Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

154 citation(s) found for "Qu, Gang".

Isatuximab (Isa) subcutaneous (SC) via an on-body injector (OBI) vs isa intravenous (IV), plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): East asia subgroup results from the randomized, non-inferiority, phase 3 irak
Liao, Aijun , Xia, Zhongjun, Liu, Jing , Cen, Hong , Xu, Yan , Li, Fei , Zhong, Yuping , Ito, Satoshi, Togano, Tomiteru , Fang, Baijun , Sun, Chunyan , Jing, Hongmei, Ri, Masaki , Kitano, Toshiyuki , Shimazaki, Chihiro , Ito, Shigeki , Fu, Rong, Komeno, Takuya, Teisserenc, Florence Suzan, Gao, Dan , Li, Yi , Lu, Jin , Dou, Xuelin , Li, Chunrui , Wang, Yafei, Xia, Zhongjun , Cen, Hong, Ishida, Tadao , Sun, Chunyan, Jing, Hongmei , Sunami, Kazutaka , Jin, Jie , Fu, Rong , Matsue, Kosei , Huang, Shang‐Yi , Ailawadhi, Sikander , Wang, Xu , Liu, Gang

Blood | December 4, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 5819-5819

10.1182/blood-2025-5819 Get It

Abstract Background: Intravenous (IV) isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Isa-Pd) is approved for treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) based on the ICARIA-MM study. Subcutaneous (SC) administration of Isa offers potential advantages such as shorter administration duration and greater patient comfort compared with IV routes. Isa SC via an on-body injector (OBI), an investigational wearable bolus injector, demonstrated safety and efficacy in a Phase 1b study in patients with RRMM. The IRAKLIA trial (NCT05405166) was the first Phase 3 trial evaluating the non-inferiority of Isa-Pd SC via an OBI vs Isa-Pd IV in patients with RRMM. Here, we report the findings of the IRAKLIA trial in the East Asian subgroup with RRMM. Methods: This global, multicenter, open-label study enrolledpatients aged ≥18 years with RRMM who had received ≥1 prior line of therapy (LOT) including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (PI). Patients were randomized 1:1 to Isa SC (1400 mg) or Isa IV (10 mg/kg) weekly in Cycle (C)1, then every 2 weeks in addition to P (4 mg orally daily, Day [D]1-21) and d (40 mg orally [20 mg if age ≥75 years] weekly). Treatment was administered in 4-week cycles and continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. Co-primary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and observed Isa concentration before dosing (Ctrough) at steady state (predose at C6D1). Key secondary endpoints included rate of very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), Ctroughlevel Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1), infusion reaction incidence, and patient satisfaction rate based on the patient experience and satisfaction questionnaire (PESQ) at C5D15. Results: The East Asian subgroup consisted of 105 patients from China (Mainland, n=82 and Taiwan, n=1) and Japan(n=22) (SC, n=50; IV, n=55). Baseline characteristics of the East Asian subgroup were generally balanced between the two arms and generally comparable to the overall global population (median age 62 years; median 2 prior LOT; 29.5% high-risk cytogenetics; 82.9% refractory to lenalidomide; 7.6% prior exposure to daratumumab). After a median of 13.0 months follow-up, ORR in the SC and IV arm was 74.0% and 70.9%, respectively (relative risk [95% CI] = 1.044 [0.815 – 1.335]). The mean (SD) of Ctroughat C6D1 was 502 (232) µg/mL for SC arm and 282 (123) µg/mL for IV arm. The geometric mean ratio (90% CI) comparing SC to IV for Ctrough at steady state was 1.756 (1.346 – 2.290). The ≥VGPR rates were 58.0% for SC and 50.9% for IV (relative risk [95% CI] = 1.139 [0.798 – 1.631]). The mean(SD) of C2D1 Ctroughlevel was 420 (161) µg/mL for the SC arm and 262 (111) µg/mL for IV arm. The geometric mean ratio (90% CI) comparing SC to IV for Ctrough at C2D1 was 1.673 (1.321 to 2.120). The infusion reaction incidence was 0% and 21.8% for SC and IV, respectively. Grade ≥3treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in 82.0% and 87.3% of patients in the SC and IV arms, respectively. Treatment discontinuation rates were 6% for the SC arm and 12.7% for the IV arm. Injection site reactions (ISRs) occurred in 4% (2/50) of patients in the SC arm and in 0.21% (2/964) of SC injections (all Grade 1), with 99.3% of SC injections completed successfully. Isa SC patients expressed higher satisfaction with their injection method, with 64.0% of patients reporting “satisfied” or “very satisfied” vs 52.7% of Isa IV patients (odds ratio [95% CI] = 1.594 [0.728 – 3.489]). Conclusions: The efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic results between Isa SC vs IV + Pd in the East Asian population from the IRAKLIA study were consistent with the results of the overall global population, in which non-inferiority of ORR, Ctrough at C6D1, ≥VGPR and Ctrough at C2D1 was demonstrated and statistically significantly fewer infusion reactions and higher patient satisfaction were also noted for SC vs IV. These results support the potential use of Isa SC delivered via OBI in East Asian patients and demonstrate the potential of this delivery method to improve patient experience and practice efficiency.
Golcadomide (GOLCA), a potential, first-in-class, oral CELMoD™ agent, ± rituximab (R) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): Phase 1/2 study extended follow-up Results
Hoffmann, Marc, Chavez, Julio, Westin, Jason, Jørgensen, Judit, Munoz, Javier, Carpio, Cecilia, Perini, Guilherme, Bachy, Emmanuel, Campbell, Victoria, Riley, Caroline Hasselbalch, Morschhauser, Franck, Morillo, Daniel, Akyol, Alev, Moucheron, Berengere De, Pourdehnad, Michael, Sudhindra, Akshay, Carrancio, Soraya, Voetsch, Jessica, Yang, Gang, Perna, Serena, Michot, Jean-Marie, Hoffmann, Marc, Chavez, Julio, Westin, Jason, Jørgensen, Judit, Munoz, Javier, Carpio, Cecilia, Perini, Guilherme, Bachy, Emmanuel, Campbell, Victoria, Riley, Caroline Hasselbalch, Morschhauser, Franck, Morillo, Daniel, Akyol, Alev, Moucheron, Berengere De, Pourdehnad, Michael, Sudhindra, Akshay, Carrancio, Soraya, Voetsch, Jessica, Yang, Gang, Perna, Serena, Michot, Jean-Marie

