Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

30 citation(s) found for "Badheka, Apurva".

Abstract 18807: Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): Insights From Nationwide Inpatient Sample
Singh, Vikas , Savani, Chirag, Sonani, Rajesh, Patel, Nileshkumar , Patel, Achint , Patel, Nilay, Thakkar, Badal, Arora, Shilpkumar , Desai, Maheshkumar, Deshmukh, Abhishek , Badheka, Apurva O., Patel, Samir , Panaich, Sidakpal , Lahewala, Sopan , Pau, Dhaval , Jhamnani, Sunny

Circulation | July 3, 2021 | Volume: 132 | Issue: suppl_3 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3.18807 Get It

Introduction: Short-term use of Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS) has the potential to benefit the patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) who may be high-risk or suffer complications. The present study was conducted to address the contemporary use of MCS in TAVR procedures. Methods: The study included a total of 1794 TAVR procedures in the years 2011-2012 from Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Use of MCS was identified using ICD-9-CM codes. The patients were divided based on use of MCS devices. The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcomes were complications, length of stay (LOS) and cost. Multi-variate simple logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of the outcomes. Results: Out of total 1794 TAVR procedures, 190 (10.6 %) utilized a MCS device (MCS group) and 1,604 (89.4%) did not (non-MCS group). The use of MCS devices with TAVR was associated with increase in the in-hospital mortality (14.9% vs. 3.5%, p<0.01) with same results obtained in multi-variate models. The rates of complications were significantly higher in MCS group so as the mean length of stay (11.8±0.8 vs. 8.1±0.2 days, p<0.01) and cost ($68,997±3,656 vs. $55,878±653, p=0.03). Conclusion: Use of MCS in TAVR predicts increase in-hospital mortality, complications, LOS and cost of care.
Abstract 18615: Impact of Peripheral Atherectomy Utilization on the Outcomes of Lower Extremity Arterial Intervention - A Cross-sectional US Experience
Arora, Shilpkumar , Patel, Nilay , Agnihotri, Kanishk, Patel, Nileshkumar , Savani, Chirag, Dave, Abhishek , Thakkar, Badal, Patel, Achint , Patel, Sanskruti, Patel, Aashay, Sonani, Rajesh, Chothani, Ankit , Singh, Vikas , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Badheka, Apurva O., Lahewala, Sopan , Panaich, Sidakpal , Dave, Abhishek, Patel, Samir , Bhatt, Parth , Jhamnani, Sunny

Circulation | July 3, 2021 | Volume: 132 | Issue: suppl_3 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3.18615 Get It

Background: Contemporary outcome data regarding effects of atherectomy in lower extremity arterial revascularization is lacking. Methods: We queried HCUP’s Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) for 2012 using the appropriate primary ICD 9-CM diagnostic code for peripheral vascular disease and procedural codes 39.90 (bare metal stent - BMS), 00.55 (drug eluting stent - DES), 17.56 (peripheral artherectomy) and 39.50 for angioplasty. Only procedures performed in patients >= 18 years were included. Hierarchical mixed effects logistic regression models were generated to evaluate multivariate predictors of outcomes. Results: In total 13,206 (weighted: 66,030) lower extremity arterial revascularization were analyzed (65.5% white, 56.2% Male & 97.4% angioplasty). Atherectomy utilization (23.2%) was associated with significant reduction in amputation (11.5% vs 13.4%), any complications (13.2% vs 16.3%) and in hospital morality (0.8% vs 1.4%) compared to no atherectomy group (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed similar results with decrease amputation (OR, 95% CI; p - value) (0.83, 0.71 - 0.97, p = 0.02) and in hospital mortality/any complication (0.79, 0.69 - 0.90, p = 0.001) with atherectomy (similar results were observed with propensity score matching). “Atherectomy only” was utilized only in 2.3%. post-hoc analysis also shows better outcomes when atherectomy was used with either angioplasty or stenting (figure a & b). subgroup multivariate analysis shows significant reduction in amputation when atherectomy was utilized in chronic limb ischemia (0.74, 0.59 - 0.93, p = 0.01) and with angioplasty (0.72, 0.60 - 0.87, p = 0.001) and trend towards advantage while used along with stents but not reaching statistical significant. Conclusion: Lower extremity atherectomy utilization was associated with significant reduction in amputation and overall complication. We observed better outcomes when atherectomy was used in conjunction with angioplasty.
Abstract 16538: The Impact of Institutional Design on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Complication Rates in the United States
Pant, Sadip, Golwala, Harsh , Patel, Nilesh, Badheka, Apurva, Deshmukh, Abhishek , Agnihotri, Kanishk, Patel, Nilay, Savani, Chirag, Flaherty, Michael P. , Patel, Samir , Patel, Nilesh, Grubb, Kendra J

