Chandra, Joya

ABSTRACT Background Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) carries a poor prognosis with a median survival of less than 12 months. Key molecular features include histone H3 mutation (K27M) and AKT pathway dysregulation. There is currently no curative treatment. Methods This is a Phase I study of vorinostat and temsirolimus in newly diagnosed (Stratum 1) and progressive (Stratum 2) DIPG (NCT02420613). The primary aims are to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and toxicities. A modified 3 + 3 design was used to establish the MTD, where the first three patients were assigned the first dose level regardless of stratum. Stratum 1 received radiotherapy with vorinostat, followed by up to 10 cycles of vorinostat and temsirolimus. Stratum 2 received up to 12 cycles of vorinostat and temsirolimus. Vorinostat was administered at a fixed dose of 230 mg/m 2 daily on Days 1–8, and temsirolimus was administered on Days 1 and 8 at 25 mg/m 2 (Dose level 1) or 35 mg/m 2 (Dose level 2). Results Six patients were enrolled, three in each stratum. No dose‐limiting toxicity was observed, and most adverse effects were limited to Grades 1 or 2, including fatigue, myelosuppression, hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, elevated creatinine, nausea, vomiting, and headache. One patient experienced Grade 3 leukopenia. In the study, the MTD with acceptable toxicity was vorinostat 230 mg/m 2 and temsirolimus 35 mg/m 2 . Conclusions Overall, the combination of temsirolimus and vorinostat is well‐tolerated and safe, prompting the need for larger studies to investigate its efficacy.

Abstract BACKGROUND Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) carries a poor prognosis with a median survival of less than 12 months. Histone mutation, K27M, and AKT pathway dysregulation play key roles in tumorigenesis. There is no curative treatment with radiation therapy, which currently remains the standard treatment. METHODS This is a phase I study of vorinostat and temsirolimus in newly diagnosed (stratum 1) and progressive (stratum 2) DIPG. The primary aims are to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose, and toxicities (NCT02420613). Stratum 1 received radiation concurrently with vorinostat, followed by vorinostat and temsirolimus for up to 10 cycles. Stratum 2 received vorinostat and temsirolimus for up to 12 cycles. In stratum 1, vorinostat was administered daily at 230 mg/m2. The maintenance phase (both strata) included concurrent vorinostat 230 mg/m2 daily and temsirolimus 25 or 35 mg/m2 (Days 1 and 8). RESULTS Six patients were enrolled, three in each stratum. Three of the six patients had confirmed H3 K27M mutations. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and most adverse effects were limited to grades 1 or 2, including fatigue, nausea, vomiting, myelosuppression, hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, elevated liver enzymes, and creatinine. However, one patient experienced grade 3 leukopenia. Two of the three patients in stratum 1 showed evidence of radiographic response after the chemoradiation phase, of whom one patient had progression-free survival of 12 months and completed the 10 maintenance cycles. All patients at stratum 2 had disease progression with no radiographic response. CONCLUSION Overall, the combination of temsirolimus and vorinostat is well tolerated and safe, prompting the need for larger studies to investigate its efficacy. Due to the small number of patients, the study’s findings are limited, and trends in efficacy should be interpreted with caution.

Abstract The impetus for kinase inhibition as a therapeutic endpoint in leukemia research has been driven largely by the success of imatinib mesylate in chronic myelogenous leukemia. However, while imatinib mesylate has been extremely effective in the treatment of chronic phase CML, resistant disease often emerges in both Philadelphia positive ALL and aggressive phase CML patients. Adaphostin is a tyrphostin inhibitor originally developed to target the bcr/abl kinase and demonstrates selectivity in CML patient isolates. Here we show that in vitro, adaphostin is cytotoxic in numerous models that are resistant to imatinib. Features of adaphostin action in bcr/abl containing cells include apoptosis induction via an oxidant dependent mechanism and degradation of bcr/abl protein. Cell lines containing point mutations in p210 bcr/abl which confer imatinib resistance exhibit intracellular peroxide production and DNA fragmentation in response to adaphostin. Bcr/abl degradation also occurs but can be dissociated from peroxide production and subsequent apoptosis signaling. Similar data has also been obtained in cell lines containing p190 bcr/abl. Studies extending these observations into mononuclear and polymorphonuclear cells from imatinib resistant CML patients and Ph+ ALL patients confirm the same mechanism in primary clinical isolates. Collectively, these data suggest that reactive oxygen species generation by adaphostin bypasses imatinib resistance in CML and Ph+ ALL. Further studies dissecting the mechanism of ROS generation by adaphostin in imatinib resistant cells may lead to the identification of new therapeutic targets.

Abstract Adaphostin (NSC 680410), an analog of the tyrphostin AG957, was previously shown to induce Bcr/abl down-regulation followed by loss of clonogenic survival in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cell lines and clinical samples. Adaphostin demonstrated selectivity for CML myeloid progenitors in vitro and remained active in K562 cells selected for imatinib mesylate resistance. In the present study, the mechanism of action of adaphostin was investigated in greater detail in vitro. Initial studies demonstrated that adaphostin induced apoptosis in a variety of Bcr/abl- cells, including acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) blasts and cell lines as well as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) samples. Further study demonstrated that adaphostin caused intracellular peroxide production followed by DNA strand breaks and, in cells containing wild-type p53, a typical DNA damage response consisting of p53 phosphorylation and up-regulation. Importantly, the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) blunted these events, whereas glutathione depletion with buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) augmented them. Collectively, these results not only outline a mechanism by which adaphostin can damage both myeloid and lymphoid leukemia cells, but also indicate that this novel agent might have a broader spectrum of activity than originally envisioned. (Blood. 2003;102:4512-4519)

Abstract The adenosine triphosphate binding-site–directed agent STI571 and the tyrphostin adaphostin are undergoing evaluation as bcr/abl kinase inhibitors. The current study compared the effects of these agents on the survival of K562 cells, bcr/abl-transduced FDC-P1 cells, and myeloid progenitors from patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) compared with healthy donors. Treatment of K562 cells with 10 μM adaphostin resulted in decreased p210bcr/ablpolypeptide levels in the first 6 hours, followed by caspase activation and accumulation of apoptotic cells in less than 12 hours. By 24 hours, 90% of the cells were apoptotic and unable to form colonies. In contrast, 20 μM STI571 caused rapid inhibition of bcr/abl autophosphorylation without p210bcr/abl degradation. Although this was followed by the inhibition of Stat5 phosphorylation and the down-regulation of Bcl-xL and Mcl-1, only 7% ± 3% and 25% ± 9% of cells were apoptotic at 16 and 24 hours, respectively. Instead, the cytotoxic effects of STI571 became more pronounced with prolonged exposure, with IC90values greater than 20 μM and 1.0 ± 0.6 μM after 24 and 48 hours, respectively. Consistent with these results, 24-hour adaphostin exposure inhibited CML granulocyte colony-forming units (CFU-G) (median IC50, 12 μM) but not normal CFU-G (median IC50, greater than 20 μM), whereas 24-hour STI571 treatment had no effect on CML or normal CFU-G. Additional experiments revealed that STI571-resistant K562 cells remained sensitive to adaphostin. Moreover, the combination of STI571 + adaphostin induced more cytotoxicity in K562 cells and in CML CFU-G than either agent alone did. Collectively, these results identify adaphostin as a mechanistically distinct CML-selective agent that retains activity in STI571-resistant cell lines.