Citations

TPS646 Background: SSTR-targeted RPT has transformed the treatment landscape for NETs, significantly improving clinical outcomes in phase 3 studies versus other targeted therapies. Nevertheless, disease progression and renal toxicity after treatment highlight the need for further improvement. Use of the α-emitter 225 Ac as the radioactive component has shown promising results in clinical studies: initial data from ACTION-1 suggest promising efficacy for RYZ101, a first-in-class, highly potent α-emitting RPT, in patients with SSTR+ GEP-NETs progressing after 2–4 cycles of 177 Lu-somatostatin analogs. RYZ401 is a cyclic 6-amino acid SSTR-targeting peptide agonist conjugated to a DOTA chelator bound to 225 Ac. Preclinical data have shown an improved therapeutic window versus DOTATATE. RYZ401 has the potential to deliver higher radiation doses to tumors, with improved renal clearance and lower kidney absorbed dose, potentially eliminating the need for amino acid infusion. Methods: RYZ401-101 is a global, multicenter, phase 1, first-in-human, dose-escalation/-expansion study designed to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and optimal treatment regimen, safety and tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of RYZ401 in patients with NETs and other selected solid tumors expressing SSTRs. Key eligibility criteria: histologically confirmed metastatic or unresectable well-differentiated NETs; WHO grade 1–3 (Ki-67 ≤55%); ≥1 SSTR PET-positive measurable lesion; and disease progression after ≥1 prior treatment line. In dose escalation, 6–18 patients will receive escalating doses of RYZ401 (2.0–11.1 MBq IV Q6W × 2–4 cycles); no amino acid co-infusion is planned. In dose expansion, approximately 80 patients will receive RYZ401 at the RP2D, 40 patients with well-differentiated GEP-NETs (cohort A) and 40 with other SSTR+ tumors including non-GEP-NETs (cohort B). Primary endpoints: dose-limiting toxicities in weeks 1–4 of treatment (dose escalation) and safety (dose expansion). Secondary endpoints: safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy outcomes (dose escalation and expansion). RYZ401 dosimetry will be evaluated in a sub-study of 10−16 patients. Enrollment is ongoing in the USA. Clinical trial information: NCT07165132 .

635 Background: [ 212 Pb]VMT-a-NET is an alpha therapy agent targeting somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2)-expressing tumors. Here, we report the results of a prospective, open-label, Phase I/IIa trial (NCT05636618), assessing safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of [ 212 Pb]VMT-a-NET in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Methods: Adults with well-differentiated unresectable or metastatic SSTR2-expressing NETs, who are peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) naïve, and who progressed on at least one prior line of systemic therapy, are eligible. Participants can receive up to four cycles of [ 212 Pb]VMT-a-NET at the assigned dose level. Participants are followed for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) observation up to 42 days after the first dose. Efficacy is evaluated by investigators according to RECIST criteria v1.1. Results: As of 16-Aug-2025 (data cut-off [DCO]) a total of 48 participants were enrolled into cohorts 1 and 2 and received at least one dose of [ 212 Pb]VMT-a-NET (n=2 in Cohort 1, and n=46 in Cohort 2 at a dose level of 92.5 MBq and 185 MBq, respectively). Among all participants treated with at least one dose of [ 212 Pb]VMT-a-NET (n=48), no DLTs, no grade 4 or 5 adverse events (AEs), and no treatment-related discontinuations, were observed. Median follow-up time was 28 weeks (range: 6-93). Nine participants were followed for DLT observation (n=2 in cohort 1 and n=7 in cohort 2).Seven of these patients were with no progression as of the DCO. Three out of the seven participants enrolled at the dose level of 185 MBq achieved a confirmed partial response (PR). Median follow-up time for participants included in the efficacy group was 72 weeks (range: 6-93). Cohort 3, at a dose level of 222 MBq, has recently been opened for enrollment. At the DCO, 4 participants were enrolled in this cohort. Updated safety outcome for all participants along with updated efficacy findings for participants in Cohort 1 and 2 with sufficient maturity, will be presented during the congress. Conclusions: [ 212 Pb]VMT-a-NET showed a favorable safety profile and promising clinical benefit for patients with advanced SSTR2-expressing NETs treated at the dose levels of 92.5 MBq and 185 MBq. The study is ongoing with Cohort 3 (222 MBq) currently open for enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT05636618 .

