Citations

Abstract Background: NOTCH oncogenic signaling induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and tumor stemness that play a critical role in driving tumor progression. Following interaction of NOTCH receptors (NOTCH 1, 2, 3, and 4) with their ligands (DELTA-LIKE 1, 3, 4 and JAGGED 1, 2), γ- secretase complex performs an intra-membrane cleavage releasing the NOTCH intracellular domain (NNICD). NNICD translocates to the nucleus and induces the expression of HEY1 and HES1 transcription factors that in turn orchestrate NOTCH-mediated EMT and stemness reprogramming. Materials and Methods: Parental MCF-7 and unique metastatic MCF-7RAF-1 xenografts with constitutively active MAPK signaling (D’Assoro et al., Oncogene 2014: 33:599-610) were used to define the extent to which increased expression of NOTCH signaling was linked to distant metastases. SKY analysis was performed to assess the grade of chromosomal instability (CIN) in tumor xenografts. Stemness activity was assessed by culturing breast cancer cells under non-adherent conditions to generate mammospheres. Expression of CD24 luminal marker was characterized by FACS analysis and immunofluorescence. Global transcriptome analysis was performed using Affymetrix® microarray. Highly invasive MDA-MB 231 breast cancer cells were used to perform a tail vein cancer cell-seeding assay. The LY411575 γ-secretase inhibitor (Pan-NOTCH inhibitor) was used to block NOTCH signaling in MDA-MB 231 cells. Results: Metastasis Initiating Cells (MICs) isolated from the lungs of nude mice carrying MCF-7RAF-1 xenografts exhibited a higher degree of genomic stability than primary tumor xenografts that was characterized by the absence of centrosome amplification and non-clonal chromosomal abnormalities. MICs also showed higher mammosphere forming capacity that was linked to lower expression of luminal marker CD24. Significantly, global transcriptome analysis showed that expression of NOTCH3 and HES1 stemness genes was increased in MICs. To corroborate the role of NOTCH signaling in inducing metastatic seeding, MDA-MB 231 breast cancer cells were pre-treated with 1 µM of LY411575 After 72 hours viable cells were injected into the tail vein of immune-compromised mice to develop lung metastases. While animals injected with untreated MDA-MB 231 cells developed lung metastases, those injected with the LY411575-treated MDA-MB 231 cells failed to develop lung metastatic lesions. Conclusions: These preliminary findings demonstrate the role of NOTCH stemness signaling in promoting metastatic seeding of breast cancer cells. Since NOTCH signaling is a “druggable target”, these results also provide the rationale to develop novel NOTCH-targeted therapies to inhibit tumor stemness and early onset of distant metastases. Citation Format: Alexey Leontovich, Jeffrey Salisbury, Candace L. Haddox, Lisa Mills, Tufia Haddad, James McCubrey, Matthew Goetz, James Ingle, Evanthia Galanis, Antonino B. D'Assoro. NOTCH signaling promotes metastatic seeding and growth of human breast cancer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4851. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4851

Objective: To report the clinical features, treatment, and outcomes of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced hepatotoxicity. Patients and Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we identified patients with metastatic malignant melanoma seen in consultation and/or treated between March 2011 and March 2016. Hepatotoxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v4.0. Results: Seventeen patients were identified as having any degree of hepatotoxicity by history (grade 1 to 4). Twelve of 17 were diagnosed after ipilimumab, 3 of 17 were diagnosed after pembrolizumab, and 2 of 17 after ipilimumab combined with nivolumab. Median time from first dose of immune therapy to hepatotoxicity was 52 days. Clinical symptoms were variable: asymptomatic, fatigue, myalgias, headache, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, confusion, and/or jaundice. Eight patients had concurrent adverse events including colitis, hypophysitis, pneumonitis, and/or rash. Immune therapy was discontinued in all patients except 3. The patients were most commonly treated with systemic corticosteroids such as prednisone. Immunosuppression was discontinued by taper over a median of 42 days; in 3 patients steroids had to be reinitiated based on clinical or laboratory worsening of liver tests. Normalization of liver tests was seen within a median of 31 days of immunosuppression initiation. One patient with grade 4 hepatotoxicity had normalization with the addition of cyclosporine. Conclusions: Melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors should be monitored regularly for hepatotoxicity. Treatment with discontinuation of therapy and initiation of corticosteroids is indicated with grade 3 or 4 hepatotoxicity. Cyclosporine may be beneficial in steroid-refractory hepatotoxicity.

