Sayenko, Dimitry G.

Epidural and dorsal root stimulation have emerged as promising therapies to restore function after spinal cord injury. However, how each modality uniquely or jointly engages spinal circuits remains unclear. To address this, we analyzed leg electromyography (EMG) responses to epidural stimulation (ES) and dorsal root ganglia stimulation (DRGS) delivered to the lumbosacral cord in the same individuals.

Transcutaneous (TSS) and epidural spinal stimulation (ESS) are electrophysiological techniques that have been used to investigate the interactions between exogenous electrical stimuli and spinal sensorimotor networks that integrate descending motor signals with afferent inputs from the periphery during motor tasks such as standing and stepping. Recently, pilot-phase clinical trials using ESS and TSS have demonstrated restoration of motor functions that were previously lost due to spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the spinal network interactions that occur in response to TSS or ESS pulses with spared descending connections across the site of SCI have yet to be characterized. Therefore, we examined the effects of delivering TSS or ESS pulses to the lumbosacral spinal cord in nine individuals with chronic SCI. During low-frequency stimulation, participants were instructed to relax or attempt maximum voluntary contraction to perform full leg flexion while supine. We observed similar lower-extremity neuromusculature activation during TSS and ESS when performed in the same participants while instructed to relax. Interestingly, when participants were instructed to attempt lower-extremity muscle contractions, both TSS- and ESS-evoked motor responses were significantly inhibited across all muscles. Participants with clinically complete SCI tested with ESS and participants with clinically incomplete SCI tested with TSS demonstrated greater ability to modulate evoked responses than participants with motor complete SCI tested with TSS, although this was not statistically significant due to a low number of subjects in each subgroup. These results suggest that descending commands combined with spinal stimulation may increase activity of inhibitory interneuronal circuitry within spinal sensorimotor networks in individuals with SCI, which may be relevant in the context of regaining functional motor outcomes.

Transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS), a noninvasive technique to modulate sensorimotor circuitry within the spinal cord, has been shown to enable a wide range of functions that were thought to be permanently impaired in humans with spinal cord injury. However, the extent to which TSS can be used to target specific mediolateral spinal cord circuitry remains undefined. We tested the hypothesis that TSS applied unilaterally to the skin ~2 cm lateral to the midline of the lumbosacral spine selectively activates ipsilateral spinal sensorimotor circuitry, resulting in ipsilateral activation of downstream lower extremity neuromusculature. TSS cathodes and anodes were positioned lateral from the midline of the spine in 15 healthy subjects while supine, and the timing of TSS pulses was synchronized to recordings of lower extremity muscle activity and force. At motor threshold, left and right TSS-evoked muscle activity was significantly higher in the ipsilateral leg compared with contralateral recordings from the same muscles. Similarly, we observed a significant increase in force production in the ipsilateral leg compared with the contralateral leg. Delivery of paired TSS pulses, during which an initial stimulus was applied to one side of the spinal cord and 50 ms later a second stimulus was applied to the contralateral side, revealed that ipsilateral leg muscle responses decreased following the initial stimulus, whereas contralateral muscle responses did not decrease, indicating side-specific activation of lateral spinal sensorimotor circuitry. Our results indicate TSS can selectively engage ipsilateral neuromusculature via lumbosacral sensorimotor networks responsible for lower extremity function in healthy humans. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate the selectivity of transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS), which has been shown to enable function in humans with chronic paralysis. Specifically, we demonstrate that TSS applied to locations lateral to the spinal cord can selectively activate ipsilateral spinal sensorimotor networks. We quantified lumbosacral spinal network activity by recording lower extremity muscle electromyography and force. Our results suggest lumbosacral TSS engages side-specific spinal sensorimotor networks associated with ipsilateral lower extremity function in humans.

Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) of the spinal cord has been shown to restore function after spinal cord injury (SCI). Characterization of EES-evoked motor responses has provided a basic understanding of spinal sensorimotor network activity related to EES-enabled motor activity of the lower extremities. However, the use of EES-evoked motor responses to guide EES system implantation over the spinal cord and their relation to post-operative EES-enabled function in humans with chronic paralysis attributed to SCI has yet to be described. Herein, we describe the surgical and intraoperative electrophysiological approach used, followed by initial EES-enabled results observed in 2 human subjects with motor complete paralysis who were enrolled in a clinical trial investigating the use of EES to enable motor functions after SCI. The 16-contact electrode array was initially positioned under fluoroscopic guidance. Then, EES-evoked motor responses were recorded from select leg muscles and displayed in real time to determine electrode array proximity to spinal cord regions associated with motor activity of the lower extremities. Acceptable array positioning was determined based on achievement of selective proximal or distal leg muscle activity, as well as bilateral muscle activation. Motor response latencies were not significantly different between intraoperative recordings and post-operative recordings, indicating that array positioning remained stable. Additionally, EES enabled intentional control of step-like activity in both subjects within the first 5 days of testing. These results suggest that the use of EES-evoked motor responses may guide intraoperative positioning of epidural electrodes to target spinal cord circuitry to enable motor functions after SCI.