Citations

Background Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in small, premature infants is increasingly performed in the contemporary practice. Data regarding optimal timing of PDA closure are scarce. We therefore decided to compare morbidity and mortality of early and late device closure in preterm infants. Methods Hospitalizations of 166,583 newborn infants diagnosed with PDA were identified from the Kids’ Inpatient Database (KID) in 2009, 2012, 2016, and 2019. Of these, 299 preterm infants (gestational age (GA) ≤32 weeks, birth weight <1500 grams) underwent percutaneous PDA closure. Characteristics and periprocedural outcomes were compared between early (≤30 days) ( n = 120) and late PDA closure (>30 days) ( n = 179). Results Mean age (±standard deviation) for early PDA closure was 18.6 days ± 7 and 67.3 days ± 36.5 in late PDA closure. Comorbidities including respiratory distress syndrome/bronchopulmonary dysplasia, heart failure, and pulmonary hypertension were comparable between the two groups. There was no difference in mortality or referral for surgical ligation between early and late closure. Postprocedural vascular complications were low, but higher in patients with early PDA closure (3.3% vs 0%; p = 0.025). While the total length of hospital stay was longer in late PDA closure group (121.1 days ± 51.7 vs 81.5 days ± 48.8; p = <0.01), postprocedural length of stay was paradoxically longer in the early closure group (69 days ± 43.6 vs 57.5 days ± 43, p = 0.03). Conclusion There was no statistical difference in in-hospital mortality; however, there is a trend toward higher mortality in the early closure group. Major periprocedural complications are comparable between early and late PDA closure, except vascular complications that were higher with early PDA closure.

ABSTRACTVarious cutaneous adnexal neoplasms have been associated with gene fusions as the main driver of their histogenesis, most of which showed poroid or hidradenomatous differentiation or represented other tumors of sweat glands. Recently, we encountered two cases of primitive basaloid neoplasms of predominantly folliculogenic/pilosebaceous origin, both surprisingly harboring recurrent EWSR1 rearrangements. Both tumors presented in young patients of either sex (1 F; 17 years; 1 M; 37 years) and involved the dermis and subcutaneous tissue of the abdominal wall (case 1) and the buttock (case 2). Histologically, the tumors were composed of primitive, basaloid cells with areas of keratinization (case 1) or foci of sebaceous differentiation (case 2) and stained strongly with keratins, p40 (case 1) or p63 (case 2), while lacking significant CD99 expression in both cases. Case 1 harbored an EWSR1::FLI1 fusion while case 2 harbored an EWSR1::PBX3 fusion. Clinical follow‐up was available for case 2 and showed no evidence of disease at 15 months of follow‐up. Methylation profiling showed case 1 to cluster with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, while case 2 was independent but positioned close to salivary gland epithelial‐myoepithelial carcinoma. These findings expand on the histopathologic and molecular genetic features of basaloid tumors with apparent adnexal differentiation and raise awareness to carefully interpret and correlate molecular findings with morphology and immunophenotype to avoid misinterpretation as a mesenchymal neoplasm.

Kidney organoids are an increasingly established model of polycystic kidney disease (PKD). Derived from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), organoids may be generated from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) of patients that bear naturally occurring mutations or from CRISPR mutant hPSCs by virtue of their genetic tractability. PKD is the leading inheritable cause of kidney failure (KF), accounting for ∼5%–10% of the kidney transplant and dialysis needs worldwide. PKD is a disorder of considerable genetic heterogeneity, composed of typical adult-onset autosomal dominant (ADPKD) and fetal-onset autosomal recessive (ARPKD) forms, which share pathomechanisms. Despite advances in our understanding of the genetic and molecular underpinnings of PKD, the limited clinical treatment options have raised concerns regarding the faithfulness of preclinical models. Kidney organoids have emerged as a promising platform to study PKD by mimicking human-specific responses, enabling personalized medicine, and supporting high-throughput screens. Yet, valid criticisms have related to the relative immaturity of kidney organoids for modeling adult-onset forms of PKD, the faithfulness of organoids in modeling the cystic distribution of afflicted patients, and their batch-to-batch variability limiting experimental reproducibility. Here, we summarize a decade of kidney organoid models of PKD, emphasizing their role in advancing translational and therapeutic applications while addressing their limitations and future potential.

