Citations

Importance Since 2018, a movement has emerged to define Alzheimer disease (AD) as a purely biological entity based on biomarker findings. The recent revision of the Alzheimer’s Association (AA) criteria for AD furthers this direction. However, concerns about a purely biological definition of AD being applied clinically, the understanding of AD by society at large, and the translation of blood-based biomarkers into clinical practice prompt these International Working Group (IWG) updated recommendations. Objective To consider the revised AA criteria and to offer an alternative definitional view of AD as a clinical-biological construct for clinical use. The recommendations of the 2021 IWG diagnostic criteria are updated for further elaborating at-risk and presymptomatic states. Evidence Review PubMed was searched for articles published between July 1, 2020, and March 1, 2024, using the terms “biomarker” OR “amyloid” OR “tau” OR “neurodegeneration” OR “preclinical” OR “CSF” OR “PET” OR “plasma” AND “Alzheimer’s disease.” The references of relevant articles were also searched. Findings In the new AA diagnostic criteria, AD can be defined clinically as encompassing cognitively normal people having a core 1 AD biomarker. However, recent literature shows that the majority of biomarker-positive cognitively normal individuals will not become symptomatic along a proximate timeline. In the clinical setting, disclosing a diagnosis of AD to cognitively normal people with only core 1 AD biomarkers represents the most problematic implication of a purely biological definition of the disease. Conclusions and Relevance The ultimate aim of the field was to foster effective AD treatments, including preventing symptoms and dementia. The approach of diagnosing AD without a clinical and biological construct would be unwarranted and potentially concerning without a clear knowledge of when or whether symptoms will ever develop. It is recommended that those who are amyloid-positive only and, more generally, most biomarker-positive cognitively normal individuals, should not be labeled as having AD. Rather, they should be considered as being at risk for AD. The expansion of presymptomatic AD is viewed as a better diagnostic construct for those with a specific pattern of biomarkers, indicating that they are proximate to the expression of symptoms in the near future.

Abstract Protease activated receptor 2 (PAR2) is a G-protein coupled receptor expressed in meningeal neurons, fibroblasts and mast cells that may be targeted to treat migraine. MEDI0618, a fully humanized PAR2 monoclonal antibody, engineered to enhance FcRn-dependent recycling and currently in clinical development, was evaluated in human and rodent in vitro assays, in multiple murine in vivo migraine models and in a model of post-traumatic headache. MEDI0618 bound specifically and with high affinity to cells expressing human PAR2 (hPAR2) and prevented matriptase-induced increase in cytosolic calcium. Similarly, MEDI0618 prevented matriptase-induced calcium in primary fibroblasts and microvascular endothelial cells from human dura mater. MEDI0618 had no effect on hPAR1 receptors. Single-cell calcium imaging of acutely dissociated mouse trigeminal ganglion neurons confirmed expression and functionality of mouse PAR2. Studies in vivo used evoked cutaneous allodynia as a surrogate of headache-like pain and, in some experiments, rearing as a measure of non-evoked headache pain. MEDI0618 was administered subcutaneously to C57BL6/J female mice prior to induction of migraine-like pain with (i) systemic nitroglycerin or compound 48/80 (mast cell degranulator); or (ii) with supradural compound 48/80 or an inflammatory mediator (IM) cocktail. To assess possible efficacy against CGRP receptor (CGRP-R)-independent pain, MEDI0618 was also evaluated in the IM model in animals pretreated with systemic olcegepant (CGRP-R antagonist). Migraine-like pain was also induced by inhalational umbellulone, a TRPA1 agonist, in animals primed with restraint stress in the presence or absence of MEDI0618 as well as in a model of post-traumatic headache pain induced by a mild traumatic brain injury. MEDI0618 prevented cutaneous allodynia elicited by systemic nitroglycerin, compound 48/80 and from supradural compound 48/80 and IM. Systemic olcegepant completely blocked periorbital cutaneous allodynia induced by supradural CGRP but failed to reduce IM-induced cutaneous allodynia. In contrast, MEDI0618 fully prevented IM-induced cutaneous allodynia, regardless of pretreatment with olcegepant. Umbellulone elicited cutaneous allodynia only in restraint stress-primed animals, which was prevented by MEDI0618. MEDI0618 prevented the decrease in rearing behaviour elicited by compound 48/80. However, MEDI0618 did not prevent mild traumatic brain injury-related post-traumatic headache measures. These data indicate that MEDI0618 is a potent and selective inhibitor of PAR2 that is effective in human and rodent in vitro cell systems. Further, blockade of PAR2 with MEDI0618 was effective in all preclinical migraine models studied but not in a model of post-traumatic headache. MEDI0618 may represent a novel therapy for migraine prevention with activity against CGRP-dependent and independent attacks.

