Citations

Abstract Herein, we present the long-term follow-up of the randomized E1912 trial comparing the long-term efficacy of ibrutinib–rituximab (IR) therapy to fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) and describe the tolerability of continuous ibrutinib. The E1912 trial enrolled 529 treatment-naïve patients aged ≤70 years with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Patients were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to receive IR or 6 cycles of FCR. With a median follow-up of 5.8 years, median progression-free survival (PFS) is superior for IR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; P < .001). IR improved PFS relative to FCR in patients with both immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV) gene mutated CLL (HR: 0.27; P < .001) and IGHV unmutated CLL (HR: 0.27; P < .001). Among the 354 patients randomized to IR, 214 (60.5%) currently remain on ibrutinib. Among the 138 IR-treated patients who discontinued treatment, 37 (10.5% of patients who started IR) discontinued therapy due to disease progression or death, 77 (21.9% of patients who started IR) discontinued therapy for adverse events (AEs)/complications, and 24 (6.8% of patients who started IR) withdrew for other reasons. Progression was uncommon among patients able to remain on ibrutinib. The median time from ibrutinib discontinuation to disease progression or death among those who discontinued treatment for a reason other than progression was 25 months. Sustained improvement in overall survival (OS) was observed for patients in the IR arm (HR, 0.47; P = .018). In conclusion, IR therapy offers superior PFS relative to FCR in patients with IGHV mutated or unmutated CLL, as well as superior OS. Continuous ibrutinib therapy is tolerated beyond 5 years in the majority of CLL patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02048813.

Background While use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is increasing, little is known about how patients view healthcare AI. Characterizing patient attitudes and beliefs about healthcare AI and the factors that lead to these attitudes can help ensure patient values are in close alignment with the implementation of these new technologies. Methods We conducted 15 focus groups with adult patients who had a recent primary care visit at a large academic health center. Using modified grounded theory, focus-group data was analyzed for themes related to the formation of attitudes and beliefs about healthcare AI. Results When evaluating AI in healthcare, we found that patients draw on a variety of factors to contextualize these new technologies including previous experiences of illness, interactions with health systems and established health technologies, comfort with other information technology, and other personal experiences. We found that these experiences informed normative and cultural beliefs about the values and goals of healthcare technologies that patients applied when engaging with AI. The results of this study form the basis for a theoretical framework for understanding patient orientation to applications of AI in healthcare, highlighting a number of specific social, health, and technological experiences that will likely shape patient opinions about future healthcare AI applications. Conclusions Understanding the basis of patient attitudes and beliefs about healthcare AI is a crucial first step in effective patient engagement and education. The theoretical framework we present provides a foundation for future studies examining patient opinions about applications of AI in healthcare.

Background: Administrative data such as Medicare data are commonly used for health services research and comparative effectiveness studies. These databases are readily available and a good source of long-term data on healthcare utilization and health outcomes in real-world settings. Outcomes are captured using diagnostic codes, but the evidence on the validity of these codes is scarce in contemporary Medicare data. Methods: We linked the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study data using SSN, date of birth and sex to 2003-2009 Medicare claims. In addition to the events captured by REGARDS phone interviews, medical charts were pursued for Medicare-identified strokes not previously identified in REGRADS. Events were adjudicated by stroke specialists using the retrieved medical charts. Using all the adjudicated strokes as gold standard, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of inpatient stroke algorithms with ICD-9-CM codes [430, 431, 433.x1, 434.x1, 436] in the primary discharge diagnosis. Results: We successfully linked 15,089 REGARDS participants with mean age of 69.3, 52% female and 37% Black. We adjudicated 457 strokes, of which 48 were identified by claims only and not by interviews. The tested algorithms had high specificity (99.8-100%), PPV (88.6-90.5%) and NPV (98.9-99.9%), but low sensitivity (58.6-67.4%) (Table). Conclusions: High specificity and PPV of our algorithms to identify strokes in contemporary Medicare populations support their use in etiological and comparative effectiveness studies. While our inpatient Medicare algorithms identified 12% extra cases of strokes, their usefulness for estimating stroke incidence or related healthcare utilizations is limited by their low sensitivity. Linking cohorts to Medicare data is feasible and should be considered to increase the completeness of follow-up. Further studies are needed to evaluate more sensitive Medicare algorithms.

