Citations

Abstract Purpose: The RANO criteria have not been assessed using outcome data from prospective trials. We examined the radiologic data of patients with recurrent glioblastoma from the randomized phase II trial (AVF3708g) to determine the effect of including T2/FLAIR evaluation as per RANO criteria on measurements of objective response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with assessment based on contrast enhancement (Macdonald criteria). Experimental Design: The ORRs and median PFS were determined using the RANO criteria and compared with those obtained using the Macdonald criteria. Landmark analyses were performed at 2, 4, and 6 months, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the associations between OR and progression with subsequent survival. Results: The ORRs were 0.331 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.260–0.409] and 0.393 (95% CI, 0.317–0.472) by RANO and Macdonald criteria, respectively (P < 0.0001). The median PFS was 4.6 months (95% CI, 4.1–5.5) using RANO criteria, compared with 6.4 months (95% CI, 5.5–7.1) as determined by Macdonald criteria (P = 0.01). At 2-, 4-, and 6-month landmarks, both OR status and PFS determined by either RANO or Macdonald criteria were predictive of overall survival [OS; hazard ratios for 4-month landmark (OR HR = 1.93, P = 0.0012; PFS HR, 4.23, P < 0.0001)]. Conclusions: The inclusion of T2/FLAIR assessment resulted in statistically significant differences in median PFS and ORRs compared with assessment of solely enhancing tumor (Macdonald criteria), although OR and PFS determined by both RANO and Macdonald criteria correlated with OS. Clin Cancer Res; 22(3); 575–81. ©2015 AACR.

AbstractThe population pharmacokinetic model reported here was developed using data from 2 phase 2 trials of irinotecan for treatment of malignant glioma to quantify the impact of concomitant therapy with enzyme‐inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) on irinotecan pharmacokinetics. Patients received weekly irinotecan doses of 100 to 400 mg/m2, and plasma samples were collected and analyzed for irinotecan and its APC, SN‐38, and SN‐38G metabolites. Nonlinear mixed‐effects modeling was employed for population pharmacokinetic analysis. Concomitant therapy with phenytoin, phenobarbital, or carbamazepine increased the clearances of irinotecan, SN‐38, and SN‐38G but not APC. SN‐38 clearance was 2‐fold higher with concomitant EIAED use, resulting in 40% lower SN‐38 exposure. Evaluation of additional covariates revealed no clinically relevant effects of sex or concomitant corticosteroid use. The population pharmacokinetic model suggests that a 1.7‐fold increase in irinotecan dose may compensate for decreases in SN‐38 exposure in the presence of concomitant EIAEDs. Although slightly more conservative, this dose adjustment is consistent with those recommended based on increases in the maximally tolerated dose for malignant glioma patients receiving EIAEDs and may be an appropriate starting point for further investigation when extrapolating to other cancer types or alternative regimens.

