Citations

Background Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted in populations of European ancestry (EA) have identified and confirmed 23 germline susceptibility loci for multiple myeloma (MM). The effect sizes of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at these loci are small, therefore combining them into a single summary measure, known as a polygenic risk score (PRS), may provide a more meaningful risk factor. We have previously shown a PRS comprised of the 23 SNPs for MM contributes to increased risk of MM, with a 2.7-fold increase for highest vs. lowest PRS quintiles. Whether the MM-PRS is also associated with overall survival (OS) in MM cases has not been evaluated. We examined the association between MM-PRS and OS in two EA studies. Methods The first study consisted of 2,179 EA MM cases from ten studies included in the Multiple Myeloma Working Group within the International Lymphoma Consortium (InterLymph). Cases were diagnosed between 1970 and 2015 and genotyped using multiple platforms (Oncoarray, Affymetrix, Human660W-quad Beadchip, and Illumina arrays); 885 cases also had stage [based on International Staging System (ISS)] available. Each of the GWAS was subjected to rigorous standard quality control independently (prior to imputation via the Michigan imputation server based on the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC). The second study consisted of 515 newly diagnosed EA MM cases from CoMMpass (Relating Clinical Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma to Personal Assessment of Genetic Profile), diagnosed from 2011-2013, who had whole genome sequencing (WGS) performed on germline DNA. The WGS data was used to call common germline genetic variants through the Mayo Clinic bioinformatics pipeline. Briefly, genetic variants were detected with GenomeGPS, aligned to the hg19 reference genome, called using the GATK (V3.6) Haplotype Caller, and merged for multiple-sample joint calling. To reduce the false positive variants, variant quality score recalibration (VQSR) was applied for both SNPs and INDELs. After quality control, 458 EA samples remained. Follow-up was available for both studies and consisted of time from MM diagnosis date until death or date of last known follow-up. The PRS was constructed from the 23 MM SNPs using the published per allele odds ratio associated with MM risk. The published log odds ratios for each SNP were multiplied by the number of risk alleles (0, 1, 2) for the corresponding SNP, and summed, resulting in a unique score per person. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between PRS with MM OS considering two models: 1) adjusted for age, sex, study and 2) additional adjustment by stage (ISS). Hazard ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. The PRS was evaluated both as a continuous variable, per standard deviation (SD), and as a categorical variable (quintiles). Results MM cases (N=2,179) in the InterLymph study were 59% male and 41% female and the median age was 61.0 years (26-90 years). Median follow-up time was 57.2 months (1.0-509.0 months) with 868 reported deaths. MM cases with stage information available consisted of 20% stage I (n=178), 53% stage II (n=466), and 27% stage III (n=241). No association was observed between PRS and OS in MM patients regardless of adjustment for stage (continuous PRS (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.83-1.28, P=0.80) or by quintile PRS (p>0.05)) (Table). The CoMMpass EA MM cases (n=458) had similar distributions for sex (61% male and 39% females) but were slightly older 65 years (27-93 years) and had shorter follow-up time (median=39.75 months (0.13-77.2)) with 117 deaths. Stage was available for 96% of CoMMpass cases including 36% stage I (n=159), 33% stage II (n=146), and 31% stage III (n=134). We also observed no association of PRS and OS in the CoMMpass study (HR=1.02, 95% CI: 0.72 -1.46, P= 0.89), adjusted for age, sex, and stage (Table). Discussion A PRS score for MM risk is not associated with OS for MM cases in two EA populations. Given that prior studies have shown association of genetic variation with MM survival, efforts to identify additional loci associated with OS or MM specific survival are warranted. Future studies should also consider germline variants impact on molecular subtypes, specific therapies, and outcomes. Disclosures Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding.

