Citations

Background: Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) pose a significant treatment challenge due to biofilm-associated resistance, which limits antibiotic effectiveness. Bacteriophages, naturally occurring viruses that selectively infect and lyse bacteria, can disrupt biofilms, potentially enhancing antibiotic activity. We present the case of a male in his 70s with a history of total hip arthroplasty in 1973 who developed a chronic methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) PJI. Despite eight surgical interventions and multiple courses of suppressive antibiotics, the infection persisted, necessitating the use of bacteriophage therapy. Methods: The patient's MSSA isolate was sent to a bacteriophage laboratory in Quebec, which identified effective bacteriophages, and a two-bacteriophage cocktail was selected. Following approval by Health Canada and the University of Calgary (REB23-1733), bacteriophages were administered during a planned incision and drainage (I&D). Locally, bacteriophage was applied topically into the hip, followed by 2 weeks of twice-daily intravenous bacteriophage therapy with standard-of-care intravenous antibiotics. Results: Therapy was well tolerated except for initial mild rigors. Now, 24 weeks after bacteriophage administration, there is cessation of pain, normalization of inflammatory markers, and significant improvement in quality of life while continuing on suppressive antibiotics. Conclusions: Bacteriophage therapy was safe in our case, and emerging evidence is promising for its use in PJIs. However, regulatory hurdles, cost, and lack of standardized protocols currently limit its use. Classified as experimental therapy in Canada, bacteriophage use is restricted to clinical trials. This case underscores the potential for broader adoption of bacteriophage therapy in managing PJIs across Canada.

Background Grade group 5 (GG5) prostate cancer (PCa) carries a less favorable prognosis after standard-of-care (SOC) therapy, necessitating novel therapeutic approaches. High-dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may modulate immune response in GG5 PCa, particularly in tumors with increased immune content. This study evaluated whether the addition of nivolumab to SOC was associated with improved disease control in patients with high-volume GG5 PCa, including those with oligometastatic disease. Methods In this non-randomized phase II trial, 31 patients with localized or oligometastatic GG5 PCa and >30% positive biopsy cores were evaluated between September 2018 and April 2021. Patients received four doses of nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) beginning 4 weeks prior to HDRBT, alongside ADT, HDRBT, and external beam radiation. The primary endpoint was to evaluate whether the 2-year freedom from biochemical recurrence (FFBR) rate would exceed a prespecified historical control rate of 75%. Results Among the 31 patients, the median follow-up was 38.8 months (IQR 31.0–46.5 months). The addition of nivolumab to SOC RT with ADT was associated with a 2-year FFBR rate of 90.3% (95% CI 74.3% to 98.0%) (median FFBR not reached), exceeding the prespecified historical control rate of 75% (one-sided p value from binomial test=0.024). Definitive and probable nivolumab-related toxicity included 6.3% acute grade 2 and 6.3% acute grade 3 adverse events (AEs), with no grade 4+ AEs observed. A higher Decipher immunosuppression score at diagnosis correlated with early pathologic response (p=0.005) and was independently associated with time to metastatic failure (p=0.044). Conclusions Nivolumab combined with SOC was associated with encouraging FFBR in this high-risk GG5 PCa population and may represent a promising therapeutic intensification strategy. The Decipher immunosuppression score may serve as a predictive biomarker for response. These findings warrant further investigation in randomized trials.