632 Background: Paltusotine is an oral, nonpeptide, selective somatostatin receptor 2 agonist. In a phase 2 study, treatment with once-daily paltusotine reduced the frequency and severity of carcinoid syndrome (CS) symptoms and was well tolerated. The effect of paltusotine on biomarkers of serotonin and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) was further explored. Methods: This exploratory study, without formal power calculations, included an 8-week randomized treatment phase (completed) and a 102-week open-label extension phase (currently ongoing). The purpose was to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics, and exploratory efficacy endpoints, including changes in biomarkers of paltusotine treatment. Enrolled patients were adults with a stable, documented grade 1 or 2 neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and CS. These patients were actively symptomatic and either untreated with somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) therapy (average of ≥4 bowel movements [BMs] per day or >2 flushing episodes per day in ≥2 days over a 2-week period) or washed out of SRL therapy (symptoms previously controlled on SRL), with demonstrated symptom worsening after washout. Patients were randomized to once-daily paltusotine 40 mg or 80 mg; one optional uptitration (from 40 mg to 80 mg or 80 mg to 120 mg) was permitted. Blood samples for assessment of biomarkers (serum serotonin and plasma 5-HIAA) were collected longitudinally from screening to end of treatment. Upper limit of normal was prespecified as 541 ng/mL for serotonin and 22 ng/mL for 5-HIAA. This analysis focuses on changes in biomarker from baseline to the end of 8-week randomized treatment phase and after approximately one year (48 weeks). Results: Thirty-six patients (n=9 untreated; n=27 SRL washout) were randomized. Mean age was 60.8 years (range 35-83), and 52.8% were female. Nineteen patients had grade 1 NETs, and 17 had grade 2 NETs. As reported previously, treatment with once-daily, oral paltusotine was well tolerated and reduced the frequency and severity of CS symptoms, justifying further clinical development of the 80 mg dose. Mean serum serotonin decreased from 1553.0 ng/mL at baseline to 643.9 ng/mL at Week 8, and mean plasma 5-HIAA decreased from 245.1 ng/mL to 159.7 ng/mL. There was a trend of untreated patients achieving a greater reduction in comparison to washout patients. At 48-week follow-up, mean serum serotonin was stabilized at 791.50 ng/mL (n=20), and mean plasma 5-HIAA was stabilized at 190.45 ng/mL (n=20). Conclusions: Paltusotine significantly reduced serotonin and 5-HIAA levels, with effects maintained at 48 weeks. Biomarker reductions paralleled reductions in BM and flushing frequency. These findings support further investigation in the ongoing phase 3 study (CAREFNDR, NCT07087054). Clinical trial information: NCT05361668 .

392 Background: PAC+RAM is the standard second-line therapy for advanced GEA. However, PAC-related neuropathy is a major challenge, particularly since many pts have pre-existing neuropathy from prior platinum exposure. An effective “neuropathy-free” regimen remains an unmet need. We evaluated FTD-TPI+RAM as an alternative to PAC+RAM. Methods: This multi-center, randomized, phase II study enrolled GEA pts who progressed on or were intolerant to fluoropyrimidine+ platinum therapy. Pts were randomized to FTD-TPI+RAM (Arm A) or PAC+RAM (arm B) at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), defined as time interval between randomization date and the date of disease progression or death; Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). The design hypothesized non-inferiority (NI) of Arm A to Arm B with a NI margin of hazard ratio 1.19. 90 PFS events from 116 pts provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 0.15. The interim futility analysis, conducted in December 2024 with 20 events, did not cross the futility boundary (Z statistic ≥ 1.172 ) and continued enrolling pts. The trial closed enrollment in March 2025 due to slow accrual. At the time of interim analysis, 20 events had occurred and the Z statistic was 0.4532. Final analysis included the 29 pts that were eligible, consented, randomized, and received any protocol treatment. Results: Among 29 pts (15 Arm A; 14 Arm B), baseline characteristics were balanced (in Arms A vs B, median age 64 vs 63; 80% vs 85.7% male; 86.7%% vs 78.6% White; 80% vs 78.6% ECOG 1). At data freeze of 8/4/2025, 26 PFS events were reported. Median PFS was 3.2 vs. 3.9 months in Arm A vs. Arm B (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.61-3.02). NI was not demonstrated (Z =0.34, threshold for NI<-1.036). Median OS was 8.4 vs. 10.7 months, in Arms A and B, respectively. Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 93% (Arm A) vs 71% (Arm B) with hematologic AEs occurring more frequently in Arm A than Arm B (53% vs 29%). Peripheral sensory neuropathy (any grade) occurred more frequently in Arm B (86%) vs. Arm A (47%). Conclusions: Although NI was not achieved due to early closure and small sample size, FTD-TPI+RAM was relatively safe and associated with less neuropathy compared with PAC+RAM. This regimen warrants further evaluation for pts in whom neuropathy limits taxane use. Clinical trial information: NCT04660760 .

