Citations

ABSTRACT Apheresis medicine is a continually evolving field with numerous studies published each year. To help apheresis practitioners stay up to date with the current literature, members of the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Attending Physician Subcommittee identified and summarized 10 seminal articles published in 2025, from the field of apheresis medicine. PubMed was used to identify articles published in four topics including donor apheresis, therapeutic apheresis, apheresis education, and apheresis collection for cellular therapy. These articles met at least one of the following criteria: novel findings, practice‐altering outcomes, international in scope, randomized‐controlled trial, relevant to current clinical practice, and/or provide evidence for category III or IV indications based on the ASFA 9th Special Issue of the Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice‐Evidence‐Based Approach. Full length, peer‐reviewed manuscripts in English with data from human subjects were included while case reports, review articles, and meta‐analyses were excluded.

Abstract Objective Invasive presurgical evaluation plays a key role in pediatric epilepsy surgery, particularly in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐negative cases, by guiding resective, disconnective, or ablative procedures. This International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery Taskforce study provides an updated global overview of current invasive evaluation practices. Methods Group‐level data were collected from 61 epilepsy surgery programs (49 pediatric‐only) in 29 countries across six continents. Included were children and adolescents who underwent presurgical evaluation and epilepsy surgery in 2023. The study was designed to enable comparison with the similar ILAE survey conducted in 2004. Results A total of 2427 patients were included. Invasive evaluations were performed in 21.1% of cases, most frequently in North America (33.7%, higher than Europe: 18.0%, p = .003). Among invasive cases, 32.3% had no detectable MRI abnormalities. The main indication for invasive evaluation was seizure onset localization (88.1%), followed by motor or sensory mapping (17.2%) and language mapping (14.2%). Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) was the predominant technique (19.8% overall, 93.6% of invasive cases), more common in North America (30.0%, p = .021) and less common in South America (7.4%, p < .001). Subdural electrodes were used in only 3.2% of invasive cases, and combined depth and subdural approaches in 3.2%. SEEG‐guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RF‐TC) was performed in 40.9% of SEEG cases, most commonly in Asia (63.8%). In 16.2% of invasive evaluations, patients did not proceed to resection, disconnection, or ablation, with the highest rate in Europe (28.5%). Significance This global survey provides the first broad overview of invasive evaluation practices in pediatric epilepsy surgery across participating centers worldwide. It highlights the widespread adoption of SEEG, declining use of subdural electrodes, and increasing application of SEEG‐guided RF‐TC. The high proportion of MRI‐negative cases and the considerable proportion of patients not proceeding to resection, disconnection, or ablation underscore the complexity of contemporary surgical candidates and the need for further refinement of selection strategies.

Accurate assessment of renal function is fundamental to dosing renally eliminated drugs. For decades, serum creatinine–based estimating equations have been used to approximate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) for this purpose. While these equations perform reasonably well at the population level, they exhibit substantial individual‐level imprecision and inaccuracy. Simultaneously, recent efforts to remove race from estimating equations addressed important ethical concerns but did not resolve the core limitation of population‐based estimation for individual drug dosing. In this perspective, we argue that personalized dosing requires a shift away from demographic surrogates toward direct measurement of renal clearance and clarify when incremental therapeutic complexity is warranted. We review the limitations of endogenous biomarkers, discuss the role of cystatin C, and propose exogenously measured GFR using iohexol integrated within a Bayesian pharmacometric framework as a clinically actionable approach to individualized drug dosing. Practically, this framework can be implemented by administering a small iohexol dose, collecting sparse timed samples, estimating absolute mGFR and its uncertainty with Bayesian software, and using that posterior estimate to refine renal dose selection.

The primary aim of this study was to examine pitching performance metrics before and after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) among Major League Baseball (MLB) starting and relief pitchers. The following information was extracted from the “Tommy John Surgery List” database regarding UCLR surgeries among MLB pitchers: UCLR date, pitcher type (starting pitcher, relief pitcher), and age at time of UCLR. Pitching performance metrics were extracted from the Baseball Savant online platform for the two seasons immediately prior to UCLR (pre) and the two seasons immediately following returning to pitching after UCLR (post). Fifty-nine pitchers were included in this study (29 starting pitchers, 30 relief pitchers). The outcome measures included the number of pitches thrown, earned run average (ERA), walks plus hits per inning pitched (WHIP), strikeout percentage, whiff percentage, walk percentage, batting average against, ground ball percentage, and fastball velocity. There was a pitcher type-by-time interaction effect for ERA (p = 0.01; η2 = 0.12) and WHIP (p = 0.01; η2 = 0.12). Starting pitcher ERA increased from 3.68 to 4.40 from pre- to post-surgery, while relief pitcher ERA decreased from 4.47 to 3.90. In addition, starting pitcher WHIP increased from 1.22 to 1.29 from pre- to post-surgery, while relief pitcher WHIP decreased from 1.38 to 1.28. There was a main effect of time for pitches thrown (p = 0.04; η2 = 0.07). Significant differences between starting and relief pitchers were observed for changes in ERA and WHIP following UCLR, whereas no pitcher type-by-time interactions were observed for the remaining performance metrics. Both starting and relief pitchers threw fewer pitches following UCLR, while fastball velocity and other key pitching performance metrics remained largely unchanged.