Abstract Objectives Patients referred for specialized care often arrive with outside medical records (OMRs) compiled into multi-report PDFs that include imaging, pathology, and clinical notes in unstructured formats. Reviewing these records is time consuming and mentally taxing, increasing the risk of delayed care, clinician frustration, and missed information affecting quality of care. This study aimed to automate the segmentation, classification, and date extraction of scanned OMRs, with a focus on records relevant to breast cancer care. Materials and Methods We used optical character recognition (OCR) to extract machine-readable text from 1303 scanned PDF documents from 116 distinct external institutions. Gemini 1.5, a large language model (LLM), was then used to segment multi-report files into individual documents, classify them into clinically meaningful categories such as mammograms and pathology reports, and extract study dates to build diagnostic timelines. Document categories were informed by clinical workflows in a breast cancer center. Results The system achieved an F1 score of 0.95 for segmentation, 0.96 for classification, and 0.90 for date extraction. In a pilot of 45 records reviewed by clinicians, only 2 classification errors and 1 date error were reported. Clinicians estimated that the tool reduced OMR review time by 40%, improved workflow efficiency, and increased satisfaction. Discussion Our findings demonstrate that combining OCR with LLMs can significantly enhance the processing of unstructured medical records, reducing manual burden and supporting timely clinical decision-making. Conclusion This study demonstrates the successful application of OCR and LLMs for organizing scanned OMRs within a specialty clinic. By automating a previously manual process, the approach supports scalable review of incoming outside records and has potential for adaptation to other clinical workflows. Future work will focus on evaluating the system across additional specialties and institutions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The artery of Davidoff and Schechter (ADS) is a dural branch of the posterior cerebral artery, supplying the falcotentorial junction. It is not commonly depicted on angiography due to its small size; thus, its visibility is usually indicative of a pathology, such as a dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF). Recognizing the ADS as a feeder could be vital in enhancing management success, and understanding its anatomy is important for preventing complications during embolization or microsurgery. We present a scoping review of DAVFs fed by the ADS followed by an illustrative case report encountered at our institution. METHODS: An extensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. The search included the keywords: “Davidoff,” “Schechter,” “Davidoff and Schechter,” “dural branch,” “tentorial branch,” “medial branch,” and “meningeal branch,” in combination with “arteriovenous fistula,” “posterior cerebral artery,” and “superior cerebellar artery.” Only articles published in English or Spanish were included, with no restriction on publication date. Case reports and series were further screened based on best relevance. Data extraction and synthesis were performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 16 articles describing 32 cases of DAVFs supplied by the ADS were identified. The most common onset was headache (43.8%), followed by altered mental status (21.2%). Most DAVFs were classified as high grade based on Borden/Cognard scales. Transarterial embolization was the most used treatment (81.3%), achieving complete occlusion in 76.9% of cases. Among patients with complete occlusion, approximately half experienced full resolution of symptoms. In a mean follow-up of 27.4 months (IQR: 30), 2 cases reported complications due to reflux of the embolic agent. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive understanding of the ADS's angioarchitecture is essential to take full advantage of this artery's features in the treatment, mitigating potential complications and optimizing patient outcomes.

Background Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are widely employed for chronic pain. These injections include peripheral nerve blocks and trigger point injections, injections of large appendicular joints, the axial facet and sacroiliac joints, and the epidural space. These injections may be performed in patients who have been recently vaccinated or plan to be vaccinated. This multisociety multispecialty position statement aims to develop evidence-based statements and recommendations (SRs) on the safe interval between CSIs and COVID-19 and influenza vaccine administration. Methods Development of the position statement was approved by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Board of Directors and several other societies that agreed to participate. The scope of the SRs was agreed on to include the efficacy of COVID-19 and influenza vaccines, adverse events related to the CSIs, specifically the effect of CSIs on the hypothalamic–pituitary axis, incidence of COVID-19 in patients who had CSIs during the pandemic, incidence of influenza in patients who had CSIs during the influenza season, and recommend a reasonable interval between CSIs and COVID-19 and influenza vaccination 20 mg/day of prednisone s. Experts were assigned topics to perform a comprehensive literature review and draft SRs, which were refined and voted for consensus (≥75% agreement) using a modified Delphi process. A modified version of the US Preventive Services Task Force grading of evidence and strength of recommendation was followed. Results All SRs were approved by all participants after four rounds of discussion. The Practice Guidelines Committees and Boards of Directors of the participating societies also approved all SRs. If a vaccine has been recently administered or planned, then for non-urgent indications, the CSI should be offered at least 1 week before or after vaccine administration. For healthy patient(s), CSI, or vaccine administration may be performed without a 7-day interval after informed discussion with the patient and consent regarding the risk of blunted vaccine efficacy. For non-healthy patients, shared decision-making should include discussion of diminished vaccine effectiveness and the possibility of influenza or COVID-19 infection. Conclusions In this position statement, we provide recommendations on the optimal timing between CSIs and COVID-19 or influenza vaccine.

Background Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are widely employed in facet and sacroiliac joint pain. Similar to CSIs at other sites (peripheral nerve blocks, joints, epidural), these injections are associated with potential adverse events. These multisociety consensus recommendations aim to develop evidence-based statements and recommendations on the safe use of CSIs in facet joint and sacroiliac joint injections. Methods Development of the consensus recommendations was approved by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Board of Directors and several other societies that agreed to participate. The scope of statements and recommendations was agreed on to include safety of the injection technique (landmark-guided, ultrasound, or radiology-aided injections); effect of the addition of the corticosteroid on effectiveness (vs local anesthetic or saline); and adverse events related to the injection. Experts were assigned topics to perform a comprehensive literature review and draft statements and recommendations, which were refined and voted for consensus (>75% agreement) using a modified Delphi process. A modified version of the US Preventive Services Task Force grading of evidence and strength of recommendation was followed. Results All statements and recommendations were approved by all participants after four rounds of discussion. The Practice Guidelines Committees and Boards of Directors of the participating societies also approved all statements and recommendations. Injection of corticosteroid into the facet joint in patients with joint inflammation may relieve pain and improves function. Intra-articular, extra-articular (periarticular), and combined administration are effective for sacroiliac joint injections. No dose-response studies exist, but CSIs containing 10 mg of methylprednisolone or triamcinolone per facet joint and 40 mg per sacroiliac joint (SIJ) (or their respective pharmacologic equivalents) are reasonable. Conclusions In this practice recommendation, we provide statements and recommendations on facet and sacroiliac joint CSIs, the optimal doses, and intervals and criteria for repeating the CSIs in patients with facet joint and sacroiliac joint pain.