Circulation | July 3, 2021 | Volume: 132 | Issue: suppl_3 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3.16538 Get It

Introduction: With the technical advancements and expanding indications, utilization of TAVR is on the rise among various institutions in the United States .While appropriate patient selection and better techniques are essential to improving outcomes, the impact of institutional design (or hospital setting) on outcomes with TAVR has yet to be examined. Objective: The objective of our study is to compare TAVR complication rates among teaching vs non-teaching centers in the United States Methods: We used Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project - National Inpatient Sample (NIS) data , the largest all payer database of hospital inpatient stay available in United States, to identify patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent TAVR from Jan-Dec 2012. We constructed multivariable models to determine independent predictors (age, sex, race, Charlson’s comorbidity index, hospital size, hospital location and TAVR approach) of TAVR-associated complications. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata IC 11.0 (Stata-Corp, College Station, TX). Results: We identified 7,405 TAVR procedures performed in the United States in 2012. 88% of TAVR were performed in teaching centers. There was no difference in mortality following TAVR between teaching and non-teaching centers. The occurrence of any in-hospital complication was lower in teaching centers as compared to non-teaching centers (42% vs. 50%, p<0.001). Rates of individual complications in teaching vs. non-teaching centers are illustrated in the figure. In adjusted analysis, hemorrhage requiring transfusion (13.2% vs. 20.8%, p<0.001), renal complications requiring dialysis (1.2% vs. 2.3%, p=0.009), respiratory complications (7.5% vs. 11%, p<0.001) and complications requiring open-heart surgery (2% vs. 4.6%, p<0.001) were lower in teaching centers as compared to non-teaching centers. Vascular access site complications, pacemaker insertion, pericardial and neurological complications were similar between teaching and non-teaching centers (Figure). Conclusion: Institutional design impacts TAVR complication rates albeit no difference in mortality. In general, complication rates are lower in teaching centers compared to non-teaching centers.
Frequency of in‐hospital adverse outcomes and cost utilization associated with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator implantation in the United States
Patel, Nilay , Viles-González, Juan F., Agnihotri, Kanishk, Arora, Shilpkumar , Patel, Nileshkumar , Aneja, Ekta, Shah, Mahek , Badheka, Apurva O., Pothineni, Naga Venkata K. , Kancharla, Krishna , Mulpuru, Siva K. , Cha, Yong‐Mei , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Pothineni, Naga Venkata , Mulpuru, Siva, Cha, Yong-Mei , Noseworthy, Peter A. , Kusumoto, Fred

Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology | July 17, 2018 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1425-1435

10.1111/jce.13701 | PMID 30016005 Get It

AbstractBackground: The utilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT‐D) has increased significantly, since its initial approval for use in selected patients with heart failure. Limited data exist as for current trends in implant‐related in‐hospital complications and cost utilization. The aim of our study was to examine in‐hospital complication rates associated with CRT‐D and their trends over the last decade.Methods and Results: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we estimated 378 248 CRT‐D procedures from 2003 to 2012. We investigated common complications, including mechanical, cardiovascular, pericardial complications (hemopericardium, cardiac tamponade, or pericardiocentesis), pneumothorax, stroke, vascular complications (consisting of hemorrhage/hematoma, incidents requiring surgical repair, and accidental arterial puncture), and in‐hospital deaths described with CRT‐D, defining them by the validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code. Mechanical complications (5.9%) were the commonest, followed by cardiovascular (3.6%), respiratory failure (2.4%), and pneumothorax (1.5%). Age (≥65 years), female gender (OR, 95% CI; P value) (1.08, 1.03‐1.13; 0.001), and the Charlson score ≥3 (1.52, 1.45‐1.60; <0.001) were significantly associated with increased mortality/complications.Conclusions: The overall complication rate in patients undergoing CRT‐D has been increasing in the last decade. Age (≥65), female sex, and the Charlson score ≥3 were associated with higher complications. In patients who underwent CRT‐D implantation, postoperative complications were associated with significant increases in cost.
Temporal trends of in‐hospital complications associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States: An update from Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2011–2014)
Arora, Shilpkumar , Kumar, Varun , Lahewala, Sopan , Dave, Mihir, Shah, Mahek , Tan, Bryan E‐Xin , Savani, Sejal, Badheka, Apurva, Gopalan, Radha , Shantha, Ghanshyam Palamaner Subash , Viles-González, Juan F., Deshmukh, Abhishek , Tripathi, Byomesh , Tripathi, Byomesh , Abdel‐Rahman, Mohamed H. , Tan, Bryan E-Xin

Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology | February 25, 2018 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 715-724

10.1111/jce.13471 | PMID 29478273 Get It

AbstractBackgroundCatheter ablation is widely accepted intervention for atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs, but limited data are available regarding contemporary trends in major complications and in‐hospital mortality due to the procedure. This study was aimed at exploring the temporal trends of in‐hospital mortality, major complications, and impact of hospital volume on frequency of AF ablation–related outcomes.MethodsThe Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was utilized to identify the AF patients treated with catheter ablation. In‐hospital death and common complications including vascular access complications, cardiac perforation and/or tamponade, pneumothorax, stroke, and transient ischemic attack, were identified using International Classification of Disease (ICD‐9‐CM) codes.ResultIn‐hospital mortality rate of 0.15% and overall complication rate of 5.46% were noted among AF ablation recipients (n = 50,969). Significant increase in complications during study period (relative increase 56.37%, P‐trend < 0.001) was observed. Cardiac (2.65%), vascular (1.33%), and neurological (1.05%) complications were most common. On multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR]; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]; P value), significant predictors of complications were female sex (OR = 1.40; CI = 1.17–1.68; P value < 0.001), high burden of comorbidity as indicated by Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (OR = 2.84; CI = 2.29–3.52; P value < 0.001), and low hospital volume (< 50 procedures).ConclusionOur study noted a decline in AF ablation–related hospitalizations and complications associated with the procedure. These findings largely reflect shifting trends of outpatient performance of the procedure and increasing safety profile due to improved institutional expertise and catheter techniques.
Procedural trends, outcomes, and readmission rates pre‐and post‐FDA approval for MitraClip from the National Readmission Database (2013–14)
Panaich, Sidakpal , Arora, Shilpkumar , Badheka, Apurva, Kumar, Varun , Maor, Elad , Raphael, Claire E. , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Reeder, Guy S., Eleid, Mackram F. , Rihal, Charanjit S. , Panaich, Sidakpal S, Raphael, Claire , Eleid, Mackram F , Panaich, Sidakpal S , Maor, Elad , Rihal, Charanjit S.

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | November 20, 2017 | Volume: 91 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1171-1181

10.1002/ccd.27366 | PMID 29152829 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThere are sparse clinical data on the procedural trends, outcomes and readmission rates following FDA approval and expansion of Transcatheter mitral valve repair/MitraClip®. Whether a complex new technology can be disseminated safely and quickly is controversial.MethodsThe study cohort was derived from the National Readmission Data (NRD) 2013–14. MitraClip® was identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM) codes. The primary outcome was a composite of in‐hospital mortality + procedural complications. Secondary outcome included 30‐day readmissions. Hierarchical two level logistic models were used to evaluate study outcomes.ResultsOur analysis included 2003 MitraClip® procedures. Overall in‐hospital mortality was 3.9%. As expected, there was a significant increase in procedural volume post‐FDA approval. Importantly, a corresponding downward trend in mortality and procedural complications was observed. Significant predictors of in‐hospital mortality and procedural complications included the use of vasopressors (P <0.001) and hemodynamic support (P < 0.001). Higher hospital volume (≥10 MitraClips/year) was associated with lower in‐hospital mortality and complications (P = 0.02). There were 304 (15.1%) 30‐day readmissions, with heart failure being the most common cause of readmission. Elective procedures had lower in‐hospital mortality (P < 0.001) and lower readmission rates (P = 0.011) compared with nonelective procedures.ConclusionA significant increase in MitraClip® procedural volumes occurred post‐FDA approval. Overall morbidity and mortality were low and trended downwards. Hospital procedure volume ≥10 cases were associated with lower mortality and overall complication rates. These data suggest a successful roll out of a very complex novel structural heart procedure.
Septal Ablation and Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy: 7 Years US Experience
Chothani, Ankit , Panaich, Sidakpal , Patel, Nilay , Patel, Nileshkumar , Arora, Shilpkumar , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Badheka, Apurva O., Grines, Cindy L. , Panaich, Sidakpal S

Journal of Interventional Cardiology | August 22, 2016 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 505-512

10.1111/joic.12319 | PMID 27545515 Get It

BackgroundSeptal ablation (SA) is a key modality for left ventricular outflow tract gradient reduction in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) patients with refractory symptoms. The primary objective of our study was to evaluate post‐procedural mortality, complications, length of stay (LOS), and cost of hospitalization following SA.MethodsWe queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2005 and 2011 using the ICD9 procedure code of 37.34 for ablation of heart tissue. Only adult patients with HOCM (ICD‐9‐CM: 425.1) were included. Patients with any arrhythmia diagnosis or open surgical ablation procedure code were excluded. Hierarchical mixed effects models were generated in order to identify the independent multivariate predictors of outcomes.ResultsA total of 358 SAs were available for analysis. There was no reported mortality during the study period; permanent pacemaker implantation rate was 8.7%. Highest hospital volume tertile (OR, 95%CI, P‐ value) predicted significantly lower post‐procedural complications (0.51, 0.26–0.98, P = 0.04). Univariate analysis of highest versus lowest tertile of hospital volume showed significant decrease in LOS (2.6 days vs. 3.8 days, P<0.01) and non‐significant decrease hospitalization costs (16,800$ vs. 19,500$, P = 0.29).ConclusionsSA is a safe procedure and associated with low peri‐ procedural mortality rate. A higher burden of baseline comorbidities is associated with worse outcomes while higher annual hospital volume is associated with lower rate of post‐procedural complications, length of stay, and cost of care following SA.
Impact of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors Use on Outcomes After Lower Extremity Endovascular Interventions From Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2006–2011)
Arora, Shilpkumar , Panaich, Sidakpal , Patel, Nilay , Patel, Nileshkumar , Lahewala, Sopan , Thakkar, Badal, Savani, Chirag, Jhamnani, Sunny , Singh, Vikas , Patel, Nish , Patel, Samir , Sonani, Rajesh, Patel, Achint , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Chothani, Ankit , Bhatt, Parth , Mohamad, Tamam , Remetz, Michael S., Curtis, Jeptha P. , Attaran, Ramak R., Mena, Carlos, Schreiber, Theodore , Cleman, Michael , Forrest, John K. , Badheka, Apurva O., Tripathi, Byomesh , Patel, Jay N. , Grines, Cindy L. , Panaich, Sidakpal S

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | February 25, 2016 | Volume: 88 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 605-616

10.1002/ccd.26452 | PMID 26914274 Get It

ObjectiveThe aim of our study was to study the impact of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) on in‐hospital outcomes.BackgroundThere is paucity of data regarding the impact of GPI on the outcomes following peripheral endovascular interventions.MethodsThe study cohort was derived from Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between the years 2006 and 2011. Peripheral endovascular interventions and GPI utilization were identified using appropriate ICD‐9 Diagnostic and procedural codes. Two‐level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The study outcomes were: primary (in‐hospital mortality and amputation studied separately) and secondary (composite of in‐hospital mortality and postprocedural complications). Hospitalization costs were also assessed.ResultsGPI utilization (OR, 95% CI, P‐value) was independently predictive of lower amputation rates (0.36, 0.27–0.49, <0.001). There was no significant difference in terms of in‐hospital mortality (0.59, 0.31–1.14, P 0.117), although GPI use predicted worse secondary outcomes (1.23, 1.03–1.47, 0.023). Following propensity matching, the amputation rate was lower (3.2% vs. 8%, P < 0.001), while hospitalization costs were higher in the cohort that received GPI ($21,091 ± 404 vs. 19,407 ± 133, P < 0.001).ConclusionsMultivariate analysis revealed GPI use in peripheral endovascular interventions to be suggestive of an increase in composite end‐point of in‐hospital mortality and postprocedural complications, no impact on in‐hospital mortality alone, significantly lower rate of amputation, and increase in hospitalization costs. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.