Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

163 citation(s) found for "Vu, Tam".

Novel Richter Syndrome Xenograft Models to Study Genetic Architecture, Biology, and Therapy Responses
Braggio, Esteban , Allan, John N. , Zamò, Alberto , Tam, Wayne , Chadburn, Amy , Furman, Richard R. , Allan, John N , Zamò, Alberto , Braggio, Esteban , Vaisitti, Tiziana , Arruga, Francesca , Serra, Sara , Deaglio, Silvia

Cancer Research | May 7, 2018 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 3413-3420

10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-4004 | PMID 29735551 Get It

Abstract Richter syndrome represents the evolution of chronic lymphocytic leukemia into an aggressive tumor, most commonly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The lack of in vitro and in vivo models has severely hampered drug testing in a disease that is poorly responsive to common chemoimmunotherapeutic combinations as well as to novel kinase inhibitors. Here we report for the first time the establishment and genomic characterization of two patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) models of Richter syndrome, RS9737 and RS1316. Richter syndrome xenografts were genetically, morphologically, and phenotypically stable and similar to the corresponding primary tumor. RS9737 was characterized by biallelic inactivation of CDKN2A and TP53, monoallelic deletion of 11q23 (ATM), and mutations of BTK, KRAS, EGR2, and NOTCH1. RS1316 carried trisomy 12 and showed mutations in BTK, KRAS, MED12, and NOTCH2. RNA sequencing confirmed that in both cases >80% of the transcriptome was shared between primary tumor and PDX. In line with the mutational profile, pathway analyses revealed overactivation of the B-cell receptor, NFκB, and NOTCH pathways in both tumors, potentially providing novel tumor targets. In conclusion, these two novel models of Richter syndrome represent useful tools to study biology and response to therapies of this highly aggressive and still incurable tumor. Significance: Two patient-derived xenograft models of Richter syndrome represent the first ex vivo model to study biology of the disease and to test novel therapeutic strategies. Cancer Res; 78(13); 3413–20. ©2018 AACR.
Canadian Association of Radiologists White Paper on Artificial Intelligence in Radiology
Tang, An , Tam, Roger , Cadrin-Chênevert, Alexandre , Guest, Will , Chong, Jaron , Barfett, Joseph, Chepelev, Leonid , Cairns, Robyn, Mitchell, J. Ross , Cicero, Mark , Poudrette, Manuel Gaudreau, Jaremko, Jacob L. , Gallix, B. , Gray, Bruce, Geis, Raym, O’Connell, Timothy, Babyn, Paul , Koff, David , Ferguson, D., Derkatch, Sheldon , Bilbily, Alexander, Shabana, Wael , Reinhold, Caroline , Tam, Roger

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal | April 11, 2018 | Volume: 69 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 120-135

10.1016/j.carj.2018.02.002 | PMID 29655580 Get It

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly moving from an experimental phase to an implementation phase in many fields, including medicine. The combination of improved availability of large datasets, increasing computing power, and advances in learning algorithms has created major performance breakthroughs in the development of AI applications. In the last 5 years, AI techniques known as deep learning have delivered rapidly improving performance in image recognition, caption generation, and speech recognition. Radiology, in particular, is a prime candidate for early adoption of these techniques. It is anticipated that the implementation of AI in radiology over the next decade will significantly improve the quality, value, and depth of radiology's contribution to patient care and population health, and will revolutionize radiologists' workflows. The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) is the national voice of radiology committed to promoting the highest standards in patient-centered imaging, lifelong learning, and research. The CAR has created an AI working group with the mandate to discuss and deliberate on practice, policy, and patient care issues related to the introduction and implementation of AI in imaging. This white paper provides recommendations for the CAR derived from deliberations between members of the AI working group. This white paper on AI in radiology will inform CAR members and policymakers on key terminology, educational needs of members, research and development, partnerships, potential clinical applications, implementation, structure and governance, role of radiologists, and potential impact of AI on radiology in Canada.
Pevonedistat, a first-in-class NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor, combined with azacitidine in patients with AML
Swords, Ronan , Maris, Michael B., Zeidner, Joshua F. , Foran, James M. , Cruz, José C. , Tam, Wayne , Vardhanabhuti, Saran , Pawlikowska-Dobler, Iwona , Faessel, Hélène M. , Dash, Ajeeta B. , Sedarati, Farhad , Dezube, Bruce J., Faller, Douglas V. , Swords, Ronan T , Zeidner, Joshua F , Cruz, Jose , Tam, Wayne , Vardhanabhuti, Saran , Pawlikowska-Dobler, Iwona , Dash, Ajeeta B , Sedarati, Farhad , Faller, Douglas V , Savona, Michael R , Coutré, Steven , Erba, Harry Paul , Berdeja, Jesús G. , Savona, Michael R.