Background Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy of healthcare interventions. However, conflicts of interest (COIs) can compromise the scientific integrity in these trials. This study characterized COIs in RCTs on spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain, focusing on the prevalence, disclosure, and monetary value of COIs. Methods This cross-sectional study analyzed RCTs published from January 1, 2013 to July 27, 2023. Primary outcomes included the presence, disclosure, and monetary value of COIs, while secondary outcomes assessed the presence of direct/indirect COIs, sponsor access to data, and associations between COIs and select variables, including journal impact factor, publication year, and study outcomes. Results Of 38 RCTs, 30 (78.9%) reported COIs. On average, 35.6% of authors per RCT had at least one COI, with a mean of 0.7 COIs per author. The mean annual monetary value of COIs was US$41,157.83 per author per RCT. 29 RCTs (76.3%) had undisclosed COIs, with an average of 24.2% of authors per RCT having undisclosed COIs. Sponsor access to data was reported in 67.6% of RCTs. No associations were observed between the mean percentage of authors with COIs and the monetary value of COIs and select dependent variables (impact factor, publication year, and study outcomes). Conclusions A substantial majority of RCTs reported COIs with many authors having undisclosed conflicts, highlighting the need for stringent COI disclosure guidelines to maintain research integrity. Expanding COI registry systems globally and increasing non-industry funding are crucial steps toward enhancing transparency and reducing biases in medical research.

Abstract We performed an international retrospective study on 283 patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis to investigate the prognostic impact of cytogenetic abnormalities by fluorescence in situ hybridization, when treated with frontline daratumumab–based therapy. The cytogenetic subgroups of interest were t(11;14), gain/amp(1q) (hereafter, +1q), hyperdiploidy, deletion(13q), del(17p), and myeloma high-risk (HR) translocations (t[4;14], t[14;16], or t[14;20]). The end points of interest were rate of hematologic complete response (heme-CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or better, and hematologic event-free survival (heme-EFS). The incidence of abnormalities was as follows: t(11;14), 53.4%; deletion (13q), 28.9%; +1q, 22.3%; hyperdiploidy, 19.4%; HR translocations, 6.6%; and deletion(17p), 4.5%. The heme-CR rate by cytogenetic subgroups were as follows: t(11;14) vs no t(11;14), 45.2% vs 41.8% (P=0.597); del(13q) vs no del(13q), 46.8% vs 42.8% (P=0.594); +1q vs no +1q, 30.2% vs 47.9% (P=0.022); hyperdiploidy vs no hyperdiploidy, 39.5% vs 44.9% (P=0.541); HR translocations vs none, 45.5% vs 43.1% (P=0.877); and del(17p) vs no del(17p), 50.0% vs 42.9% (P=0.658), respectively. Similarly, +1q was the only subgroup with a significantly lower VGPR or better rate (64.2% vs 79.0%; P=0.033). At a median follow-up of 19.8 months, the median heme-EFS was 49.6 months (95% CI, 24.7-not reached [NR]), and the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 80.98% (95% CI, 75.6-85.4). The presence of +1q was significantly associated with worse heme-EFS on multivariate analysis (HR 2.06, 95% CI, 1.14-3.71; P=0.017). Notably, there was no adverse prognostic impact of t(11;14) on heme-EFS or OS. In conclusion, +1q is associated with worse outcome in the daratumumab-era. Clinical trials testing novel frontline immunotherapies should be enriched in +1q to further improve outcomes in this subgroup.

Background In an effort to improve migraine management around the world, the International Headache Society (IHS) has here developed a list of practical recommendations for the acute pharmacological treatment of migraine. The recommendations are categorized into optimal and essential, in order to provide treatment options for all possible settings, including those with limited access to migraine medications. Methods An IHS steering committee developed a list of clinical questions based on practical issues in the management of migraine. A selected group of international senior and junior headache experts developed the recommendations, following expert consensus and the review of available national and international headache guidelines and guidance documents. Following the initial search, a bibliography of twenty-one national and international guidelines was created and reviewed by the working group. Results A total of seventeen questions addressing different aspects of acute migraine treatment have been outlined. For each of them we provide an optimal recommendation, to be used whenever possible, and an essential recommendation to be used when the optimal level cannot be attained. Conclusion Adoption of these international recommendations will improve the quality of acute migraine treatment around the world, even where pharmacological options remain limited.