Citations

Objective To evaluate cochlear implant speech perception among patients with sporadic inner ear schwannoma who underwent ipsilateral implantation. Study Design Retrospective multi-institutional cohort study. Setting Eleven tertiary academic medical centers across Germany, Denmark, and the United States. Patients One hundred six patients with sporadic inner ear schwannoma who received an ipsilateral cochlear implant from 2011 to 2022. Interventions Ipsilateral cochlear implantation with observation, stereotactic radiosurgery, or microsurgery for tumor management. Main Outcome Measures Monosyllabic speech perception testing scores and rates of open-set speech perception. Results Among 106 patients studied, 101 (95%) achieved open-set speech perception with a median of 24 months (interquartile range [IQR] 12–42 mo) of audiometric follow-up. Median ipsilateral monosyllabic speech perception testing achieved was 72% (IQR 54–85%), and median ipsilateral AzBio in quiet was 75% (IQR 46–90%). Most (91 of 106 [86%]) underwent microsurgery for tumor control, with cochlear implantation performed simultaneously in 98% (89 of 91) of these patients. The ability to achieve gross total resection significantly differed by tumor complexity, with 97% of low-complexity tumors, 100% of intermediate complexity, and 0% of high-complexity tumors undergoing gross total resection (p < 0.001). However, among patients managed with microsurgery, there was not a statistically significant difference in post-cochlear implantation monosyllabic speech perception scores across complexity groupings, with median scores of 75 and 70% for patients with tumors of low or intermediate complexity and those with tumors of high complexity, respectively (p = 0.5). Eight of 102 patients (8%) assessed experienced deterioration in cochlear implant performance over time. Among the subset of 39 patients with available MRI to review, the region of surveillance interest could be visualized postoperatively on MRI in all cases. Conclusions Open-set speech perception is achieved in most patients with inner ear schwannoma undergoing ipsilateral cochlear implantation. Although cochlear implantation in high-complexity inner ear schwannomas is only possible with incomplete tumor resection, long-term open-set speech perception outcomes are similar to lower-complexity tumors.

Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) based gene therapies (GT) have successfully demonstrated significant reduction in vasocclusive crises (VOCs) associated with sickle cell disease (SCD). The efficacy and safety of these products is well established across multiple clinical trials (Kanter et al. NEJM 2022, Frangoul et al. NEJM 2024). This led to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the lentiviral-based gene addition product (lovotibeglogene autotemcel) and CRISPR-Cas9 based gene editing product (exagamglogene autotemcel) for patients with SCD above 12 years of age. As these therapies have a different logistical process compared to a standard allogeneic HSCT, there is a need to develop a collaborative transition of care plan for these patients and families prior to and long after completion of transformative therapies. Methods: Upper Midwest Sickle Cell Curative Therapies Consortium is a collaborative model including multiple stakeholders between 7 centers across the upper Midwest United States, the regional community-based organization (CBO) and National Marrow Donors Program (NMDP). The structure and workflow for this model was presented previously (Blaylark et al. ASH 2023). With the advent of commercial GTs, we developed a multi-specialty care model in collaboration with community stakeholders to address diverse patient and logistical needs for smoother transition to and from these therapies. Discussion: The initial transition is a period of potential gaps in medical care and often high anxiety for patients and families. Thus, when patients and families are considering GT, our care model engages a multidisciplinary team. As part of the comprehensive evaluation prior to gene therapy, an initial shared collaborative checklist includes an extensive medical history, assessment of treatment plan, an individualized pain plan and adherence, transfusion planning (simple or exchange) with setting of target hemoglobin and hemoglobin S% targets, and coordination of multi-specialty consults including apheresis, fertility preservation, child life, and social work. Additionally, pain, psychology, and integrative medicine specialists address not only ongoing concerns, but also help develop a plan for future transition back to the primary site of SCD care (“re-transition”) after GT. Patients undergo neuropsychological evaluations to establish baseline functioning and the role of chronic pain and fatigue, as GT can significantly impact long term cognitive functioning, emotional coping with transitions, and overall daily functioning. When appropriate and available, warm handoffs are encouraged between centers within each of these specialties. Our team also reviews available resources for education and ongoing support through the process and after from national and regional CBOs. Similarly, the post-GT transition is also a period of potential medical care gaps and high anticipated anxiety and concern, as patients go through significant unfamiliar adverse effects followed by the potential for persistent freedom from VOCs. In the post-GT transition, ongoing psychology, integrative medicine, and pain team support; peer mentoring; and support groups are critical for a smooth re-transition to post-GT care and further successful re-transition back into the community. Using this interdisciplinary approach across GT clinical trials, we successfully weaned opioids in 83% of patients (5/6) by day 60 post-GT infusion and successful re-transition of these patients, further highlighting the role of interdisciplinary care. Our team's collaborative approach to SCD care with sickle cell specialists, transplant team and other care providers and CBO continues into the long term follow up period, including ongoing supportive services for both patients and their families. Conclusion: As newer therapies are developed and approved for transformative SCD care, development of a transitional model with early engagement of an interdisciplinary team is critical for empowering sickle cell warriors and for their successful transition back into the community.

