Citations

The NCCN Guidelines for Melanoma: Cutaneous provide strategies for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with cutaneous melanoma, which is among the most common cancers in the United States. The outcome of cutaneous melanoma is significantly influenced by stage at initial presentation. Generally, localized disease and smaller primary tumors have been associated with more favorable prognosis. Thus, the select content featured in this issue focuses on risk factors associated with cutaneous melanoma development and which should be considered during an initial assessment. These include (1) phenotypic predispositions, (2) personal medical history or comorbidities, (3) genetic predispositions, and (4) environmental factors.

TPS6138 Background: Patients with early-stage oral cavity cancer (OCC; T1-2N0M0; AJCC 8th edition) have a 20-30% risk of occult nodal metastases despite clinical and radiographic evaluations. Standard-of-care treatment for most patients includes elective neck dissection (END), which requires surgical removal of the regional cervical lymph nodes, even though 70-80% of these necks are disease-free. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN Bx), a less invasive procedure, could assess the first echelon lymph nodes as an alternative to END, potentially reducing morbidity and costs. A pivotal clinical trial comparing SLN Bx to END (NCT#04333537) is underway to inform efforts to establish optimal disease management for early-stage OCC. Methods: To assess the efficacy of SLN Bx in this population, we activated an international, multi-institutional, prospective phase II/III trial in July 2020, randomizing patients to two surgical arms: SLN Bx and END. A node-negative 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging biomarker study with centralized read was required before randomization. OCC patients with a positive PET/CT remained in a registry to compare imaging findings with final neck pathology. Given the current evidence on morbidity for SLN Bx versus END, the phase II was designed to determine whether the change in patient-reported neck and shoulder function and related quality of life (QOL) from baseline to 6 months after surgery, using the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII), showed a signal of superiority of SLN Bx compared to END (minimum important difference ³ 7.5; one-sided a = 0.10; 90% power). As of December 2024, 261 patients had been randomized and 203 were analyzed for the “Go/No-Go” decision to move forward into phase III. The phase III portion is a non-inferiority (NI) trial with disease-free survival (DFS) as the primary endpoint (NI margin hazard ratio 1.34 based on a 5% absolute difference in 2-year DFS; one-sided a = 0.05; 80% power, and two interim looks). The change in NDII from baseline to 6 months after surgery is a hierarchical co-primary endpoint for phase III. Phase III opened in October 2025 upon receiving a “Go” signal from phase II. Target accrual for phase III is 686 node-negative PET/CT patients, including those randomized in phase II (425 additional patients). In addition to sites requiring radiotherapy and imaging credentialing, quality assurance will include central pathology review of all negative SLN Bx cases and surgeon credentialing through an education course with SLN Bx and END case review by the surgical co-chairs. A surgical quality assurance working group will review all trial SLN Bx and END procedures. As of 01/12/26, 351 patients have been screened, and 273 of the planned 686 have been randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT#04333537 .

8001 Background: The ALCHEMIST clinical trial platform, launched by the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) in 2014, screened patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for molecular markers and tailored post-operative adjuvant therapy trials. A081105 evaluated whether adjuvant erlotinib improved overall survival (OS) following complete resection in patients with early stage EGFR mutated lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: A081105 was a randomized phase III trial enrolling patients with completely resected stage IB (≥4 cm), II, or IIIA non-squamous NSCLC (per the 7 th TNM staging classification) harboring EGFR exon 19 deletion or L858R mutations. Patients were randomized 1:1 to erlotinib 150 mg daily for up to 2 years or placebo/observation, stratified by stage, prior chemotherapy, EGFR mutation subtype, and ECOG performance status. The primary endpoint was OS in the per-protocol (PP) population with centrally confirmed EGFR mutations, designed to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 in favor of erlotinib with a power of 86% and one sided type I error rate of 5%. Secondary endpoints included OS and disease free survival (DFS) in a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population with local or centrally confirmed EGFR mutations, and safety. A prespecified backstop analysis was conducted after a minimum of 5 years of follow-up on all patients. Results: Trial enrollment was discontinued when 390 of the intended 450 patients had been enrolled due to the proven benefit of adjuvant osimertinib. Among 390 enrolled patients, the arms were balanced for age (median: 67.0 years), sex (70% female), race (70% white), stage (II: 51%, IIIA: 37%), prior chemotherapy (82%), ECOG PS 0 (60%), and exon 19 deletion (57%). Adjuvant erlotinib did not significantly improve OS compared with placebo/observation in the overall PP population (364 patients, 108 events, HR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.59–1.34; 1-sided P = 0.29) or within exon 19 deletion (HR: 0.94) or L858R mutation (HR: 0.82) subgroups. Five-year OS rates were 78.6% versus 77.9%, respectively. Results were consistent in the mITT analysis (379 patients, 113 events, HR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.58–1.28). Erlotinib improved DFS (mITT: 181 events, median: 68 vs 50 months, HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55–1.01). Across both arms, 11% of patients started non-protocol treatment (Osimertinib: 9%) prior to disease progression, and 9% withdrew consent for all follow-up prior to recurrence. In the erlotinib arm, 3 deaths on study were reported; grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported on 39% of patients. Median duration of treatment on Erlotinib arm was 16 months; only 37% of patients completed the planned treatment. Conclusions: In resected EGFR -mutant NSCLC, adjuvant erlotinib did not improve overall survival but improved DFS. Additional studies are exploring efficacy in selected subsets of patients using genomics and proteomic analyses. Clinical trial information: NCT02193282 .

