Hassan, Amr

Background Despite consistent epidemiological evidence identifying smoking as a risk factor for medication-overuse headache (MOH), the mechanisms underlying this association remain incompletely elucidated. The aim of this work was to explore the relationship between the severity of analgesic dependence, headache-related disability, nicotine dependence, psychological distress, and addiction-related personality traits in patients with MOH. Methods This multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted on 442 patients with primary headache disorders. Participants underwent structured face-to-face interviews and were asked to fill out the following questionnaires: Headache Impact Test–6 (HIT-6), Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS), Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-12 (DASS-12), and Substance Use Risk Profile Scale (SURPS). Smoking status was documented for all participants. Current smokers were asked to complete Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence questionnaire (FTND). Results This study included 442 patients with primary headache disorders, of whom 150 had MOH and 292 did not. Patients with MOH (n = 150) reported significantly higher monthly headache days (MHD), acute medication days (AMD), HIT-6, DASS-12, and SURPS scores than those without MOH (n = 292) (all P-values < 0.001). Smoking prevalence and FTND scores were significantly higher among MOH patients than those without MOH (all P-values < 0.001). Smokers demonstrated higher MHD, AMD, prevalence of MOH, DASS-12, and SURPS scores than non-smokers (all P-values < 0.05). Among smokers, FTND correlated positively with MHD, AMD, HIT-6, DASS-12, and SURPS (all P-values < 0.001). In patients with MOH, SDS scores showed positive correlations with AMD, HIT-6, DASS-12, and SURPS (all P-values < 0.05). Conclusion Severity of dependence on analgesics in patients with MOH is strongly associated with headache burden, nicotine dependence, psychological distress, and addiction-related personality traits.

We here present evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of migraine. These guidelines, created by the Italian Society for the Study of Headache and the International Headache Society, aim to offer clear, actionable recommendations to healthcare professionals. They incorporate evidence-based recommendations from randomized controlled trials and expert-based opinions. The guidelines follow the GRADE approach for assessing the quality of evidence. The guideline development involved a systematic review of literature across multiple databases, adherence to Cochrane review methods, and a structured framework for data extraction and interpretation. Although the guidelines provide a robust foundation for migraine treatment, they also highlight gaps in current research, such as the paucity of head-to-head drug comparisons and the need for long-term outcome studies. These guidelines serve as a resource to standardize migraine treatment and promote high-quality care across different healthcare settings.

Background In an effort to improve migraine management around the world, the International Headache Society (IHS) has here developed a list of practical recommendations for the acute pharmacological treatment of migraine. The recommendations are categorized into optimal and essential, in order to provide treatment options for all possible settings, including those with limited access to migraine medications. Methods An IHS steering committee developed a list of clinical questions based on practical issues in the management of migraine. A selected group of international senior and junior headache experts developed the recommendations, following expert consensus and the review of available national and international headache guidelines and guidance documents. Following the initial search, a bibliography of twenty-one national and international guidelines was created and reviewed by the working group. Results A total of seventeen questions addressing different aspects of acute migraine treatment have been outlined. For each of them we provide an optimal recommendation, to be used whenever possible, and an essential recommendation to be used when the optimal level cannot be attained. Conclusion Adoption of these international recommendations will improve the quality of acute migraine treatment around the world, even where pharmacological options remain limited.