Objective To identify the association between aneuploidy and clinical outcome in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who participated in MMRF (Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation) sequencing study at University of Michigan. Background: Aneuploidy, defined by abnormal copy number changes of chromosomes, is one of the hallmarks in cancer, reflecting and also contributing to genome instability (Ye, Regan et al. 2018). Approximately 90% of cancers have gained or lost one or both arms of at least one chromosome (Taylor, Shih et al. 2018). In recent years, large scale sequencing efforts have extended aneuploidy study, identifying DNA somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs). Published data suggest aneuploidy has a stronger impact on prognosis than gene mutations in multiple myeloma (Walker, Boyle et al. 2015; Bolli, Biancon et al. 2018; Jamal-Haniani, Wilson et al. 2017). Methods: Fifty one RRMM patients from our institute participated in Clinical-Grade Molecular Profiling of Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Related Plasma Cell Malignancies (MMRF-002) from Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) between March 2016 and November 2018. Genomic DNA was obtained from CD138+ sorted myeloma cells and a peripheral blood sample from each patient. Capture exome sequencing on a targeted panel of 1500 genes was performed by the Illumina HiSeq 2500 (2x115bp paired-end reads, average 520X coverage). Copy number changes, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and tumor purity were jointly estimated using an in-house pipeline for matched tumor/normal libraries. We assessed aneuploidy using chromosomal and arm level SCNAs which are determined by the median of SCNAs and summation of gain and loss of SCNAs for a given chromosomal arm, which are then used for a time-to-event analysis of overall survival (OS) of the patients. The differences between Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves were tested using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated from Cox proportional hazard regression. A threshold of significance was taken as p<0.05. Results Patient demographic data is summarized in Table 1. All the patients in this study harbor DNA somatic copy-number abnormalities (SCNAs) on the arm level for at least one chromosome (Figure 1). Gain of a chromosome or a whole arm mostly occurs on 1q, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 15, 19, 21 while loss was noted in 1p, 8p, 13, 16q, and 17p. At a global-level, we find that whole genomic aneuploidies (genomic-level across all chromosomes) have a significant association with inferior OS. Specifically, patients with a high frequency of genomic aneuploidies (defined as number of SCNA >8, the first quartile) had a significantly worse prognosis than those with low number of SCNA events (<=8) (p=0.037, Figure 2). Arm-level aneuploidies with high incidences include 11q (54.9%), 13q (52.9%), 15q (51.0%), 1q (51.0%), 9q (51.0%), a finding consistent with previous studies (Walker, Leone et al. 2010). Aneuploidies in 10p (11.8%) and 10q (7.8%) are uncommon in agreement with previous studies (Tricot G, Sawyer et al. 2017) as myeloma structural or numerical abnormalities rarely occur on chromosome 10. Using univariate analysis, we identified five arm-level aneuploidies which are significantly associated with worse OS: 10p, 10q, 11p, 18q and 20q. It is noteworthy that aneuploidies in either arm of chromosome 10 (10p and 10q) had significant negative OS prognostic effect: 10p (median survival for diploid 28.9 vs. aneuploid 4.1 mo; p<0.001) and 10q (28.9 vs 3.8 mo; p=0.015). Similar results with a negative impact on OS were found from 11p (not reached vs 13.8 mo; p=0.036); 18q (28.9 vs 8.5 mo; p=0.025); and 20q (28.9 vs 3.1 mo; p=0.009). Given the small sample size we did not conduct a multivariable analyses and multiplicity adjustment in this preliminary analyses. Conclusion Aneuploidy measured by SCNAs is correlated with unfavorable survival in relapsed/refractory myeloma. The higher the occurrence of aneuploidies, the worse the overall survival, illustrating of the impact of cancer genome instability. Disclosures Ye: Janssen: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; MingSight: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Talpaz:Imago BioSciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding. Bergsagel:Celgene: Consultancy; Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Background: The overall incidence of Pneumocystis Pneumonia (PJP) in lymphoma varies according to diagnosis, host factors and treatment rendered.(Carmona, et al. 2011) A meta-analysis suggested that prophylaxis is appropriate when the chance of incurring PJP is 3.5% or greater.(Green, et al. 2007) Accurately characterizing the incidence of PJP is further complicated by a transition in diagnostic methods from direct immunofluorescence assay (DFA) to a DNA-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique.(Caliendo et al., 1998, Wilson JW, et al., 2011) The incidence of PCR-based diagnosis of PJP and the need for anti-Pneumocystis prophylaxis in patients diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma receiving chemotherapy requires further investigation. Methods: This single center, retrospective, observational study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board and performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. Consecutive adult patients with a diagnosis of Hodgkin lymphoma receiving chemotherapy between January 2006 and August 2018 were evaluated. Patients with history of bone marrow transplant were excluded. Kaplan-Meier estimation was used to calculate the cumulative incidence of PJP with a 95% confidence interval. Cox proportional hazard models were used to demonstrate the strength of association between the independent variables and PJP rate. Results: The 506 included patients had a median (IQR) age of 40.3 (28.6, 59.7) years, 287 (56.7%) were male, and 470 (92.9%) were Caucasian. Further baseline demographics and clinical characteristics are described in table 1 with no significant differences between those diagnosed and those free from PJP. Chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy was prescribed for 163 (32.3%) patients while 342 (67.7%) patients received chemotherapy alone. Chemotherapy regimen distribution included 356 patients (70.4%) receiving bleomycin-containing chemotherapy. Median (IQR) total Bleomycin dose was 122 (IQR: 78, 178) Units. Bleomycin-containing combination chemotherapy regimen was not significantly associated with a higher risk for PJP when compared to other combination regimens (HR=1.59, 95% CI 0.55-4.62 p=0.40). Bleomycin-related lung compromise was suspected in 130 (25.7%) patients. Anti-pneumocystis prophylaxis was provided for 97 patients (n=39 a priori, 58 after chemotherapy initiation) and this was not significantly associated with a decreased incidence of PJP (HR=0.51, 95% CI 0.15-1.71, p=0.28). The cumulative incidence of PJP 1 year after start of chemotherapy was 6.2% (95% CI 3.8%-8.5%) and is shown in figure 1. Diagnosis of PJP occurred most commonly during the 2nd (n=8, 30.7%), 3rd (n=8, 30.7%), and 4th (n=7, 26.9%) cycles of chemotherapy. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was the only agent prescribed as PJP management. There were 10 (38%) patients with PCP that required ICU admission with 9 needing mechanical ventilation, 4 necessitating vasopressor support, and none requiring dialysis. Mortality 30-days from PJP diagnosis was 8% (n=2) with one death attributable to PJP infection. Conclusion: Cumulative incidence of PJP was 6.2% in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma. As the incidence is above the 3.5% threshold previously described, the clinician should consider the potential value of prophylaxis. Defining the overall utility of universal vs. targeted anti-pneumocystis prophylaxis requires further prospective, randomized investigation. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. OffLabel Disclosure: Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole, Pentamidine isethionate, and dapsone will be discussed as prevention of Pneumocystis Pneumonia in the HIV-negative population

Background Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in adults. R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) remains the standard of care for newly diagnosed DLBCL, with cure rates of 60-70%. However, more effective front-line options are needed to further improve outcomes, particularly in high-risk patients (Sehn LH, Gascoyne RD. Blood 2015;125:22). Approximately 15-20% of treatment-naïve patients with DLBCL have CD20-low expressing tumors, while CD19 is expressed in >90% of DLBCL. CD20-low DLBCL is associated with poor response to rituximab-based regimens (Johnson NA, et al. Blood 2009;113:3773; Prevodnik VK, et al. Diagnostic Pathol 2011;6:33). CD19 is a B-lymphocyte lineage-specific surface antigen that is widely expressed in mature B-cell malignancies, including DLBCL. CD19 functions as a positive regulator of B-cell receptor signaling and is important for B-cell activation and proliferation, and is, therefore, an attractive therapeutic target in addition to CD20. Tafasitamab (MOR208) is a humanized anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody with an engineered constant region (Fc) that enhances Fc-γ receptor binding affinity on effector cells, thereby enhancing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and phagocytosis (ADCP). Preliminary data in DLBCL cell lines suggest that combined targeting of CD19 and CD20 with tafasitamab and rituximab, respectively, could have synergistic cytotoxic effects. Monotherapy with tafasitamab has shown clinical activity and acceptable safety in a Phase I study in relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (NCT01161511) and in a Phase IIa study in R/R NHL (NCT01685008). In patients with R/R DLBCL, treatment with single agent tafasitamab until progression led to a 26% objective response rate (ORR) with several long-term responses (Jurczak W, et al. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:1266). Preclinical in vitro and in vivo data have demonstrated increased combinatorial antitumor effects with tafasitamab and the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide (LEN). In the Phase II, single-arm L-MIND study (NCT02399085) in patients with R/R DLBCL, treatment with tafasitamab/LEN achieved an ORR of 60%, a complete response (CR) rate of 42.5% and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 12.1 months (Salles GA, et al. ICML 2019; Abstr 124). This combination received breakthrough therapy designation by the US Food and Drug Administration. Study design and methods First-MIND is a Phase Ib, open-label, multicenter, randomized trial of tafasitamab/R-CHOP or tafasitamab/LEN/R-CHOP in patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL (Figure 1). Patients must be aged ≥18 years, treatment naïve, with histologically confirmed DLBCL not otherwise specified and have intermediate- to high-risk disease (International Prognostic Index 2-5). Key exclusion criteria include known double- or triple-hit lymphoma, and transformed or composite lymphoma. Treatment consists of six 21-day cycles of tafasitamab (12 mg/kg intravenously [IV], on Days [D] 1, 8 and 15) in addition to R-CHOP (Arm A) or tafasitamab (12 mg/kg IV, on D1, 8 and 15) and LEN (25 mg orally, on D1-10) in addition to R-CHOP (Arm B). The trial includes a safety run-in phase and a main phase. In the safety run-in phase, 12 patients will be enrolled in each arm. If no unexpected safety signals suspected to be related to the addition of tafasitamab ± LEN to R-CHOP are observed, an additional 18 patients will be enrolled in each arm in the main phase. The primary objective of the trial is to assess safety; secondary objectives include evaluation of efficacy (ORR and PET-assessed CR rate at end of treatment, PFS, overall survival, event-free survival, time to next anti-lymphoma treatment), long-term safety and pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of tafasitamab in each arm. Exploratory objectives will include the assessment of biomarkers in peripheral blood (natural killer [NK] cell count, cell-free circulating tumor DNA) and tumor tissue (DLBCL cell of origin, NK cell or macrophage count/gene expression profile, CD19 and CD20 expression) that may be relevant to the mechanism of action and/or response to study treatment. As this is a Phase Ib study to primarily explore safety, no formal statistical hypothesis is considered for the sample size calculation; approximately 60 patients will be recruited across Europe and the US. Disclosures Burke: Gilead: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. André:Celgene: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding; Takeda Millenium: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Roche: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants. Cheson:Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Epizyme: Research Funding; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Symbios: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Duell:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Nowakowski:Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; Selvita: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NanoString: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rosenwald:MorphoSys: Consultancy. Salles:Roche, Janssen, Gilead, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis, Servier, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Kite, MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; Autolus: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Educational events; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sharman:Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Staber:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda-Millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Trněný:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Westin:Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; Unum: Research Funding; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; 47 Inc: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Brugger:MorphoSys: Employment; AstraZeneca: Equity Ownership. Fingerle-Rowson:MorphoSys AG: Employment. Klanova:MorphoSys AG: Employment. Würth:MorphoSys AG: Employment. Truemper:Janssen Oncology: Consultancy; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding.