Abstract Background: While there are abundant data on the surgical management of BC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), there is less guidance regarding surgical management of BC after NET, particularly with respect to lymph node (LN) surgery. While pathologic complete response (pCR) is common with NAC, it is a rare event with NET. In this analysis we assess the surgeons’ approach in the context of NET. Methods: The ALTERNATE trial is a phase III study that randomized postmenopausal patients (pts) with clinical stage II/III ER+ HER2- BC to receive neoadjuvant anastrozole (A), fulvestrant (F), or both for 6 mos. before surgery. The primary objective was to determine if neoadjuvant F or A+F increases the rate of pCR or ypT1-2N0/N1mic/Ki67 <2.7% residual disease over A alone. Breast surgery was per standard of care. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with or without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was required to determine preoperative endocrine prognostic index PEPI score and residual cancer burden (RCB). Surgeons were required to indicate if the patient would be eligible for breast- conserving surgery (BCS) prior to NET. Patient accrual occurred from 2014-2018. The surgical outcomes are reported for the entire group. Results: Among the 3 treatment arms, 933 patients completed 6 cycles of NET. The clinical T stage at diagnosis was 73.6% T2, 22.6% T3and 3.8% T4. Initial tumor size was assessed by mammogram and ultrasound. Primary tumor histology was ductal in 64.8% and lobular in 25.4%.568 pts (60.9%) were clinically node negative (cN0), 36.2% cN1, 2.6% cN2 with 0.3% cN3. LNs were palpable in 25.2%. 383 had LN needle biopsy pre NET, of which 80.9% were positive. The surgeons’ initial impression of the patient’s eligibility for BCS was 74% while 0.6% were considered inoperable.75.5% of pts had post-NET imaging performed. Of those with tumor size recorded, 52.9% were T1 or not visible. Overall, 69.9% of the 933 patients had BCS. Of those 330 pts without post-NET imaging or who had post-NET imaging without a size noted, 64.8% underwent BCS. For pts undergoing BCS, 80.2% required only one surgery for margin clearance. Of the 690 pts deemed eligible for BCS pre NET, 79% had BCS. Of the 240 pts deemed ineligible for BCS pre-NET, 43.8% had BCS. Of the pre-NET cT2 tumors, 79% had BCS while only 45.5% of T3 tumors and 37.1% of T4 tumors had BCS. On surgical pathology, 474 (50.8%) pts were LN+ compared to pre-NET cN+ 39.1% and needle biopsy-proven 33.2%. For pts with pN0, 93.3% had SLNB alone. 6.7 % of pN0 had ALND alone or SLNB+ALND. For those with pN1-3 , 36.3% had SLN only; 37.3% SLN+ ALND; 26.4% ALND alone. Only 0.8% of the patients had no ALND or SLNB performed. Pts undergoing BCS were more likely to have SLNB alone for a +SLN compared to mastectomy pts (62.9% vs. 37.6%; chi-square p<0.0001). For pts with pre-NET +LN on needle biopsy, only 26.8% underwent SLNB alone, while 37.4% underwent ALND alone. Of the 204 LN-positive pts having SLNB alone, 55.9% had only 1 + LN and 27% had only 2+ LNs. For pN+ pts who underwent SLNB +ALND, 42.1% had 1-2 + LNs. Conclusion: With NET, 69.9% of pts achieved BCS, including 43.8% deemed ineligible pre-NET. Given the low rate of pCR to NET, there should not be the expectation of pCR in +LNs. Based on the procedures performed in pts with +SLNs, it appears that surgeons were applying ACOSOG Z0011 criteria for pts having BCS, but were less likely to omit ALND for +LN in pts having mastectomy. The finding of only 1-2 +LNs in many of the LN+ pts suggests that omission of ALND may be a reasonable approach post-NET. Longer follow-up is required to assess local-regional recurrence. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588 Citation Format: A. M. Leitch, T. Dockter, V. suman, A. Weiss, G. W. Unzeitig, J. Guenther, S. Sanati, K. Vij, J. Hoog, A. Caudle, A. Tiersten, M. Mita, W. Razaq, T. J. Hieken, Y. Wang, M. Rimawi, M. J. Ellis, E. Winer, K. K. Hunt, A. H. Partridge, L. A. Carey. Surgical outcomes in the ALTERNATE trial (Alliance A011106) -a randomized phase 3 neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) trial in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II/III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF1-02.

