Citations

Background: Simultaneous carpal tunnel release (sCTR) with emergent forearm fasciotomy in the setting of acute compartment syndrome (ACS) has been reported, but the national incidence and cost of delayed carpal tunnel release (CTR) remain unknown. This large database study aims to evaluate how often sCTR is performed, the frequency of delayed CTR when not performed simultaneously, and the associated costs. Methods: The PearlDiver Mariner database was queried for patients who underwent forearm fasciotomies between January 1, 2015, and October 31, 2022. Patients were grouped based on CTR timing: simultaneous, within 2 weeks, 2 weeks to 1 year, 1 to 5 years, or no CTR. Reimbursement data were collected, and patient numbers and costs were analyzed across cohorts. Results: More than half of patients undergoing emergent forearm fasciotomy received sCTR. Among those who did not, 31% required CTR within 1 year and 35% within 5 years. The total cost was highest when CTR was performed within 1 year but not on the same day as fasciotomy. After 1 year, the additional cost of CTR was similar to that of patients who never underwent fasciotomy. Conclusions: This large database study shows that over one-third of patients who did not undergo sCTR at the time of emergent forearm fasciotomy required it within 1 year, incurring significantly higher costs. Including sCTR during initial fasciotomy may reduce delayed care and associated expenses. While these findings suggest that including sCTR during initial fasciotomy may reduce delayed care and expenses, the retrospective design precludes definitive recommendations, and clinical judgment remains essential Level of Evidence: 4

OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine minimum clinically important difference (MCID) values for dysphagia using the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) in patients undergoing anterior cervical surgery, focusing on early dissatisfaction and later satisfaction thresholds to guide clinical decisions. METHODS Data were prospectively collected from patients undergoing anterior cervical surgery across three institutions from 2016 to 2024. Dysphagia severity was assessed preoperatively and at various postoperative stages up to 1 year using EAT-10. The inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to control for confounding variables. The retrospective study of patient data employed two analytical phases: the first phase examined the relationship between dissatisfaction at 3 months (indicated by a North American Spine Society satisfaction score > 2) and changes in EAT-10 scores from baseline to peak (i.e., worst) postoperative scores; the second phase focused on recovery, comparing changes in EAT-10 scores from peak postoperative scores to 12 months against satisfaction (score < 2) at 12 months. RESULTS The mean ± SD baseline EAT-10 score for the 1463 patients included in the study was 1.5 ± 4.7 and the mean peak score was 5.2 ± 7.4. The patients underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (90%), arthroplasty (6%), or corpectomy (4%); a hybrid procedure was used in 1%. The phase 1 analysis indicated that a 4-point increase in EAT-10 score was a threshold for significant postoperative dissatisfaction in those without baseline dysphagia, with much higher thresholds observed in patients with any baseline dysphagia. In phase 2, among patients with baseline EAT-10 scores < 3 who experienced an increase to EAT-10 score ≥ 8 postoperatively, a subsequent decrease of 9 points by 12 months was necessary to report satisfaction. For patients with baseline scores 3–8 whose postoperative scores rose to ≥ 8, a subsequent decrease of 15 points was necessary for satisfaction. Patients with initial scores of ≥ 8 who did not improve to < 3 immediately after surgery required further reductions of 2–11 points to reach satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS The MCID thresholds from this study provide crucial benchmarks for assessing dysphagia changes after anterior cervical surgery, allowing tailored interventions. Patients with baseline dysphagia are less likely to experience early dissatisfaction, and high peak scores negatively impact long-term satisfaction. These findings emphasize the importance of proactive dysphagia management to enhance patient outcomes.