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) for patient-reported outcome metrics (PROMs) in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) lack consensus on the most appropriate calculation method. This retrospective study aimed to identify the optimal MCIDs for commonly used PROMs in CSM. METHODS: The CSM database from the Quality Outcomes Database SpineCORe Study Group was analyzed. Baseline, 3-month, and 24-month PROM values for Neck Disability Index (NDI), 5-dimension Euro-quality of life (EQ-5D) in quality-adjusted life years, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, and neck/arm pain numeric rating scale (NRS) were collected. MCIDs were calculated for each PROM using previously validated techniques. MCID values were compared using the area under the curve (AUC) with the North American Spine Society satisfaction scale as an anchor. RESULTS: A total of 1141 patients with CSM undergoing surgery were included in this analysis. Improvement of ≥30% from baseline was the optimal MCID for NDI and neck/arm NRS. At 24 months, the optimal percentage cutoff MCID for these instruments resulted in AUCs of 0.76, 0.72, and 0.67, similar to the 30% improvement method, with AUCs of 0.73, 0.71, and 0.67, respectively. Numeric cutoffs (0.065 at 3 months; 0.149 at 24 months) were the superior MCIDs for EQ-5D. For mJOA score, a severity-adjusted MCID outperformed other methods, yielding an AUC of 0.67 at 24 months. MCIDs were achieved in 63% of patients for NDI, 59% for neck pain NRS, 61% for arm pain NRS, 52% for EQ-5D, and 59% for mJOA score at 24 months. CONCLUSION: Using the Quality Outcomes Database SpineCORe data set, we defined optimal MCIDs for key PROMs in CSM. A ≥30% improvement from baseline was optimal in NDI and arm/neck NRS. An absolute numeric cutoff was superior for EQ-5D (0.149 at the 24-month follow-up). A severity-adjusted MCID performed best for mJOA score. These redefined benchmarks better capture the treatment impact and guide care decisions for patients with CSM.

Abstract Background Plasma phosphorylated‐tau217 (pTau217) is a blood‐based biomarker of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) pathology. Cognitive resilience describes the presence of neurodegenerative pathology and preserved cognition. Cognitive resistance describes avoidance of neurodegeneration. This post hoc analysis of the Post‐Operative Delirium Belfast (PODB) cohort aimed to define cognitive resilience using plasma pTau217 and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) measures. Methods PODB was an observational cohort study, investigating people aged 65 and over, without a diagnosis of dementia, undergoing elective hip and knee replacement between 2012‐2014 with subsequent long‐term follow‐up. In this analysis, pre‐operative plasma pTau217 was used as a marker of neuropathology. A cutoff of 0.42 pg/mL was used (Ashton NJ et al. 2024). Pre‐operative and 8‐year follow‐up MMSE scores were used as a marker of cognition. A score of ≥24 was considered preserved. Definitions used were: Cognitive resilience = pTau217 ≥0.42 pg/mL plus MMSE ≥24. Cognitive resistance = pTau217 <0.42pg/mL plus MMSE ≥24. Affected = pTau217 ≥0.42 pg/mL plus MMSE <24. Those with normal markers plus poor cognition were defined as pTau217 <0.42pg/mL plus MMSE <24. These four groups were identified at baseline and follow‐up, respectively. In this analysis, 231 participants were included at baseline, 104 at follow‐up. Results Of the n = 231 participants included at baseline, n = 147/231 (64%) were cognitively resilient, n = 65/231 (28%) resistant, n = 17/231 (7%) affected, and n = 2/231 (<1%) had normal markers and MMSE <24. Of the n = 104 participants with follow‐up information included in this analysis, n = 61/104 (59%) were cognitively resilient, n = 33/104 (32%) were resistant, n = 8/104 (8%) affected, and n = 2/104 (<1%) had normal markers and MMSE <24. Cognitively resilient participants at baseline were younger ( p = 0.011) and tended to be female ( p = 0.977) compared to affected participants. At follow‐up, those who were cognitively resilient tended to be younger ( p = 0.196) and female ( p = 0.212) compared to affected participants (Table 1). Of those cognitively resilient at follow up, n = 59/61 (97%) of these participants were also cognitively resilient at baseline. Conclusions Using pTAu217, at the cut‐off quoted, we found a high incidence of cognitive resilience in an older elective surgical cohort.