Abstract Accurate prediction of risk of progression from smoldering (SMM) to active multiple myeloma (MM) is paramount to individualized early therapeutic strategies with minimum risk of overtreatment. Current risk stratification models do not account for evolving biomarker trajectories. We assembled the largest cohort to date of 2,270 SMM patients from six international centers with longitudinal clinical and biological data to train and validate the PANGEA 2.0 risk models. Four evolving biomarkers were significantly associated with shorter time-to-progression: M-protein increase ≥0.2g/dL, involved:uninvolved serum free light chain ratio increase ≥20, creatinine increase >25%, and hemoglobin decrease ≥1.5g/dL. PANGEA 2.0 outperforms established models including the 20/2/20 and IMWG models by more accurately predicting progression (C-statistics=0.69–0.84), even without biomarker history (C-statistics=0.69–0.83) or recent bone marrow biopsy. PANGEA 2.0 is an easy-to-use, open-access tool (https://ghobrial.shinyapps.io/pangea_2_calculator) to improve and individualize SMM risk stratification. Validation tools are available to compare PANGEA 2.0 to established models (https://ghobrial.shinyapps.io/pangea_validation).

PURPOSE Tumor treating fields (TTFields) use alternating electric fields to disrupt cancer cell proliferation. Feasibility of TTFields therapy with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel was previously demonstrated in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PANOVA-3 was designed to confirm safety and efficacy of TTFields in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LA-PAC). METHODS In this global phase III trial, 571 patients with newly diagnosed LA-PAC were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 and nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m 2 by intravenous infusion once a day on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle with or without TTFields. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), local PFS, pain-free survival, and overall response rate (ORR). Distant PFS was analyzed post hoc. RESULTS OS was significantly prolonged using TTFields with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (median, 16.2 months [95% CI, 15.0 to 18.0] v 14.2 months [95% CI, 12.8 to 15.4]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.68 to 0.99]; P = .039). PFS, local PFS, and ORR were not improved. Pain-free survival was significantly prolonged with TTFields with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (median, 15.2 months [95% CI, 10.3 to 22.8] v 9.1 months [95% CI, 7.4 to 12.7]; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.56 to 0.97]; P = .027), as was distant PFS (median, 13.9 months [95% CI, 12.2 to 16.8] v 11.5 months [95% CI, 10.4 to 12.9]; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.96]; P = .022). Device-related skin adverse events (AEs) were experienced by 76.3% of patients. Most device-related skin AEs were mild to moderate, with 7.7% of patients reporting a grade 3 AE. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated significant OS, pain-free survival, and distant PFS benefits for TTFields with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in patients with unresectable LA-PAC, with no additive systemic toxicity.