Abstract Edmonston vaccine strains of measles virus (MV) have significant antitumor activity in mouse xenograft models of ovarian cancer. MV engineered to express the sodium iodide symporter gene (MV-NIS) facilitates localization of viral gene expression and offers a tool for tumor radiovirotherapy. Here, we report results from a clinical evaluation of MV-NIS in patients with taxol- and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. MV-NIS was given intraperitoneally every 4 weeks for up to 6 cycles. Treatment was well tolerated and associated with promising median overall survival in these patients with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer; no dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 16 patients treated at high-dose levels (108–109 TCID50), and their median overall survival of 26.5 months compared favorably with other contemporary series. MV receptor CD46 and nectin-4 expression was confirmed by immunohistochemistry in patient tumors. Sodium iodide symporter expression in patient tumors after treatment was confirmed in three patients by 123I uptake on SPECT/CTs and was associated with long progression-free survival. Immune monitoring posttreatment showed an increase in effector T cells recognizing the tumor antigens IGFBP2 and FRα, indicating that MV-NIS treatment triggered cellular immunity against the patients' tumor and suggesting that an immune mechanism mediating the observed antitumor effect. Our findings support further clinical evaluation of MV-NIS as an effective immunovirotherapy. Cancer Res; 75(1); 22–30. ©2014 AACR.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Breast cancer affects thousands of women each year. Epithelial to Mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been associated with increased metastatic potential of cancer cells as well as resistance to chemotherapy. Predicatively, presence of EMT leads to worse prognosis in patients with breast cancer. We have recently showed that Aurora-A plays a key role in development of EMT and increased ability of breast cancer cells for self renewal. Therefore we hypothesized that inhibition of Aurora-A in breast cancer cells will lead to increased sensitivity to chemotherapy. RESULTS: Increased Aurora-A expression, as assessed by IHC staining, in patients with locally advanced disease was associated with worse prognosis. We show that in ER+ cell line, MCF7, activating MAPK pathway through overexpression of Raf1 leads to increase in Aurora-A activity. These cells have decreased sensitivity to treatment with paclitaxel when compared to untransfected cells in MTT assays. This effect is even more exacerbated with over-expression of Aurora-A. The sensitivity to paclitaxel was restored with inhibition of Aurora-A by specific inhibitor, Alisertib. This was further explored in triple negative (MDA-MB-231) or Her-2/neu expressing (SUM149) cell lines. These cells express higher levels of Aurora-A. Inhibition of Aurora-A activity in combination with paclitaxel was superior when compared to either therapy alone. Similar effect was seen with use of anthracyclines. Inhibition of Aurora-A resulted in decreased SMAD5 expression as well as decreased Akt phosphorylation. Current studies are looking at a role of Aurora-A in activating SMAD5 and its role in resistance to chemotherapy. In vivo experiments evaluating combination therapies in breast cancer animal model are ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of Aurora-A by a specific inhibitor, MLN8237, resulted in decreased SMAD5 expression and increased effectiveness of chemotherapeutic agents in breast cancer cells. These results contribute to better understanding of signaling pathways involved in resistance of breast cancer cells to chemotherapy. This knowledge could be very useful in developing more effective treatments for breast cancer patients in neo-adjuvant, adjuvant and metastatic settings. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-09-07.

Abstract Purpose: We hypothesized that vertical blockade of VEGF signaling by combining bevacizumab with sorafenib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma would result in a synergistic therapeutic effect. We also investigated whether VEGF, VEGFR2 and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), circulating biomarkers of angiogenesis, and MRI markers such as apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) are correlated with treatment efficacy and/or toxicity. Experimental Design: Patients received bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) with sorafenib (200 mg twice a day, weekly, days 1–5; group A). Due to toxicity, the starting sorafenib dose was subsequently modified to 200 mg every day (group B). Results: Fifty-four patients were enrolled: 19 patients in group A and 35 in group B. Objective response rate was 18.5% with median duration of 6.7 months (range 0.5–24.1 months). Six-month progression-free survival (PFS6) was 20.4% (11/54), and median overall survival (OS) was 5.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.7–8.2]; outcome was similar between the two dose groups. We identified SNPs in the VEGF and VEGFR2 promoter regions, which were associated with PFS6 (P < 0.022). Among molecular markers of angiogenesis, a higher log2 baseline level of stromal cell–derived factor-1 was associated with PFS6 success (P = 0.04). Circulating endothelial cells decreased during treatment with subsequent increase at disease progression (P = 0.022). Imaging analysis showed a trend associating ADC-L with poor outcome. Conclusions: The bevacizumab/sorafenib combination did not improve outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma versus historic bevacizumab-treated controls. Biologic markers of response and resistance to bevacizumab in gliomas were identified which merit prospective validation. Clin Cancer Res; 19(17); 4816–23. ©2013 AACR.