Abstract Background. DCIS consists of a molecularly heterogeneous group of premalignant lesions, with variable risk of invasive progression. Understanding biomarkers for invasive progression could help individualize treatment recommendations based upon tumor biology. As part of the NCI Human Tumor Atlas Network (HTAN), we conducted comprehensive genomic analyses on two large DCIS case-control cohorts. Methods. We performed smart3-seq and low-pass whole genome sequencing on two independent, retrospective, longitudinally sampled DCIS case-control cohorts. TBCRC 038 was a multicenter cohort diagnosed with DCIS between 1998 and 2016 at one of the Translational Breast Cancer Research sites; the RAHBT (Resource of Archival Human Breast Tissue) cohort included women identified through the St. Louis Breast Tissue Repository, and the Women’s Health Repository diagnosed between 1997 and 2001. We studied the spectrum of molecular changes present and sought genomic predictors of subsequent ipsilateral breast events (iBEs: DCIS recurrence or invasive progression) in both DCIS epithelium and stroma in formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue. We generated de novo tumor and stroma-centric subtypes for DCIS that represents fundamental transcriptomic organization. Copy number analysis was performed using low-pass DNA sequencing. Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) was applied to the RNA expression of all coding genes to identify clusters. A negative-binomial regression model was used to identify differentially expressed genes. Results. We analyzed 677 DCIS samples from 481 patients with 7.1 years median follow-up. In TBCRC samples, we identified three clusters via NMF in TBCRC referred to as ER low, quiescent, and ER high. The ER-low cluster had significantly higher levels of ERBB2 and lower levels of ESR1 compared to quiescent and ER-high clusters. Quiescent cluster lesions were less proliferative and less metabolically active than ER high and ER low subtypes. These findings were replicated in the RAHBT cohort. Focusing on the stromal component of DCIS from laser capture microdissection in RAHBT samples, we identified four distinct DCIS-associated stromal clusters. A “normal-like” stromal cluster with ECM organization and PI3K-AKT signaling; a “collagen-rich” stromal cluster; a “desmoplastic” stromal cluster with high fibroblast and total myeloid abundance, mostly associated with macrophages and myeloid dendritic cells (mDC); and an “immune-dense” stromal cluster. Further, we compared differentially expressed genes in patients with or without subsequent iBEs within 5 years of diagnosis. Hypothesizing that the resulting 812 DE genes (DESeq2) represent multiple routes to subsequent iBEs, we leveraged NMF to identify paths to progression. In both TBCRC and RAHBT cohorts, poor outcome groups exhibited increased ER, MYC signaling, and oxidative phosphorylation, supporting that these pathways are important for DCIS recurrence and progression. Conclusion. Comprehensive genomic profiling in two independent DCIS cohorts with longitudinal outcomes shows distinct DCIS stromal expression patterns and immune cell composition. RNA expression profiles reveal underlying tumor biology that is associated with later iBEs in both cohorts. These studies provide new insight into DCIS biology and will guide the design of diagnostic strategies to prevent invasive progression. Citation Format: Siri H Strand, Belén Rivero-Gutiérrez, Kathleen E Houlahan, Jose A Seoane, Lorraine M King, Tyler Risom, Lunden Simpson, Sujay Vennam, Aziz Khan, Timothy Hardman, Bryan E Harmon, Fergus J Couch, Kristalyn Gallagher, Mark Kilgore, Shi Wei, Angela DeMichele, Tari King, Priscilla F McAuliffe, Julie Nangia, Joanna Lee, Jennifer Tseng, Anna Maria Storniolo, Alastair Thompson, Gaorav Gupta, Robyn Burns, Deborah J Veis, Katherine DeSchryver, Chunfang Zhu, Magdalena Matusiak, Jason Wang, Shirley X Zhu, Jen Tappenden, Daisy Yi Ding, Dadong Zhang, Jingqin Luo, Shu Jiang, Sushama Varma, Cody Straub, Sucheta Srivastava, Christina Curtis, Rob Tibshirani, Robert Michael Angelo, Allison Hall, Kouros Owzar, Kornelia Polyak, Carlo Maley, Jeffrey R Marks, Graham A Colditz, E Shelley Hwang, Robert B West. The Breast PreCancer Atlas DCIS genomic signatures define biology and correlate with clinical outcomes: An analysis of TBCRC 038 and RAHBT cohorts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-07.