Background and significance: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare condition caused by a somatic mutation in the PIG-A gene, leading to complement-mediated hemolysis and severe complications such as anemia and thrombosis. Patients often experience fatigue, dyspnea, and abdominal pain, impacting their daily lives and emotional well-being. This study aims to comprehensively explore the impact of PNH on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), alongside real-world treatment utilization and symptom burden patterns, especially as new treatments become available to this patient population. These results are based on interim baseline data from currently enrolled study participants, providing an initial assessment of their PNH disease experience. This analysis does not include any data collected prospectively during the data collection period. Study design and methods: This ongoing, prospective, observational study (NCT06411626) aims to enroll at least 128 US-based participants aged 18 or older with PNH, regardless of treatment usage. Participants are recruited through clinician-based referrals, patient advocacy organizations, and community-based online channels. All activities can be completed remotely using the Folia Health app, the single site for this study. This app-based study aims to comprehensively assess patient-reported symptom burden, treatment use patterns, and impacts of PNH on health and FACIT-Fatigue through self-reported home-reported outcomes (HROs). Participants will track symptoms and treatment use, including recently approved treatments (e.g., iptacopan, danicopan, crovalimab). HROs consist of participants' self-identified symptoms and personalized treatment plan that are tracked longitudinally against self-reported baselines. Semi-structured interviews and collaborative feedback sessions with PNH patients and clinicians yielded a comprehensive outcomes inventory for tracking key health outcomes specific to PNH. This inventory includes the ability to track infusion treatments and denote flare-ups in fatigue. Participants can customize their data collection to track symptoms in additional domains beyond those initially suggested (e.g., respiratory or immune). At enrollment, participants report baseline health status and select their relevant symptoms and treatments to routinely track for 6 months. Monthly in-app surveys will collect data on overall health and the FACIT- Fatigue. The Folia app allows participants to visualize symptoms trends, set treatment reminders, and generate reports for their care team. Results: Enrollment began on June 11, 2024. As of July 22, 2024, an interim data analysis was conducted on 20 participants; 65% (n=13) enrolled through online community-based channels and 35% (n=7) enrolled through clinic referrals. Participants selected 37 distinct symptoms and measurements and 26 distinct treatments to track over the 6-month period. The most common symptoms selected at baseline include fatigue (n=19), brain fog (n=17), and dark colored urine (n=15). PNH treatments selected for tracking include iptacopan (n=9), ravulizumab (n=5), eculizumab (n=4), and pegcetacoplan (n=3). The mean baseline FACIT- Fatigue score (n=18) was 35.7 and the median was 40 (IQR= 16). Further descriptive analyses stratified by primary treatment use will be conducted assessing characteristics of symptom burden, satisfaction with treatments-in-use, and self-reported impact on HRQoL. Conclusions: Initial interim baseline data of recently enrolled participants with PNH show a variable disease experience. This app-based, observational study aims to establish a new real-world data source to understand patient priorities related to symptom variability, treatment patterns and preference, and impacts of condition management on HRQoL.