Abstract Purpose: Surrogate biomarkers are lacking for predicting or monitoring response to anti-angiogenesis therapies. We investigated whether circulating biomarkers (CBMs) of angiogenesis (i.e., bFGF, SDF-1α, HGF, sKIT, Ang-2, and PlGF) correlated with treatment efficacy in a pooled analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (rGBM) patients (pts) treated with bevacizumab/sorafenib (BEV/SOR). Experimental procedures: Peripheral blood samples were obtained for CBM analyses from pts enrolled in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase II studies N054C (mCRC, n=75, Grothey, ASCO 2010) and N0776 (rGBM, n=54, Galanis, ASCO 2010). Blood collection time points were: baseline (BL), cycle 1 day 3 (C1D3), prior to treatment cycles 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and after the pt went off study. Plasma CBM levels were determined by commercially-available ELISAs (R&D Systems) and performed according to manufacturer's instructions. For each CBM, a linear regression model that adjusted for study was used to evaluate the correlation with either progression-free survival (PFS) success/failure or progression within 14 days of the last blood draw for the following measures: absolute BL levels, log2 BL levels; C1D3 log2-fold change (FC) from BL, prior to cycle 2 log2-FC from BL, last draw log2-FC from BL, and last draw log2-FC from prior draw. Results summary: There appears to be no significant difference in the PFS or overall survival (OS) between the pts on these two studies; therefore, we pooled the patients from both studies for a combined analyses. We found no difference in absolute or log2 levels for any of the CBMs during the course of BEV/SOR treatment. In these pooled analyses, we found increased absolute and increased log2 BL SDF-1α levels were significantly correlated with PFS success (p=0.023 and p=0.02, respectively). After correcting for multiple comparisons (method of Benjamini & Hochberg) the p-values <0.05 had a false-discovery-rate of 41.4%. None of the other CBM measures were significantly correlated with either PFS success/failure or progression within 14 days of the last blood draw (all p>0.10). Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence that SDF-1α may be a useful CBM for determining treatment efficacy in these pts treated with BEV/SOR. Further prospective validation of SDF-1α for predicting pt progression with this treatment combination in advanced disease (e.g., mCRC and rGBM) appears warranted. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5562. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-5562

Abstract Background: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) functions within the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway as a critical modulator of cell survival. We previously demonstrated significant synergy of the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus with RT in glioma xenografts. This Phase I study evaluated the safety and tolerability of combined therapy with the mTOR inhibitor RAD001, RT and TMZ. Methods: All patients received weekly oral RAD001, starting 1 week prior to RT/TMZ and continuing until progression, with a break from therapy between RT/TMZ and adjuvant TMZ. RAD001 was dose escalated in cohorts of 6 patients. In addition to RAD001, all pts received standard treatment with RT (60 Gy)/TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily) and adjuvant TMZ (200 mg/m2 daily × 5 every 28 days). DLTs were defined during therapy with RAD001 combined with TMZ/RT. Results: A total of 18 patients were enrolled. Combined RAD001/RT/TMZ was well tolerated at all dose levels with 1 of 6 patients with a DLT at each dose level. DLTs were Grade 3 fatigue (RAD001 25 mg/week), Grade 4 hematologic toxicity (RAD001 50 mg/week), and Grade 4 liver function elevation (RAD001 70 mg/week). With adverse event information available for all 18 patients, no grade 5 events were seen. Nine grade 4 events (thrombosis, fatigue, anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, SGPT (ALT), SGOT (AST), bilirubin elevation) were seen in 3 patients. On the basis of these results, the recommended Phase II dose currently being tested is RAD001 70 mg/week in combination with standard RT/TMZ and adjuvant TMZ. FDG PET scans were also obtained prior to the first dose of RAD001 and within 24 hours of the second dose of RAD001, prior to starting RT or TMZ, and changes in maximum standard uptake values (SUV) were compared between scans for each patient. Two patients at 25 mg RAD001/week had a 21% and 24% change in SUV, and 2 patients receiving 70 mg/week had a change in SUV uptake of −33% and −16%. Additional follow-up will be required to evaluate whether these SUV changes are associated with outcome. Conclusions: RAD001 in combination with RT/TMZ and adjuvant TMZ was well tolerated, and the imaging results support continued evaluation of PET imaging as an early predictor of response to therapy. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):C56.