Blood | December 4, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 479-479

10.1182/blood-2025-479 Get It

Abstract Introduction Approximately 40% of patients with DLBCL will experience relapse after initial treatment with standard-of-care chemo-immunotherapy. Effective treatment options are limited for patients who experience first-line treatment failure, particularly for those with R/R disease following CAR T-cell therapy or those not able to receive CAR T-cell therapy (Sehn et al, N Engl J Med. 2021). GOLCA is a potential, first-in-class, oral CELMoD agent designed for the treatment of lymphoma, with preferential distribution to lymphoid organs and enhanced activity in lymphoma cell lines. GOLCA drives the closed, active conformation of cereblon to induce rapid and deep degradation of Ikaros and Aiolos, leading to direct cell killing (agnostic of cell of origin) and immunomodulatory activity. In the two-part, multicenter, first-in-human Phase 1/2 study (CC-99282-NHL-001; NCT03930953), GOLCA was well tolerated and effective in patients with R/R DLBCL (Bachy et al, ICML 2025, #148). Here, we provide longer follow-up in patients with R/R DLBCL from Part B of the study. Methods Patients with R/R DLBCL and disease progression after ≥ 2 lines of therapy or transplant-ineligible patients after ≥ 1 line of therapy were included in the study. Patients received GOLCA monotherapy orally, once daily at different dosing schedules in Part A. In Part B, GOLCA was dosed at 0.2 or 0.4 mg (14 days on/14 days off) ± R. Total GOLCA treatment duration was up to 2 years or until progressive disease (PD)/unacceptable toxicity. Primary objectives included safety and recommended Phase 2 dose determination. Results As of April 3, 2025, a total of 77 patients with R/R DLBCL were enrolled in Part B Cohort C (GOLCA 0.2 mg + R, n = 39; GOLCA 0.4 mg + R, n = 38). Median age was 66 years (range, 20–86). Patients were heavily pre-treated; median number of prior treatments was 4 (range, 1–11), 55% of pts had prior CAR T-cell therapy, 38% had prior bispecific antibody treatment, and 44% were refractory to last treatment. Ten patients (13%) were ongoing, 4 completed 2 y of treatment, and 63 (82%) had discontinued treatment, mostly due to PD (n = 48 [62%]). The most common any-grade (G) treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) in the 0.2- and 0.4-mg cohorts, respectively, were neutropenia (54% and 84%), an on-target side effect of GOLCA, and anemia (44% and 45%). G3/4 neutropenia was reported in 49% of patients with 0.2 mg and 79% with 0.4 mg, and febrile neutropenia (FN) in 5% and 16%, respectively. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was used in 81% and 88% of patients with neutropenia and 50% and 100% of patients with FN in the 0.2-mg and 0.4-mg cohorts. Dose interruptions (mainly due to infections/neutropenia) occurred in 49% and 53% of patients and discontinuations due to AEs occurred in 10% and 3% with 0.2 and 0.4 mg. One G5 pneumonia was considered related to study treatment (0.2 mg). The median follow-up was 11.8 months (range, 3.1–35.1) with 0.2 mg and 16.2 months (range, 3.8–31.4) with 0.4 mg. The overall response rate (ORR) in efficacy evaluable patients was 34% (complete response rate [CRR], 20%) with 0.2 mg (n = 35) and 58% with 0.4 mg (n = 36), including a CRR of 44% with this dose. In patients with prior T-cell–redirecting treatment, the ORR was 33% (CRR, 22%) with 0.2 mg (n = 18) and 56% (CRR, 38%) with 0.4 mg (n = 16). Seven of 35 (0.2 mg) and 14 of 36 (0.4 mg) patients experienced durable response > 12 months. The median time to response with both 0.2 and 0.4 mg was 1.8 months. In patients with durable responses (remained in response [CR or partial response] for more than two consecutive efficacy assessments) to GOLCA, circulating tumor DNA reduction from baseline continues to deepen over time. Response was similar across clones/tumor variants. Conclusions With additional follow-up, GOLCA + R continued to demonstrate a predictable and manageable safety profile, with no new safety signals observed at longer follow-up. Durable responses were shown in heavily pretreated patients with R/R DLBCL, including those with prior T-cell–redirecting therapy. GOLCA + R induced a decrease in circulating tumor DNA across tumor variants. These data support the ongoing development of GOLCA + R in patients with R/R non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Endothelial Cell Loss 1 Year After Successful DMEK in the Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study
Lass, Jonathan H. , Lass, Jonathan H., Benetz, Beth Ann, Verdier, David D., Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta B., Bauza, Colleen E., Reed, Zachariah W., Greiner, Mark A., Mian, Shahzad I., Patel, Sanjay V., Pramanik, Sudeep, Price, Francis W., Soper, Mark C., Terry, Mark A., Titus, Michael S., Kollman, Craig, Beck, Roy W., Price, Marianne O., Group, Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study, Gang, Anjulie, Hall, Taylor, Lucas, Katelyn, Lynn, Ashlyn, Cole, Shawna, Phelps, Derek, Baratz, Keith H. , Hardtke, Elainey, Treichel, Emily J., Hood, Christopher , Nallasamy, Nambi , Verkade, Angela , Jones, Kristin, Shapiro, Jeremy N. , Leavy, Lisa, Sinkey, Chris, Tenkman, Lawrence R., Gordon, DJ, Ketcherside, Christopher, Fox, Jenni, Coonfield, Kristy, Vislisel, Jesse M., Sharma, Yogi, Young, Angela M. , Schoenberg, Evan, Kelly, Sharra, Huffman, James, Sears, Melinda, Stone, Merisa, Phillips, Paul, Maloney, Charlene, Jun, Albert S. , Maria, Christina, Boyce, Michelle, Kam, Yong, Crosser, Vicki, Chen, Jessica , Straiko, Michael D., Bauer, Alex, Croasdale, Christopher, Brown, Gayle Waldheim, Veldman, Peter B., Evans, Que, Majmudar, Parag A., Epstein, Rachel , Vaidya, Neal, Rosselson, Marie, Nykaza, Jim, Jurkunas, Ula V., Venkateswaran, Nandini, Cheung, Michael K., Ayres, Brandon D. , Haught, Drew Monteleone, Prasad, Elizabeth, Toti, G, Wier, Jim, Brandsdorfer, Ari, Pape, Denise, Hansen, Mark, Hardten, David R., Reeves, Sherman, Dreyer, Allison, Mack, Megan, Hamill, M. Bowes , Nguyen, Jessica, Koo, Ellen, Stanfield, Ryan, Greenwood, Michael, Ernst, L, Messer, Brooke, Risbrudt, Nick, Stofferahn, Seth, Saville, Alyson, Castaneda, Leslie, Torres, Nidia, Potts, Luke B. , Alexander, Jamie, Rinn, Jennifer, Bokosky, John, Cardenas, Ilina, Murphy, Doreen, Priebe, Kinsey, Sica, Chris, Buckman, Natalie, Ansin, Amy, Clover, Jameson , Pivoney, Charles, Vizzerra, Anthony, Elbanhawy, Lindsey, Mullins, Monica, Statz, Brianne, Fout, Elizabeth, Drury, Donna, Tavolazzi, Trisha, Lass, Jonathan, Lass, Jonathan, Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta, Richards, Leslie, Raghupathy, Sangeetha, Spruill, Rashad, Bauza, Colleen, Kollman, Craig, Garrett, Kaitlyn, Reed, Zachariah, Benetz, Beth Ann, Lê, Jimmy T. , Redford, Maryann , Arafah, Baha M. , Greiner, Mark, Johnson, Paula C, Keeler, D. K., Monnier, Vincent M. , Titus, Michael, Verdier, David, Soper, Mark, Velhuisen, Paul Van, Hawkins, Barbara S., Macsai, Marian S., Patel, Sanjay, Mian, Shahzad, Pramanik, Sudeep, Price, Francis, Terry, Mark, Sell, David, Gabrielson, Deanna, Barton, Glenn, Bear, Andrew, Das, Pravamaya, Dawson, Lauren, Dingess, Ryan, Madere, Mark, Sengupta, Pratim , Wadleigh, Garth, Greiner, Mark A. , Lass, Jonathan H., Benetz, Beth Ann, Verdier, David D., Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta B., Bauza, Colleen E., Reed, Zachariah W., Greiner, Mark A., Mian, Shahzad I., Patel, Sanjay V., Pramanik, Sudeep, Price, Francis W., Soper, Mark C., Terry, Mark A., Titus, Michael S., Kollman, Craig, Price, Marianne O., Group, Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study, Gang, Anjulie, Hall, Taylor, Lucas, Katelyn, Lynn, Ashlyn, Cole, Shawna, Phelps, Derek, Hood, Christopher, Sáles, Christopher S. , Sinkey, Chris, Gordon, DJ, Ketcherside, Christopher, Fox, Jenni, Young, Angela, Schoenberg, Evan, Kelly, Sharra, Huffman, James, Sears, Melinda, Stone, Merisa, Srikumaran, Divya S. , Daoud, Yassine J. , Eghrari, Allen Omid , Ali, Muhammad , Croasdale, Christopher, Brown, Gayle Waldheim, Epstein, Rachel H. , Vaidya, Neal, Jurkunas, Ula V. , Cheung, Michael, Prasad, Elizabeth, Toti, Gwen, Brandsdorfer, Ari, Pape, Denise, Hansen, Mark, Reeves, Sherman, Dreyer, Allison, Mack, Megan, Nguyen, Jessica, Greenwood, Michael, Messer, Brooke, Saville, Alyson, Omar, Ahmed F. , Castaneda, Leslie, Torres, Nidia, Rinn, Jennifer, Bokosky, John, Cardenas, Ilina, Murphy, Doreen, Priebe, Kinsey, Sica, Chris, Schmidt, Gregory A. , Lass, Jonathan, Lass, Jonathan, Price, Marianne O. , Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta, Richards, Leslie, Bauza, Colleen, Beck, Roy W. , Kollman, Craig, McCarthy, Chris, Garrett, Kaitlyn, Reed, Zachariah, Benetz, Beth Ann, Greiner, Mark, Johnson, Paula, Titus, Michael, Verdier, David, Soper, Mark, Aleppo, Grazia , Bateman-House, Alison , Tu, Elmer Yuchen , Patel, Sanjay, Mian, Shahzad, Pramanik, Sudeep, Price, Francis, Terry, Mark, Sell, David, Gabrielson, Deanna, Barton, Glenn, Bear, Andrew, Das, Pravamaya, Dingess, Ryan, Sengupta, Paromita

