Citations

AbstractBackgroundThe prognosis in patients with advanced cardiac amyloidosis (CA) remains poor.ObjectivesWe sought to describe survival post heart transplantation (HT) in amyloid compared with non‐amyloid recipients, highlight waitlist times within the new allocation system across three Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) regions, and describe multiorgan transplantation (MOT) in hereditary amyloidosis.MethodsThis is a retrospective review of end‐stage CA patients who underwent HT at Mayo Clinic from January 2007 to December 2020. Wait time was compared in the new versus old OPTN allocation era starting December 18, 2018 by Wilcoxon rank sum test. All‐cause mortality for those with and without CA was compared using Kaplan–Meier estimates with log rank analysis, censoring December 16, 2022.ResultsFifty‐five patients with CA underwent HT between 2007 and 2020, 8 light chain amyloidosis (AL) (14.5%), 28 hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) (50.9%), 17 wildtype transthyretin (ATTRwt) (30.9%), and 2 hereditary apolipoprotein A1 (AApoA1) amyloidosis patients (3.6%). No significant difference in overall survival post‐transplant was seen in amyloid compared with non‐amyloid (p = 0.816). Median time to HT was shorter in the new system, 45 days (IQR 24, 78) versus 174 days (IQR 76.5, 483.5), p = 0.006. There was a decline in MOT in hereditary amyloidosis over time with the concomitant rise in disease‐targeted therapies.ConclusionsHT survival in CA patients was similar to non‐amyloid patients. The new allocation system benefits this cohort with shorter wait times. There is less MOT in hereditary amyloidosis with increased utilization of disease‐targeted therapy.

Abstract Introduction Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) parameters such as peak VO2 ≤ 14ml/kg/min, percentage predicted peak VO2 (ppVO2) ≤ 50% and ventilation equivalent of carbon dioxide (Ve/VCO2) >35 l/min/l/min are recommended thresholds to list for isolated heart transplant. There is minimal data on clinical events after listing to guide clinical management or priority in organ allocation. Purpose To assess the effect of peak VO2, ppVO2, Ve/VCO2 on clinical events after listing for isolated heart transplant. Methods In a single centre retrospective study, we identified patients who were status 6 or status 2 prior to 2018 at time of listing for isolated heart transplant between 2007 and 2021. Clinical data were collected by chart review. Primary outcome of progressive heart failure was defined as death or upgrade in transplant priority status (new inotropes or mechanical circulatory support). Comparison was made between peak VO2 strata (> 14 vs ≤ 14 ml/kg/min), ppVO2 strata (> 50% vs 40-50% vs <40%) and Ve/VCO2 strata (<35 vs >35 l/min/l/min). Secondary outcome was time dependent survival after listing for heart transplant. Results We identified 141 patients of which 133 underwent CPET and follow up was available for 130 who were included in the analysis. Median age was 53 years (interquartile range 41-59 years), 29.1% of patients were female. Median peak VO2 was 14.0 ml/kg/min (11.2-15.7), ppVO2 was 44% (36-52), Ve/VCO2 slope was 34.0 (31.0-37.0) and RER was 1.1 (1.1-1.2). 87 patients had progressive heart failure consisting of 34 deaths and 83 patients having upgrade in priority status. There was a significant difference in risk of progressive heart failure comparing peak VO2 strata (Figure 1) (freedom from event at one year 71.4% with peak VO2 > 14 vs 46.5% with peak VO2 ≤ 14, p=0.00061) and ppVO2 strata (Figure 2) (freedom from event at one year 75.0% with ppVO2 >50% vs 61.2% with ppVO2 40-50% vs 42.6% with ppVO2 <40%, p=0.0015). There was no significant difference with Ve/VCO2 strata (freedom from event at one year 59.8% with Ve/VCO2 <34 vs 54.9% with Ve/VCO2 >34, p=0.52). There were 34 deaths before transplant and 23 deaths after transplant. 87 patients underwent transplant. In a time dependent survival analysis, age, gender and ppVO2<50% (HR 1.65 (0.87-3.12)) were not significant predictors of mortality. Both early transplant (defined as < 1 year after listing, HR 0.14 (0.06-0.34) and late transplant (defined as > 1 year after listing, HR 0.16 (0.08-0.32)) were significant predictors of lower mortality whilst Ve/VCO2>35 (HR 2.09 (1.19-3.68)) was a significant predictor of higher mortality. Conclusions Peak VO2 and ppVO2 stratify risk of progressive heart failure in ambulatory patients awaiting isolated heart transplant. However, Ve/VCO2 is a predictor of significantly higher mortality. These findings should affect clinical management and transplant priority status; and influence revision of future guidelines.Freedom from event by peak VO2 strataFreedom from event by ppVO2 strata