Introduction: Epcoritamab (Epcor) is a novel subcutaneous CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody (bsAb) that is currently approved as monotherapy for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma after ≥2 systemic therapies. The combination of Epcor with standard treatment regimens has been shown to be safe and efficacious; Epcor in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (Epcor+GemOx) has provided deep and durable responses with favorable survival outcomes in a transplant-ineligible R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patient (pt) population, of which 99% were from the US and Europe (EPCORE NHL-2; NCT04663347). Another CD3xCD20 bsAb, intravenous glofitamab, has been studied in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (Glofi+GemOx) in the randomized STARGLO trial (NCT04408638) and demonstrated benefit over rituximab plus GemOx (R-GemOx), despite not demonstrating superiority over R-GemOx in patients from the US and Europe. In the absence of head-to-head data, this study used matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) to assess the comparative efficacy of Epcor+GemOx vs R-GemOx and vs Glofi+GemOx. Methods: Individual pt-level data from EPCORE NHL-2 arm 5 and aggregated data from pts in each of the STARGLO arms were used to conduct an MAIC. Logistic propensity score models were used to weight Epcor+GemOx-treated pts to create matched cohorts with the R-GemOx and Glofi+GemOx arms separately. Weighting was conducted based on the distribution of baseline characteristics and prognostic factors such as age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, previous therapies, and primary refractory status. Overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared for Epcor+GemOx vs R-GemOx, and vs Glofi+GemOx. Results: A total of 103 pts treated with Epcor+GemOx (median follow-up: 13.2 months) were compared to 91 pts treated with R-GemOx and 183 pts treated with Glofi+GemOx (median follow-up: 20.7 months), although differences in median follow-up time limited comparisons of longer-term survival outcomes. Match-adjustment mitigated differences in baseline characteristics across the 3 cohorts. After adjustment, Epcor+GemOx demonstrated a significant 44.8% advantage in ORR over R-GemOx (85.4% vs 40.7%), with a 110% increase in the likelihood of achieving a response (odds ratio [OR] 2.1; 95% CI 1.6-2.8; P&lt;0.0001). Epcor+GemOx also demonstrated a significant 43.2% advantage in CR rate over R-GemOx (68.5% vs 25.3%), with a 170% increase in the likelihood of achieving a CR (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.8-4.1; P&lt;0.0001). With the current follow-up, Epcor+GemOx demonstrated superior PFS vs R-GemOx (hazard ratio [HR] 0.37; 95% CI 0.22-0.63; P&lt;0.001), corresponding to a 63% reduction in the risk of progression. Median OS was not reached [NR] for Epcor+GemOx vs 13.9 months for R-GemOx, corresponding to a 43% reduction in the risk of mortality (HR 0.57 [95% CI 0.33-0.98]; P=0.04). After adjustment, Epcor+GemOx demonstrated a significant 15% advantage in ORR over Glofi+GemOx (83.3% vs 68.3%), with a 20% increase in the likelihood of achieving a response (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.0-1.4; P=0.021). Epcor+GemOx demonstrated a trend toward higher CR rate than Glofi+GemOx (66.8% vs 58.5%; OR 1.1; 95% CI 0.90-1.5; P=0.277). Adjusted median PFS and OS for Epcor+GemOx, with limited follow-up and substantial censoring, was 12.9 months and NR, respectively. For Glofi+GemOx with longer follow-up, PFS and OS were 13.8 months and 25.6 months, respectively. Conclusions: Results show significantly superior efficacy for all outcomes with Epcor+GemOx vs R-GemOx from STARGLO. Epcor+GemOx also provided superior ORR and a trend toward higher CR rates vs Glofi+GemOx, indicating potential for better long-term efficacy outcomes. The Epcor+GemOx survival data are still maturing given shorter follow-up time, preventing a robust comparison of survival vs Glofi+GemOx. Findings support the efficacy of Epcor+GemOx as an alternative therapeutic regimen in transplant-ineligible patients with R/R DLBCL.