Background: Prolonged methotrexate (MTX) exposure following high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX; ≥1g/m2) occurs in up to 33% of patients and potentially compromises management through increased renal and systemic toxicities.(Pinedo et al, 1977, Joerger et al, 2012) MTX-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in 5% to 30% of patients.(May et al, 2014) Rescue leucovorin dose escalation in response to an elevated 48-hour MTX concentration or serum creatinine rise is standard-of-care to reduce adverse events. The practice of preemptive leucovorin dose increases in patients with elevated MTX concentrations or previous AKI during prior MTX doses has unclear outcomes. Methods: This retrospective, single-center, cohort study was approved by the Mayo Clinic IRB and performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. We identified patients newly initiated on HDMTX for management of lymphoma between 1/1/2011 and 10/31/2017 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Patients were followed longitudinally until HDMTX was discontinued. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an elevated MTX concentration (MTX > 1.0 mcmol/L) at 48 hours for the initial cycle. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of AKI (Kellum et al, 2012) and whether preemptively increased leucovorin doses during subsequent cycles of HDMTX impacted the incidence of a repeated episode of an elevated 48-hour MTX concentration, decreased incidence of AKI, or decreased hospital length of stay (LOS) compared to patients with standard leucovorin dosing (25mg intravenous every 6 hours until MTX < 0.1 mcmol/L). Results: The 321 included patients had a median (IQR) age of 65 (57, 72) years, 190 (59%) were male, and 293 (91%) were Caucasian. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics are depicted in table 1 with those who had elevated MTX levels during their initial cycle more likely to be Male, Caucasian, have a higher BSA, have Primary DLBCL of the CNS, have bone marrow involvement, have a higher baseline SCr, higher total bilirubin, and lower albumin. The median (IQR) grams of the initial MTX dose was 6.3 (4.3, 7.5) for 84 patients (26%) receiving MTX for prophylaxis and was 12.8 grams (7.5, 16.8) for the 237 patients (74%) receiving MTX as treatment. Chemotherapy regimen distribution included 43 patients (13%) receiving HDMTX 8 grams/m2 monotherapy, 162 patients (50%) receiving HDMTX 8 grams/m2 with Rituximab and Temozolomide (MRT), and 96 patients (30%) receiving HDMTX 3.5 grams/m2 in combination with R-CHOP. Patients received a median of 3 MTX doses (IQR:2 doses, 6 doses). A total of 83 patients (36%) had an elevated MTX concentration after their first MTX dose, and the overall incidence of elevated MTX concentrations was 22% following a total of 1558 MTX doses. Preemptively increasing the leucovorin dose (based on the prior MTX concentration) was associated with a 34% rate of elevated MTX concentrations (160/466 cycles). Giving standard leucovorin (based on the prior MTX concentration) was associated with a 12% rate of elevated MTX concentration (84/713 cycles). Those with a preemptively increased leucovorin dose were more likely to have an elevated MTX concentration in that cycle (OR=2.84, 95% CI: 2.03-3.97, p<0.001). For the secondary endpoint of AKI, the overall incidence was 18% with 107 patients (33%) experiencing AKI after their first MTX dose. In these first dose AKI episodes, 81 cases (25%) were stage 1, 19 (6%) stage 2, and 7 (2%) stage 3 Preemptive leucovorin dose increase was associated with a greater risk of AKI after MTX (OR=1.52, 95% CI: 1.05-2.19, p=0.027). Overall median hospital LOS was 4.1 (3.8, 5.8) days. Hospital LOS was longer in those with preemptively increased leucovorin doses (Median LOS with preemptively increased leucovorin doses: 5 (4.1, 6.1) days; without preemptively increased leucovorin doses: 4 (3.2, 4.3) days; estimated difference=1.1 days, 95% CI: 0.5-1.7, p<0.001). Conclusion: HDMTX leads to a significant incidence of elevated serum 48hr MTX levels and AKI, 22% and 18%, respectively. Rather than protective, we found that preemptively increased leucovorin doses used during subsequent cycles did not improve the incidence of delayed elimination, reduce the incidence of AKI, or shorten hospital LOS per MTX dose. Further investigation is needed to optimize dosing strategies and supportive measures following MTX administration for management of lymphoma patients. Disclosures Barreto: FAST Biomedical, Inc: Consultancy. Leung:Takeda: Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aduro: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Research Funding.

Purpose: Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare histiocytic disorder that presents with a wide spectrum of clinical diseases, ranging from single-organ lesions to systemic disease. Although previously thought of as an immune disorder, LCH was reclassified as an inflammatory myeloid neoplasm in the 2016 Histocyte Society classification after discovery of BRAF V600E or MAP2K1 gain-of-function mutations and evidence of clonality in most LCH patients. In this revised classification, LCH was divided into single-system LCH, pulmonary LCH, or multisystem LCH. However, there is a lack of data on clinical features and outcomes in the subgroup of "unifocal" non-pulmonary LCH in adults. In this study, we sought to address the gaps in knowledge for unifocal adult LCH utilizing our institution's experience over 20 years. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 189 adult patients (defined as >18 years old at diagnosis) with histopathologically confirmed LCH who were seen at our tertiary referral center between 1997 and 2018. Of these, 44 met criteria for unifocal LCH at diagnosis after careful exclusion of other sites of disease involvement. Results: We included 44 adult patients with unifocal LCH at diagnosis, with median age 42 years (range 19 to 88) and 55% males. 84% were Caucasians and 50% were smokers. Most commonly involved disease sites included bone (43%), skin (25%), pituitary (14%), and gastrointestinal (11%), with common presenting symptoms of head pain/swelling (25%), skin rash (20%), abdominal pain/diarrhea (11%), and diabetes insipidus (9%). Resection/excision was the most common first line therapy in 24 patients (63%); none had local recurrence and 3 patients developed recurrence at a new site. Radiation was the second most common therapy in 6 patients, with an overall response rate of 83%; none had local recurrence and 1 patient had recurrence at a new site. Other less common first-line treatments included resection followed by radiation (2), topical immunosuppression (2), dexamethasone (1), cladribine (1), smoking cessation (1), and observation (1) (Table 1). Cladribine used as first-line therapy for pituitary LCH resulted in progressive disease, but cladribine used as second-line therapy in 2 cases (including one who had progressed to multisystem disease) resulted in partial remission with no further recurrence in both cases. Patients were followed for a median of 3.8 years (range 0.1 to 18.8), with 5 patients lost to follow-up. By time of last follow-up, 11 (28%) had developed recurrence: 1 had local recurrence, 5 developed disease at a new site within the same system (skin or bone), and 5 developed multisystem disease (Figure 1). Median time to recurrence was 2 years (range 0.2 to 6.6). 2 out of 5 patients tested for BRAF had a V600E mutation, both of whom had isolated unifocal bone disease and remained in complete remission following resection at time of last follow-up. Median overall survival (OS) from time of diagnosis was not reached and overall 5-year OS was 94%. 3 patients died, only 1 of progressive LCH. Conclusion: In our study, most patients with unifocal adult LCH achieved a complete remission with surgical resection or local radiation. None of the patients treated with resection or radiation developed local recurrence, but around 1 in 5 developed distant recurrence within 5 years. However, the overall prognosis was very good, and none of the patients in the cohort progressed to "high-risk" organ (liver, spleen, or bone marrow) involvement or pulmonary involvement. Further studies are warranted to assess the role of MAPK-ERK mutations in the prognosis of unifocal LCH. Disclosures Bennani: Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Adicet Bio: Other: Advisory board; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Vassallo:Sun Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Sun Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Prospective studies for adult medulloblastoma (MB) are scarce and management guidelines are largely derived from pediatric experience and retrospective data. However, adult MB is a distinct disease for which limited data exist regarding clinical characteristic, prognostic factors, outcome based on upfront treatment, or patterns of recurrence. METHODS 200 patients (≥18 years at diagnosis) were identified from 1978 to 2017. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Median age at diagnosis 29 (18–63); 111 (55.5%) standard-risk (SR), 59 (29.5%) high-risk (HR), 30 (15%) unknown. 188 (94%) and 97 (48.5%) underwent radiotherapy and upfront chemotherapy, respectively. Median PFS: 6.28 years (4.9–11.2); median OS: 8.8 (7.8–12.4) years. Median time to first recurrence: 8.2 (5.1-not reached); 5-year recurrence-free rate: 71% in SR and 45% in HR patients. Survival after first recurrence: 2 years (1.64–2.4). Documented recurrence and risk group were associated with survival (HR 30.4, p< 0.0001 and 2.33, p< 0.001), but metastatic status and local vs. distant recurrence were not. The effect of upfront chemotherapy on survival did not reach statistical significance in SR patients. The use of chemotherapy regimens with or without vincristine or containing cisplatin vs. carboplatin, did not alter the survival outcome. In a subgroup of 57 SR patients who were seen at initial diagnosis and for whom complete staging and treatment information were available 3 and 5-year PFS were 94% (88%, 100%) and 76% (66%, 86%); OS at 5 years, 94% (87%, 100%). CONCLUSION No statistically significant difference was noted in outcome of patients treated without vincristine or with carboplatin instead of cisplatin, suggesting attenuated upfront regimens could be considered to reduce toxicity. Adult MB patients recur late and have a poor post-recurrence survival, therefore long-term follow-up, development of molecular risk-adjusted upfront treatment, and optimization of rescue treatments are needed.