JAMA Ophthalmology | October 17, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1053

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.4261 | PMID 41105099 Get It

Importance The effect of cornea donor diabetes on endothelial cell density (ECD) and morphometry after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is not known. Objective To determine whether endothelial cell loss (ECL) and morphometric changes 1 year after successful DMEK are related to cornea donor’s diabetes status. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial conducted from February 2022 to July 2024 at 28 US clinical sites (46 surgeons) and 13 eye banks. Included in the trial were the eyes of recipients (some of whom received tissue from donors without diabetes and others who received tissue from donors with diabetes) who underwent successful DMEK, primarily for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, and had at least 1 analyzable postoperative endothelial image. Intervention DMEK performed with a cornea from a donor without or with diabetes, assigned using a minimization procedure to achieve an approximate 2:1 distribution. Main Outcomes and Measures ECD, ECL, coefficient of variation in cell area (CV), and percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX) at 1 year from eye bank and postoperative specular central endothelial images. Results A total 1274 eyes of 982 recipients (mean [SD] age, 70 [8] years; 569 female [57.9%]; 816 [64.1%] with tissue from donors without diabetes and 458 [35.9%] with tissue from donors with diabetes) were included in the study. Preoperatively, mean (SD) central ECD in tissue from donors without diabetes and with diabetes were 2676 (290) cells/mm 2 and 2671 (286) cells/mm 2 , respectively. At 1 year, mean (SD) ECL was 28.3% (16.1%) and 28.0% (17.0%), in the donor groups without and with diabetes, respectively (adjusted mean difference = −0.4%; 95% CI, −2.3% to 1.4%), resulting in a mean (SD) 1-year ECD of 1927 (498) cells/mm 2 and 1920 (496) cells/mm 2 , respectively (adjusted mean difference = 10 cells/mm 2 ; 95% CI, −36 to 56; P = .95). No difference in ECD at 1 year associated with diabetes severity was noted ( P = .97). Mean (SD) CV did not differ at 1 year between the 2 groups of eyes (31.5% [4.1%] vs 31.4% [4.1%]; adjusted mean difference = −0.4%; 95% CI, −0.9% to 0.1%; P = .51), and mean (SD) HEX did not differ at 1 year between the 2 groups of eyes (57.7% [5.8%] vs 57.2% [5.8%]; adjusted mean difference = 0.1%, 95% CI, −0.8% to 0.9%; P = .33). Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial found that ECL and morphometry 1 year after DMEK were not affected by cornea donor diabetes status. With comparable 1-year graft success with tissue from donors with and without diabetes demonstrated in this trial, these findings support the use of corneas from donors with diabetes for endothelial keratoplasty procedures. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05134480
Donor Diabetes and 1-Year Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Success Rate
Price, Francis W. , Szczotka‐Flynn, Loretta , Bauza, Colleen , Reed, Zachariah W., Arafah, Baha M. , Greiner, Mark A. , Johnson, Paula, Keeler, Devon B., Pramanik, Sudeep, Soper, Mark, Terry, Mark A., Titus, Michael S. , Verdier, David D. , Kollman, Craig, Lass, Jonathan H. , Lass, Jonathan H., Group, Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study, Gang, Anjulie, Hall, Taylor, Lynn, A. G., Cole, Shawna, Phelps, Derek, Baratz, Keith H. , Hardtke, Elainey, Treichel, Emily J., Hood, Christopher , Nallasamy, Nambi , Verkade, Angela , Jones, Kristin, Shapiro, Jeremy, Leavy, Lisa, Sinkey, Chris, Tenkman, Lawrence R., Gordon, DJ, Ketcherside, Christopher, Fox, Jenni, Coonfield, Kristy, Vislisel, Jesse M., Sharma, Yogi, Young, Angela M. , Schoenberg, Evan, Kelly, Sharra, Huffman, James L. , Sears, Melinda, Stone, Merisa, Phillips, Paul, Maloney, Charlene, Jun, Albert S. , Maria, Christina, Boyce, Michelle, Kam, Yong, Crosser, Vicki, Chen, Jessica , Straiko, Michael D., Bauer, Alex, Croasdale, Christopher, Brown, Gayle Waldheim, Veldman, Peter B., Evans, Que, Majmudar, Parag A., Epstein, Rachel , Vaidya, N. N., Nykaza, Jim, Venkateswaran, Nandini, Ayres, Brandon D. , Haught, Drew Monteleone, Prasad, Elizabeth, Toti, Gwen, Wier, Jim, Brandsdorfer, Ari, Pape, Denise, Hansen, Mark D., Hardten, David R., Reeves, Sherman W., Dreyer, Allison, Mack, Megan, Hamill, Mark, Nguyen, Jessica , Stanfield, Ryan, Greenwood, Michael , Ernst, Lindsay, Risbrudt, Nick, Saville, Alyson, Castaneda, Leslie, Torres, Nidia, Potts, Luke B. , Alexander, Jamie, Rinn, Jennifer, Bokosky, John, Cardenas, Ilina, Murphy, Doreen, Priebe, Kinsey, Sica, Chris, Buckman, Natalie, Ansin, Amy, Clover, Jameson , Pivoney, Charles, Vizzerra, Anthony, Elbanhawy, Lindsey, Mullins, Monica, Statz, Brianne, Fout, Elizabeth, Drury, Donna, Tavolazzi, Trisha, Lass, Jonathan, Lass, Jonathan, Richards, Leslie, Raghupathy, Sangeetha, Spruill, Rashad, Bauza, Colleen, Beck, Roy, Garrett, Kaitlyn, Reed, Zachariah, Benetz, Beth Ann , Lê, Jimmy T. , Redford, Maryann , Arafah, Baha, Greiner, Mark, Keeler, Devon, Monnier, Vincent M. , Titus, Michael, Verdier, David, Velhuisen, Paul Van, Hawkins, Barbara S., Macsai, Marian S., Patel, Sanjay, Mian, Shahzad I. , Pramanik, Sudeep , Price, Francis, Terry, Mark, Sell, David, Gabrielson, Deanna, Barton, Glenn, Bear, Andrew, Das, Pravamaya, Dawson, Lauren, Dingess, Ryan, Madere, Mark, Wadleigh, Garth, Price, Marianne O. , Mian, Shahzad I. , Patel, Sanjay V. , Pramanik, Sudeep, Titus, Michael S., Beck, Roy W. , Lass, Jonathan H., Group, Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study, Lynn, Ashlyn, Cole, Shawna, Phelps, Derek, Hardtke, Elainey, Hood, Christopher, Shapiro, Jeremy, Sáles, Christopher S. , Leavy, Lisa, Gordon, DJ, Fox, Jenni, Coonfield, Kristy, Young, Angela, Schoenberg, Evan, Kelly, Sharra, Huffman, James, Sears, Melinda, Stone, Merisa, Srikumaran, Divya S. , Daoud, Yassine J. , Eghrari, Allen Omid , Ali, Muhammad , Crosser, Vicki, Croasdale, Christopher, Brown, Gayle Waldheim, Evans, Que, Epstein, Rachel H. , Nykaza, Jim, Jurkunas, Ula V. , Cheung, Michael, Wier, Jim, Brandsdorfer, Ari, Pape, Denise, Mack, Megan, Hamill, M. Bowes, Nguyen, Jessica, Koo, Ellen H. , Stanfield, Ryan, Risbrudt, Nick, Saville, Alyson, Omar, Ahmed F. , Castaneda, Leslie, Torres, Nidia, Bokosky, John, Cardenas, Ilina, Murphy, Doreen, Priebe, Kinsey, Schmidt, Gregory A. , Elbanhawy, Lindsey, Statz, Brianne, Tavolazzi, Trisha, Lass, Jonathan, Lass, Jonathan, Richards, Leslie, Spruill, Rashad, Bauza, Colleen, Beck, Roy, McCarthy, Chris, Reed, Zachariah, Arafah, Baha, Greiner, Mark, Titus, Michael, Verdier, David, Velhuisen, Paul Van, Aleppo, Grazia , Bateman-House, Alison , Tu, Elmer Yuchen , Patel, Sanjay, Price, Francis, Terry, Mark, Sell, David, Barton, Glenn, Das, Pravamaya, Dingess, Ryan, Madere, Mark, Sengupta, Partha Pratim , Wadleigh, Garth