PURPOSE Integrating external control data into clinical trial designs and analyses has the potential to accelerate drug development processes. We reanalyzed the three experimental arms of the Individual Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT), a randomized phase II platform trial in newly diagnosed O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase-unmethylated glioblastoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02977780 ). To evaluate the validity of using external data sets, we compared treatment effect estimates based on internal INSIGhT control data and matched external control data. METHODS The three experimental arms of INSIGhT (abemaciclib [n = 72], neratinib [n = 80], and CC-115 [n = 12]) did not improve survival compared with internal controls (standard chemoradiation [n = 70]). We derived external control patient-level data from multiple real-world and clinical trial data sets. We applied propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate treatment effects with external controls. Additionally, using this glioblastoma (GBM) data collection, we specified simulation scenarios to evaluate trial designs that integrate external controls. RESULTS After matching to external controls, no survival benefit was observed for patients receiving abemaciclib (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.34]), neratinib (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.70 to 1.24]), or CC-115 (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.41 to 1.88]). Simulations, together with the INSIGhT data and a collection of GBM data sets, allowed us to examine efficiencies and risks of clinical trial designs that leverage external control data. CONCLUSION The use of carefully matched external controls, to replace or augment the internal controls of INSIGhT, produced treatment effect estimates that were similar to previously published analyses. Single-arm trial designs and hybrid randomized designs incorporating propensity score–matched external control data evaluated treatment effects in the early-phase testing of experimental therapies in newly diagnosed GBM. The validity of this approach and risks of bias depended on the availability of comprehensive and accurate data on all potential confounders, in the absence of unmeasured confounding.

Abstract Rationale Mismatch of airway to lung size has been implicated in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) pathophysiology, whether arising from disproportioned growth or from acquired pathologies over the life course. Lower airway-to-lung ratio (ALR), assessed reproducibly via computed tomography (CT) as the mean airway lumen diameters (trachea-to-subsegments) divided by the cubed root of lung volume, is associated with COPD risk and mortality (all-cause, respiratory, cardiovascular, lung cancer). We sought to characterize the airway biology associated with lower ALR by profiling bronchial gene expression across current and former smokers. Methods We leveraged clinical, radiologic, and bronchial epithelial RNA sequencing data from the SPIROMICS (SubPopulations and Intermediate Outcomes Measures in COPD Study) Phase 1 Bronchoscopy Sub-study (n = 161). To analyze transcriptional differential expression (DE) between participants based on CT-assessed ALR, we utilized DESeq2 and then identified impacted pathways by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). Generating cell-type transcriptional signatures from lung and blood single cell sequencing atlases, we also assessed association of ALR with differences in airway cellular composition. Results Across all ever-smokers, after adjustment for age, sex, height, COPD status, smoking status, and pack-years, n = 1,324 genes from airway epithelial samples exhibited DE at a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.2. Per IPA, enriched pathways associated with lower ALR included neutrophilic degranulation and macrophage activity. In cell type analysis, lower ALR was associated with higher signatures of macrophages, neutrophils, dendritic cells, and B cells, and lower ciliated and club cell signatures. When we repeated DE analysis using the same covariate adjustments plus an interaction term for ALR and smoking, n = 713 DE genes were identified at FDR <0.2; the association of DE with lower ALR was overwhelmingly in current rather than former smokers (3699 vs. 2 genes). By pathway and cell type analyses, the association between lower ALR and heightened inflammation (greater macrophage and neutrophil signaling) and epithelial dysregulation (downregulated ciliated and club cell function) was primarily restricted to current smokers. Conclusions In adult ever-smokers, lower ALR is associated with transcriptomic evidence of heightened neutrophil- and macrophage-driven airway inflammation and reduced ciliated and club cell expression, associations that were most evident among current smokers. Whether these cross-sectional patterns, which suggest impaired mucociliary defense and a diminished capacity to clear inhaled particulates, are the result of pre-existing reduced ALR, its cause, or both, will require further investigation. This abstract is funded by: SPIROMICS was supported by contracts from the NIH/NHLBI (HHSN268200900013C, HHSN268200900014C, HHSN268200900015C, HHSN268200900016C, HHSN268200900017C, HHSN268200900018C, HHSN268200900019C, HHSN268200900020C, 75N92024D00012), grants from the NIH/NHLBI (U01HL137880, U24HL141762, R01HL182622, R01HL144718, and R01HL093081), and supplemented by contributions made through the Foundation for the NIH and the COPD Foundation from Amgen; AstraZeneca/MedImmune; Bayer; Bellerophon Therapeutics; Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.; Forest Research Institute, Inc.; Genentech; GlaxoSmithKline; Grifols Therapeutics, Inc.; Ikaria, Inc.; MGC Diagnostics; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Nycomed GmbH; Polarean; ProterixBio; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Sanofi; Sunovion; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; Theravance Biopharma; Verona; and Mylan/Viatris.

