Gupta, Ashish O.

This Viewpoint summarizes recent progress in gene therapy for hemoglobinopathies.

Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) based gene therapies (GT) have successfully demonstrated significant reduction in vasocclusive crises (VOCs) associated with sickle cell disease (SCD). The efficacy and safety of these products is well established across multiple clinical trials (Kanter et al. NEJM 2022, Frangoul et al. NEJM 2024). This led to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the lentiviral-based gene addition product (lovotibeglogene autotemcel) and CRISPR-Cas9 based gene editing product (exagamglogene autotemcel) for patients with SCD above 12 years of age. As these therapies have a different logistical process compared to a standard allogeneic HSCT, there is a need to develop a collaborative transition of care plan for these patients and families prior to and long after completion of transformative therapies. Methods: Upper Midwest Sickle Cell Curative Therapies Consortium is a collaborative model including multiple stakeholders between 7 centers across the upper Midwest United States, the regional community-based organization (CBO) and National Marrow Donors Program (NMDP). The structure and workflow for this model was presented previously (Blaylark et al. ASH 2023). With the advent of commercial GTs, we developed a multi-specialty care model in collaboration with community stakeholders to address diverse patient and logistical needs for smoother transition to and from these therapies. Discussion: The initial transition is a period of potential gaps in medical care and often high anxiety for patients and families. Thus, when patients and families are considering GT, our care model engages a multidisciplinary team. As part of the comprehensive evaluation prior to gene therapy, an initial shared collaborative checklist includes an extensive medical history, assessment of treatment plan, an individualized pain plan and adherence, transfusion planning (simple or exchange) with setting of target hemoglobin and hemoglobin S% targets, and coordination of multi-specialty consults including apheresis, fertility preservation, child life, and social work. Additionally, pain, psychology, and integrative medicine specialists address not only ongoing concerns, but also help develop a plan for future transition back to the primary site of SCD care (“re-transition”) after GT. Patients undergo neuropsychological evaluations to establish baseline functioning and the role of chronic pain and fatigue, as GT can significantly impact long term cognitive functioning, emotional coping with transitions, and overall daily functioning. When appropriate and available, warm handoffs are encouraged between centers within each of these specialties. Our team also reviews available resources for education and ongoing support through the process and after from national and regional CBOs. Similarly, the post-GT transition is also a period of potential medical care gaps and high anticipated anxiety and concern, as patients go through significant unfamiliar adverse effects followed by the potential for persistent freedom from VOCs. In the post-GT transition, ongoing psychology, integrative medicine, and pain team support; peer mentoring; and support groups are critical for a smooth re-transition to post-GT care and further successful re-transition back into the community. Using this interdisciplinary approach across GT clinical trials, we successfully weaned opioids in 83% of patients (5/6) by day 60 post-GT infusion and successful re-transition of these patients, further highlighting the role of interdisciplinary care. Our team's collaborative approach to SCD care with sickle cell specialists, transplant team and other care providers and CBO continues into the long term follow up period, including ongoing supportive services for both patients and their families. Conclusion: As newer therapies are developed and approved for transformative SCD care, development of a transitional model with early engagement of an interdisciplinary team is critical for empowering sickle cell warriors and for their successful transition back into the community.