JAMA Ophthalmology | October 17, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1043

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.4253 | PMID 41105094 Get It

Importance If the success of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is not affected by whether the donor has diabetes, then the donor pool should expand. Objective To determine whether the 1-year DMEK success rate is affected by the presence of diabetes in the donor. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial conducted from February 2022 to July 2025 at 28 clinical sites (46 surgeons), with donor corneas provided by 13 eye banks in the US. Included in the study were individuals undergoing low to moderate risk DMEK (95% for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy). Study data were analyzed from April to September 2025. Intervention DMEK performed with a cornea from a donor without or with diabetes, assigned using a minimization procedure (comparable with randomization) to achieve an approximate 2:1 distribution, respectively. Main Outcomes and Measures Graft success at 1 year Results A total of 1097 individuals (1421 study eyes; median [IQR] age, 71 [66-76] years; 631 female [57.5%]) were included in the study. The 1-year cumulative probability of graft success was 96.3% (95% CI, 95.0%-97.5%) among 912 study eyes (64.2%) receiving tissue from donors without diabetes and 97.1% (95% CI, 95.5%-98.4%) among 509 study eyes (35.8%) receiving tissue from donors with diabetes (difference between groups = 0.7 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.2 to 2.6; P = .63). The 1-year cumulative probability of graft success was 96.5% (95% CI, 93.6%-98.9%) in the mild donor diabetes severity subgroup (n = 173) and 97.3% (95% CI, 95.4%-98.8%) in the moderate to severe donor diabetes severity subgroup (n = 336), using a diabetes severity rating scale based on medical history. The rates of primary donor failure, early failure related to surgical complications, and subsequent failure were as follows: 2.5% (23 of 912), 0.7% (6 of 912), and 0.3% (3 of 912), respectively, in recipients of tissue from a donor without diabetes, and 2.6% (13 of 509), 0.4% (2 of 509), and 0%, respectively, among recipients of tissue from a donor with diabetes. There were no failures due to graft rejection. Conclusions and Relevance The 1-year success rate in eyes undergoing DMEK with successfully prepared tissue was very high regardless of donor diabetes status. These results, supported by the separately reported finding that endothelial cell loss and cornea morphometry after 1 year were not affected by donor diabetes status, provide strong support for having no restrictions on the use of tissue from donors with diabetes for DMEK. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05134480
Investigation of DNA Damage Response Genes Validates the Role of DNA Repair in Pediatric Cancer Risk and Identifies SMARCAL1 as a Novel Osteosarcoma Predisposition Gene
Oak, Ninad , Chen, Wenan , Blake, Alise K. , Harrison, Lynn , O’Brien, Martha A., Previti, Christopher , Balasubramanian, Gnanaprakash, Hirsch, Steffen , Penkert, Judith , Jones, Barbara C. , Schramm, Kathrin , Nathrath, Michaela , Witt, Olaf , Li, Jiaming , Ness, Kirsten K. , Kratz, Christian P. , Armstrong, Greg , Autry, Robert J. , Nichols, Kim E. , Armstrong, Gregory T. , Blake, Alise , Hirsch, Steffen , Penkert, Judith , Jones, Barbara C , Nathrath, Michaela , Pajtler, Kristian W , Jones, David T W , Witt, Olaf , Dirksen, Uta , Li, Jiaming , Sapkota, Yadav , Ness, Kirsten K , Guenther, Lillian M , Kratz, Christian , Wang, Zhaoming , Hudson, Melissa M , Wu, Gang , Nichols, Kim E , Sharma, Richa , O'Brien, Martha, Maaß, Kendra K. , Pajtler, Kristian W. , Jones, David , Sapkota, Yadav , Pfister, Stefan M. , Wang, Zhaoming , Hudson, Melissa M. , Wu, Gang , Sharma, Richa

Journal of Clinical Oncology | October 9, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 36 | Pages: 3833-3843