Background: Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices provide hemodynamic assistance for shock refractory to pharmacological treatment. Most registries have focused on single devices or specific etiologies of shock, limiting data regarding overall practice patterns with temporary MCS in cardiac intensive care units. Methods: The CCCTN (Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network) is a multicenter network of tertiary CICUs in North America. Between September 2017 and September 2018, each center (n=16) contributed a 2-month snapshot of consecutive medical CICU admissions. Results: Of the 270 admissions using temporary MCS, 33% had acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (CS), 31% had CS not related to acute myocardial infarction, 11% had mixed shock, and 22% had an indication other than shock. Among all 585 admissions with CS or mixed shock, 34% used temporary MCS during the CICU stay with substantial variation between centers (range: 17%–50%). The most common temporary MCS devices were intraaortic balloon pumps (72%), Impella (17%), and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (11%), although intraaortic balloon pump use also varied between centers (range: 40%–100%). Patients managed with intraaortic balloon pump versus other forms of MCS (advanced MCS) had lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and less severe metabolic derangements. Illness severity was similar at high- versus low-MCS utilizing centers and at centers with more advanced MCS use. Conclusions: There is wide variation in the use of temporary MCS among patients with shock in tertiary CICUs. While hospital-level variation in temporary MCS device selection is not explained by differences in illness severity, patient-level variation appears to be related, at least in part, to illness severity.

Background Right atrial pressure ( RAP ), a composite metric of right ventricular diastolic function, volume status, and right heart compliance, is a predictor of mortality in patients with heart failure due to acquired heart disease. Because patients with tetralogy of Fallot ( TOF ) might have abnormal right atrial and ventricular mechanics caused by myocardial injury and remodeling, we hypothesized that RAP would be associated with disease severity and cardiovascular adverse events in this population. Methods and Results We performed a cohort study of adults with TOF who underwent right heart catheterization at the Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1990 and 2017. The objective was to determine the association between RAP and multiple domains of disease severity in TOF (percentage of predicted peak oxygen consumption, atrial or ventricular arrhythmia, and heart failure hospitalization), as well as cardiovascular adverse events, defined as sustained ventricular tachycardia, resuscitated or aborted sudden death, heart transplantation, or death. Among 225 patients (113 male; mean age: 39±14 years), mean RAP was 10.7±5.2 mm Hg and median was 10 mm Hg (interquartile range: 7–13 mm Hg). Increasing RAP was associated with atrial or ventricular arrhythmias (odds ratio: 5.01; 95% CI, 1.22–23.49; P <0.001), heart failure hospitalization (odds ratio: 1.47; 95% CI, 1.10–2.39; P =0.033) per 5 mm Hg, and worsening exercise capacity (peak oxygen consumption; R 2 =0.74, r =−0.86, P <0.001). RAP was a predictor of cardiovascular adverse events (hazard ratio: 1.28; 95% CI, 1.10–1.47; P =0.028) per 5 mm Hg. Conclusions In symptomatic patients with TOF , increasing RAP correlates with multiple domains of disease severity (risk stratification) and predicts future cardiovascular events (prognostication). These data have potential clinical implications in the target population of symptomatic TOF patients.

Objective Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an evidence-based therapy for the treatment of refractory pain. Current American College of Graduate Medical Education requirements for pain medicine fellowship graduation include observation of five neuromodulation cases. Matriculating fellows have varying degrees of technical skill, training, and experience. The purpose of this study was to use an innovative skill-based assessment tool using the validated Zwisch scale to evaluate fellow surgical performance during SCS cases. Design Cross-sectional survey Setting Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Subjects Consultant faculty (10) in the Division of Pain Medicine and pain medicine fellows (5). Methods A list of faculty-driven neuromodulation surgical objectives was formed and a rubric was created that focused on technical approach, imaging, epidural access and wound closure. Consultants who perform surgical cases were instructed to use the Zwisch scale as a guide to evaluate fellow surgical performance during a neuromodulation case. Faculty and fellows were surveyed before and after implementation of the tool to determine their satisfaction with use of the skill assessment tool. Results The consultants reported they were more satisfied, consistent, and efficient with feedback provided to the trainee on every aspect of neuromodulation surgical cases. The improvement was most significant during the fellows’ intraoperative skill assessment. The fellows indicated increased satisfaction, improved communication, and increased efficiency of feedback when the tool was utilized. The fellows reported greater intraoperative skill assessment and consistency of feedback provided. Conclusions The diverse nature of primary specialty backgrounds observed in pain medicine fellowship training offers a unique opportunity to assess and improve fellow skill and surgical competence in the field of neuromodulation. Both faculty and fellows reported improved satisfaction, consistency and efficiency with feedback provided. Importantly, this pilot project observed that implementation of a skill assessment tool was beneficial for both the faculty and fellow as the feedback received was viewed as strongly beneficial to the educational experience.