Citations

Key Points Organ progression at second-line therapy predicated inferior survival. Patients relapsing from >VGPR had a longer time to develop organ progression.

AbstractOutside of clinical trials, experience with daratumumab‐based combination therapies (DCTs) using bortezomib (V)/lenalidomide (R)/pomalidomide (P), and dexamethasone (d) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is limited. We reviewed the outcomes of 126 patients who received ≥ 1 cycle of any DCT. Median age at DCT initiation was 67 (range, 43‐93) years. High‐risk cytogenetics was present in 33% patients. Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1‐14) and time to first DCT from diagnosis was 4.3 years (range, 0.4‐13.0). Seventeen (13%) patients were refractory to single agent daratumumab. Fifty‐two (41%), 34 (27%), 23 (18%), and 17 (14%) received DPd, DRd, DVd and “other” DCTs, respectively. Overall response rate was 47%. Median follow‐up was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.2‐6.1). Median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.2‐7.8). Median overall survival was not reached (NR) with any regimen. Median PFS (months) was worst for penta‐refractory MM (n = 8) vs quadruple refractory MM (n = 18) and others (n = 100) (2.2 [95% CI, 1‐2.4] vs 3.1 [95% CI, 2.1‐NR] vs 5.9 [95% CI, 5.0‐NR]; P < .001); those who were refractory to ≥1 agents used in the DCT vs others (4.9 [95% CI, 3.1‐6.0] vs 8.2 [95% CI, 4.6‐NR]; P = .02); and those who received >2 prior therapies vs others (5.0 months [95% CI, 3.7‐5.9] vs NR [95% CI, NR‐NR]; P = .002). Non‐hematologic toxicities included infections (38%), fatigue (32%), and infusion reactions (18%). Grade 3 or higher hematological toxicities were seen in 41% of patients. DCTs are effective in RRMM. ORR and PFS in heavily pretreated patients are lower than those reported in clinical trials.

SummaryThe management of Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM) relies predominantly on small trials, one of which has demonstrated activity of dexamethasone, rituximab and cyclophosphamide (DRC) in the frontline setting. We report on the efficacy of DRC, focusing on relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients. Ibrutinib, a recently approved agent in WM demonstrated limited activity in patients with MYD88WT genotype. Herein, we additionally report on the activity of DRC based on the MYD88L265P mutation status. Of 100 WM patients evaluated between January 2007 and December 2014 who received DRC, 50 had R/R WM. The overall response rate (ORR) was 87%. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) and time‐to‐next‐therapy (TTNT) were 32 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15–51) and 50 (95% CI: 35–60) months, respectively. In the previously untreated cohort (n = 50), the ORR was 96%, and the median PFS and TTNT were 34 months (95% CI: 23–not reached [NR]) and NR (95% CI: 37–NR), respectively. Twenty‐five (86%) of 29 genotyped patients harbored MYD88L265P. The response rates and outcomes were independent of MYD88 mutation status. Grade ≥3 adverse effects included neutropenia (20%), thrombocytopenia (7%) and infections (3%). Similar to the frontline setting, DRC is an effective and well‐tolerated salvage regimen for WM. In contrast to ibrutinib, DRC offers a less expensive, fixed‐duration option, with preliminary data suggesting efficacy independent of the patients’ MYD88 status.

Assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in histopathologic specimens can provide important prognostic information in diverse solid tumor types, and may also be of value in predicting response to treatments. However, implementation as a routine clinical biomarker has not yet been achieved. As successful use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and other forms of immunotherapy become a clinical reality, the need for widely applicable, accessible, and reliable immunooncology biomarkers is clear. In part 1 of this review we briefly discuss the host immune response to tumors and different approaches to TIL assessment. We propose a standardized methodology to assess TILs in solid tumors on hematoxylin and eosin sections, in both primary and metastatic settings, based on the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group guidelines for TIL assessment in invasive breast carcinoma. A review of the literature regarding the value of TIL assessment in different solid tumor types follows in part 2. The method we propose is reproducible, affordable, easily applied, and has demonstrated prognostic and predictive significance in invasive breast carcinoma. This standardized methodology may be used as a reference against which other methods are compared, and should be evaluated for clinical validity and utility. Standardization of TIL assessment will help to improve consistency and reproducibility in this field, enrich both the quality and quantity of comparable evidence, and help to thoroughly evaluate the utility of TILs assessment in this era of immunotherapy.