10.1200/jco-25-01114 | PMID 41066719 Get It

PURPOSE Recent studies reveal that 5%-18% of children with cancer harbor pathogenic variants in known cancer-predisposing genes. However, DNA damage repair (DDR) genes, which are frequently somatically altered in pediatric tumors, have not been systematically examined as a source of novel cancer-predisposing signals. METHODS To address this gap, we interrogated 189 DDR genes for presence of germline predisposing variants (PV) among 5,993 childhood cancer cases and 14,477 adult noncancer controls (discovery cohort). PV were determined using a tiered approach incorporating ClinVar annotations, InterVar classification, and in silico tools (REVEL, CADD, and MetaSVM). Using logistic and firth regression, we identified genes with PV statistically enriched in the germline of children with tumors and replicated findings among 1,497 additional childhood cancer cases across three independent cohorts. RESULTS Analysis across all cases with cancer revealed enrichment of TP53 PV. Cancer-specific analyses confirmed known associations including germline TP53 PV in adrenocortical carcinoma, high-grade glioma (HGG), and medulloblastoma (MB), PMS2 in HGG and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), MLH1 in HGG, BRCA2 in NHL, and BARD1 in neuroblastoma. In addition, four novel associations were uncovered, including BRCA1 in ependymoma, SPIDR in HGG, SMC5 in MB, and SMARCAL1 in osteosarcoma (OS). Importantly, the SMARCAL1 :OS association was significant in the discovery (6/230, 2.6%, false discovery rate [FDR] logistic = 0.0189) as well as all three replication cohorts (Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: 8/275, 2.9%; P Fisher < .0001; Cancer Predisposition Syndrome-German Childhood Cancer Registry: 4/135, 3%, P Fisher = .002; Individualized Therapy for Relapsed Malignancies in Childhood: 4/217, 1.8%, P Fisher = .012). The remaining wild-type SMARCAL1 allele was deleted in three of four OS tumors with available data. CONCLUSION Our study confirms the relevance DDR genetic variation in pediatric cancer risk and establishes SMARCAL1 as a novel OS predisposing gene, providing insights into tumor biology and creating opportunities to optimize care for patients with this challenging tumor.
Large language models for bioinformatics
Ruan, Wei, Lyu, Yanjun , Zhang, Jing , Cai, Jiazhang , Lu, Yao , Wang, Tao , Liu, Yufang , Fang, Luyang , Liu, Ziyu , Liu, Zhengliang , Li, Yiwei , Wu, Zihao , Chen, Junhao , Jiang, Hanqi, Yang, Zhenyuan, Liang, Shizhe, Zhang, Wei , Ma, Terry, Dou, Yuan , Zhang, Jianli , Gong, Xinyu , Gan, Qi , Zou, Yusong , Chen, Z. J. , Qian, Yuanxin, Yu, Shuo , Song, Kenan, Sikora, Andrea, Li, Xiang , Wang, Yingfeng , Zhong, Wenxuan, Liu, Rongjie , Huang, Chao , Shen, Ye , Yan, Yajun , Liu, Tianming, Huang, Chao , Song, Kenan , Wang, Peilong, Chen, Jingyuan, Song, Kenan , Ruan, Wei, Shu, Peng , Yang, Ge , Gao, Shang , Wang, Yue , Wang, Peilong , Zhao, Lin , Jiang, Hanqi , Pan, Yi Feng , Chen, Jingyuan , Dou, Yuan, Chen, Z. J. , Qian, Yuanxin, Jin, Lu , Wang, Xianqiao , Sikora, Andrea , Li, Gang , Li, Quanzheng , Zhang, Lu, Abate, Yohannes , He, Lifang , Zhong, Wenxuan, Liu, Wei , Ma, Ping , Zhu, Hongtu , Zhu, Dajiang

Quantitative Biology | September 29, 2025 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/qub2.70014 | PMID 41676319 Get It

Abstract With the rapid advancements in large language model technology and the emergence of bioinformatics‐specific language models (BioLMs), there is a growing need for a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape, computational characteristics, and diverse applications. This survey aims to address this need by providing a thorough review of BioLMs, focusing on their evolution, classification, and distinguishing features, alongside a detailed examination of training methodologies, datasets, and evaluation frameworks. We explore the wide‐ranging applications of BioLMs in critical areas such as disease diagnosis, drug discovery, and vaccine development, highlighting their impact and transformative potential in bioinformatics. We identify key challenges and limitations inherent in BioLMs, including data privacy and security concerns, interpretability issues, biases in training data and model outputs, and domain adaptation complexities. Finally, we highlight emerging trends and future directions, offering valuable insights to guide researchers and clinicians toward advancing BioLMs for increasingly sophisticated biological and clinical applications.
Restoration of SIRT3 Expression in Aged Mice Alleviates UUO‐Induced Renal Fibrosis by Reducing GSK‐3β Hyperacetylation
Lu, Huan , Guo, Zihao , Li, Xing , Tian, Yiqun, Yin, Yisheng , Qin, Zhenliang, Yun, Kun , Wu, Minglong, Zeng, Xiaoyong , Zeng, Xiaoyong , Wang, Jing , Ren, Xiang , Yun, Kun, Chen, Gang

Advanced Science | July 23, 2025 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 39 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/advs.202417248 | PMID 40698425 Get It

Abstract Aging increases the vulnerability of kidneys to injury and impairs their regenerative capacity. SIRT3 expression declines with aging and is associated with multiple age‐related pathologies. The expression profile and functional role of SIRT3 in renal aging remain unclear. Here, SIRT3 expression in aging kidneys is assessed and analyzed for its promoter methylation patterns using methylation‐specific PCR (MSP). It is found that aging exacerbates UUO‐induced renal fibrosis, associated with downregulated SIRT3 expression. Mechanistically, age‐related SIRT3 downregulation is mediated by hypermethylation of its promoter region. SIRT3 knockout exacerbated renal fibrosis in young mice subjected to UUO, whereas SIRT3 overexpression attenuated fibrosis in aged UUO mice. Integration of RNA‐seq and immunoprecipitation‐mass spectrometry (IP‐MS) analyses revealed that SIRT3 deficiency leads to hyperacetylation of GSK3β at lysine 15 (K15). This K15 hyperacetylation inhibited GSK3β activity, consequently stabilizing its substrate β‐catenin. Furthermore, self‐assembled PEG‐PCL‐PEG micelles are designed and synthesized to encapsulate hydrophobic honokiol (HKL). These micelles significantly enhanced the aqueous solubility and oral bioavailability of free HKL, maintained stable blood concentrations, and ultimately improved its anti‐fibrotic efficacy. These findings propose novel therapeutic strategies for managing renal fibrosis in the aging population and provide a foundation for developing new drugs and combination therapies.
441 | GOLCADOMIDE, A CEREBLON E3 LIGASE MODULATOR (CELMoD) AGENT ± RITUXIMAB, IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA: UPDATED PHASE 1/2 RESULTS
Cordoba, R., Perini, Guilherme Fleury , Jørgensen, Judit , Bijou, Fontanet , Munoz, J., Kim, W. S., Rao, P. , Moucheron, Bérengère de, Yang, Gang , Carrancio, Soraya , Sudhindra, Akshay, Voetsch, Jessica, Cordoba, R., Chavez, Julio C , Nastoupil, Loretta J. , Bories, Pierre , Zinzani, Pier Luigi , Munoz, J., Carpio, Cecilia del Carmen , Costa, Alfredo Cardoso , Pourdehnad, Michael , Michot, Jean‐Marie

Hematological Oncology | June 16, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: S3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/hon.70094_441 Get It

