Engle, Jonathan W.

The dynamic field of radiopharmaceuticals is currently experiencing an explosion of growth due in part to excitement over the emerging field of theranostics (therapy and diagnostics). Radiopharmaceuticals use physiological targeting methods to deliver radionuclides with medically relevant decay properties to disease biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment, offering opportunities for early disease imaging and radiation therapy treatment in disease pathologies that are inoperable or refractory to other forms of radiotherapy. Sustaining this rapidly growing field depends heavily on the continued design and production of novel, effective radiopharmaceuticals. Effective therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals cause complex and varied cellular responses, and to choose radionuclides that maximize therapeutic response, researchers must understand radiation biology. Cellular radiation response depends heavily on factors including linear energy transfer (LET), dose, dose rate, targeted location, direct or indirect energy deposition mechanisms, the broader cellular matrix, cellular stress signaling pathways, and endogenous radiation protection mechanisms. Because of the extensive application of low-LET external beam radiation on clinical cancer treatments, biological responses to low-LET form the basis of radiation biology and are generally considered transferable to high-LET radiopharmaceuticals. However, increased focus on high-LET, radiopharmaceutical therapy-specific radiation biology is motivated by differences between low- and high-LET radiation, external beam versus radiopharmaceutical therapy-induced biological response, and the observed varied clinical responses to radiopharmaceutical therapies. This review article summarizes historical understanding of low- and high-LET radiation responses within cells, with emphasis on radiopharmaceutical-specific responses when available, and discusses current gaps in understanding in the radiation biology of radiotheranostic pharmaceuticals.

Abstract Purpose: Men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) frequently develop resistance to androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) treatment; therefore, new therapies are needed. Trophoblastic cell-surface antigen (TROP-2) is a transmembrane protein identified in prostate cancer and overexpressed in multiple malignancies. TROP-2 is a therapeutic target for antibody–drug conjugates (ADC). Experimental Design: TROP-2 gene (TACSTD2) expression and markers of treatment resistance from prostate biopsies were analyzed using data from four previously curated cohorts of mCRPC (n = 634) and the PROMOTE study (dbGaP accession phs001141.v1.p1, n = 88). EPCAM or TROP-2–positive circulating tumor cells (CTC) were captured from peripheral blood for comparison of protein (n = 15) and gene expression signatures of treatment resistance (n = 40). We assessed the efficacy of TROP-2–targeting agents in a mouse xenograft model generated from prostate cancer cell lines. Results: We demonstrated that TACSTD2 is expressed in mCRPC from luminal and basal tumors but at lower levels in patients with neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Patients previously treated with ARSI showed no significant difference in TACSTD2 expression, whereas patients with detectable AR-V7 expression showed increased expression. We observed that TROP-2 can serve as a cell surface target for isolating CTCs, which may serve as a predictive biomarker for ADCs. We also demonstrated that prostate cancer cell line xenografts can be targeted specifically by labeled anti–TROP-2 agents in vivo. Conclusions: These results support further studies on TROP-2 as a therapeutic and diagnostic target for mCRPC.