Assessment of the immune response to tumors is growing in importance as the prognostic implications of this response are increasingly recognized, and as immunotherapies are evaluated and implemented in different tumor types. However, many different approaches can be used to assess and describe the immune response, which limits efforts at implementation as a routine clinical biomarker. In part 1 of this review, we have proposed a standardized methodology to assess tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in solid tumors, based on the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group guidelines for invasive breast carcinoma. In part 2 of this review, we discuss the available evidence for the prognostic and predictive value of TILs in common solid tumors, including carcinomas of the lung, gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary system, gynecologic system, and head and neck, as well as primary brain tumors, mesothelioma and melanoma. The particularities and different emphases in TIL assessment in different tumor types are discussed. The standardized methodology we propose can be adapted to different tumor types and may be used as a standard against which other approaches can be compared. Standardization of TIL assessment will help clinicians, researchers and pathologists to conclusively evaluate the utility of this simple biomarker in the current era of immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVE Lumbar spondylolisthesis is a degenerative condition that can be surgically treated with either open or minimally invasive decompression and instrumented fusion. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches may shorten recovery, reduce blood loss, and minimize soft-tissue damage with resultant reduced postoperative pain and disability. METHODS The authors queried the national, multicenter Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) registry for patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion between July 2014 and December 2015 for Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis. The authors recorded baseline and 12-month patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ-5D, numeric rating scale (NRS)–back pain (NRS-BP), NRS–leg pain (NRS-LP), and satisfaction (North American Spine Society satisfaction questionnaire). Multivariable regression models were fitted for hospital length of stay (LOS), 12-month PROs, and 90-day return to work, after adjusting for an array of preoperative and surgical variables. RESULTS A total of 345 patients (open surgery, n = 254; MIS, n = 91) from 11 participating sites were identified in the QOD. The follow-up rate at 12 months was 84% (83.5% [open surgery]; 85% [MIS]). Overall, baseline patient demographics, comorbidities, and clinical characteristics were similarly distributed between the cohorts. Two hundred fifty seven patients underwent 1-level fusion (open surgery, n = 181; MIS, n = 76), and 88 patients underwent 2-level fusion (open surgery, n = 73; MIS, n = 15). Patients in both groups reported significant improvement in all primary outcomes (all p < 0.001). MIS was associated with a significantly lower mean intraoperative estimated blood loss and slightly longer operative times in both 1- and 2-level fusion subgroups. Although the LOS was shorter for MIS 1-level cases, this was not significantly different. No difference was detected with regard to the 12-month PROs between the 1-level MIS versus the 1-level open surgical groups. However, change in functional outcome scores for patients undergoing 2-level fusion was notably larger in the MIS cohort for ODI (−27 vs −16, p = 0.1), EQ-5D (0.27 vs 0.15, p = 0.08), and NRS-BP (−3.5 vs −2.7, p = 0.41); statistical significance was shown only for changes in NRS-LP scores (−4.9 vs −2.8, p = 0.02). On risk-adjusted analysis for 1-level fusion, open versus minimally invasive approach was not significant for 12-month PROs, LOS, and 90-day return to work. CONCLUSIONS Significant improvement was found in terms of all functional outcomes in patients undergoing open or MIS fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis. No difference was detected between the 2 techniques for 1-level fusion in terms of patient-reported outcomes, LOS, and 90-day return to work. However, patients undergoing 2-level MIS fusion reported significantly better improvement in NRS-LP at 12 months than patients undergoing 2-level open surgery. Longer follow-up is needed to provide further insight into the comparative effectiveness of the 2 procedures.

Abstract Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) are appearing as a prime approach for preclinical studies despite being insufficiently characterized as a model of the human disease and its diversity. In this work, 29 PDX were obtained from either surgery or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirate of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The extensive genomic profiling of these pancreatic PDX, revealed two clinically-relevant subtypes having broad similarities with human primary tumors. These subtypes are defined by highly specific DNA methylation and transcriptomic profiles (mRNA, miRNA or lncRNA) but are not distinguishable by exonic mutations or copy number aberrations. Moreover, by specifically analyzing the stroma transcriptome, as defined by the expression of murine transcripts, we found that it is able to stratify the patients with the same efficiency than the analysis of grafted human tumor cells. This finding suggest that transformed pancreatic cells drive the composition of their own stroma. Finally, the multiomics analysis pinpoints novel therapeutic targets, one of which we demonstrate to be an efficient method for treating pancreatic cancer. Overall, we show that PDX are trustworthy pre-clinical models of pancreatic adenocarcinoma including of unresectable tumors. Their multiomics profiling allow the independent analysis of the uncontaminated cancer or stromal compartments and discloses several original therapeutics targets. Citation Format: Remy Nicolle, Yuna Blum, Laetitia Marisa, Celine Loncle, Odile Gayet, Vincent Moutardier, Olivier Turrini, Marc Giovannini, Benjamin Bian, Martin Bigonnet, Marion Rubis, Nabila Elarouci, Lucile Armenoult, Mira Ayadi, Pauline Duconseil, Mohamed Gasmi, Mehdi Ouaissi, Aurélie Maignan, Gwen Lomberk, Jean-Marie Boher, Jacques Ewald, Erwan Bories, Jonathan Garnier, Anthony Goncalves, Flora Poizat, Jean-Luc Raoul, Veronique Secq, Stephane Garcia, Philippe Grandval, Marine Barraud-Blanc, Emmanuelle Norguet, Marine Gilabert, Jean-Robert Delpero, Julie Roques, Ezequiel Calvo, Fabienne Guillaumond, Sophie Vasseur, Raul Urrutia, Aurélien de Reyniès, Nelson Dusetti, Juan Iovanna. Multiomics assessment of the cancer and stromal compartments of patient-derived pancreatic xenografts reveals clinically-relevant subtypes and novel targeted therapies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4396. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4396

