Citations

Abstract Purpose: Expression of the tumor suppressor gene E-cadherin is diminished in lobular breast cancers and has been implicated in epithelial mesenchymal transition. We assessed risk factor associations for breast cancer stratified by low vs. high E-cadherin protein expression in a pooled analysis within the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) studies. Methods: E-cadherin tumor tissue staining was performed centrally at the NCI on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue microarray (TMA) sections representing 6,010 breast cancer patients from 12 US and European BCAC studies. TMAs were digitally scanned and scored using the SlidePath Digital Image Hub (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany). For 5,896 cancers with evaluable tumors, E-cadherin was visually scored as estimated percent of positive cells times stain intensity (0, 1+, 2+, 3+) (score range 0-300). E-cadherin low was defined as tumors with a score < 100. Risk factor associations for low vs. high E-cadherin expressing tumors were evaluated by logistic regression, adjusted for age and study site, and stratified by ER status and histologic subtype. To assess the consistency in results by study, meta-analyses were performed using the random-effects model. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: E-cadherin low cancers comprised 20% of tumors and were associated with lobular histology, well/moderately differentiated cancers, > 2cm in size, and HER2-negative status (χ2, P < 0.003 for all factors). E-cadherin low status was associated with family history of breast cancer (FH) (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.09-1.60, P-het = 0.005) and ever use of menopausal hormones (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.02-1.56, P-het = 0.03). Study specific meta-plots showed consistent effects across studies for menopausal hormone therapy (I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.64); however, E-cadherin loss by FH did show evidence of heterogeneity by study (I2 = 54%, P = 0.03). Differences in E-cadherin expression remained significant for FH, and menopausal hormone use when further adjusted for ER (P < 0.05). We also found relationships with E-cadherin loss to vary by BMI, number of live births, age at first birth, and oral contraceptive use in stratified analysis by ER status and histologic subtype. Conclusion: This large pooled analysis shows that breast cancer risk factor associations may differ by E-cadherin expression independent of ER status, suggesting that it may represent a marker of etiologic heterogeneity. Citation Format: Hisani N. Horne, Hannah Oh, Mark E. Sherman, Maya Palakal, Stephen H. Hewitt, Marjanka Schmidt, Javier Benitez, Roger Milne, Hermann Brenner, Heli Nevanlinna, Arto Mannermaa, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Fergus Couch, Peter Devilee, Diana Eccles, Maartje Hooning, Anthony J. Swerdlow, Nick Orr, Melissa A. Troester, Renata Cora, Paul D. Pharoah, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Jonine D. Figueroa. Breast cancer risk factor associations by loss of E-cadherin tumor tissue expression: A pooled analysis of 5,896 cases in 12 studies from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3451.