Abstract Multiple lines of evidence suggest that calorie restriction may slow biological processes related to aging and extend lifespan. To determine whether calorie restriction affects mitochondrial function, we treated fibroblasts from adult donors with serum samples obtained from participants of the CALERIE (Comprehensive Assessment of Long-term Effects of Reducing Intake of Energy) study. The CALERIE study enrolled healthy, non-obese middle-aged (average 38y.o) participants to examine the effects of long-term calorie restriction. We studied the serum samples of 177 participants (calorie restriction CR = 121, ad libitum AL = 56) who had specimens available at two timepoints (12 and 24 months). We assessed the basal and maximal mitochondrial respiration of fibroblasts treated with dilute serum for 24 hours. Our results show that the baseline basal and maximal mitochondrial respiration of fibroblasts is positively correlated with the adiposity of the serum donor (R = 0.112, P = 0.137; R = 0.183, P = 0.015, respectively). Interestingly, treatment of fibroblasts with serum collected after 12 months of calorie restriction causes a decrease in both basal and maximal mitochondrial respiration (P = 0.1854; P = 0.0623, respectively). Fibroblasts treated with serum collected after 24 months of calorie restriction exhibited a further reduction in both basal and maximal mitochondrial respiration (P = 0.0174; P = 0.0092, respectively). These findings suggest that the serum of individuals on long term calorie restriction diet comprises factors that can reduce oxidative phosphorylation. This reduction in bioenergetic capacity may align with the theory that calorie restriction leads to a cellular energy-conserving state, which could have implications for cellular aging and metabolism.

Abstract Lower cerebral perfusion is associated with adverse outcomes, but risk factors are poorly understood. This study examined associations of cumulative systolic blood pressure [SBP], diabetes, and BMI from mid- to late-life with late-life cerebral perfusion, using whole-brain MRI Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL). Cumulative exposures were defined as either average continuous SBP or BMI across visits or number of years with diabetes, hypertension, or obesity. Multiple regression, adjusted for age and gender, estimated ASL (β: 95% CI) among participants without prevalent conditions at baseline in participants with ASL data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC; Jackson, MS; n = 100; age=81±3 years; 65% Female; 100% Black participants; 34 years retrospective risk factor assessments (1987-2021); pulsed ASL, 8/2021-1/2024) and the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA; Rochester, MN; n = 537; age=71±13 years; 36.3% Female, 100% White participants; 18 years retrospective risk factor assessments (2005-2023); pseudo-continuous ASL 2/2023-3/2024). A 10 mmHg higher cumulative SBP was associated with a 0.04 lower ASL (MCSA β=-0.04; -0.01, -0.07; ARIC β=-0.04; -0.09, 0.01). A 10 kg/m2 higher cumulative BMI was associated with a 0.30 lower ASL (-0.51, -0.08) in ARIC and 0.03 lower ASL (-0.16, 0.10) in MCSA participants. Every five additional years of diabetes exposure was associated with a 0.03 (-0.06, -0.01) lower ASL in ARIC and 0.11 (-0.27, 0.05) lower ASL in MCSA participants. High BP, obesity, and diabetes may contribute to poor cerebral perfusion over extended exposures from midlife. Longer risk factor assessment periods and different ASL techniques may explain differences in the cohorts.