Abstract Isolated/idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is a usually prodromal manifestation of neurodegenerative disorders with α-synuclein pathology: Parkinson’s disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and multiple system atrophy (MSA). Clinical trials in the iRBD population face substantial barriers: limited access to well-characterized cohorts, inconsistent assessment protocols across centers, and the absence of validated biomarkers of disease burden. The North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) Consortium was established to address these challenges and facilitate clinical trials for neuroprotective therapies targeting synucleinopathy at the earliest known stages. In this multi-site, longitudinal, observational study, nine academic centers across North America will enroll and follow over 500 individuals with iRBD from existing sleep centers. Sixty control participants, matched for age, sex, and race will also be recruited. A harmonized protocol—including a standardized clinical battery assessing motor, cognitive, autonomic, psychiatric, sensory, and sleep function; structured diagnostic adjudication; biospecimen collection; and centralized analysis of both polysomnography and neuroimaging data—is outlined herein and reflects NAPS Stage 2. Each participants completes these assessments annually, and are replaced in the event of phenoconversion. By unifying assessments and expanding geographic reach, NAPS lays the groundwork for efficient, well-powered clinical trials designed to delay or prevent progression of iRBD to overt PD, DLB, or MSA—ultimately enabling earlier, more effective therapeutic intervention for neurodegenerative disease. Registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05826457).

Abstract Despite the reported benefits of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), prior studies have shown that TRT is correlated with increased incidence of adverse outcomes after orthopedic procedures. There is a paucity of literature assessing the outcomes of patients on preoperative TRT undergoing distal radius open reduction and internal fixation (DR-ORIF). Our purpose was to evaluate rates of surgical and medical complications in patients on TRT undergoing DR-ORIF with a matched control cohort. The PearlDiver database was queried for patients who used TRT within 3 months prior to the index procedure. Patients were matched 1:4 with nonuser controls using propensity score matching. Matching was conducted based on age, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, hypogonadism, osteoporosis, and other comorbidities. Complications were assessed at 90 days and 2 years. Statistical analyses were conducted using chi-square tests. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each complication. Statistical significance was determined at a p-value of < 0.05. The matched group included 657 TRT users and 2,236 controls. There were significant differences in depression (control: 40.6% vs. TRT: 45.7%, p = 0.02) and rates of hypogonadism (control: 74.1% vs. TRT: 77.9%, p = 0.05) between the groups. No other statistically significant demographic or characteristic differences were noted. TRT use was not associated with increased surgical or medical complication rates at 90 days postoperatively. At 2 years, TRT use was associated with a greater incidence of revision (OR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.34–5.85) and nonunion (OR: 2.76, 95% CI: 1.59–4.81). There were no other associations noted at 2 years. Preoperative TRT was associated with an increased risk of revision surgery and nonunion at 2 years postoperatively. No other significant associations in the risk of major or minor complications were observed. Level III

Abstract Introduction Accurate detection of gene fusions is critical for the diagnosis and management of sarcomas. However, occasional false-negative results may occur due to factors such as low tumor cellularity, limited assay coverage of relevant genomic regions, or mis-annotation by bioinformatic pipelines. We recently encountered a case in which our clinical SARCP fusion detection assay failed to identify an HMGA2::NCOR2 (exon 3–exon 16) fusion. Method The SARCP assay is a targeted, amplicon-based RNA-seq next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay designed to detect gene fusions across 138 genes, including HMGA2. Although NCOR2 is not among the targeted genes, the assay is capable of detecting fusions when only one gene partner is represented. Results Suspicion of a false-negative result arose when the pathologist noted that the tumor’s histologic features—keratin-positive, giant cell-rich soft tissue—were consistent with a subtype previously associated with the HMGA2::NCOR2 fusion. This prompted a review of the bioinformatic output, which had erroneously reported an HMGA2::MAML2 fusion. The misannotation was traced to sequence homology involving a CAA/CAG repeat at the 5′ end of NCOR2 exon 16, likely resulting from DNA polymerase slippage and misalignment in low-complexity, partially complementary repetitive regions. This erroneously lead to the target genomic sequence getting mapped to MAML2 exon 2 as opposed to the NCOR2 exon 16. Discussion This case highlights how bioinformatic mis-annotation can lead to occasional false-negative fusion calls. It underscores the importance of manual review in cases with strong clinical or pathologic suspicion and calls attention to the need for fusion-calling algorithms that better handle repetitive and homopolymeric sequences. Citation Format: Ganesh P. Pujari, Mitch L. Klebig, Kurt S. Willkom, Montha Chhunn, Stefan W. Nelson, Neiladri Saha, Kevin C. Halling. Mis-Annotation of an HMGA2::NCOR2 Fusion in FFPE Sarcoma Samples: A Case Illustrating Bioinformatic Limitations in Fusion Detection [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Fusion-Positive Cancer: From Discovery to Therapy; 2026 Jan 13-15; Philadelphia PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(1_Suppl):Abstract nr A012.