Abstract Several papers have implicated mutations in the AT-rich interactive domain containing protein 1B (ARID1B) in carcinoma formation in multiple tissue types, including the lung. The ARID1B protein functions as part of SWI/SNF, a multi-subunit chromatin remodeling complex that repositions nucleosomes and may act as a tumor suppressor in cancer. ARID1B is located in a region in 6q that was previously shown to have strong evidence of linkage with lung cancer risk. As it is one of the more promising candidates within the target region, this study presents the viability of ARID1B as a candidate gene for familial lung cancer. Here, we chose individuals from families in our previous linkage study that showed the strongest linkage signal on 6q. 75 individuals from 9 families were sequenced for 37Mb of chromosome 6 from 130Mb to 167Mb using Illumina technology and a custom Agilent kit. Genotypes were imported into GoldenHelix SVS 7 for quality control and dropped if read depth < 10, quality score < 10 or a quality score to read depth ratio < 0.5. Variants with more than 1 Mendelian error were dropped. Variants with a single Mendelian inconsistency were dropped only for that family. Two-point parametric linkage analysis at theta = 0 was performed using R and an implementation of the Elston-Stewart algorithm in the paramlink package using a penetrance model of 0.01/0.1/0.1 (dd/Dd/DD) and a disease allele (D) frequency of 0.01. Family 102 showed strong evidence for linkage near ARID1B. The highest LOD score (1.34) out of all sequenced variants was located near this gene in a known conserved intergenic region between ARID1B and NOX3. Four other LOD scores > 0.7 were found in the intergenic region between these two genes. Two are transcription factor binding sites; two are conserved genomic elements. We also observed two linked intronic variants of ARID1B in this family; an enhancer (LOD = 0.89) and a transcribed region (LOD = 0.73). Two other families (47 and 59) displayed evidence of linkage in ARID1B. Here, the interest is not the value of the LOD scores (top scores were 0.64 and 0.54), but the centering of the linked haplotype around the gene. Family 47 has 60 variants with LODs between 0.64 and 0.61; 45 located within ARID1B or known regulatory regions. Family 59 has 61 variants with LODs between 0.54 and 0.51; 29 located within ARID1B or known regulatory regions The variants appear to be spread evenly throughout ARID1B, suggesting the presence of linked haplotypes. Analyses are currently underway to reconstruct possible haplotypes in these families. The results of this study show that variants in the ARID1B gene at least partially account for the linkage signal on 6q in three of the nine most strongly linked families in our cohort and thus we believe that ARID1B is a plausible candidate gene for further studies involving familial lung cancer. Replication studies using 27 new extended families are currently underway to confirm this initial result. Citation Format: Anthony M. Musolf, Claire L. Simpson, Mariza de Andrade, Diptasri Mandal, Colette Gaba, Ping Yang, Ming You, Elena Y. Kupert, Marshall W. Anderson, Ann G. Schwartz, Susan M. Pinney, Christopher I. Amos, Joan E. Bailey-Wilson. Chromatin remodeling gene ARID1B is linked to familial lung cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2542.

SummaryObjectivePosttraumatic seizures (PTS) are well‐recognized acute and chronic complications of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Risk factors have been identified, but considerable variability in who develops PTS remains. Existing PTS prognostic models are not widely adopted for clinical use and do not reflect current trends in injury, diagnosis, or care. We aimed to develop and internally validate preliminary prognostic regression models to predict PTS during acute care hospitalization, and at year 1 and year 2 postinjury.MethodsPrognostic models predicting PTS during acute care hospitalization and year 1 and year 2 post‐injury were developed using a recent (2011–2014) cohort from the TBI Model Systems National Database. Potential PTS predictors were selected based on previous literature and biologic plausibility. Bivariable logistic regression identified variables with a p‐value < 0.20 that were used to fit initial prognostic models. Multivariable logistic regression modeling with backward‐stepwise elimination was used to determine reduced prognostic models and to internally validate using 1,000 bootstrap samples. Fit statistics were calculated, correcting for overfitting (optimism).ResultsThe prognostic models identified sex, craniotomy, contusion load, and pre‐injury limitation in learning/remembering/concentrating as significant PTS predictors during acute hospitalization. Significant predictors of PTS at year 1 were subdural hematoma (SDH), contusion load, craniotomy, craniectomy, seizure during acute hospitalization, duration of posttraumatic amnesia, preinjury mental health treatment/psychiatric hospitalization, and preinjury incarceration. Year 2 significant predictors were similar to those of year 1: SDH, intraparenchymal fragment, craniotomy, craniectomy, seizure during acute hospitalization, and preinjury incarceration. Corrected concordance (C) statistics were 0.599, 0.747, and 0.716 for acute hospitalization, year 1, and year 2 models, respectively.SignificanceThe prognostic model for PTS during acute hospitalization did not discriminate well. Year 1 and year 2 models showed fair to good predictive validity for PTS. Cranial surgery, although medically necessary, requires ongoing research regarding potential benefits of increased monitoring for signs of epileptogenesis, PTS prophylaxis, and/or rehabilitation/social support. Future studies should externally validate models and determine clinical utility.