Abstract We followed 106 349 primary care patients for 22 385 3099 person-days across 21 calendar months and documented 69 breakthrough coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalizations: 65/102,613 (0.06%) among those fully vaccinated, 3/11 047 (0.03%) among those previously infected, and 1/7,313 (0.01%) among those with both statuses. These data give providers real-world context regarding breakthrough COVID-19 hospitalization risk.

There is a growing appreciation for differences in epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes of cardiovascular conditions by sex. Historically, cardiovascular clinical trials have under-represented females, but findings have nonetheless been applied to clinical care in a sex-agnostic manner. Thus, much of the collective knowledge about sex-specific cardiovascular outcomes result from post hoc and secondary analyses. In some cases, these investigations have revealed important sex-based differences with implications for optimizing care for female patients with arrhythmias. This review explores the available evidence related to cardiac arrhythmia care among females, with emphasis on areas in which important sex differences are known or suggested. Considerations related to improving female enrollment in clinical trials as a way to establish more robust clinical evidence for the treatment of females are discussed. Areas of remaining evidence gaps are provided, and recommendations for areas of future research and specific action items are suggested. The overarching goal is to improve appreciation for sex-based differences in cardiac arrhythmia care as 1 component of a comprehensive plan to optimize arrhythmia care for all patients.

TPS7 Background: Penis cancer is a rare but potentially fatal disease. A limited body of evidence exists on which to base the majority of management decisions for patients with regional nodal metastases. Five-year survival for patients with a single involved inguinal lymph node treated with surgery alone is approximately 80%, whilst it ranges from 0 to 12% for patients with pelvic node involvement (N3). Additional strategies are required for the management regionally-advanced disease. InPACT (NCT02305654) aims to determine prospectively the relative benefits and sequencing of surgery, chemotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy in the management of patients with penis cancer who present with palpable or radiologically evident inguinal lymph node metastases. InPACT addresses the following questions: Is there a role for neoadjuvant therapy and, if so, which of the two options (chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) before surgery gives superior outcomes? Among patients whose inguinal node histology predicts a high risk of recurrence, does prophylactic pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) plus chemoradiation to the inguinal and pelvic fields improve survival compared to chemoradiation alone? Methods: A Bayesian trial design aims to include a wide population of patients and incorporates two randomisations: InPACT-neoadjuvant and InPACT-pelvis. Participants are stratified by disease burden (extent of nodal involvement), by the presence or absence of high-risk radiological features, and by GFR. Participants with high disease burden where neoadjuvant treatment is thought to be indicated are randomised to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Participants with intermediate disease burden are randomised to one of 3 arms: Surgery alone or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery. Participants in the low-burden group proceed directly to surgery. Participants with postoperative inguinal node pathology that shows high-risk features may then proceed to InPACT-pelvis where randomisation is between adjuvant chemoradiotherapy ± PLND for those not previously treated with chemoradiotherapy & between PLND & observation for those previously treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The study aims to recruit 200 participants. The primary outcome measure is overall survival, with secondary outcome measures of disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, and freedom from locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis. Feasibility, toxicity, the type/extent of surgical complications, and quality of life will be assessed as secondary endpoints for all the InPACT treatment arms. To October 2021, 65 participants have been recruited with centres open in the UK, US and Canada. Clinical trial information: NCT02305654.