Citations

ABSTRACTBackgroundPsychological safety is critical to early and continued engagement with healthcare providers, yet no studies have explored this concept in relationship to cancer care. Black/African American (“Black”) individuals experience disparities in breast and ovarian cancer beyond what can be explained biologically.AimsWe explored factors influencing psychological safety among Black breast and ovarian cancer patients and their family members.MethodsSocioeconomically diverse patients with a personal diagnosis or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer were invited to complete a semi‐structured qualitative interview on their cancer and healthcare experiences between September 2020 and April 2021. Informed by principles of grounded theory, interview transcripts were qualitatively analyzed for thematic content related to psychological safety.ResultsBlack breast and ovarian cancer patients and their family members described personal and community experiences and structural components of the healthcare system that suggested they may receive differential cancer care due to their race, placing them on guard. This posture was mediated by several self‐identified factors that added to or detracted from their comfort, including provider racial and gender concordance in healthcare, personalized care, and effective communication. The priorities and perceptions of care in participants receiving care in safety net clinics were more focused on what was feasible given resource limitations rather than what was ideally desired.ConclusionsImplementation of strategies to promote psychological safety with Black cancer patients may foster improved patient experiences, as well as encourage early screening, patient engagement, and treatment continuation.

ABSTRACT Background Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma remains challenging due to high recurrence rates and poor survival outcomes. Developing precise technologies for disease burden assessment, treatment response, and minimal residual disease (MRD) surveillance is crucial for improving prognosis. Methods This review explores the potential of liquid biopsy for MRD and recurrence detection. A novel liquid TNM (LiTNM) staging system is introduced, integrating biomarkers from saliva, surgical drain lymphatic fluid (SLF), and peripheral blood. Results Proximal liquid biopsies, particularly saliva and SLF, offer advantages due to their proximity to the tumor microenvironment. Saliva demonstrates high sensitivity in HPV‐associated oropharyngeal cancers, while SLF holds potential in identifying early postoperative recurrence. Despite these advancements, standardization and validation remain challenges. Conclusions Liquid biopsy approaches show promise for postoperative disease monitoring, yet their clinical implementation remains in the early stages. The proposed LiTNM staging system could complement TNM staging by providing a molecular framework for risk stratification. However, rigorous prospective studies are necessary to validate its clinical utility and facilitate adoption.

Diagnosing pulmonary rheumatoid nodules (RN) is challenging because they are rare and share clinical, radiologic, and histopathologic features with other necrotizing granulomatous diseases such as infectious granulomas (IG) and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). Herein, we revisit the histopathologic features of RN and the findings in the adjacent lung tissue, in comparison with IG and GPA, to identify distinguishing features. Twenty-eight cases with surgically resected RN evaluated at our institution (1991 to 2024), 33 IG (10 mycobacterial infection, 10 histoplasmosis, 13 coccidiomycosis), and 10 GPA cases were included in the study. All available slides with H&E and special stains were reviewed for various histologic parameters within the nodules and in surrounding lung tissue. Many histopathologic features of RN overlap with the necrotizing granulomas seen in infections and GPA. However, some findings in the adjacent lung tissue showed significant differences. The lack of airspace granulomas/non-necrotizing granuloma and the absence of necrotizing vasculitis in the setting of RN can help to differentiate between infection cases and GPA, respectively. Given their considerable overlap, correlation with clinical context, serologic and microbiologic studies, as well as careful evaluation of special stains is crucial in the diagnosis of RN.

OBJECTIVE Previous research suggests elective surgical procedures performed later in the week have worse outcomes. This study investigated whether the day of the week on which elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery was performed impacts clinical outcomes. METHODS Using data from the Quality Outcomes Database, a nationwide, multicenter prospective registry, this study included patients undergoing elective ACDF for cervical spondylosis. Patients were categorized into groups based on the surgery day (early week, Monday and Tuesday; late week, Thursday and Friday). Analyzed outcomes included postoperative complications, readmissions, reoperations, and patient-reported outcomes. Statistical methods included the independent t-test, Pearson’s chi-square test, and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS The study analyzed 19,818 patients, with 41.7% undergoing surgery early in the week and 36.9% later. There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality, readmissions, or reoperations between the two groups. Early-week surgical procedures were associated with a higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia requiring nasogastric tubes (0.6% vs 0.3%, p = 0.02) and a higher incidence of vocal cord paralysis (0.5% vs 0.3%, p = 0.01). The data indicate a surgical selection bias with more complex surgical procedures and higher risk patients typically scheduled earlier in the week, which likely contributed to the increased rates of dysphagia. Conversely, patients who underwent operations on Fridays were more likely to be discharged on the same day compared to those earlier in the week (p = 0.02), without a significant difference in length of stay overall. Surgical procedures performed later in the week were more likely to be performed at ambulatory surgical centers rather than inpatient facilities (p < 0.01), indicating a strategic selection of healthier patients for end-of-week procedures. CONCLUSIONS The day of elective ACDF surgery does not affect mortality, readmissions, or reoperation rates. However, early-week surgical procedures may see slightly higher rates of postoperative dysphagia and vocal cord paralysis, likely due to the scheduling of more complex cases or higher risk patients during these days. Overall, the authors’ data confirm that day of surgery does not influence overall patient recovery significantly. This information is useful for surgical planning and for providing patient reassurance that the day of the week does not significantly impact surgical outcomes.