Abstract Background It has been hypothesized that combined heart and kidney transplantation (HKT) may lead to immune modulation and attenuation of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) progression. Sirolimus (SRL) has been shown to mitigate the progression of CAV and confer renal protection. With the increasing use of SRL as primary immunosuppression in heart transplant (HT) recipients, the effect of HKT on CAV progression compared to HT-only remains undetermined. Purpose We sought to investigate the patterns of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) to SRL, and its impact on CAV progression and outcomes in HKT compared to HT-only in a cohort with frequent use of SRL as primary immunosuppression. Methods A cohort of 302 patients who underwent either HT only (n=262) or combined HKT (n=40) was analyzed. CAV progression was assessed by measuring the delta (Δ) annual change in plaque volume (PV) normalized to vessel length (PV/VL in mm3/mm) and plaque index (PI) (%) (calculated as the PV to VV ratio) between baseline and last follow-up coronary intravenous ultrasound (IVUS). Clinical adverse outcomes included all-cause death and CAV-associated events. Secondary outcomes included differences in renal function and incidence of SRL-associated proteinuria (defined as Δ urine protein ≥300 mg/24 h at 1 year after conversion to SRL) between HT-only and HKT recipients. Results Overall, 217 (72%) patients were converted from CNI to SRL as primary immunosuppression. HT recipients were more likely to be converted to SRL than combined HKT recipients (74% vs. 55%, P=0.01). HKT was associated with significantly higher ΔPV/VL (P=0.01) and a trend toward a higher ΔPI (P=0.06) than HT-only, but this association was markedly attenuated after adjustment to SRL conversion. HKT was associated with similar risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95%CI: 0.28-1.71, P=0.43) and CAV-related events (adjusted HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.30-2.31, P=0.72). Conversion to SRL was significantly associated with decreased risk of death and CAV-related events in the overall cohort. This association was not modified by the type of organ transplantation (Pinteraction=NS), and without a significant effect on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or proteinuria. Conclusions HKT recipients compared to HT-only were less likely to be converted from CNI to SRL-based immunosuppression and had a greater CAV progression but without significant differences in all-cause mortality or CAV-related events. The clinical benefit and safety of conversion to SRL appeared similar in the HKT and isolated HT cohorts.

Abstract Background In light of the updated lowered threshold for diagnosing pulmonary hypertension (PH), the reversibility of precapillary PH with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and the associated post heart transplantation (HT) outcomes remain unclear. Purpose and methods Using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we aimed to investigate predictors of persistent precapillary PH in HT recipients bridged with LVAD, and examine the interrelated post-HT survival, using the updated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) cutoff of >2 WU for precapillary PH. Results Among 2169 HT recipients bridged with LVAD, 1299 had PVR>2 at baseline; 551 (42.4%) of whom normalized their PVR≤2 and 748 (57.6%) remained with elevated PVR>2 after LVAD implantation. Female sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.61-3.07, p<0.001) and inotropes-treatment at-listing (aOR 1.31, 95% CI: 1.03-1.66, p=0.028) were associated with persistently elevated PVR post LVAD. Conversely, longer duration of LVAD support (aOR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.65-.84, p<0.001) and use of HeartMate 2 (aOR 0.74, CI: 0.59-0. 93, p=0.011) were protective against persistently elevated PVR post-LVAD. Persistently elevated PVR >2 post-LVAD was associated with increased risk of death compared to those who normalized their PVR (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.26, 95% CI: 1.01-1.57, p=0.037). However, normalized PVR post-LVAD group had comparable survival to those with PVR≤2 at baseline (aHR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.57-1.02, p=0.07). Conclusions Many HT recipients bridged with LVAD remain with PVR>2 post-LVAD implantation, which is associated with increased risk of death post-HT compared to patients with normalized PVR post-LVAD.

Introduction: Advanced age is a risk factor for poor outcomes following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant. A means of identifying elderly patients with acceptable mortality risk following LVAD surgery is not currently available. The HeartMate II (HMII) Risk Score (HMRS) was recently developed and validated, providing good risk discrimination for predicting survival in patients undergoing HMII implant. Independent survival predictors in the model included age and markers of renal function, coagulopathy and nutrition. We hypothesize that the HMRS will provide utility for risk stratification of the elderly LVAD candidate. Methods: Elderly patients (age >65 years) enrolled into the HMII Destination Therapy (DT) and Bridge to Transplant trials were selected for the study (n=444). Complete data for HMRS calculation was available in 98% (n=435). Preoperative patient HMRS was calculated according to the formula: HMRS = ln(1.29)*decade of age + ln(0.71)*Albumin + ln(1.37)*Cr + ln(1.86)*INR + ln(0.52)*LVAD Center Volume >=15 + ln(0.67)*Implant after 2007. Patients were trichotimized into high (HMRS >1.0), medium (HMRS 0.50-1.0), and low (HMRS <=0.50) risk categories (as previously defined in model development) based on HMRS. The primary endpoint was survival at 1 year following LVAD implant, estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: The mean cohort age was 71±4 years and 84% (n=372) had devices implanted for DT. The table shows the HMRS along with mean±stddev values for the score's components. All between-group differences were statistically significant (Kruskal-Wallis p<0.05), although differences in age were not clinically significant. Survival based on HMRS strata is shown in the figure. Patients in the low and medium risk groups had survivals >80% at 1 year following LVAD implant. Conclusions: The HMRS can be used to identify elderly patients with survivals comparable to that of the general LVAD population.

