Citations

Mayo Clinic

Showing 10 of 108519 citations.

Teflon Granuloma With Active Inflammation: A Cause of Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia After Microvascular Decompression
Herber, Steven C., Zimmerman, Richard S. , Yang, Ming , Martinez, Felipe , Herber, Steven, Chen, Alicia

Clinical Nuclear Medicine | October 31, 2024 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1105-1108

10.1097/rlu.0000000000005444 | PMID 39479994 Get It

Abstract Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is characterized by excruciating facial pain usually caused by neurovascular compression of the trigeminal nerve roots. TN can be treated medically or invasively. Microvascular decompression is the procedure of choice and usually results in complete symptom relief. During surgical decompression, Teflon can be placed between the offending vessel and the nerve root entry zone. In some cases, chronic Teflon-related inflammation can cause recurrent TN, which might lead to additional surgical intervention. We present imaging and histopathological correlation of a patient presenting with intractable recurrent TN approximately 2 years after microvascular decompression with Teflon implant.
A pilot trial of integrating the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) into rheumatology care
Gedert, Rosemary J. , Ochocki, Danielle N., Kortam, Neda , Huang, Suiyuan, Chakrabarti, Katherine , Ford, Julia A. , Garber, Martin E. , Ognenovski, V., Cella, David , Nagaraja, Vivek , Lee, Jiha , Roofeh, David , Khanna, Dinesh

Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology | October 31, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.55563/clinexprheumatol/fp914f | PMID 39480493 Get It

Efficacy of Adding Veliparib to Temozolomide for Patients With MGMT -Methylated Glioblastoma
Kizilbash, Sani H. , Friday, Bret B., Butowski, Nicholas , Mohile, Nimish, Battiste, James , Campian, Jian , Mashru, Sandeep H., Jaeckle, Kurt A. , O’Brien, Barbara , Kabat, Brian, Laack, Nadia L., Hu, Leland , Kumthekar, Priya , Anderson, S. Keith , Dixon, Jesse G. , Kabat, Brian F, Kaufmann, Timothy, Kizilbash, Sani H , Sarkaria, Jann N. , Ballman, Karla V. , Sulman, Erik P. , Giannini, Caterina , Piccioni, David Eric , Drappatz, Jan , Kaufmann, Timothy J. , Ellingson, Benjamin M. , Galanis, Evanthia

JAMA Oncology | October 31, 2024 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1637

10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.4361 | PMID 39480453 Get It

Importance The prognosis for patients with glioblastoma is poor following standard therapy with surgical resection, radiation, temozolomide, and tumor-treating fields. Objectives To evaluate the combination of veliparib and temozolomide in glioblastoma based on preclinical data demonstrating significant chemosensitizing effects of the polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase 1/2 inhibitor veliparib when combined with temozolomide. Design, Setting, and Participants Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with MGMT promoter hypermethylation who had completed concomitant radiation and temozolomide were enrolled between December 15, 2014, and December 15, 2018, in this Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology trial. The data for this analysis were locked on April 21, 2023. Interventions Patients were randomized and treated with standard adjuvant temozolomide (150-200 mg/m 2 orally, days 1-5) combined with either placebo or veliparib (40 mg orally, twice daily, days 1-7) for 6 cycles. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point for the phase 3 portion of the trial was overall survival (OS). Results There were 322 patients randomized during the phase 2 accrual period and an additional 125 patients randomized to complete the phase 3 accrual, for a total of 447 patients in the final phase 3 analysis. The median (range) age for patients was 60 (20-85) years and 190 patients (42.5%) were female. The median OS was 24.8 months (90% CI, 22.6-27.7) for the placebo arm and 28.1 months (90% CI, 24.3-33.3) for the veliparib arm ( P = .17). The difference in survival did not meet the prespecified efficacy end point. However, there was a separation of the survival curves that favored the veliparib arm over 24 to 48 months of follow-up. The experimental combination was well tolerated with an acceptable elevation in grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxic effects. Conclusions and Relevance This trial found that adding veliparib to adjuvant temozolomide did not significantly extend OS in patients with newly diagnosed, MGMT -hypermethylated glioblastoma. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02152982
Carbon monoxide inhalation for performance: dancing with the devil?
Minson, Christopher T. , Joyner, Michael J. , Joyner, Michael J

Journal of Applied Physiology | October 31, 2024 | Volume: 137 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1563-1565

10.1152/japplphysiol.00767.2024 | PMID 39480268 Get It

Whys and Wherefores of Coronary Arterial Positive Remodeling
Onnis, Carlotta , Virmani, Renu , Madra, Anna , Nardi, Valentina , Montisci, Roberta , Cau, Riccardo , Boi, Alberto , Lerman, Amir , Cecco, Carlo N. De , Saba, Luca , Montisci, Roberta , Cau, Riccardo , Boi, Alberto , Lerman, Amir , De Cecco, Carlo N , Libby, Peter , Saba, Luca , Virmani, Renu , Nardi, Valentina , Salgado, Rodrigo , Libby, Peter

Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology | October 31, 2024 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2416-2427