ImportanceHip fractures present a substantial public health challenge, with projections of more than 500 000 per year by 2040. As such, frailty indices such as the Revised Risk Analysis Index (RAI) and the Modified Five-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5) have been recently investigated as metrics for preoperative risk stratification for these patients.ObjectiveTo understand the accuracy of frailty, as measured by the RAI and the mFI-5, for estimating 30-day mortality following surgically managed hip fractures.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cross-sectional analysis used the American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement database. Patients aged 65 years old with surgically managed traumatic hip fracture from 2015 to 2019 were included. Frailty was evaluated using the RAI, a 5-domain scale with 14 weighted variables graded from 0 to 81, and the mFI-5, a 2-domain scale with 5 unweighted variables graded from 0 to 5; for both, a higher score denotes worse frailty. Data collection occurred from May to June 2024.ExposureDiagnosis of hip fracture and undergoing surgical fixation, hemiarthroplasty, or total hip arthroplasty.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Multivariable regression was conducted to assess the estimating value of frailty scales. Discriminatory accuracy was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic curve and quantified using a C-statistic.ResultsThe cohort consisted of 114 359 patients (70 038 female [69.9%]; median [IQR] age, 84 [77-89] years) with 51 071 prefrail patients (44.7%) according to the mFI-5 and 31 883 very frail patients (27.9%) according to the RAI comprising the largest frailty groups. Increasing frailty status was associated with greater odds ratio (OR) for 30-day mortality for both the mFI-5 (prefrail OR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.24-1.47]; frail OR, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.94-2.30]; severely frail OR, 3.53 [95% CI, 3.20-3.90]; P &amp;lt; .001 for all) and RAI (normal OR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.35-1.79]; frail OR, 2.97 [95% CI, 2.59-3.42]; very frail OR, 6.17 [95% CI, 5.38-7.08]; P &amp;lt; .001 for all). The RAI demonstrated superior discriminatory accuracy for 30-day mortality compared with the mFI-5 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.72-0.73] vs 0.61 [95% CI, 0.60-0.62]; P &amp;lt; .001).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study of 114 359 patients, the RAI demonstrated superior odds and discriminatory accuracy for estimating 30-day mortality following surgical management of hip fractures. The RAI may be considered as a risk stratification tool for orthopedic surgeons to adjunct surgical planning, thereby reducing postoperative mortality.

10032 Background: Identifying clinical and biological factors associated with outcomes in localized Ewing sarcoma (ES) will enable risk-stratified clinical trials with the goal of improved outcomes for high-risk patients and decreased treatment toxicity for low-risk patients. The specific aims of this analysis in localized ES patients were 1) to classify extraosseous (EO) primary tumors with subdivisions into deep (viscera, glands, body cavities, muscle, nerves) and superficial (cutaneous and subcutaneous) sites, and 2) to understand the relationship between baseline clinical factors (age, sex, primary tumor site, size (maximum dimension and volume)) and event-free survival (EFS). Methods: The analytic cohort included ES patients treated with ICC on AEWS0031 and AEWS1031. Primary tumor sites were defined as pelvic, non-pelvic, and EO (deep vs. superficial). Post-enrollment EFS was the primary endpoint. Univariate analyses used the Kaplan–Meier method (logrank test). Multivariable analyses used Cox proportional hazards models. To assess the impact of tumor volume as a continuous variable, a subgroup analysis was conducted using AEWS1031 only, as tumor volumes were collected prospectively on this study. Visual exploration of effects of continuous variables on EFS event hazard used restricted cubic splines with 3 knots. Tests were performed at the 5% level. Results: AEWS0031 (n = 628) and AEWS1031 Regimen B (n = 283) yielded 911 patients. In univariate analyses, difference in risk of EFS event was observed between tumor sites ( P = 0.03). EO tumors had the highest estimated EFS compared to pelvic and non-pelvic (5 year EFS 84.7% vs. 72.4% and 75.9%). Superficial EO appeared to be a very low-risk group, albeit interpretations are limited by the small group size and singular event (one second malignant neoplasm among 15 patients). In multivariable analysis of the combined cohort, sex, race, and ethnicity were not prognostic. EO tumors may be associated with decreased hazard compared with non-pelvic bone primaries (HR 0.58, P = 0.07), and tumors ≥200 mL with increased hazard (HR 1.56, P < 0.01). In the subgroup analysis, tumor volume and age were prognostic and in visualizations age was non-linearly related to the hazard of EFS event, increasing until approximately 15 years. Tumor volume was non-linearly related to the hazard of EFS event and increased until approximately 400 mL. Conclusions: Patients with ES and primary tumors ≥200 mL continue to be at higher risk of an EFS event when treated with ICC, and EO tumors may be lower risk compared with other sites. Risk of an event appears to remain constant in ES patients ≥15 years or with primary tumors ≥400 mL. These findings should be validated in prospective trials and tumor biology integrated with clinical factors to improve risk stratification for localized ES.