Abstract Breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers are hormone-related and may have a shared genetic basis, but this has not been investigated systematically by genome-wide association (GWA) studies. Meta-analyses combining the largest GWA meta-analysis data sets for these cancers totaling 112,349 cases and 116,421 controls of European ancestry, all together and in pairs, identified at P &lt; 10−8 seven new cross-cancer loci: three associated with susceptibility to all three cancers (rs17041869/2q13/BCL2L11; rs7937840/11q12/INCENP; rs1469713/19p13/GATAD2A), two breast and ovarian cancer risk loci (rs200182588/9q31/SMC2; rs8037137/15q26/RCCD1), and two breast and prostate cancer risk loci (rs5013329/1p34/NSUN4; rs9375701/6q23/L3MBTL3). Index variants in five additional regions previously associated with only one cancer also showed clear association with a second cancer type. Cell-type–specific expression quantitative trait locus and enhancer–gene interaction annotations suggested target genes with potential cross-cancer roles at the new loci. Pathway analysis revealed significant enrichment of death receptor signaling genes near loci with P &lt; 10−5 in the three-cancer meta-analysis. Significance: We demonstrate that combining large-scale GWA meta-analysis findings across cancer types can identify completely new risk loci common to breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers. We show that the identification of such cross-cancer risk loci has the potential to shed new light on the shared biology underlying these hormone-related cancers. Cancer Discov; 6(9); 1052–67. ©2016 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 932

BACKGROUNDProspective quality metrics for neck dissection have not been established for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between lymph node counts from neck dissection, local‐regional recurrence, and overall survival.METHODSThe number of lymph nodes counted from neck dissection in patients treated in 2 NRG Oncology trials (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG] 9501 and RTOG 0234) was evaluated for its prognostic impact on overall survival with a multivariate Cox model adjusted for demographic, tumor, and lymph node data and stratified by the postoperative treatment group.RESULTSFive hundred seventy‐two patients were analyzed at a median follow‐up of 8 years. Ninety‐eight percent of the patients were pathologically N+. The median numbers of lymph nodes recorded on the left and right sides were 24 and 25, respectively. The identification of fewer than 18 nodes was associated with worse overall survival in comparison with 18 or more nodes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09‐1.74; P = .007). The difference appeared to be driven by local‐regional failure (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.02‐2.08; P = .04) but not by distant metastases (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.77‐1.53; P = .65). When the analysis was limited to NRG Oncology RTOG 0234 patients, adding the p16 status to the model did not affect the HR for dissected nodes, and the effect of nodes did not differ with the p16 status.CONCLUSIONSThe removal and identification of 18 or more lymph nodes was associated with improved overall survival and lower rates of local‐regional failure, and this should be further evaluated as a measure of quality in neck dissections for mucosal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2016;122:3464–71. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

AbstractAimThe Cleveland Clinic has proposed a prognostic model of preoperative risk factors for failure of restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis. The model incorporates four predictive variables: completion proctectomy, handsewn anastomosis, diabetes mellitus and Crohn's disease. The aim of the present study was to perform an external validation of this model in a new cohort of patients who had RPC.MethodValidation was performed in a multicentre cohort of 747 consecutive patients who had an RPC between 1990 and 2015 in three tertiary‐care facilities, using a Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis. The performance of the model was expressed using the Harrell concordance error rate. The primary outcome measure was pouch survival with maintenance of anal function.ResultsDuring the study period, 45 (6.0%) patients experienced failure at a median interval of 31 months (interquartile range 9–82 months) from the original RPC. Multivariable analysis showed handsewn anastomosis to be the only significant independent predictor. The Harrell concordance error rate was 0.42, indicating poor performance. Anastomotic leakage and Crohn's disease of the pouch were strong postoperative predictors for pouch failure and showed a significant difference in pouch survival after 10 years (P < 0.001).ConclusionThe poor performance of the Cleveland Clinic prognostic model makes it unsuitable for daily clinical practice. Handsewn anastomosis was associated with pouch failure in our cohort with relatively few events. A prediction model for anastomotic leakage or Crohn's disease of the pouch may be a better solution since these variables are strongly associated with pouch failure.