Background Patch-test readings after day 5 have previously been used to identify delayed reactions to metals and topical antibiotics. Objective The aims of this study were to identify allergens for which late readings (beyond day 5) would be most valuable and to compare our results with our previous study on delayed patch-test readings. Methods This was a retrospective study of 298 patients who underwent metal and corticosteroid series patch testing from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2013. Patch-test readings were conducted on days 3 and 5 and at least once sometime between days 7 and 14. All reactions were examined at each reading. Conclusions These results were concordant with our previous findings that additional readings after day 7 are particularly useful for identifying reactions to metals (gold, cobalt, beryllium, palladium), specific preservatives (dodecyl gallate, propolis), and the topical antibiotic neomycin. New delayed reactions to bacitracin, p -phenylenediamine, and topical corticosteroids were not seen in this cohort.

Objectives/HypothesisSarcomatoid carcinoma is a rare variant of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. No consensus exists on its management. Our aim was to present our outcomes.Study DesignRetrospective study. Median follow‐up 45 months.MethodsThere were 38 patients with pathologically confirmed sarcomatoid carcinoma of the larynx treated at the Mayo Clinic from 1990 to 2014. Statistical analysis of overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) were conducted using the Kaplan‐Meier method.ResultsThe majority of patients were elderly males (92%) with a smoking history (74%) presenting with early‐stage disease (71%). Surgery alone was the primary treatment in 27 patients (71%). Nine patients (25%) were treated with adjuvant radiation due to initial stage or high‐risk pathologic features. Median radiation dose to the primary/surgical bed was 65 Gy (range, 60.3–75.0 Gy). A total of 15 patients (39%) had tumor recurrence, majority being local (n = 12). Sixty percent (n = 9) had multiple local recurrences. Five‐year OS, PFS, and LC were 63%, 46%, and 72%, respectively. Subgroup analysis by stage I versus higher stages (II–IV) showed an OS of 80% versus 43% (P = .030), PFS of 65% versus 18% (P = .003), and LC of 84% versus 57% (P = .039).ConclusionsSarcomatoid carcinoma of the larynx is rare, and frequently presents at an early stage in older men with history of smoking. Based on our outcomes and patterns of failure, it appears early‐stage tumors are treated appropriately with single‐modality therapy, whereas more advanced tumors require multimodality therapy. Validation in a larger cohort is warranted.Level of Evidence4. Laryngoscope, 128:373–377, 2018

Background: Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a neurological and ophthalmologic emergency associated with poor visual recovery. There is a dilemma regarding the appropriate treatment, as formal guidelines are lacking. Despite being considered an ocular equivalent of cerebral infarction, the time window of intravenous (IV) thrombolysis administration for maximum efficacy and safety in CRAO remains uncertain. Objective: To critically assess the current evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of IV thrombolysis in the treatment of patients with CRAO. Methods: The objective was addressed through the development of a critically appraised topic that included a clinical scenario, structured question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, assessment of results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom-line conclusions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, a medical librarian, and content experts in the fields of vascular neurology and ophthalmology. Results: A recent patient-level meta-analysis was selected for critical appraisal. The study compared the visual recovery rates after IV thrombolysis in CRAO against the natural history of this illness and conservative therapies (ocular massage, anterior chamber paracentesis, and/or hemodilution). Time to thrombolytic therapy administration had a significant impact on visual recovery in CRAO (P<0.001). IV thrombolysis within the first 4.5 hours after symptom onset resulted in recovery of vision in 50.0% of the patients [95% confidence interval (CI), 32.4%-67.6%]. The rate of visual recovery was nearly 3 times higher than in the natural history cohort [odds ratio, 4.7 (95% CI, 2.3-9.6); P<0.001], with a 32.3% absolute risk reduction and a number needed to treat of 4.0 (95% CI, 2.6-6.6). There was no significant difference in the recovery rate after thrombolysis compared with the natural history cohort for those patients treated after 4.5 hours. No major hemorrhages occurred after alteplase administration in this meta-analysis. Conclusions: IV thrombolysis in CRAO seems to be safe and effective within the first 4.5 hours of symptom onset. A clinical decision based on this meta-analysis alone cannot be made due to several limitations. A randomized controlled clinical trial of early IV alteplase administration in CRAO is necessary to provide evidence-based therapeutic guidance.