Abstract The Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO) in collaboration with the Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (CCFR) aims to identify genetic variants and environmental risk factors that impact colorectal cancer (CRC). Over 30 studies from North America, Europe, and Australia participate in GECCO. These studies have collected clinical, epidemiological, and survival data, as well as blood and tumor biospecimens, for over 80,000 CRC cases and controls. The current study aims to conduct targeted deep sequencing of tumors and matching normal DNA to identify recurrent and novel somatic and germline variants in 4,200 CRC cases. To achieve this goal, an AmpliSeq targeted sequencing panel of 1.12 Mbp was constructed to sequence the coding regions of 190 significantly mutated genes identified from whole exome sequencing datasets generated by the Nurses’ Health Study and Health Professional’s Follow-up Study, and The Cancer Genome Atlas. The panel also covers coding regions of 15 genes with germline high penetrance mutations in CRC, 54 regions to detect CRC-related copy number alterations (CNAs), and microsatellite and homopolymer repeat regions to identify defective DNA mismatch repair. Primers were also included to detect Fusobacterium nucleatum DNA in tumor biopsies, as F. nucleatum is thought to promote CRC carcinogenesis. Sequencing of the DNA libraries on Illumina HiSeq 2500 produced a mean coverage of greater than 500X for tumor DNA and 100X for normal DNA, with &gt;85% of the bases covered at the target at 50x. So far, targeted sequencing of &gt;1,500 DNA samples from CRC tumors and normal tissues has identified recurrent and novel somatic mutations, germline genetic variants, and hypermutation status of the tumors due to defective DNA mismatch repair or pathogenic mutations in the POLE gene. Targeted sequencing has also allowed quantification of the F. nucleatum DNA in tumor biopsies; the results were validated by a multiplex QPCR assay. At the AACR annual meeting, we will present targeted sequencing results generated from the first two GECCO-participating studies (n=1,300 cases). These data will be valuable for future association testing of somatic mutations, CNAs, hypermutation status, and F. nucleatum with germline genetic variants, lifestyle, and environmental risk factors and survival. This large study will allow development of better strategies for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of CRC. Citation Format: Syed H. Zaidi, Wei Sun, Jeroen Huyghe, Catherine S. Grasso, Quang Trinh, Charles Connolly, Amy French, Jasmine Mu, Marios Giannakis, Eve Shinbrot, Ivan Borozan, Michael J. Quist, Hermann Brenner, Daniel Buchanan, Peter Campbell, Andrew Chan, Jenny Chang-Claude, Vincent Ferretti, Charles Fuchs, Andrea Gsur, Marc Gunter, Tabitha Harrison, Michael Hoffmeister, Wen-Yi Huang, Paul Krzyzanowski, Stephen Lee, Mathieu Lemire, Jessica Miller, Danielle Pasternack, Cherie Teney, Elaine Mardis, Polly Newcomb, Lincoln Stein, Lee Timms, David Wheeler, Christina Yung, Niha Zubair, Levi Garraway, Shuji Ogino, Li Hsu, Steven Gallinger, Stephen Thibodeau, Thomas Hudson, Ulrike Peters. Targeted deep sequencing of colorectal tumor tissues to study associations of tumor subtypes with germline genetic, lifestyle, and environmental risk factors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1286. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1286

ABSTRACT Culture of periprosthetic tissue specimens in blood culture bottles is more sensitive than conventional techniques, but the impact on laboratory workflow has yet to be addressed. Herein, we examined the impact of culture of periprosthetic tissues in blood culture bottles on laboratory workflow and cost. The workflow was process mapped, decision tree models were constructed using probabilities of positive and negative cultures drawn from our published study (T. N. Peel, B. L. Dylla, J. G. Hughes, D. T. Lynch, K. E. Greenwood-Quaintance, A. C. Cheng, J. N. Mandrekar, and R. Patel, mBio 7:e01776-15, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01776-15 ), and the processing times and resource costs from the laboratory staff time viewpoint were used to compare periprosthetic tissues culture processes using conventional techniques with culture in blood culture bottles. Sensitivity analysis was performed using various rates of positive cultures. Annualized labor savings were estimated based on salary costs from the U.S. Labor Bureau for Laboratory staff. The model demonstrated a 60.1% reduction in mean total staff time with the adoption of tissue inoculation into blood culture bottles compared to conventional techniques (mean ± standard deviation, 30.7 ± 27.6 versus 77.0 ± 35.3 h per month, respectively; P < 0.001). The estimated annualized labor cost savings of culture using blood culture bottles was $10,876.83 (±$337.16). Sensitivity analysis was performed using various rates of culture positivity (5 to 50%). Culture in blood culture bottles was cost-effective, based on the estimated labor cost savings of $2,132.71 for each percent increase in test accuracy. In conclusion, culture of periprosthetic tissue in blood culture bottles is not only more accurate than but is also cost-saving compared to conventional culture methods.