Introduction: Epcoritamab, a novel subcutaneously administered CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody (bsAb) being developed as a core therapy across several lymphoma subtypes, is currently approved for the treatment of adults with different types of R/R LBCL after ≥2 systemic therapies. The combination of epcoritamab with standard treatments has been shown to be safe and efficacious; epcoritamab in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (Epcor+GemOx) has provided deep and durable responses with favorable survival benefits in a transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL study population, of which 99% was from the United States and Europe (EPCORE NHL-2; NCT04663347). The rituximab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (R-GemOx) regimen has been a widely used treatment for patients with R/R DLBCL ineligible for transplant, albeit with suboptimal efficacy outcomes. In the absence of direct comparisons of these regimens, this study assessed the comparative efficacy of Epcor+GemOx vs R-GemOx in patients with R/R DLBCL ineligible for transplant. Methods: Individual patient-level data (IPD) from EPCORE NHL-2 arm 5 were compared to 2 sources of clinical practice data for patients with R/R DLBCL treated with R-GemOx: published data from Cazalles et al (2021) and IPD from the US-based COTA electronic health record database. The Cazalles study reports the results of a large retrospective analysis of patients with R/R DLBCL treated in 2 academic centers in France. The COTA database includes de-identified IPD with demographic and clinical information from numerous academic and community clinical sites in the US. For the comparison to Cazalles, logistic propensity score models were used to weight the Epcor+GemOx cohort to create match-adjusted distributions of baseline characteristics with the R-GemOx cohort in Cazalles. For the comparison to COTA, inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed to balance covariates between the Epcor+GemOx and R-GemOx cohorts. Analyses were restricted to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T)-naive patients from EPCORE NHL-2, as the comparator cohorts did not include patients treated with CAR T. Overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared for Epcor+GemOx vs R-GemOx. Results: A total of 74 patients treated with Epcor+GemOx (median follow-up: 13.2 months) were compared to 196 R-GemOx-treated patients from Cazalles et al (median follow-up: 22 months). After match-adjustment, Epcor+GemOx (ORR 86.8%) demonstrated significantly higher ORR, corresponding to a 48.5% advantage over R-GemOx (ORR 38.3%) with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.3 (95% CI 1.8-2.9; P&lt;0.0001). Adjusted CR rate was also significantly higher with Epcor+GemOx vs R-GemOx (71.2% vs 32.7%; 38.6% difference; OR 2.2 [95% CI 1.6-3.0]; P&lt;0.0001). Median PFS was significantly longer with Epcor+GemOx (26.7 months) vs R-GemOx (4.8 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.38 [95% CI 0.22-0.67]; P&lt;0.001). Median OS was not reached (NR) for Epcor+GemOx vs 10.0 months with R-GemOx (HR 0.54 [95% CI 0.29-1.0]; P=0.05), corresponding overall to a 62% reduction in the risk of a progression event and a 46% reduction in the risk of mortality with Epcor+GemOx vs R-GemOx. A total of 72 patients were treated with R-GemOx in COTA (median follow-up: 7.5 months) and compared to 74 Epcor+GemOx patients. After adjustment, ORR was significantly higher with Epcor+GemOx vs R-GemOx (88.5% vs 35.6%; OR 2.5 [95% CI 1.8-3.4]; P&lt;0.0001). Adjusted CR rate was also significantly higher with Epcor+GemOx (63.9% vs 10.2%; OR 6.3 [95% CI 3.1-12.7]; P&lt;0.0001). Adjusted median PFS was significantly longer with Epcor+GemOx (11.2 months) vs R-GemOx (2.4 months; HR 0.23 [95% CI 0.15-0.36]; P&lt;0.0001). Adjusted median OS was also significantly longer with Epcor+GemOx (21.6 vs 8.3 months; HR 0.47 [95% CI 0.30-0.74]; P=0.002), corresponding overall to a 77% reduction in the risk of a progression event and a 53% reduction in the risk of mortality with Epcor+GemOx vs R-GemOx. Conclusions: In this indirect treatment comparison analysis,Epcor+GemOx provided significantly superior efficacy benefits in terms of ORR, CR, PFS, and OS vs standard-of-care R-GemOx. While subject to the limitations of comparisons outside of controlled trials, findings indicate the compelling efficacy of Epcor+GemOx as a novel therapeutic option for transplant-ineligible patients with R/R DLBCL.

ABSTRACTBackgroundCoccidioidomycosis is a fungal infection that poses a serious risk when transmitted through organ transplantation. We analyzed cases reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network ad hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee from 2013 to 2022.MethodsDonors and/or recipients who had positive Coccidioides immitis/posadasii serology, pathology, and/or culture were included in this study. Cases adjudicated as ‘proven’ or ‘probable’ were analyzed for donor infection risk factors, the timing of infection, transmission by organ type, clinical manifestations, and recipient outcomes. Patient and facility identifiers were removed prior to review.ResultsDuring this time period, 73 potential instances of Coccidioides donor disease transmission events were reported. Among them, infection was transmitted from seven deceased donors to eight recipients. All seven deceased donors had prior infection or exposure to regions where coccidioidomycosis is endemic. Of 20 individuals receiving organs from these donors, eight developed infection, resulting in a 40% transmission rate. The median time to diagnosis post‐transplant was 39 days. Disseminated disease occurred in six recipients, five of whom died from the infection. Notably, none of the recipients who received prophylactic antifungal treatment died from the infection.ConclusionDespite its rarity, donor‐derived Coccidioides infection is a serious concern, particularly due to the high mortality rate in the early post‐transplant period. To mitigate these risks, a thorough assessment of donor exposure history, coupled with donor serology and bronchoalveolar lavage cultures, can effectively guide post‐transplant antifungal prophylaxis. Prompt reporting is crucial to prevent Coccidioides infections among other recipients. image

BACKGROUND Cutaneous lichen planus (LP) is a recalcitrant, difficult-to-treat, inflammatory skin disease characterized by pruritic, flat-topped, violaceous papules on the skin. Baricitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor that interrupts the signaling pathway of IFN-γ, a cytokine implicated in the pathogenesis of LP. METHODS In this phase II trial, 12 patients with cutaneous LP received 2 mg daily baricitinib for 16 weeks, accompanied by in-depth spatial, single-cell, and bulk transcriptomic profiling of pre- and posttreatment samples. RESULTS An early and sustained clinical response was seen, with 83.3% of patients responsive at week 16. Our molecular data identified a unique, oligoclonal IFN-γ, CD8 + , and CXCL13 + cytotoxic T cell population in LP skin and demonstrated a rapid decrease in IFN signature within 2 weeks of treatment, most prominently in the basal layer of the epidermis. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the efficacy and molecular mechanisms of JAK inhibition in LP. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05188521 FUNDING Eli Lilly, Appignani Benefactor Funds, 5P30AR075043, Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials Stimulus Funds.