PANOVA-3: Phase 3 study of tumor treating fields (TTFields) with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (LA-PAC).
Picozzi, Vincent J. , Chandana, Sreenivasa R , Kasi, Anup , Jin, Gang , Bullock, Andrea J. , Chunyi, Hao, Osipov, Arsen , Lee, Woo Jin , Feeney, Kynan, Ueno, Makoto , Seufferlein, Thomas , Investigators, PANOVA-3 Study, Babiker, Hani M. , Melichar, Bohuslav , Gállego, Javier , Wyrwicz, Lucjan , Fouchardière, Christelle de la , Dragovich, Tomislav , Philip, Philip A. , Cutsem, Eric Van , Macarulla, Teresa , Investigators, PANOVA-3 Study

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 4, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 17_suppl | Pages: No page available

10.1200/jco.2025.43.17_suppl.lba4005 Get It

LBA4005 Background: To date, no phase 3 clinical trial has demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit in patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LA-PAC). TTFields are electric fields that disrupt cancer cell division. TTFields therapy is approved for glioblastoma, pleural mesothelioma, and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. A phase 2 trial in PAC demonstrated the safety and preliminary efficacy of TTFields therapy with gemcitabine with or without nab-paclitaxel. We report final data from PANOVA-3 (NCT03377491), the largest global, phase 3, randomized, open-label trial in LA-PAC to date. Methods: Adult patients with newly diagnosed unresectable LA-PAC were randomized 1:1 to receive TTFields therapy (150 kHz) with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP) or GnP. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), local PFS, objective response rate (ORR), and pain-free survival. Distant PFS (metastases beyond the pancreas and regional lymph nodes) was assessed post hoc. Survival data were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and a log-rank test. Results: 571 patients were randomized. Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between the study arms. OS was significantly longer with TTFields/GnP than with GnP (median 16.2 [95% CI: 15.0, 18.0] vs 14.2 months [95% CI: 12.8, 15.4]; HR 0.82 [95% CI: 0.68, 0.99], p=0.039). One-year survival rate was also significantly improved with TTFields/GnP vs GnP (68.1% [95% CI: 62.0-73.5] vs 60.2% [95% CI: 54.2-65.7], p=0.029). There was no significant difference in PFS or local PFS between arms. Pain-free survival was significantly longer with TTFields/GnP vs GnP (median 15.2 [95% CI: 10.3, 22.8] vs 9.1 months [95% CI: 7.4, 12.7]; HR 0.74 [95% CI: 0.56, 0.97], p=0.027). Post-hoc analysis showed significant distant PFS benefit (median 13.9 [95% CI: 12.2, 16.8] vs 11.5 months [95% CI: 10.4, 12.9], HR 0.74 [95% CI: 0.57, 0.96], p=0.022) with TTFields/GnP vs GnP. ORR was similar between arms (36.1% [95% CI: 30.0, 42.4] vs 30.0% [95% CI: 24.3, 36.2], p=0.094). 97.8% and 98.9% of patients who received TTFields/GnP and GnP, respectively, had adverse events (AEs) and 88.6% and 84.3% had grade ≥3 AEs. The most frequent grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (47.8% and 47.6%) and anemia (21.9% and 22.3). 81% of patients receiving TTFields/GnP had device-related AEs, mostly grade 1/2 skin AEs, e.g., dermatitis (27.7%), rash (17.5%), and pruritus (15.0%); grade 3 and grade 4 device-related AEs occurred in 9.1% and 0.4% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: PANOVA-3 is the largest phase 3 trial exclusively performed in patients with LA-PAC and the first to show a statistically significant OS benefit. With no additive systemic toxicity and a statistically significant pain-free survival benefit, TTFields therapy is a potential new standard treatment for LA-PAC. Clinical trial information: NCT03377491 .
Tumor Treating Fields With Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Randomized, Open-Label, Pivotal Phase III PANOVA-3 Study