Fetal hemoglobin (HbF) is anti-sickling and elevated HbF ameliorates sickle cell disease (SCD) manifestations. BEAM-101 is an investigational cell therapy comprised of autologous CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) that are base edited ex vivo to introduce naturally occurring A-to-G substitutions into the promoters of the HBG1/2 genes that encode γ-globin to disrupt BCL11A transcriptional repressor binding sites, leading to increased HbF production. We previously demonstrated in pre-clinical studies that base editing potently induced HbF (>60%) and proportionately reduced sickle hemoglobin (HbS) (<40%) without relying on double-stranded DNA breaks. We present initial data from BEACON (NCT05456880), a Phase 1/2, single-arm, open-label study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a single dose of BEAM-101 in patients with SCD with severe vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs). Patients 18-35 years diagnosed with SCD and ≥4 severe VOCs in the 2-year period prior to screening per trial criteria were eligible. After plerixafor mobilization, autologous CD34+ HSPCs were collected by leukapheresis/isolation and genetically modified with an adenine base editor. After myeloablative conditioning with pharmacokinetically adjusted busulfan, patients received a single infusion of BEAM-101 (≥3.0 × 106 viable CD34+ cells/kg) and are monitored for neutrophil and platelet engraftment, adverse events (AEs), total hemoglobin (Hb), Hb fractions, % F-cells, hemolysis markers, peripheral blood editing, and VOCs for 24 months. As of July 2, 2024, >20 patients are enrolled and BEAM-101 has been manufactured for 8 patients, of whom 6 patients have been dosed. One patient not included in this analysis discontinued during the mobilization/collection period prior to BEAM-101 treatment for non-medical reasons. Baseline demographics were as follows: 5/6 patients βS/βS, 1/6 patients βS/β0, all self-reported Black/African American, 50% female, aged 19-27 years. Of the 6 patients, half (n=3) required only a single mobilization cycle and the other half required 2. Patients received a mean BEAM-101 dose of 11.9 × 106 (5.2-23.4) viable CD34+ cells/kg. Excepting safety data that include all patients dosed (n=6), the following data are from patients dosed with ≥1 month of follow up (n=4; 6, 5, 2, and 1 month[s] post-treatment, each). All 4 patients with ≥1 month of follow up achieved neutrophil and platelet engraftment at a median of 17 (15-19) and 20 (11-34) days, respectively. One patient died due to respiratory failure, likely related to busulfan conditioning, 4 months after infusion. In all patients dosed (n=6), there have been no ≥Grade 3 AEs or serious AEs related to BEAM-101. Using the central laboratory data, patients' total Hb increased from baseline (mean 9.3 [7.9-10.9] g/dL) to 17.9, 18.2, 11.0, and 11.8 g/dL at last time point (LTP) available for P1, P2, P3, and P4, respectively. No signs/symptoms or interventions were undertaken for high total Hb. All patients achieved >60% HbF of non-transfused Hb (total Hb − HbA) at Month (M) 1 and sustained this elevation to the LTP available. By M1, HbS% in non-transfused blood dropped to ≤36% in all 4 patients and was sustained through LTP. In total blood, % F-cells were 99.6% in P1 at M6, 94.4% in P2 at M4, 52.0% in P3 at M2, and 13.3% in P4 at M1 with all patients having >19 pg HbF/F-cell at LTP available. Peripheral blood editing in nucleated cells, measured in P1 (at M6) and P2 (at M3), was 69.9% and 76.1%, respectively. Markers of hemolysis (lactate dehydrogenase, indirect bilirubin, haptoglobin, and reticulocyte counts) have normalized or improved for all patients. No VOCs have been reported by investigators following BEAM-101 treatment. These initial data show a safety profile for BEAM-101 consistent with busulfan conditioning and autologous HSCT. Treatment with BEAM-101 resulted in rapid engraftment, improvement in hemolysis markers, and marked improvement of anemia in all 4 dosed patients. We observed rapid and robust HbF induction consistent with pre-clinical data by M1 (>60%) and corresponding HbS reduction (≤36%) in non-transfused blood in all post-treatment assessments. No VOCs were reported by investigators post-treatment. These initial data support base editing of the HBG1/2 promoters as an effective therapeutic modality for the treatment of SCD and will continue to be investigated in the ongoing BEACON study. Updated data to be presented.

Introduction: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common inherited hemoglobinopathy affecting populations across the United States. Several well-established patient-centered comprehensive care models have been in practice for preventive care and pain management. However, access to hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and clinical trials for sickle cell gene therapies are limited, especially in pediatric and adult centers with limited HSCT-related resources. We describe a patient-centered collaborative model in the Upper Midwest United States to improve patient education and engagement as well as access to HSCT and gene therapy trials for patients with SCD. Collaborative Care Model: Since August 2021, centers across the Midwest meet monthly to improve access for HSCT and gene therapy as well as education about these therapies for individuals with SCD. The teams include: hematology and transplant teams from University of Minnesota, Comprehensive Sickle Cell Care team from Children's Hospital of Minneapolis, hematology and transplant team from Mayo Children's Hospital, hematology team from Essential Health, Duluth, Minnesota, hematology team from Sanford Children's Hospital Fargo and Sioux Falls and hematology team from Blank Children's Hospital, Des Moines, Iowa. This collaborative approach involves several stakeholders including an SCD community advocacy organization, hematology care providers across several rural as well as community/university hospitals, social workers, nurse coordinators, HSCT/gene therapy providers, as well as representatives from National Marrow Donor Program. Individual patient needs and available community support as well as institutional resources are discussed at length during monthly virtual meetings and a pre-intervention plan is established to ensure smooth transition of care to and from primary centers (Figure 1). Ongoing communication with the primary team helps with efficient transition of care after transplant as patients continue ongoing monitoring and care closer to home. Community partners help with early education of the families and provide necessary resources and support. Institutional partners like NMDP provide support with immune typing and discuss ongoing support and other resources available for providers and families. Results/Impact: Since the implementation of this collaborative model, there has been a steady increase in early referrals for education regarding HSCT and potential gene therapies trials for patients with SCD. There has been about 100% increase in new patient referrals since the implementation of this collaborative model compared to the average new referrals in the previous years (2021-22 vs 2018-19; Figure 2). Enrollment in HSCT as well as gene therapy clinical trials also has increased 2-3 folds since the implementation of the collaborative care model. It has helped established early discussion and longitudinal care and has also led to ongoing evaluation and discussions for availability of optimal donors, determining eligibility for HSCT and gene therapy trials as well as providing ongoing support and education to the sickle cell community and providers regarding the available therapies for SCD. This has also facilitated the transplant team establish earlier and better rapport with patients and their families and provide necessary education with an in-depth discussion regarding the potential benefits and risks of therapies such as HSCT and gene therapy. These discussions often occur over multiple visits and helps address psychological as well social barriers with a prospective evaluation. Additionally, the ongoing discussion among the providers helps with longitudinal monitoring of the patients and provide an assessment of the risks and benefits of therapies as the patient's disease course continues to evolve. This multi-stake holder collaborative approach continues to provide a well-established platform for discussion of newer therapies and access to open clinical trials, available resources for patients and families, and improve patient care and experience. The impact of this collaboration is noted in significant increase in early referrals and educational consults for HSCT and gene therapies, improved patient engagement as well as the acceptability and participation in clinical trials.