10.1161/atvbaha.124.321504 | PMID 39479766 Get It

Positive remodeling (PR) is an atherosclerotic plaque feature defined as an increase in arterial caliber at the level of an atheroma, in response to increasing plaque burden. The mechanisms that lead to its formation are incompletely understood, but its role in coronary atherosclerosis has major clinical implications. Indeed, plaques with PR have elevated risk of provoking acute cardiac events. Hence, PR figures among the high-risk plaque features that cardiac imaging studies should report. This review aims to provide an overview of the current literature on coronary PR. It outlines the pathophysiology of PR, the different techniques used to assess its presence, and the imaging findings associated to PR, on both noninvasive and invasive studies. This review also summarizes clinical observations, trials, and studies, focused on the impact of PR on clinical outcome.
When and What to Test for Diarrhea: Focus on Stool Testing
Camilleri, Michael

American Journal of Gastroenterology | October 31, 2024 | Volume: 120 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 778-784

10.14309/ajg.0000000000003175 | PMID 39480027 Get It

INTRODUCTION: To review stool diagnostic tests in acute and chronic diarrhea. METHODS: Narrative review of published literature. RESULTS: In acute diarrhea, stool tests are indicated when there is strong pretest probability of infectious etiology or Clostridioides difficile infection suggested by > 3 unformed bowel movements per 24 hours, symptoms lasting >7 days, and circumstances that are suggestive of infection. Several commercially available rapid tests for bacterial, viral, or protozoal infections may be offered in addition to traditional methods (e.g. culture, microscopy) and provide a result within 6 hours. For C . difficile infections, a highly sensitive test such as glutamate dehydrogenase test is required; however, this does not distinguish infection from carrier state. That differentiation requires specialized nucleic acid amplification test (for toxin B) or enzyme immunoassays for toxin A or B, which are unfortunately not generally offered by microbiology laboratories. Chronic diarrhea may result from inflammatory, fatty, osmotic, or secretory causes; the commonest cause is diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome/functional diarrhea. Current recommendations in societal guidelines or clinical practice updates regarding stool tests in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome/functional diarrhea in the absence of alarm symptoms include testing for Giardia, calprotectin, fecal immunochemical test, and bile acid diarrhea. Comprehensive stool biochemical analyses (osmolality, pH, electrolytes) differentiate osmotic from secretory diarrhea and identify laxative abuse. Specific stool diagnostic tests for bile acid diarrhea and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency can lead to specific diagnosis and treatments. Surrogate markers associated with high fecal output and rapid transit in chronic diarrhea are stool form and colonic transit. DISCUSSION: Fecal testing is still very relevant in the practice of gastroenterology and deserves introduction of advanced microbiological and biochemical tests.
Polynucleotides in Skin Regeneration: Targeting the Adenosine A2A Receptor and Salvage Pathway
Pitassi, Luiza Helena Urso, Pearson, Keenan , Assis, Luís Antônio de, Biesman, Brian S. , Calomeni, Mariana, Bay-Aguilera, Shino, Wyles, Saranya P. , Elias, Mariana Calomeni , Pearson, Keenan S , Assis, Luís Antônio de

Dermatologic Surgery | October 31, 2024 | Volume: 50 | Issue: 11S | Pages: S131-S134

10.1097/dss.0000000000004438 | PMID 39480034 Get It

Comparative Effectiveness of Ozanimod and Vedolizumab as First-Line Advanced Therapies in Ulcerative Colitis: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis
Kochhar, Gursimran , Khataniar, Himsikhar , Hashash, Jana G. , Tabaku, Fjona, Regueiro, Miguel , Desai, Aakash , Kochhar, Gursimran S , Desai, Aakash , Regueiro, Miguel , Hashash, Jana G , Farraye, Francis A.

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases | October 31, 2024 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1868-1875

10.1093/ibd/izae251 | PMID 39478367 Get It

Abstract Introduction There is limited real-world evidence comparing the effectiveness of ozanimod to vedolizumab as first-line advanced therapies in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a multi-institutional US database in adults with UC who were initiated on ozanimod compared to vedolizumab between January 1, 2021 and 22 June, 2024. The primary outcome was to compare the risk of a composite outcome of corticosteroid use, colectomy, or change to another advanced therapy between the 2 cohorts within 12 months. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for demographics, comorbid conditions, disease extent, laboratory parameters, and previous corticosteroid use. The risk was expressed as an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% CIs. Results We identified 222 patients in the ozanimod cohort (mean age 41.2 ± 15.7, 46.3% male sex, 68% White, and 22.5% ulcerative proctitis), and 4145 patients in the vedolizumab cohort (mean age 47.4 ± 18.3, 45.2% male sex, 69.7% White, and 17.2% ulcerative proctitis). After PSM, there was no significant difference in the risk of the composite outcome (aOR 0.92, 95% CI, 0.63-1.36) and corticosteroid use (aOR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.53-1.18) between the 2 cohorts within 12 months. There was a higher risk of change in therapy in the ozanimod cohort (aOR 1.95, 95% CI, 1.09-3.49) compared to the vedolizumab cohort. Colectomy rates were low in both cohorts (<0.04%). Conclusions Our real-world study showed that ozanimod use is associated with similar corticosteroid use but higher odds of a change in therapy compared to vedolizumab when used as first-line therapy in patients with UC. Further prospective studies are needed to understand long-term outcomes.
IPP PLAN: A penile implant checklist
Pinkhasov, Alexandr, Byrne, Eileen R. , Köhler, Tobias S.

International Journal of Reconstructive Urology | October 31, 2024 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 124-127

10.4103/ijru.ijru_23_24 Get It