Babiker, Hani M. , Picozzi, Vincent J. , Chandana, Sreenivasa R , Melichar, Bohuslav, Kasi, Anup , Gang, Jin, Gállego, Javier , Bullock, Andrea J. , Chunyi, Hao, Hitre, Erika, Osipov, Arsen , Alés, Inmaculada, Dragovich, Tomislav, Lee, Woo Jin , Feeney, Kynan, Ueno, Makoto , Seufferlein, Thomas , Investigators, on behalf of the PANOVA-3 Study, Osipov, Arsen, Matrana, Marc , Blondin, Nicholas, Shroff, Rachna T. , Orr, Douglas, Anderson, Michael J. , Shields, Anthony F. , Hamm, John , Bullock, Andrea, Nagireddy, Sumana, Kolodney, Joanna, Dragovich, Tomislav, Maniam, Ajit, Sears, Judith D., Stilwill, Joseph, Cusnir, Mike , Niewiaroska, Anna, Small, William, Kasi, Anup, Tache, Jason, Ross, Sharona, Shihabi, Samer, Gandhi, Sunil, Reeves, J. N. , Green, Garrett , Feinstein, Trevor, Huyck, Timothy K., Ramdin, Nadia, Marsh, Robert , Jiang, Yixing , Hatoum, Hassan , Manda, Sudhir, Kochenderfer, Mark D., Illum, Henrik, Richards, Donald , Valilis, P., Wong, Lucas, Newton, Herbert B. , Abdelrahim, Maen, Einspahr, David, Siegel, Richard, McKenney, Scott, Narang, Mohit , Cárdenes, Higinia R. , Thanikachalam, Kannan , Raff, Joshua P. , Ye, Joseph , Behl, Deepti , Kam, Audrey E., DeRose, Paul, Tasneem, A. , Brenner, Warren, Santos, Jennifer De Los , Rausch, D C, Trikha, Gaurav, Gabrail, Nashat , Mowat, Rex B., Jahangir, Khawaja, Schumaker, Robert P. , Soffen, Edward , Bravin, Eric, Gupta, Mukul Kumar , Bedoya-Apraez, Ivan Dario, Kang, Tyler Y., Lemay, Frédéric , Vincent, Mark , Létourneau, Richard, Doehring, Christine, Haberkorn, Mike, Rußwurm, Karen, Chater, Jack, Küng, Marc , Schacher, Sabine, Passhak, Maria , Geva, Ravit , Hubert, Ayala, Golan, Talia , Senellart, Hélène, Trouilloud, Isabelle , Blan, Jean-Frederic, Dourthe, Luis-Marie, Roy, Florence Le, Martin-Babau, J., Greil, Richard , Schreil, Georg, Gerger, Armin , Eisterer, Wolfgang , Mercadé, T. Macarulla, Cubillo, Antonio , Pons, Francesc Valladares, Díaz, Inmaculada Alés, Rivera, Fernando , Sarvise, Mariano Ponz, Airoldi, Mario , Bellotti, Giovanna, Corsi, Domenico , Antonuzzo, Lorenzo , Melichar, Bohuslav, Holečková, Petra , Kotasek, Rostislav, Němeček, Radim , Cutsem, Eric van, Laethem, Jean‐Luc Van , Sym, Sun Jin , Kim, Jin Young , Oh, Sang Cheul , Park, Joon Oh, Kim, Jin Won , Lee, Myung Ah , Choi, Hye Jin, Kang, Seok Yun , Mruk, Andrzej, Freier, Beata, Kosakowska, Ewa Anna, Kocsis, Judit, Csőszi, Tibor , Hitre, Erika, Al-Farhat, Yousuf, Cang, Shundong , Jin, Gang , Zuo, Changzeng, Song, Lijie, Wu, Zheng , Gao, Jie , Zhang, Tao� , Wang, Yusheng , Yuan, Xin , Li, Zhi-Hua , Chen, Rufu , Cai, Xiujun , Zhu, Zhizhen, Bai, Yuxian , Bai, Chunmei, Yau, Thomas, Joubert, Warren , Wong, Ka Yeung Mark, Harris, Marion , Mišir, Ana, Faccio, Adilson , Cruz, Felipe Melo , Azevedo, Srergio De, Victorino, Ana Paula , Paiva, Tadeu Ferreira, Franke, Fábio , Tiscoski, Katsuki Arima , Parolla, Gabriel, Lilno, Flora, Siqueira, Mariana Bruno , Lyra, Marcos, Lira, Jose Luis Martinez, Oliva, Dolores Mendoza, Vazquez, Arturo, Luviano, Jesus Elvis Cabrera, Gutiérrez, Erika Castillo , Camargo, Vanessa Rosas, Guerra, Cristian Chavez, Flores, Osvaldo Hernandez, Contreras, Jessica Reyes, Villanueva, Ángel Gómez, Villanueva, Omar Zayas, Bullock, Andrea , Wyrwicz, Lucjan , Osipov, Arsen , De La Fouchardiere, Christelle , Lee, Woojin , Ueno, Makoto , Van Cutsem, Eric , Macarulla, Teresa , Babiker, Hani , Antonuzzo, Lorenzo , Melichar, Bohuslav, Kasi, Anup , Gang, Jin, Gallego, Javier , Hitre, Erika, Fouchardière, Christelle de la , Dragovich, Tomislav, Philip, Philip A. , Cutsem, Eric Van , Macarulla, Teresa , Investigators, on behalf of the PANOVA-3 Study, Spigel, David R. , Osipov, Arsen, Lou, Emil , Bullock, Andrea, Dragovich, Tomislav, Coveler, Andrew L. , Arena, Francis P. , Kasi, Anup, Ross, Sharona , Reeves, James, Green, Garrett, Uemura, Marc Isamu , Ye, Joseph, Wang, James Z. , Rausch, Daniel, Park, Jae‐Hyun , Schumaker, Robert, Gupta, Mukul, Letourneau, Richard, Fuchs, Martin , Vogel, Arndt , Chater, Jack, Schacher, Sabine, Stemmer, Salomon M. , Dourthe, Luis-Marie, Abdelghani, Méher Ben , Pons, Francesc Valladares, Guillén‐Ponce, Carmen , Yayá, Ricardo , Ponz‐Sarvisé, Mariano , Vincenzi, Bruno , Melichar, Bohuslav, Petruzelka, Lubos B. , Cutsem, Eric van, Borbath, Ivan , Hwang, Jun‐Eul , Oh, Sung Yong , Lee, Moon Hee , Choi, Hye Jin , Chon, Hong Jae , Ramlau, Rodryg , Mruk, Andrzej, Hitre, Erika, Bassam, Ali, Hao, Chunyi , Liang, Bo , Li, Wei , Bai, Chunmei , Joubert, Warren, Marx, Gavin M. , Azevedo, Srergio De, Hoff, Paulo M. , Vazquez, Arturo, Guerra, Cristian Chavez, Cortez, David Orta, Campos-Gómez, Saúl , Espinoza, Iván Romarico González