Blood | January 18, 2018 | Volume: 131 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 1415-1424

10.1182/blood-2017-09-805895 | PMID 29348128 Get It

Key Points RP2D of PEV 20 mg/m2 in PEV/AZA combo did not alter toxicity profile of AZA; dose-limiting toxicities were transiently elevated AST/ALT. In treatment-naive older AML patients, the intent-to-treat ORR was 50%.
Nanowire Aptasensors for Electrochemical Detection of Cell-Secreted Cytokines
Liu, Ying , Rahimian, Ali , Vu, Tam , Crulhas, Bruno P. , Imanbekova, Meruyert , Revzin, Alexander , Revzin, Alexander , Krylyuk, Sergiy G. , Stybayeva, Gulnaz , Shin, Dong‐Sik , Davydov, Albert V.

ACS Sensors | October 9, 2017 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1644-1652

10.1021/acssensors.7b00486 | PMID 28991491 Get It

Randomized comparison of ibrutinib versus ofatumumab in relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma: Results from the phase III RESONATE trial.
Byrd, John C. , Brown, Jennifer R. , Reddy, Nishitha , Jäger, Ulrich, Devereux, Steve, Furman, Richard R. , Cymbalista, Florence, Fardis, Maria, McGreivy, Jesse, Clow, Fong, James, Danelle F. , O’Brien, Susan , Barrientos, Jacqueline C. , Kay, Neil E. , Coutré, Steven , Tam, Constantine S. , Mulligan, Stephen P. , Devereux, Steve, Barr, Paul M. , Kipps, Thomas J. , Hillmen, Peter

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: LBA7008-LBA7008

10.1200/jco.2014.32.18_suppl.lba7008 Get It

LBA7008 Background: Treatment options for CLL/ SLL patients (pts) who fail chemoimmunotherapy are limited. We report interim results from a phase III randomized study of ibrutinib (ibr), a first in class covalent BTK inhibitor, vs ofatumumab (ofa) in R/R CLL/SLL. The Data Monitoring Committee recommended this analysis be considered final, based on meeting the primary and a key secondary endpoint. Methods: R/R CLL/SLL pts who failed ≥1 therapy received 420 mg oral ibr daily until progression or IV ofa 300/2000mg for 12 doses. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), IRC assessed overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: Of 391 pts enrolled (median age 67 years; 40% ≥70 years; 57% Rai stage III/IV disease; 30% del 17p), 195 were randomized to ibr and 196 to ofa. Ibr pts had median 3 prior therapies vs 2 for ofa. Median follow-up was 9.4 months (m). Ibr significantly lengthened PFS (median not reached vs 8.1 m; HR 0.215, CI 0.146–0.317, p<0.0001; 78.5% risk reduction), and significantly improved OS (median not reached; HR 0.434, CI 0.238–0.789, p=0.0049) compared with ofa. ORR was 42.6 vs 4.1% (p<0.0001) and ORR+PR with lymphocytosis was 62.6 vs 4.1% for ibr vs ofa. Similar effects were seen in del17p and purine analog refractory subsets. In each arm 2 pts had confirmed Richter’s transformation. Most frequent adverse events (AE) for ibr vs ofa were diarrhea (47.7 vs 17.8%) fatigue (27.7 vs 29.8%), and nausea (26.2 vs 18.3%). Atrial fibrillation was more frequent with ibr (5.1 vs 0.5%). Major hemorrhages were reported in 1.0 vs 1.6% for ibr vs ofa. Drug discontinuation due to AE was 4.1 vs 3.6% for ibr vs ofa. 86% of ibr pts were continuing treatment. 57 pts randomized to ofa with confirmed PD had initiated ibr at cross-over. Conclusions: Compared with ofa, ibr significantly improved PFS, OS and ORR in pts with R/R CLL/SLL. The safety profile was comparable with that previously reported (Byrd NEJM 2013). These results support ibr as a beneficial therapy for R/R CLL patients irrespective of del 17p or purine analog refractory disease. Clinical trial information: NCT01578707.
Primary results, NRG Oncology/NSABP B-35: A clinical trial of anastrozole (A) versus tamoxifen (tam) in postmenopausal patients with DCIS undergoing lumpectomy plus radiotherapy.
Margolese, Richard G., Julian, Thomas B. , Costantino, Joseph P., Vallow, Laura A., Albain, Kathy S. , Whitworth, Pat W. , Cianfrocca, Mary, Gross, Howard M., Soori, Gamini S. , Hopkins, Judith O. , Sturtz, Keren , Wozniak, Timothy F., Seay, Thomas E., Mamounas, Eleftherios P. , Cecchini, Reena S. , Ganz, Peter , Brufsky, Adam , Fehrenbacher, Louis , Mamounas, Eleftherios P. , Wolmark, Norman

