Horvat, Natally

The increase in the number of injectable filler procedures has led to a rise in associated complications, with vascular compromise being the most feared. As a result, blood flow can be interrupted, leading to ischemia, necrosis or ulcerations, pulmonary embolism, blindness, and cerebral vascular injuries. In this context, Doppler high‐frequency ultrasound (DHFUS) is a radiological tool that can be used to avoid, to diagnose, and to treat vascular complications. This study aims to review facial vessels anatomy and major variations, describe the examination technique, probe positions and teach how to recognize vascular occlusions, in order to avoid negative outcomes.

ABSTRACT Background: Anal fistulas remain challenging in colorectal surgery, with recurrence and postoperative incontinence common despite advances in treatment. Multiple classification systems exist, but their predictive value for surgical and functional outcomes is unclear. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare Parks, American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), and St. James’s University Hospital (SJUH) MRI-based classifications in predicting surgical outcomes, including continence preservation. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 89 patients undergoing definitive surgical treatment for anorectal fistulas at a single referral center (2012–2019). Exclusions included rectovaginal fistulas, Crohn’s disease, or prior pelvic radiotherapy. Fistulas were classified using Parks, ASCRS, and, when available, SJUH (n=49). Outcomes included the number of procedures, type of initial procedure, fistula closure, and closure without continence deterioration. Continence was assessed using the Cleveland Clinic Jorge-Wexner score. Results: Most fistulas were transsphincteric (Parks Type 2, 62%) and complex (ASCRS, 65%). Overall, 86.5% achieved fistula closure, and 73% achieved closure without continence deterioration. Parks and ASCRS were significantly associated with fistula closure with continence preservation (p=0.008 and 0.007, respectively) and type of initial procedure. Parks remained significant when considering closure alone (p=0.005), while ASCRS showed a borderline association (p=0.051). SJUH classification was associated only with procedure selection. Conclusions: Parks and ASCRS classifications were associated with fistula closure with continence preservation and type of initial procedure. Considering closure alone, only Parks remained significant. SJUH was limited to procedure selection. Overall, Parks and ASCRS guide surgical planning and prediction of functional outcomes, with Parks slightly more sensitive.

A structured approach for interpreting postoperative imaging of the anterolateral abdominal wall integrates anatomic knowledge with surgical techniques and their associated complication patterns.

Imaging is important for evaluation and diagnosis of nail pathologic disorders, and knowledge of imaging protocols and characteristics supports informed treatment planning and effective monitoring of therapeutic outcomes in cutaneous and systemic disease contexts.

The SAR Colorectal and Anal Cancer Disease-focused Panel rectal cancer MRI restaging report template can be used to clarify common areas of confusion and deliver essential insights to ensure that clinically relevant information is effectively communicated to the treatment team.

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), mpMRI combined with PSA density (PSAd) and combined biopsy (CBx) in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in men undergoing active surveillance, using radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens as the reference standard.Patients and MethodsIn this prospective single‐centre study, 91 patients with low‐risk prostate cancer under active surveillance underwent mpMRI, PSAd measurement, CBx and ultimately RP. mpMRI was reported using PI‐RADS v2.0, and PSAd was dichotomised at 0.12 ng/ml/cm3. Diagnostic accuracy was compared using ISUP grade ≥2 and ≥3 thresholds. Radical prostatectomy pathology served as the reference standard.ResultsFor detecting ISUP ≥3 cancer, mpMRI combined with PSAd achieved the highest sensitivity (93.3%) and negative predictive value (94.4%). CBx demonstrated the highest specificity (88.2%) and overall diagnostic balance (Youden index = 0.348). mpMRI alone showed intermediate performance. Differences in classification between strategies were statistically significant (McNemar p < 0.001).ConclusionsmpMRI combined with PSAd provides high sensitivity and negative predictive value for ruling out aggressive prostate cancer, supporting its use as a non‐invasive triage tool in active surveillance. CBx remains the most specific method for histological confirmation. These strategies should be used complementarily to optimise decision‐making in active surveillance protocols.