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 31, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 2350-2360

10.1200/jco-25-00746 | PMID 40448572 Get It

PURPOSE Tumor treating fields (TTFields) use alternating electric fields to disrupt cancer cell proliferation. Feasibility of TTFields therapy with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel was previously demonstrated in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PANOVA-3 was designed to confirm safety and efficacy of TTFields in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LA-PAC). METHODS In this global phase III trial, 571 patients with newly diagnosed LA-PAC were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 and nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m 2 by intravenous infusion once a day on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle with or without TTFields. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), local PFS, pain-free survival, and overall response rate (ORR). Distant PFS was analyzed post hoc. RESULTS OS was significantly prolonged using TTFields with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (median, 16.2 months [95% CI, 15.0 to 18.0] v 14.2 months [95% CI, 12.8 to 15.4]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.68 to 0.99]; P = .039). PFS, local PFS, and ORR were not improved. Pain-free survival was significantly prolonged with TTFields with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (median, 15.2 months [95% CI, 10.3 to 22.8] v 9.1 months [95% CI, 7.4 to 12.7]; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.56 to 0.97]; P = .027), as was distant PFS (median, 13.9 months [95% CI, 12.2 to 16.8] v 11.5 months [95% CI, 10.4 to 12.9]; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.96]; P = .022). Device-related skin adverse events (AEs) were experienced by 76.3% of patients. Most device-related skin AEs were mild to moderate, with 7.7% of patients reporting a grade 3 AE. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated significant OS, pain-free survival, and distant PFS benefits for TTFields with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in patients with unresectable LA-PAC, with no additive systemic toxicity.