Abstract Rationale Eosinophilic airway inflammation in COPD is associated with more frequent exacerbations,lower lung function,and corticosteroid responsiveness.DNA methylation captures information about genetic factors and environmental exposures, but is under-studied in eosinophilic COPD.We hypothesized that sputum cell methylation patterns reflect genomic regulation of inflammatory endotypes in COPD by DNA sequence variation. Methods We analyzed DNA previously extracted from induced sputum cells for a prior study(PMID38261629) for which sufficient quantity DNA remained for methylation arrays.For this analysis,we focused on n = 132 SPIROMICS participants with ≥20 pack-years smoking history.Samples were stratified into tertiles based on sputum eosinophil proportions,previously determined from sputum cell differential analysis by the centralized sputum analysis core for SPIROMICS(Univ of North Carolina).We assessed proportion of DNA methylation (β values) spanning 936,866 CpG sites using the Illumina Infinium Methylation EPICv2.0 BeadChip Array,which we transformed into M values(meffil R package). To identify differentially methylated regions (DMRs)(FDR<0.05 in minimum of 2 CpG sites per gene region),we contrasted CpG β values between the high-eosinophil and low-eosinophil tertiles(N = 44 each),using the DMRcate package.We tested for enrichment of genes overlapping with significant DMRs using Enrichr (GWAS Catalog 2025 gene set library).To identify genetic variants associated with DNA methylation levels,we performed Methylation Quantitative Trait Loci (meQTL) analysis using TensorQTL.For each CpG site,we tested associations with SNPs within a ± 500 kb window (cis-meQTL).The linear regression model included age,sex,BMI,smoking status,smoking pack-years,study site,inhaled corticosteroid use, the first two genetic principal components, cell-type proportions (macrophages/monocytes, neutrophils, squamous epithelial cells, lymphocytes), and eosinophil tertile . Significant meQTLs were identified at an FDR<0.05 using Benjamini-Hochberg correction. Results A total of 532 eosinophil-associated DMRs (FDR < 0.05) were identified between the high- and low-eosinophil groups,encompassing 446 unique genes.The top enriched pathways related to counts of eosinophils (adjusted p = 0. 00002464), lymphocytes (adjusted p = 0.0001860), and the sum of eosinophils-plus-basophils (adjusted p = 0.0001860).We identified 18,432 significant SNP-CpG/meQTL pairs (FDR < 0.05),suggesting extensive genetic influence on airway DNA methylation patterns.Among the n = 521 eosinophil-associated CpGs that overlapped with meQTLs,rs55687040 (TENT2,a gene involved in mRNA and miRNA processing) is a GWAS locus for FEV1/FVC ratio (PMID: 26634245), suggesting possible genetic control of airway eosinophilic methylation signatures. Conclusions Our findings disclose distinct DNA methylation signatures associated with sputum eosinophil proportion in COPD.A subset of these CpGs are regulated by genetic variants,suggesting an integrated genetic-epigenetic mechanism underlying airway eosinophilic inflammation with the potential to influence COPD risk and severity. This abstract is funded by: SPIROMICS was supported by contracts from the NIH/NHLBI (HHSN268200900013C, HHSN268200900014C, HHSN268200900015C, HHSN268200900016C, HHSN268200900017C, HHSN268200900018C, HHSN268200900019C, HHSN268200900020C), grants from the NIH/NHLBI (U01 HL137880, U24 HL141762, R01 HL182622, and R01 HL144718), and supplemented by contributions made through the Foundation for the NIH and the COPD Foundation from Amgen; AstraZeneca/MedImmune; Bayer; Bellerophon Therapeutics; Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.; Forest Research Institute, Inc.; Genentech; GlaxoSmithKline; Grifols Therapeutics, Inc.; Ikaria, Inc.; MGC Diagnostics; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Nycomed GmbH; Polarean; ProterixBio; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Sanofi; Sunovion; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; and Theravance Biopharma and Mylan/Viatris.

