Citations

Abstract A041202 (NCT01886872) is a phase 3 study comparing bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) with ibrutinib and the combination of ibrutinib plus rituximab (IR) in previously untreated older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The initial results showed that ibrutinib-containing regimens had superior progression-free survival (PFS) and rituximab did not add additional benefits. Here we present an updated analysis. With a median follow-up of 55 months, the median PFS was 44 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 38-54) for BR and not yet reached in either ibrutinib-containing arm. The 48-month PFS estimates were 47%, 76%, and 76% for BR, ibrutinib, and IR, respectively. The benefit of ibrutinib regimens over chemoimmunotherapy was consistent across subgroups of patients defined by TP53 abnormalities, del(11q), complex karyotype, and immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV). No significant interaction effects were observed between the treatment arm and del(11q), the complex karyotype, or IGHV. However, a greater difference in PFS was observed among the patients with TP53 abnormalities. There was no difference in the overall survival. Notable adverse events with ibrutinib included atrial fibrillation (afib) and hypertension. Afib was observed in 11 patients (pts) on BR (3%) and 67 pts on ibrutinib (18%). All-grade hypertension was observed in 95 pts on BR (27%) and 263 pts on ibrutinib (55%). These data show that ibrutinib regimens prolong PFS compared with BR for older patients with treatment-naïve CLL. These benefits were observed across subgroups, including high-risk groups. Strikingly, within the ibrutinib arms, there was no inferior PFS for patients with abnormalities in TP53, the highest risk feature observed in CLL. These data continue to demonstrate the efficacy of ibrutinib in treatment-naïve CLL.

Rectal cancer presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with neoadjuvant therapy playing a pivotal role in improving resectability and patient outcomes. MRI serves as a critical tool in assessing treatment response. However, differentiating viable tumor tissue from therapy-induced changes on MRI remains a complex task. In this comprehensive review, we explore treatment options for rectal cancer based on resectability status, focusing on the role of MRI in guiding therapeutic decisions. We delve into the nuances of MRI-based evaluation of treatment response following neoadjuvant therapy, paying particular attention to emerging techniques like radiomics. Drawing from our insights based on the literature, we provide essential recommendations for post-neoadjuvant therapy management of rectal cancer, all within the context of MRI-based findings.

Background Remarkable interest is rising around middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) as an emerging alternative therapy for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). The study aims to highlight a large center experience and the variables associated with treatment failure and build experimental machine learning (ML) models for outcome prediction. Material and Methods A 2-year experience in MMAE for managing patients with chronic subdural hematoma was analyzed. Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted using imaging and clinical features of the patients and cSDH, which were subsequently used to build predictive models for the procedure outcome. The modeling evaluation metrics were the area under the ROC curve and F1-score. Results A total of 100 cSDH of 76 patients who underwent MMAE were included with an average follow-up of 6 months. The intervention had a per procedure success rate of 92%. Thrombocytopenia had a highly significant association with treatment failure. Two patients suffered a complication related to the procedure. The best performing machine learning models in predicting MMAE failure achieved an ROC-AUC of 70%, and an F1-score of 67%, including all patients with or without surgical intervention prior to embolization, and an ROC-AUC of 82% and an F1-score of 69% when only patients who underwent upfront MMAE were included. Conclusion MMAE is a safe and minimally invasive procedure with great potential in transforming the management of cSDH and reducing the risk of surgical complications in selected patients. An ML approach with larger sample size might help better predict outcomes and highlight important predictors following MMAE in patients with cSDH.

Background: DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (dMMR), which leads to genomic and microsatellite instability, is a biomarker that predicts response to immunotherapies and has variable prognostic effects for chemotherapies in solid tumors. The dMMR can be detected using gene sequencing or immunohistochemistry for four essential MMR proteins: MSH6, MSH2, MLH1, and PMS2. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive lymphoma. Previous studies have suggested the role of MMR gene variants in DLBCL lymphomagenesis, yet the prognostic role of dMMR in DLBCL has not been well studied. Methods: We performed targeted next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry for MSH6, MSH2, MLH1, and PMS2 in a large cohort of DLBCL patients treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy. Gene expression profiling (GEP) was performed using the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome HG-U133 Plus 2.0 microarray (data in GSE31312). Fluorescent multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) was performed using MultiOmyx multiplexing immunofluorescence staining protocols and antibodies against 13 immune markers. We investigated the frequencies of dMRR and MMR protein expression and correlated the mutation status and expression levels with patient survival and DLBCL biology, including the number of mutated genes, GEP data, previously analyzed DLBCL biomarkers, and immune cell immunophenotypes. Results: MMR gene mutations and loss of MMR protein expression were infrequent in DLBCL (Figure A) and did not show a significant prognostic impact. MMR proteins were commonly expressed in DLBCL samples and the germinal centers of reactive tonsil controls (Figure B), with higher mean and median percentages of tumor cells expressing MSH6 and MLH1 proteins than in the solid tumor samples used for comparison. High expression of MMR proteins was associated with Ki-67, MYC, and p53 overexpression as determined by immunohistochemistry. GEP analysis identified significantly upregulated genes involved in the mitotic cell cycle and DNA metabolism and prominent downregulated immune gene signatures in DLBCL with high MMR protein expression. Fluorescent mIHC confirmed the associations with decreased T cell abundance in MSH6/MSH2/MLH1/PMS2 highly expressing DLBCL (Figure C) independent of p53 and MYC expression status, whereas MSH6/ MLH1 mutations were associated with increased T cell frequencies. High versus low expression of MSH6, MLH1, and PMS2 showed significant unfavorable prognostic effects in DLBCL when the optimal cutoffs were used for high expression. However, when the median percentages were used as cutoffs, the prognostic effects were not significant; nonetheless, MSH6 and PMS2 high expression showed significant adverse prognostic effects in the MYC¯ DLBCL subset. Interestingly, when we used Ki-67, MYC + or BCL2 + percentages in DLBCL assessed by immunohistochemistry to subtract MMR protein percentages and then correlated the differences to survival, we found significant favorable prognostic impact by higher percentage expression differences between MMR proteins and BCL2, or by intermediately higher differences between MMR proteins and MYC. For MSH2/MLH1/PMS2, the higher percentages compared with MYC/BCL2 showed no significant correlations with T cell infiltration levels, whereas the higher differences between MSH6 and MYC/BCL2 were associated with significantly lower T cell frequencies (Figure D). Conclusions: This study revealed that high expression of MMR proteins is a common feature of DLBCL associated with lower tumor-infiltrating T cells, MYC and p53 overexpression, and context-dependent prognostic effects. In contrast, dMMR and loss of MMR proteins are infrequent and have no significant prognostic effects in DLBCL treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy. These results may have implications for understanding DLBCL biology and the low efficacy of PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in DLBCL.