BACKGROUND: The immunologic risk associated with preformed donor-specific allo-antibodies (DSA) against human leukocyte antigens (HLA) in heart transplant (HTX) recipients is unclear. The goal of this study was to evaluate potential role of DSA on the progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in HTX recipients. METHODS: The presence of DSA against HLA was evaluated using solid phase Single Antigen Bead assay (One Lambda, Inc., Canoga Park, CA; Luminex platform) before transplant in 35 HTX recipients. Using alloantibody specification analysis, 11% (4/35) and 20% (7/35) had DSA against donor Class I and II HLA respectively including the one patient who had both (DSA I & II+) . 71% (25/35) of patients had no demonstrable DSA (DSA-). All patients had negative cytotoxicity cross match. Baseline three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound studies (3D IVUS) were performed at 1.0 [0.18, 1.4] year after transplant. Follow up 3D IVUS exams were performed 0.92 [0.85, 1.04] years after the baseline exam. RESULTS: The increase in mean plaque (media and intima) volume (PV) was accelerated in the DSA II+ group as compared to the DSA- group (0.87±1.9 mm (3)/mm vs. 0.16±1.8 mm (3)/mm) but the vessel volume index (follow up vessel volume/ baseline vessel volume) was similar between groups (1.08±0.5 vs. 1.09± 0.4; p=0.9). Plaque index (PI) (PV/vessel volume x 100 [%]) increased significantly in the DSA II+ group (17.9±6.3%) but not in the DSA- group (-13.6±13.2%, P=0.02). None of these values were significant in the DSA I+ only group. Treatment with Sirolimus did not affect PI progression between the DSA II+ and DSA- groups (PI progression: 15.9±8.7% vs. -11.7±7.1%, P=0.03). Age, gender, lipid and uric acid levels, prevalence of diabetes, ischemic time, time between IVUS examinations, the use of steroids, mycophenolate vs. azathioprine or calcineurin inhibitors vs. sirolimus were not different between the groups (P>0.4 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Heart transplant recipients with clearly defined anti-Class II DSA are at risk for accelerated cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Whether interventions to minimize the risk of DSA such as virtual crossmatch, desensitization and complement inhibition will retard CAV remains to be proven.

Abstract Aims Graft dysfunction (GD) after heart transplantation (HTx) can develop without evidence of cell- or antibody-mediated rejection. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has an evolving role in detecting rejection; however, its role in biopsy-negative GD has not been described. This study examines CMR findings, evaluates outcomes based on CMR results, and seeks to identify the possibility of rejection missed through endomyocardial biopsy by using CMR in HTx recipients with biopsy-negative GD. Methods and results HTx recipients with GD [defined as a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by &gt;5% and LVEF &lt; 50%] in the absence of rejection by biopsy or allograft vasculopathy and who underwent CMR were included in the study. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, re-transplantation, or persistent LVEF &lt; 50%. Overall, 34 HTx recipients developed biopsy-negative GD and underwent CMR. Left ventricular late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on CMR was observed in 16 patients with two distinct patterns: diffuse epicardial (n = 13) and patchy (n = 3) patterns. Patients with LGE developed GD later after HTx [4 (1.4–6.8) vs. 0.8 (0.3–1.2) years, P &lt; 0.001], were more often symptomatic (88% vs. 56%, P = 0.06), and had greater haemodynamic derangement (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure: 19 ± 7 vs. 13 ± 3 mmHg, P = 0.002) as compared with those without LGE. No significant difference was observed in the primary composite outcome between patients with LGE and those without LGE (50% vs. 38% of patients with events, P = 0.515). During a median follow-up of 3.8 years, mean LVEF improved similarly in the LGE-negative (37–55%) and LGE-positive groups (32–55%) (P = 0.16). Conclusions Biopsy-negative GD occurs with and without LGE when assessed by CMR, indicative of possible rejection/inflammation occurring only in a subset of patients. Irrespective of LGE, LVEF improvement occurs in most GD patients, suggesting that other neurohormonal or immunomodulatory mechanisms may also contribute to GD development.