Fundamento: A angiotomografia computadorizada (ATC) com descarte triplo (TRO; do inglês, triple rule-out) é um protocolo sincronizado ao eletrocardiograma (ECG) que permite a avaliação simultânea das artérias coronárias, da aorta torácica e das artérias pulmonares em um único exame. É especialmente útil para pacientes com risco baixo a moderado de síndrome coronariana aguda no pronto atendimento, particularmente quando dissecção aórtica e embolia pulmonar também são consideradas no diagnóstico diferencial. Objetivo: O presente estudo visou comparar, em termos de dose de radiação e qualidade da imagem, dois protocolos de TRO: totalmente sincronizado ao ECG (protocolo A) e parcialmente sincronizado ao ECG (protocolo B), ambos incluindo cobertura da aorta abdominal. Tal comparação de protocolos pode ser útil quando algoritmos de reconstrução iterativa não estiverem disponíveis e a transição manual entre em protocolos parcialmente sincronizados ao ECG for necessária. Métodos: A dose de radiação foi avaliada usando o produto dose-comprimento, a dose efetiva e a dose virtual. Os valores de atenuação foram medidos nas artérias coronárias e pulmonares, bem como na aorta descendente e abdominal. A qualidade da imagem e a conspicuidade dos vasos foram avaliadas por meio de uma escala Likert de 5 pontos. Resultados: Um total de 56 pacientes foi incluído. O protocolo B demonstrou exposição à radiação significativamente menor em comparação ao protocolo A em todas as métricas: mediana do produto dose-comprimento (1,1 mSv [intervalo interquartil: 0,9 a 1,1] versus 2,2 mSv [intervalo interquartil: 1,6 a 2,8]), dose efetiva (17,0 mSv [intervalo interquartil: 14,3 a 18,1] versus 32,6 mSv [intervalo interquartil: 24,4 a 42,7]) e dose virtual (16,2 [intervalo interquartil: 9,3 a 20,4] versus 34,7 [intervalo interquartil: 19,9 a 43,5]). Todas as diferenças foram estatisticamente significativas (p < 0,001). Não houve diferenças significativas nas medidas de atenuação ou na avaliação qualitativa das imagens entre os dois protocolos. Conclusão: A ATC com TRO parcialmente sincronizada ao ECG proporciona qualidade de imagem comparável à técnica totalmente sincronizada ao ECG, reduzindo significativamente a exposição à radiação, tornando-se uma alternativa mais eficiente em termos de dose de radiação, quando algoritmos de reconstrução iterativa não estiverem disponíveis e a transição manual for necessária.

Abstract Background The treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer now includes “watch-and-wait” (WW) management for patients who exhibit a clinical complete response (cCR) to total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). We assessed patients’ knowledge and preferences regarding WW with the goal of incorporating patient input into clinical trial design. Methods Rectal cancer patients in advocacy groups (COLONTOWN/Rectalburgh and Fight CRC) were surveyed regarding perceptions about treatment strategies, tolerable risks of treatment failure, and preferences on clinical trial design. Surveys were initially distributed in 2019, with the shift toward WW prompting re-survey of select questions in 2023. Results All respondents preferred enrollment in trials that incorporated patient input. Most respondents (76%) preferred treatment that incorporated chemotherapy escalation over radiation escalation. Furthermore, when presented with a hypothetical patient who developed a cCR after chemoradiation (without the option for WW), 58% of patients chose surgical treatment (with 100% risk of permanent ostomy and 80% chance of cure) over omission of surgery (with &lt;80% chance of cure). In contrast, when the hypothetical patient developed a cCR after TNT (with an option for WW), 82% of patients opted for selective WW over surgery. Conclusions This work successfully integrated patient advocacy groups as a resource for obtaining patient input. Surveys revealed patients had a strong preference for chemotherapy escalation, for selective WW when offered, and for incorporation of input into future clinical trial design. These findings describe how well-informed patients approach complex medical decision-making and serve as a starting point for future studies seeking to incorporate patient voices.