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: LBA500-LBA500

10.1200/jco.2015.33.18_suppl.lba500 Get It

LBA500 Background: The primary endpoint of NSABP B-35, a phase III trial comparing 1 mg/day anastrozole to 20 mg/day tamoxifen, each given for 5 years, was breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), defined as the time from randomization to any breast cancer (BC) event including local, regional, or distant recurrence or contralateral disease, invasive or DCIS. Methods: Postmenopausal women with ER-receptor or PgR-receptor positive (by IHC analysis) DCIS and no invasive BC who had undergone a lumpectomy with clear resection margins were randomly assigned to receive either 20 mg/day tam or 1 mg/day A (blinded) for 5 years. Stratification was by age (<60 v ≥60). Results: From 1/6/2003 to 6/15/2006, 3,104 pts were entered and randomized (1552 in groups tam and A each). As of 2/28/15, follow-up information was available on 3,083 pts for OS and on 3,077 pts for all other disease-free endpoints, with mean time of follow-up of 8.6 years. There were 198 BCFI events, 114 in the tam group and 84 in the A group (HR, 0.73; p=0.03). 10-year point estimates for BCFI were 89.2% for tam and 93.5% for A. A significant time-by-treatment interaction (p=0.02) indicated that the effect was not evident until later in the study. There was a significant interaction between treatment and age group (p=0.04); benefit of A is only in women <60 years old. As to secondary endpoints, there were 495 DFS events, 260 in the tam group and 235 in the A group (HR, 0.89; p=0.21). 10-year point estimates for DFS were 77.9% for tam and 82.7% for A. There were 186 deaths, 88 in the tam group and 98 in the A group (HR, 1.11; p=0.48). 10-year point estimates for OS were 92.1% for tam, 92.5% for A. There were 8 deaths due to breast cancer in the tam group and 5 in the A group. There were 63 cases of invasive breast cancer in the tam group and 39 in the A group (HR, 0.61; p=0.02). There was a non-significant trend for a reduction in breast second primary cancers with A (HR, 0.68; p=0.07). Conclusions: Anastrozole provided a significant improvement compared to tamoxifen for BCFI, which was seen later in the study, primarily in women <60 years. Support: CA12027, 37377, 69651, 69974; 180868, 180822, 189867 196067, 114732; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. Clinical trial information: NCT00053898.
Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with classic hairy cell leukemia
Grever, Michael R. , Andritsos, Leslie A. , Call, Timothy G. , Catovsky, Daniel , Dearden, Claire , Demeter, Judit , Else, Monica , Forconi, Francesco , Gozzetti, Alessandro , Ho, Anthony D. , Johnston, James B. , Jones, Jeffrey A. , Juliusson, Gunnar , Kraut, Eric H., Kreitman, Robert J. , Larratt, Loree, Lauria, Francesco, Lozanski, Gerard , Montserrat, Emili , Park, Jae H. , Polliack, Aaron, Quest, Graeme, Rai, Kanti R., Robak, Tadeusz , Saven, Alan, Seymour, John F. , Tallman, Martin S. , Tam, Constantine S. , Tiacci, Enrico , Zinzani, Pier Luigi , Falini, Brunangelo , Abdel‐Wahab, Omar , Banerji, Versha , Barrientos, Jacqueline C. , Blachly, James S. , Parikh, Sameer A. , Rai, Kanti R., Ravandi, Farhad , Robak, Tadeusz , Tadmor, Tamar , Troussard, Xavier , Zent, Clive S. , Zenz, Thorsten , Tam, Constantine S , Zinzani, Pier Luigi , Falini, Brunangelo , Gozzetti, Alessandro , Forconi, Francesco