AbstractChronic lung disease (CLD) is the second leading cause of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although PH associated with CLD (PH‐CLD) leads to impaired health‐related quality of life (HRQOL), there are no validated tools to assess HRQOL in PH‐CLD. The Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension–Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire (PAH‐SYMPACT) is an HRQOL instrument aimed at assessing the symptoms and impact of PH on overall function and well‐being. We performed a single‐center prospective cohort study using PAH‐SYMPACT scores to compare symptoms, exercise capacity and HRQOL in patients with PAH and PH‐CLD. One hundred and twenty‐five patients (99 patients with idiopathic/heritable PAH and 26 with PH‐CLD) completed the PAH‐SYMPACT questionnaire which consists of 22 questions that assess HRQOL across four domains: cardiopulmonary (CP) symptoms, cardiovascular (CV) symptoms, physical impact (PI), and cognitive/emotional (CE) impact. Higher scores indicate worse HRQOL. We compared patients with PAH and PH‐CLD using a Wilcoxon rank sum or chi‐squared test as appropriate. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between PH classification and SYMPACT scores. Compared to PAH, patients with PH‐CLD were older, more likely to use oxygen and had worse functional class and exercise capacity. While there was no significant difference between the two groups in CP, CV, or CE domain scores, patients with PH‐CLD had significantly worse PI scores by univariate (1.79 vs. 1.13, p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (1.61 vs. 1.17, p = 0.02) and overall worse SYMPACT scores (1.19 vs. 0.91, p = 0.03). In conclusion, patients with PH‐CLD have worse HRQOL as assessed by the PAH‐SYMPACT questionnaire versus patients with PAH. Although PAH‐SYMPACT has not been validated in PH‐CLD, the results of this study can guide clinicians in understanding the symptoms and impact of PH‐CLD relative to PAH.

AbstractBackgroundGastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF‐LVADs) is often related to GI angiodysplasia (GIAD). We previously reported data on VEGF inhibition with IV bevacizumab in the treatment of LVAD‐associated GIAD bleeding, and now present follow‐up data on patients treated with IV bevacizumab and/or low‐dose oral pazopanib.MethodsAll consecutive adult patients with LVAD‐associated GIB from GIAD treated with bevacizumab or pazopanib, from July 20, 2017 to June 22, 2022, were included in the analysis. Data on hospitalizations, GI endoscopic procedures, and blood transfusions were obtained from first admission for GIB up to a median of 35.7 months following treatment initiation (range 1.3–59.8 months).ResultsEleven patients (91% male, mean 69.5 ± 8.9 years) were included. Eight patients (73%) received IV bevacizumab, two patients (18%) received oral pazopanib, and one patient (9%) received bevacizumab followed by pazopanib therapy. We observed a significantly decreased number of annualized hospitalizations for GIB (median difference − 2.87, p = 0.002), blood transfusions (median difference − 20.9, p = 0.01), and endoscopies (median difference − 6.95, p = 0.007) in patients pre‐ and post‐anti‐angiogenic therapy (bevacizumab and/or pazopanib). Similarly, a significant improvement in these clinical outcomes was noted in the bevacizumab group with decreased annualized hospitalizations (median difference − 2.75, p = 0.014), blood transfusions (median difference − 24.5, p = 0.047), and number of endoscopies (median differences −6.88, p = 0.006).ConclusionAnti‐angiogenic therapy with IV bevacizumab and/or low‐dose oral pazopanib appears to provide benefits in patients with LVAD‐associated GIB with reduced hospitalizations, blood transfusions, and need for GI endoscopic procedures.

The effects of left ventricular unloading on septal function in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have not been well characterized in vivo. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between markers of septal function with echocardiography in relationship to RV dysfunction and late RV failure after LVAD implantation. A retrospective study was conducted of patients supported on centrifugal-flow LVADs implanted over a 10-year period. Echocardiographic data were collected pre-operatively and up to 2 years after implantation. Interventricular septum (IVS) measurements were taken at end-systole and end-diastole. Interventricular-septal output (ISO) was calculated using the formula: (IVSs–IVSd)×heart rate. A total of 110 patients were included. An immediate and sustained reduction in both lateral annulus systolic velocity (RVS’) and TAPSE were observed after implant (p < 0.0001). However, ISO gradually decreased over time (p < 0.0001). While ISO was not predictive of late RV failure, a decrease in ISO by 25% or greater from pre-implant to hospital discharge was associated with late RV failure (OR 4.8; 95% CI, 1.4–16.5; p = 0.012) even after adjusting for relevant clinical variables (p ≤ 0.01 for each model). RV function is known to be influenced by mechanical ventricular interdependence and we demonstrate that measurement of ISO may be a useful marker in assessing RV dysfunction and predicting RV failure in patients following LVAD implantation.