Abstract Background: OPB-111077 is a new chemical entity with anticancer activity in vitro and in human tumor xenograft models. The compound modulates STAT3 phosphorylation but has no marked effect on activity of any of 69 tested human tyrosine or serine/threonine kinases. This P1 study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of OPB-111077 in subjects with advanced cancers. Methods: Primary objectives determined safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of OPB-111077 given orally once daily to subjects with advanced cancer. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity. In the first 2 cycles of dose escalation, Day 1 dose was followed by 2 days off study therapy for PK. The starting dose was 100 mg once daily. Single subject cohorts with dose level doublings were studied until the first ≥ Grade 2 AE that was possibly drug-related. Then a 3+3 design was used. After MTD determination, expansion cohorts were opened for subjects with malignancies possibly susceptible to inhibition by OPB-111077, including breast, cervical, colorectal, gastric, kidney, myeloma, non-small cell lung, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, ovarian, and prostate cancers, as well as “rare tumors” for which STAT3 inhibition might generate clinical activity. Results: Overall 145 subjects received OPB-111077. Mean age was 61 years (range 21-88), and 51% of subjects were female. Dose escalation occurred in 18 subjects. Four DLTs were observed: 2 at 400 mg QD (G3 nausea/vomiting), and 2 at 300 mg QD (G3 vertigo and G3 nausea/vomiting). The MTD was 250 mg QD. All subjects recovered from DLTs after drug discontinuation. Adverse events (AEs) that may be attributable to OPB-111077 include nausea (71%), vomiting (46%), fatigue (44%), dizziness/vertigo (26%), and hypothyroidism (19%). Most AEs were CTCAE Grades 1 or 2 and manageable with supportive treatment. OPB-111077 exposures increase dose proportionally and linearly with increasing single and multiple doses up to 250 mg. Median time to peak plasma concentration (tmax) is about 4 hours. Mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) is 16 μmol/L and mean trough concentration is 6 μmol/L after multiple doses of 250 mg QD. Terminal half-life is about 23 hours and steady state was reached by about 1 week. The major metabolites in plasma are pharmacologically inactive and unlikely to contribute to efficacy. Administration with a high fat meal did not significantly alter OPB-111077 bioavailability. Expansion cohorts enrolled 127 subjects, including NSCLC (13), breast (13), ovarian (11), kidney (11), colorectal (10), prostate (8), lymphoma (8), gastric (7), cervical (3) cancers, and myeloma (1). Rare tumors with STAT rationale included sarcomas (13), neuroendocrine tumors (7), squamous cell carcinomas (5), other carcinomas (12), and other malignant tumors (5). One RECIST Partial Response occurred in a subject with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma. In addition, 7 subjects with had stable disease for at least 8 treatment cycles, including gastric (2), cholangiocarcinoma, kidney, prostate, K-Ras mutant colon cancer, and esthesioneuroblastoma. Conclusions: OPB-111077 can be given safely and achieves clinically active drug levels in humans. Single agent clinical activity was observed. Translational work is ongoing to determine factors driving clinical activity Citation Format: Gregory Cote, Kyriakos Papadopoulos, Amita Patnaik, Drew Rascoe, Lon Smith, Andrea Bullock, Keith Flaherty, Geoffrey Shapiro, Jordan Berlin, Manish Monga, Thomas Habermann, Thomas Witzig, Chester Lin, Lin-Feng Tsai, Agnes Elekes, Naoto Ohi, Kunihiko Tatsumi, Anthony Tolcher. A phase 1, open-label multiple dose escalation trial to determine safety and tolerability of once daily OPB-111077 in subjects with advanced cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr B118.