender, insurance status, Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI) and hospital characteristics. STATA 16 software was used for analysis. Results: There was no difference in in-hospital mortality among HF patients with and without TR (OR: 1.04, 95% CI 0.94 – 1.16, p = 0.442) except in certain subgroups of HF patients. HF patients with TR were 6% more likely to have HF-specific readmission in 30-days (HR: 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 – 1.13, p = 0.044) and 9% more likely to have HF-specific readmission in 90-days (HR: 1.09, 95% CI 1.03 – 1.15, p = 0.002). Subgroup analysis revealed significant gender, racial and socioeconomic disparities in in-hospital mortality and readmission outcomes of HF patients with TR compared to those without TR. Conclusion: In our population-based survey analysis, we observed significant gender, racial and socioeconomic disparities in clinical outcomes of HF patients with TR compared to those without TR.

Abstract BACKGROUND Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) carries a poor prognosis with a median survival of less than 12 months. Histone mutation, K27M, and AKT pathway dysregulation play key roles in tumorigenesis. There is no curative treatment with radiation therapy, which currently remains the standard treatment. METHODS This is a phase I study of vorinostat and temsirolimus in newly diagnosed (stratum 1) and progressive (stratum 2) DIPG. The primary aims are to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose, and toxicities (NCT02420613). Stratum 1 received radiation concurrently with vorinostat, followed by vorinostat and temsirolimus for up to 10 cycles. Stratum 2 received vorinostat and temsirolimus for up to 12 cycles. In stratum 1, vorinostat was administered daily at 230 mg/m2. The maintenance phase (both strata) included concurrent vorinostat 230 mg/m2 daily and temsirolimus 25 or 35 mg/m2 (Days 1 and 8). RESULTS Six patients were enrolled, three in each stratum. Three of the six patients had confirmed H3 K27M mutations. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and most adverse effects were limited to grades 1 or 2, including fatigue, nausea, vomiting, myelosuppression, hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, elevated liver enzymes, and creatinine. However, one patient experienced grade 3 leukopenia. Two of the three patients in stratum 1 showed evidence of radiographic response after the chemoradiation phase, of whom one patient had progression-free survival of 12 months and completed the 10 maintenance cycles. All patients at stratum 2 had disease progression with no radiographic response. CONCLUSION Overall, the combination of temsirolimus and vorinostat is well tolerated and safe, prompting the need for larger studies to investigate its efficacy. Due to the small number of patients, the study’s findings are limited, and trends in efficacy should be interpreted with caution.

Abstract Rationale Acute exacerbations (AEs) of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Whether mucus plugs are associated with prospective exacerbations has not been examined extensively. Objectives To examine associations between mucus plugs on chest computed tomography (CT) and future moderate-to-severe AEs in two independent cohorts with spirometrically-confirmed COPD. Methods Mucus plugs were visually identified on baseline chest computed tomography scans from smokers with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease grade 2–4 COPD enrolled in two multicenter cohort studies: ECLIPSE (Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints) and COPDGene (Genetic Epidemiology of COPD). Associations between ordinal mucus plug score categories (0, 1–2, and ≥3) and prospectively ascertained AEs, defined as worsening respiratory symptoms requiring systemic steroids and/or antibiotics (moderate to severe) and/or emergency room visit or hospitalization (severe), were assessed using multivariable-adjusted zero-inflated Poisson regression; subjects were exacerbation-free at enrollment. Measurements and Main Results Among 3,250 participants in COPDGene (mean age ± SD, 63.7 ± 8.4 yr; FEV1, 50.6 ± 17.8% predicted; 45.1% female) and 1,716 participants in ECLIPSE (age, 63.3 ± 7.1 yr; FEV1, 48.3 ± 15.8% predicted; 36.2% female), 44.4% and 46.0% had mucus plugs, respectively. The incidence rates of AEs were 61.0 (COPDGene) and 125.7 (ECLIPSE) per 100 person-years. Relative to those without mucus plugs, the presence of 1–2 and ≥3 mucus plugs was associated with increased risk (adjusted rate ratio [aRR], 1.07 [95% CI, 1.05–1.09] and 1.15 [1.1–1.2] in COPDGene; aRR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.02–1.09] and 1.12 [1.04–1.2] in ECLIPSE, respectively) for prospective moderate to severe AEs. The presence of 1–2 and ≥3 mucus plugs was also associated with increased risk for severe AEs during follow-up (aRR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01–1.08] and 1.09 [1.02–1.18] in COPDGene; aRR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.07–1.27] and 1.37 [1.15–1.62] in ECLIPSE, respectively). Conclusions Computed tomography–detected mucus plugs are associated with an increased risk for future COPD AEs.

Abstract Endpoint adjudication (EA) is a common feature of contemporary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in cardiovascular medicine. Endpoint adjudication refers to a process wherein a group of expert reviewers, known as the clinical endpoint committee (CEC), verify potential endpoints identified by site investigators. Events that are determined by the CEC to meet pre-specified trial definitions are then utilized for analysis. The rationale behind the use of EA is that it may lessen the potential misclassification of clinical events, thereby reducing statistical noise and bias. However, it has been questioned whether this is universally true, especially given that EA significantly increases the time, effort, and resources required to conduct a trial. Herein, we compare the summary estimates obtained using adjudicated vs. non-adjudicated site designated endpoints in major cardiovascular RCTs in which both were reported. Based on these data, we lay out a framework to determine which trials may warrant EA and where it may be redundant. The value of EA is likely greater when cardiovascular trials have nuanced primary endpoints, endpoint definitions that align poorly with practice, sub-optimal data completeness, greater operator variability, and lack of blinding. EA may not be needed if the primary endpoint is all-cause death or all-cause hospitalization. In contrast, EA is likely merited for more nuanced endpoints such as myocardial infarction, bleeding, worsening heart failure as an outpatient, unstable angina, or transient ischaemic attack. A risk-based approach to adjudication can potentially allow compromise between costs and accuracy. This would involve adjudication of a small proportion of events, with further adjudication done if inconsistencies are detected.