373 Background: Recent studies have demonstrated encouraging outcomes with neoadjuvant ICIs in pts with localized deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and/or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) GEC, prompting discussions around the feasibility of nonoperative management (NOM). However, current evidence is largely from phase 1 and 2 clinical trials with limited sample sizes. Thus, the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ICI in this pt population remain subject to ongoing debate. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective studies evaluating neoadjuvant ICIs in pts with localized dMMR/MSI-H GEC according to the PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcomes were pathological complete response (pCR) and complete clinical response (cCR) rates. cCR was defined as no evidence of residual disease on tumor-specific imaging and on endoscopy with biopsy. Secondary outcomes included major pathologic response (MPR) rates and the incidence of grade 3–4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to pool event rates for occurrence of cCR, pCR, MPR and grade 3-4 irAEs. The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used. NOM was assessed as part of the qualitative analysis. Results: 20 studies comprising 396 pts treated with neoadjuvant ICIs were included. Three studies utilized double ICI blockade (PD-1/ PD-L1 inhibitor plus CTLA-4 inhibitor), while the remaining studies primarily utilized monotherapy with a PD-1 inhibitor, with or without chemotherapy. Overall, 320 (81.0%) underwent surgical resection. The pooled pCR rate was 41.6% (95% CI, 33.1%–50.8%), cCR 63.8% (95% CI, 45.6%–78.8%), and MPR 64.2% (95% CI, 49.1%–76.9%). The pooled incidence of grade 3–4 irAEs was 5.1% (95% CI, 0.6%–12.2%). Subgroup analysis showed higher pCR with ≥3 months versus <3 months of ICI (50.2% [95% CI 42.2–58.3] vs 28.4% [18.9–40.2]; χ²=8.69, p=0.003). Forty-four pts were managed with NOM, two experienced early local regrowth over median follow-up ranging from 11.5 to 28 months. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant ICI therapy appears to be a safe and effective therapeutic strategy for pts with localized dMMR/MSI-H GEC. Neoadjuvant ICI exposure for ≥3 months seems to yield higher pCR rates than <3 months. The high and prolonged cCR rates support the nonoperative strategy in selected patients with dMMR/MSI-H GEC.

Abstract Background Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) allows patients to complete extended antimicrobial treatment at home, improving quality of life and reducing healthcare costs. National guidelines outline best practices for antimicrobial administration, vascular access management, monitoring, and recommend involving an infectious disease physician and a multidisciplinary team. Evaluating adherence to these practices can identify improvement opportunities and enhance outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to assess patient outcomes related to adherence to OPAT best practices at Mayo Clinic Health System – Southwest Wisconsin (MCHS–SWWI). Secondary objectives included evaluating adherence to key process metrics and identifying associations between baseline characteristics and outcomes. Methods This retrospective cohort study included adults discharged from MCHS–SWWI on home OPAT from November 2021 to July 2024. Patients were excluded if under 18 years old or if they received OPAT in non-home settings (e.g., skilled nursing, infusion center). Data on process metrics, outcomes, and safety were collected through manual chart review. These findings were evaluated against established best practices to assess the OPAT program's adherence and determine the impact of this adherence on patient outcomes. Statistical analysis used Pearson’s chi-square tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests to measure associations of patient characteristics with outcomes. Results A total of 164 patients were included. The MCHS-SWWI OPAT program demonstrated high adherence ( &gt; 85%) to majority of established best practices. Successful OPAT completion occurred in 92.7% of patients, and overall incidence of adverse events and poor outcomes was generally low. Adherence to best practices was below 85% for vascular access selection (81.7%) and completion of weekly labs and vascular access care throughout the OPAT course (∼69%). Conclusion High adherence to OPAT best practices led to a generally low incidence of adverse events, treatment failures, and other unfavorable patient outcomes. The results of this study provide valuable insights to guide institutional quality improvement initiatives aimed at optimizing patient outcomes in OPAT therapy through targeted interventions. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures