Citations

Objective CHAMPION‐NMOSD (NCT04201262) is a phase 3, open‐label, externally controlled interventional study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the terminal complement inhibitor ravulizumab in adult patients with anti–aquaporin‐4 antibody–positive (AQP4+) neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Ravulizumab binds the same complement component 5 epitope as the approved therapeutic eculizumab but has a longer half‐life, enabling an extended dosing interval (8 vs 2 weeks). Methods The availability of eculizumab precluded the use of a concurrent placebo control in CHAMPION‐NMOSD; consequently, the placebo group of the eculizumab phase 3 trial PREVENT (n = 47) was used as an external comparator. Patients received weight‐based intravenous ravulizumab on day 1 and maintenance doses on day 15, then once every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was time to first adjudicated on‐trial relapse. Results The primary endpoint was met; no patients taking ravulizumab (n = 58) had an adjudicated relapse (during 84.0 patient‐years of treatment) versus 20 patients with adjudicated relapses in the placebo group of PREVENT (during 46.9 patient‐years; relapse risk reduction = 98.6%, 95% confidence interval = 89.7%–100.0%, p < 0.0001). Median (range) study period follow‐up time was 73.5 (11.0–117.7) weeks for ravulizumab. Most treatment‐emergent adverse events were mild/moderate; no deaths were reported. Two patients taking ravulizumab experienced meningococcal infections. Both recovered with no sequelae; one continued ravulizumab treatment. Interpretation Ravulizumab significantly reduced relapse risk in patients with AQP4+ NMOSD, with a safety profile consistent with those of eculizumab and ravulizumab across all approved indications. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:1053–1068

ImportanceA safe and effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is urgently needed. Antibiotics kill toxin-producing bacteria but do not repair the disrupted microbiome, which promotes spore germination and infection recurrence.ObjectivesTo evaluate the safety and rate of CDI recurrence after administration of investigational microbiome therapeutic SER-109 through 24 weeks.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis phase 3, single-arm, open-label trial (ECOSPOR IV) was conducted at 72 US and Canadian outpatient sites from October 2017 to April 2022. Adults aged 18 years or older with recurrent CDI were enrolled in 2 cohorts: (1) rollover patients from the ECOSPOR III trial who had CDI recurrence diagnosed by toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and (2) patients with at least 1 CDI recurrence (diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction [PCR] or toxin EIA), inclusive of their acute infection at study entry.InterventionsSER-109 given orally as 4 capsules daily for 3 days following symptom resolution after antibiotic treatment for CDI.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcomes were safety, measured as the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in all patients receiving any amount of SER-109, and cumulative rates of recurrent CDI (toxin-positive diarrhea requiring treatment) through week 24 in the intent-to-treat population.ResultsOf 351 patients screened, 263 were enrolled (180 [68.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 64.0 [15.7] years); 29 were in cohort 1 and 234 in cohort 2. Seventy-seven patients (29.3%) were enrolled with their first CDI recurrence. Overall, 141 patients (53.6%) had TEAEs, which were mostly mild to moderate and gastrointestinal. There were 8 deaths (3.0%) and 33 patients (12.5%) with serious TEAEs; none were considered treatment related by the investigators. Overall, 23 patients (8.7%; 95% CI, 5.6%-12.8%) had recurrent CDI at week 8 (4 of 29 [13.8%; 95% CI, 3.9%-31.7%] in cohort 1 and 19 of 234 [8.1%; 95% CI, 5.0%-12.4%] in cohort 2), and recurrent CDI rates remained low through 24 weeks (36 patients [13.7%; 95% CI, 9.8%-18.4%]). At week 8, recurrent CDI rates in patients with a first recurrence were similarly low (5 of 77 [6.5%; 95% CI, 2.1%-14.5%]) as in patients with 2 or more recurrences (18 of 186 [9.7%; 95% CI, 5.8%-14.9%]). Analyses by select baseline characteristics showed consistently low recurrent CDI rates in patients younger than 65 years vs 65 years or older (5 of 126 [4.0%; 95% CI, 1.3%-9.0%] vs 18 of 137 [13.1%; 95% CI, 8.0%-20.0%]) and patients enrolled based on positive PCR results (3 of 69 [4.3%; 95% CI, 0.9%-12.2%]) vs those with positive toxin EIA results (20 of 192 [10.4%; 95% CI, 6.5%-15.6%]).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this trial, oral SER-109 was well tolerated in a patient population with recurrent CDI and prevalent comorbidities. The rate of recurrent CDI was low regardless of the number of prior recurrences, demographics, or diagnostic approach, supporting the beneficial impact of SER-109 for patients with CDI.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03183141

ImportanceMorphea is an insidious inflammatory disorder of the skin and deeper tissues. Determining disease activity is challenging yet important to medical decision-making and patient outcomes.ObjectiveTo develop and validate a scoring tool, the Morphea Activity Measure (MAM), to evaluate morphea disease activity of any type or severity that is easy to use in clinical and research settings.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis pilot diagnostic study was conducted from September 9, 2019, to March 6, 2020, in 2 phases: development and validation. During the development phase, 14 morphea experts (dermatologists and pediatric dermatologists) used a Delphi consensus method to determine items that would be included in the MAM. The validation phase included 8 investigators who evaluated the tool in collaboration with 14 patients with pediatric morphea (recruited from a referral center [Medical College of Wisconsin]) during a 1-day in-person meeting on March 6, 2020.Main Outcomes and MeasuresDuring the development phase, online survey items were evaluated by experts in morphea using a Likert scale (score range, 0-10, with 0 indicating not important and 10 indicating very important); agreement was defined as a median score of 7.0 or higher, disagreement as a median score of 3.9 or lower, and no consensus as a median score of 4.0 to 6.9. During the validation phase, reliability (interrater and intrarater agreement using intraclass correlation coefficients), validity (using the content validity index and κ statistics as well as correlations with the modified Localized Scleroderma Severity Index and the Physician Global Assessment of Activity using Spearman ρ coefficients), and viability (using qualitative interviews of investigators who used the MAM tool) were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative variables. Data on race and ethnicity categories were collected but not analyzed because skin color was more relevant for the purposes of this study.ResultsAmong 14 survey respondents during the development phase, 9 (64.3%) were pediatric dermatologists and 5 (35.7%) were dermatologists. After 2 rounds, a final tool was developed comprising 10 items that experts agreed were indicative of morphea activity (new lesion in the past 3 months, enlarging lesion in the past 3 months, linear lesion developing progressive atrophy in the past 3 months, erythema, violaceous rim or color, warmth to the touch, induration, white-yellow or waxy appearance, shiny white wrinkling, and body surface area). The validation phase was conducted with 14 patients (median age, 14.5 years [range, 8.0-18.0 years]; 8 [57.1%] female), 2 dermatologists, and 6 pediatric dermatologists. Interrater and intrarater agreement for MAM total scores was good, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.844 (95% CI, 0.681-0.942) for interrater agreement and 0.856 (95% CI, 0.791-0.901) for intrarater agreement. Correlations between the MAM and the modified Localized Scleroderma Severity Index (Spearman ρ = 0.747; P &amp;lt; .001) and the MAM and the Physician Global Assessment of Activity (Spearman ρ = 0.729; P &amp;lt; .001) were moderately strong. In qualitative interviews, evaluators agreed that the tool was easy to use, measured morphea disease activity at a single time point, and should be responsive to changes in morphea disease activity over multiple time points.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, the MAM was found to be a reliable, valid, and viable tool to measure pediatric morphea activity. Further testing to assess validity in adults and responsiveness to change is needed.

Abstract Background Laboratory medicine has reached the era where promises of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) seem palpable. Currently, the primary responsibility for risk-benefit assessment in clinical practice resides with the medical director. Unfortunately, there is no tool or concept that enables diagnostic quality assessment for the various potential AI/ML applications. Specifically, we noted that an operational definition of laboratory diagnostic quality – for the specific purpose of assessing AI/ML improvements – is currently missing. Methods A session at the 3rd Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Laboratory Medicine in 2022 on “ AI in the Laboratory of the Future” prompted an expert roundtable discussion. Here we present a conceptual diagnostic quality framework for the specific purpose of assessing AI/ML implementations. Results The presented framework is termed diagnostic quality model (DQM) and distinguishes AI/ML improvements at the test, procedure, laboratory, or healthcare ecosystem level. The operational definition illustrates the nested relationship among these levels. The model can help to define relevant objectives for implementation and how levels come together to form coherent diagnostics. The affected levels are referred to as scope and we provide a rubric to quantify AI/ML improvements while complying with existing, mandated regulatory standards. We present 4 relevant clinical scenarios including multi-modal diagnostics and compare the model to existing quality management systems. Conclusions A diagnostic quality model is essential to navigate the complexities of clinical AI/ML implementations. The presented diagnostic quality framework can help to specify and communicate the key implications of AI/ML solutions in laboratory diagnostics.

Abstract Hemopoietic histocompatibility (Hh) Ag are noncodominantly expressed on bone marrow stem cells and other normal and neoplastic cells of hemopoietic origin. H-2/Hh-1 allogeneic or parental-strain bone marrow grafts are eliminated in a determinant specific manner by NK cells. In inbred mouse strains, seven Hh-1 alleles representing combinations of five different Hh-1 antigenic determinants are described. Each Hh-1 allele maps in the vicinity of H-2D, and the genes that map to Hh-1 are transacting regulatory genes. The expression of a particular determinant depends on the absence of the regulatory gene and the presence of the appropriate structural gene. The primary focus of this study is to ascertain whether the Hh-1 phenotype and the serologic H-2DL typing are always correlated or whether recombinant can separate the two. To achieve this, we used a panel of irradiated hosts that are able to recognize the different Hh-1 determinants on the bone marrow cells of congenic intra-H-2 recombinant donors. We report: 1) the majority of strains show a correlation between Hh-1 and H-2DL: 2) B10.RQDB and B10.WB strains dissociate Hh-1 from Lb: 3) nine H-2S/D interval recombinant strains exhibit no correlation between the H-2DL type and Hh-1 phenotype; and 4) in two strains from this group, B10.D2 (R106) and B10.RSF5, H-2S/D crossovers occurred within Hh-1r, (Hh-1 regulatory). We conclude that Hh-1r is a distinct regulatory locus mapping telomeric of H-2S and centromeric of, although probably closer to, H-2D.

