Citations

Epidural and dorsal root stimulation have emerged as promising therapies to restore function after spinal cord injury. However, how each modality uniquely or jointly engages spinal circuits remains unclear. To address this, we analyzed leg electromyography (EMG) responses to epidural stimulation (ES) and dorsal root ganglia stimulation (DRGS) delivered to the lumbosacral cord in the same individuals.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provide recommendations for the treatment of patients with NSCLC, including diagnosis, primary disease management, surveillance, and subsequent treatment. The panel has updated the list of recommended targeted therapies based on recent FDA approvals and clinical data. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for NSCLC focuses on treatment recommendations for advanced or metastatic NSCLC with actionable biomarkers.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Anti—amyloid‐β (Aβ) therapies are reshaping Alzheimer's disease (AD) management. Understanding changes in real‐world patterns of diagnostic testing and infusion chair usage is essential for optimizing access to care. METHODS Retrospective analysis of Mayo Clinic enterprise electronic health records (Jan 2019–Mar 2025) assessed trends in AD‐relevant brain imaging, fluid biomarkers, apolipoprotein E (APOE) testing, and lecanemab infusions. Rates of amyloid‐beta (Aβ) positivity by sex and age, APOE genotype frequencies, and lecanemab treatment initiation and discontinuation were evaluated. RESULTS Following national insurance coverage changes, lecanemab infusions grew by 110 infusions per quarter to 605 in Q1 2025. Aβ positron emission tomography scans increased (+22/quarter), cerebrospinal fluid biomarker orders declined (−25/quarter), and plasma p‐tau 217 orders rapidly increased (+238/quarter). Females were more likely to be Aβ positive ( p < 0.006). APOE ‐ε4 homozygotes were less likely to initiate lecanemab (HR = 0.11, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION The adoption of anti‐Aβ therapies coincided with a rapid shift in diagnostic workflows.

The dynamic field of radiopharmaceuticals is currently experiencing an explosion of growth due in part to excitement over the emerging field of theranostics (therapy and diagnostics). Radiopharmaceuticals use physiological targeting methods to deliver radionuclides with medically relevant decay properties to disease biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment, offering opportunities for early disease imaging and radiation therapy treatment in disease pathologies that are inoperable or refractory to other forms of radiotherapy. Sustaining this rapidly growing field depends heavily on the continued design and production of novel, effective radiopharmaceuticals. Effective therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals cause complex and varied cellular responses, and to choose radionuclides that maximize therapeutic response, researchers must understand radiation biology. Cellular radiation response depends heavily on factors including linear energy transfer (LET), dose, dose rate, targeted location, direct or indirect energy deposition mechanisms, the broader cellular matrix, cellular stress signaling pathways, and endogenous radiation protection mechanisms. Because of the extensive application of low-LET external beam radiation on clinical cancer treatments, biological responses to low-LET form the basis of radiation biology and are generally considered transferable to high-LET radiopharmaceuticals. However, increased focus on high-LET, radiopharmaceutical therapy-specific radiation biology is motivated by differences between low- and high-LET radiation, external beam versus radiopharmaceutical therapy-induced biological response, and the observed varied clinical responses to radiopharmaceutical therapies. This review article summarizes historical understanding of low- and high-LET radiation responses within cells, with emphasis on radiopharmaceutical-specific responses when available, and discusses current gaps in understanding in the radiation biology of radiotheranostic pharmaceuticals.

Abstract INTRODUCTION We examined when Alzheimer's disease biomarkers become informative by identifying age‐related breakpoints with slope‐changing trajectories. METHODS In 2082 Mayo Clinic Study of Aging participants, we modeled plasma amyloid beta (Aβ)42/40, phosphorylated tau (p‐tau)181, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain (NfL), amyloid/tau positron emission tomography (PET), hippocampal volume (HVa), and global cognition. Generalized additive models described age trends; Davies' test and piecewise linear regression estimated breakpoints. A C2N subsample ( n = 462) provided mass‐spectrometry plasma markers (p‐tau181, p‐tau217, their ratios, Aβ42/40). RESULTS In the full cohort, Aβ42/40, HVa, and cognition declined with age; p‐tau181, NfL, GFAP, and amyloid/tau PET increased. We observed single breakpoints (years, 95% CI): GFAP 68.1 (63.5–71.8), NfL 70.7 (65.9–75.6), p‐tau181 67.2 (60.3–70.3), amyloid PET 62.3 (56.2–69.3), HVa 68.1 (63.1–71.9), cognition 59.8 (55.4–66.0); tau PET showed none. In the mass‐spectrometry subset, p‐tau217 and p‐tau181 broke at 72.6; their ratios and Aβ42/40 showed no breakpoints. DISCUSSION Breakpoints cluster near late midlife, suggesting windows for screening and monitoring.