Nathan, Richard

ImportanceA safe and effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is urgently needed. Antibiotics kill toxin-producing bacteria but do not repair the disrupted microbiome, which promotes spore germination and infection recurrence.ObjectivesTo evaluate the safety and rate of CDI recurrence after administration of investigational microbiome therapeutic SER-109 through 24 weeks.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis phase 3, single-arm, open-label trial (ECOSPOR IV) was conducted at 72 US and Canadian outpatient sites from October 2017 to April 2022. Adults aged 18 years or older with recurrent CDI were enrolled in 2 cohorts: (1) rollover patients from the ECOSPOR III trial who had CDI recurrence diagnosed by toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and (2) patients with at least 1 CDI recurrence (diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction [PCR] or toxin EIA), inclusive of their acute infection at study entry.InterventionsSER-109 given orally as 4 capsules daily for 3 days following symptom resolution after antibiotic treatment for CDI.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcomes were safety, measured as the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in all patients receiving any amount of SER-109, and cumulative rates of recurrent CDI (toxin-positive diarrhea requiring treatment) through week 24 in the intent-to-treat population.ResultsOf 351 patients screened, 263 were enrolled (180 [68.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 64.0 [15.7] years); 29 were in cohort 1 and 234 in cohort 2. Seventy-seven patients (29.3%) were enrolled with their first CDI recurrence. Overall, 141 patients (53.6%) had TEAEs, which were mostly mild to moderate and gastrointestinal. There were 8 deaths (3.0%) and 33 patients (12.5%) with serious TEAEs; none were considered treatment related by the investigators. Overall, 23 patients (8.7%; 95% CI, 5.6%-12.8%) had recurrent CDI at week 8 (4 of 29 [13.8%; 95% CI, 3.9%-31.7%] in cohort 1 and 19 of 234 [8.1%; 95% CI, 5.0%-12.4%] in cohort 2), and recurrent CDI rates remained low through 24 weeks (36 patients [13.7%; 95% CI, 9.8%-18.4%]). At week 8, recurrent CDI rates in patients with a first recurrence were similarly low (5 of 77 [6.5%; 95% CI, 2.1%-14.5%]) as in patients with 2 or more recurrences (18 of 186 [9.7%; 95% CI, 5.8%-14.9%]). Analyses by select baseline characteristics showed consistently low recurrent CDI rates in patients younger than 65 years vs 65 years or older (5 of 126 [4.0%; 95% CI, 1.3%-9.0%] vs 18 of 137 [13.1%; 95% CI, 8.0%-20.0%]) and patients enrolled based on positive PCR results (3 of 69 [4.3%; 95% CI, 0.9%-12.2%]) vs those with positive toxin EIA results (20 of 192 [10.4%; 95% CI, 6.5%-15.6%]).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this trial, oral SER-109 was well tolerated in a patient population with recurrent CDI and prevalent comorbidities. The rate of recurrent CDI was low regardless of the number of prior recurrences, demographics, or diagnostic approach, supporting the beneficial impact of SER-109 for patients with CDI.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03183141

Abstract Background CDI is a 2-hit process requiring C. difficile spores and antibiotic-mediated dysbiosis, a low diversity state of the gut microbiome. Recurrent CDI (rCDI) is common and may be related to inadequate antibiotic concentrations (e.g., metronidazole; MET) or persistent dysbiosis (e.g., vancomycin; VAN). SER-262 is an oral investigational microbiome drug rationally designed to reduce rCDI by restoring colonization resistance. Methods SERES-262-001 was a Phase 1b randomized placebo (PBO)-controlled single and multidose study. Subjects with primary CDI (n = 96) were enrolled in 8 cohorts (SER-262: PBO, 5:1). Subjects were dosed after MET (n = 57) or VAN (n = 39) per investigator discretion. Engraftment of SER-262 strains was evaluated using strain-specific molecular probes in fecal samples; microbial diversity was measured via whole metagenomic shotgun sequencing. Endpoints included safety and rCDI rates up to 8 weeks posttreatment and strain engraftment at 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks. Results SER-262 safety was comparable to PBO. Although overall rCDI rates were similar in SER-262 (n = 80) and PBO (n = 16) subjects (18.8% vs. 12.5%, respectively), in a post-hoc analysis we observed reduced rates of rCDI in the VAN+SER-262 arm compared with MET+SER-262 (6.3 vs. 27.1%, respectively, P = 0.02, Figure 1). Overall, 8 of 12 SER-262 strains showed significant engraftment relative to PBO. However, greater SER-262 strain engraftment was observed in VAN-treated subjects compared with MET-treated subjects (P < 0.001, Figure 2). To better understand the impact of dysbiosis on engraftment, we evaluated baseline microbial diversity by prior antibiotic received and observed that the diversity of Bacteroidetes and Firmicute species was lower in VAN-treated subjects compared with MET-treated subjects (P < 0.001, Figure 3). Conclusion In this first phase 1b study of a fermented microbiome drug in subjects with primary CDI, SER-262 was safe and well-tolerated. The higher efficacy rates of SER-262 in reducing rCDI among VAN-treated subjects may be due to low baseline microbial diversity, which creates an ecologic niche for greater engraftment of dose species. Treatment of C. difficile with VAN, followed by restoration of colonization resistance with SER-262, is a promising 2-pronged therapeutic paradigm to reduce rCDI. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.