Abstract Rationale Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is an epithelial alarmin chiefly implicated in T2 airway inflammation, though it may also participate in broader (non-T2) inflammatory processes. The utility of airway epithelial gene expression of TSLP and its specific receptor subunit, cytokine receptor-like factor 2 (CRLF2), as biomarkers of downstream inflammation and clinical outcomes remains unclear. Methods We analyzed RNA sequencing data from bronchial airway brushing obtained in phase 1 of the SPIROMICS bronchoscopy sub-study (N = 161: 23 never-smokers, 67 ever-smokers with COPD, 71 ever-smokers without COPD). We related airway TSLP and CRLF2 expression to clinical, hematologic/sputum measures, and gene-expression signatures of T2/eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation, including to our published T2 signature and to eosinophil and neutrophil signatures derived from single-cell atlas data. Associations used Spearman correlations and linear models adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, COPD status, smoking status, and pack-years. Results CRLF2 expression correlated with gene-expression evidence of both T2/eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation: T2 signature (ρ = 0.26, p < 0.001), eosinophil signature (ρ = 0.44, p < 0.001), and neutrophil signature (ρ = 0.39, p < 0.001). CRLF2 was positively associated with log sputum neutrophil count (ρ = 0.24, p = 0.024) and blood neutrophil count (ρ = 0.036, p < 0.001), but not with sputum or blood eosinophil counts. Higher CRLF2 related to worse baseline lung function, particularly among current smokers, (lower post-bronchodilator FEV1: ρ = −0.21, p = 0.008), as well as greater 5-year FEV1 decline across current and former smokers (ρ = −0.22, p = 0.007). Significant findings persisted after covariate adjustment. In contrast, TSLP expression, although strongly correlated with expression of the epithelial alarmin IL33 (ρ = 0.53, p < 0.001), was negatively correlated with CRLF2 (ρ = −0.24, p = 0.002) and with eosinophil and neutrophil gene-expression signatures (ρ = −0.26 and −0.33, both p < 0.001). TSLP expression showed no association with sputum or blood cell counts. Conclusions In bronchial epithelium from SPIROMICS, gene expression of CRLF2, but not of TSLP, tracked with downstream alarmin-relevant inflammatory programs, consistent with a regulatory role in TSLP signaling through TSLPR, as well as with clinically meaningful outcomes. CRLF2 expression was associated with evidence of both T2/eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation, and with lower baseline FEV1 and accelerated FEV1 decline, suggesting engagement of a broader, clinically relevant inflammatory milieu. By contrast, epithelial TSLP transcript levels mirrored IL33 gene expression but were not associated with cellular or transcriptomic inflammation. These findings position CRLF2, rather than TSLP expression itself, as a potential airway biomarker of TSLP-axis activity and disease impact with potential implications for patient stratification as well as strategic approaches for TSLP-pathway-targeted therapies. This abstract is funded by: SPIROMICS was supported by contracts from the NIH/NHLBI (HHSN268200900013C, HHSN268200900014C, HHSN268200900015C, HHSN268200900016C, HHSN268200900017C, HHSN268200900018C, HHSN268200900019C, HHSN268200900020C, 75N92024D00012), grants from the NIH/NHLBI (U01HL137880, U24HL141762, R01HL182622, R01HL144718, and R01HL093081), and supplemented by contributions made through the Foundation for the NIH and the COPD Foundation from Amgen; AstraZeneca/MedImmune; Bayer; Bellerophon Therapeutics; Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.; Forest Research Institute, Inc.; Genentech; GlaxoSmithKline; Grifols Therapeutics, Inc.; Ikaria, Inc.; MGC Diagnostics; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Nycomed GmbH; Polarean; ProterixBio; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Sanofi; Sunovion; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; Theravance Biopharma; Verona; and Mylan/Viatris.

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer include recommendations for staging and risk assessment after a prostate cancer diagnosis and for the care of patients with localized, regional, recurrent, and metastatic disease. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s discussions on select 2026 updates to the guidelines regarding nonmetastatic disease: the elimination of the very-low-risk group, updates to the Principles of Active Surveillance, and caution in the use of focal therapy in newly diagnosed patients.