Abstract Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) is a standard endocrine strategy for premenopausal women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer. However, poor tolerability to AI+OFS limits its use, leaving tamoxifen as the only alternative. Prospective studies demonstrated that premenopausal women treated with neoadjuvant ET whose tumors exhibit Ki-67 ≤ 10% following 4 weeks of therapy achieve 5-year distant disease-free survival > 96%. Problematically, only 41% of patients reach this threshold with tamoxifen compared to 78% with AI+OFS (Nitz JCO 2022). (Z)-endoxifen (ENDX) is a potent selective estrogen receptor modulator that dually targets ERα and PKCβ1. At plasma concentrations of 3-5 ng/mL, it inhibits ERα; at ≥ 500 ng/mL, it targets PKCβ1, leading to AKT suppression. The EVANGELINE trial aims to examine endocrine sensitivity in terms of Week 4 Ki-67 in premenopausal women whose baseline Ki-67 > 10%, and objective response rate after 24 weeks of ENDX + goserelin in premenopausal women with baseline Ki-67≤ 10%. Methods: EVANGELINE (NCT05607004) is a multicenter, open-label, Phase 2 study comprised of three parts. Eligible patients are premenopausal women with Stage IIA/IIB ER+/HER2- breast cancer. • Part 1 (PK Run-in): assessed 40mg vs 80mg ENDX (+/- OFS) in 22 patients. • Part 2: patients with baseline Ki-67 >10% were randomized to 40 mg ENDX + goserelin or exemestane + goserelin for 6 months with the primary objective being 4-week ESD rate. Patients with a baseline Ki-67 ≤10% were assigned to a single-arm cohort of 40 mg ENDX monotherapy (no OFS) to evaluate the 24-week endocrine sensitivity disease rate. • Part 3 (replaces Part 2): all patients are treated with ENDX 40mg daily + goserelin every 28 days. A two stage Phase II design was chosen to assess outcomes as follows: Part 3a: Up to 45 patients with baseline Ki-67> 10% to assess Week 4 Ki-67≤ 10% rate is at least 65%. If 9 or more of these patients have a Week 4 Ki-67>10%, enrollment will be stopped due to futility. Otherwise, enrollment will continue. Part 3b: Up to 20 patients enrolled with baseline Ki-67≤ 10% to assess Week 24 objective response rate. Ki-67 levels are determined by central laboratory and images are centrally reviewed. Secondary objectives include safety, tolerability, surgical outcomes, and biomarker analysis using paired biopsies (baseline, week 4) and surgical specimens. Results: The PK run-in (completed Fall 2024) enrolled 22 patients and assessed ENDX doses (40 mg daily vs 80 mg daily (+/-OFS)). The Week 4 Ki-67 ≤ 10% rate with ENDX was 86% and did not differ according to dose. Early safety, PK, efficacy and compliance data supported the selection of 40 mg ENDX daily as the optimal dose. Enrollment in Part 2 began in May 2025. Part 3 will replace Part 2 with simplification of the trial design. Conclusions: EVANGELINE is the first trial to evaluate (Z)-endoxifen + OFS as neoadjuvant therapy in premenopausal ER+/HER2- breast cancer. By targeting both ER and PKC pathways, ENDX may offer a well-tolerated alternative to AI-based regimens and expand endocrine therapy options for this population. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05607004 Citation Format: M. P. Goetz, V. J. Suman, C. Lopez, H. Erickson, L. Beaulieu, S. S. Hammer, L. Mina, R. Leon-Ferre, K. N. Hunt, M. Piltin, A. Degnim, J. N. Ingle, J. C. Boughey, B. A. Sarah, J. M. Reid, M. Schellenberg, J. R. Hawse, P. Advani, K. Giridhar, F. Batalini, D. Flora, J. M. Jones, N. A. Bagegni, J. Jakub, V. Abramson, V. Dabak, W. J. Irvin, E. Sima, K. Seema, S. C. Quay. A Phase 2 Trial of (Z)-endoxifen + Goserelin as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Premenopausal Women with ER+, HER2-, Breast Cancer (EVANGELINE) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-12-16.