AbstractBackgroundPatients with prostate cancer suffer significant sexual dysfunction after treatment which negatively affects them and their partners psychologically, and strain their relationships.AimWe convened an international panel with the aim of developing guidelines that will inform clinicians, patients and partners about the impact of prostate cancer therapies (PCT) on patients’ and partners’ sexual health, their relationships, and about biopsychosocial rehabilitation in prostate cancer (PC) survivorship.MethodsThe guidelines panel included international expert researchers and clinicians, and a guideline methodologist. A systematic review of the literature, using the Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsychINFO, LGBT Life, and Embase databases was conducted (1995–2022) according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Study selection was based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Each statement was assigned an evidence strength (A-C) and a recommendation level (strong, moderate, conditional) based on benefit/risk assessment, according to the nomenclature of the American Urological Association (AUA). Data synthesis included meta-analyses of studies deemed of sufficient quality (3), using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR).OutcomesGuidelines for sexual health care for patients with prostate cancer were developed, based on available evidence and the expertise of the international panel.ResultsThe guidelines account for patients’ cultural, ethnic, and racial diversity. They attend to the unique needs of individuals with diverse sexual orientations and gender identities. The guidelines are based on literature review, a theoretical model of sexual recovery after PCT, and 6 principles that promote clinician-initiated discussion of realistic expectations of sexual outcomes and mitigation of sexual side-effects through biopsychosocial rehabilitation. Forty-seven statements address the psychosexual, relationship, and functional domains in addition to statements on lifestyle modification, assessment, provider education, and systemic challenges to providing sexual health care in PC survivorship.Clinical ImplicationsThe guidelines provide clinicians with a comprehensive approach to sexual health care for patients with prostate cancer.Strengths & LimitationsThe strength of the study is the comprehensive evaluation of existing evidence on sexual dysfunction and rehabilitation in prostate cancer that can, along with available expert knowledge, best undergird clinical practice. Limitation is the variation in the evidence supporting interventions and the lack of research on issues facing patients with prostate cancer in low and middle-income countries.ConclusionThe guidelines document the distressing sexual sequelae of PCT, provide evidence-based recommendations for sexual rehabilitation and outline areas for future research.

AbstractHow to deliver best care in various clinical settings remains a vexing problem. All pertinent healthcare-related questions have not, cannot, and will not be addressable with costly time- and resource-consuming controlled clinical trials. At present, evidence-based guidelines can address only a small fraction of the types of care that clinicians deliver. Furthermore, underserved areas rarely can access state-of-the-art evidence-based guidelines in real-time, and often lack the wherewithal to implement advanced guidelines. Care providers in such settings frequently do not have sufficient training to undertake advanced guideline implementation. Nevertheless, in advanced modern healthcare delivery environments, use of eActions (validated clinical decision support systems) could help overcome the cognitive limitations of overburdened clinicians. Widespread use of eActions will require surmounting current healthcare technical and cultural barriers and installing clinical evidence/data curation systems. The authors expect that increased numbers of evidence-based guidelines will result from future comparative effectiveness clinical research carried out during routine healthcare delivery within learning healthcare systems.

Signet-ring stromal tumor (SRST) is a rare ovarian stromal neoplasm characterized by a population of bland signet-ring cells, devoid of mucin or lipid, in a generally cellular fibromatous stroma. Previous reports have described heterogenous immunohistochemical and molecular genetic findings, including occasional nuclear β-catenin expression and/or CTNNB1 mutations. We report 10 ovarian stromal neoplasms originally diagnosed as SRST. All but 1 tumor underwent detailed immunohistochemical analysis (including β-catenin) and 5 of 10 had CTNNB1 mutation analysis performed. All tumors contained a population of morphologically bland signet-ring cells that ranged from 15% to 95% of the neoplasm, characterized by a single large empty intracytoplasmic vacuole, mostly with nuclear indentation. Six of the 10 tumors contained cellular fibroma-like areas, comprising from 10% to 85% of the neoplasm. Three of the 10 tumors were reclassified as microcystic stromal tumor with signet-ring cells on the basis of the microcyst formation and hyalinized stroma, beta-catenin and cyclin D1 nuclear expression and/or CTNNB1 mutation, CD10 staining and largely absent expression of inhibin and calretinin. In the remaining 7 tumors, the diagnosis of SRST remained, constituting the largest series of SRST reported in the literature to date. The results of our study suggest that a subset of tumors diagnosed as ovarian SRST, especially those which show β-catenin nuclear positivity and/or CTNNB1 mutation, likely represent microcystic stromal tumor with variant morphology. We also suggest that at least a subset of SRSTs without evidence of Wnt/β-catenin pathway abnormalities may be related to ovarian fibromas. We discuss the differential diagnosis of ovarian neoplasms containing signet-ring cells.