Blood | December 1, 2016 | Volume: 129 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 553-560

10.1182/blood-2016-01-689422 | PMID 27903528 Get It

AbstractHairy cell leukemia is an uncommon hematologic malignancy characterized by pancytopenia and marked susceptibility to infection. Tremendous progress in the management of patients with this disease has resulted in high response rates and improved survival, yet relapse and an appropriate approach to re-treatment present continuing areas for research. The disease and its effective treatment are associated with immunosuppression. Because more patients are being treated with alternative programs, comparison of results will require general agreement on definitions of response, relapse, and methods of determining minimal residual disease. The development of internationally accepted, reproducible criteria is of paramount importance in evaluating and comparing clinical trials to provide optimal care. Despite the success achieved in managing these patients, continued participation in available clinical trials in the first-line and particularly in the relapse setting is highly recommended. The Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation convened an international conference to provide common definitions and structure to guide current management. There is substantial opportunity for continued research in this disease. In addition to the importance of optimizing the prevention and management of the serious risk of infection, organized evaluations of minimal residual disease and treatment at relapse offer ample opportunities for clinical research. Finally, a scholarly evaluation of quality of life in the increasing number of survivors of this now manageable chronic illness merits further study. The development of consensus guidelines for this disease offers a framework for continued enhancement of the outcome for patients.
Control of the ccd operon in plasmid F
Tam, Jeffrey E., Kline, B C

Journal of Bacteriology | November 4, 2016 | Volume: 171 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 2353-2360

10.1128/jb.171.5.2353-2360.1989 | PMID 2651399 Get It

The F sex factor plasmid of Escherichia coli contains a pair of genes, ccdA and ccdB, whose protein gene products are involved in an unusual feature of plasmid maintenance. The CcdB protein is a cytotoxin that becomes activated when the F plasmid is lost, thereby killing the F- segregant cells. In F+ cells, the CcdA protein protects against the lethal effects of CcdB. In the present study we show that ccdA and ccdB expressions are negatively autoregulated at the level of transcription. Genetic studies showed that repression required at least ccdB; ccdA alone was without effect, and ccdB alone was not examined because it is lethal. Ccd-operator complexes were purified and contained a mixture of both CcdA and CcdB proteins; however, we could not conclude from our results whether CcdA was necessary for DNA binding or autorepression. By using restriction fragments of the promoter-operator region, we obtained results indicating that at least two DNA-binding sites existed for the Ccd protein(s). Subsequent footprinting of the binding sites showed protection over about a 113-base-pair region encompassing the putative promoter-operator and the beginning of the ccdA gene.
P3‐092: Mapping Regulatory Variants in the Alzheimer's Disease Candidate Gene ABCA7
Clement, Naomi , Medway, Christopher, Ertekin‐Taner, Nilüfer , Carrasquillo, Minerva M. , Younkin, Steven G. , Allen, Mariet , Tam, Tammie , Petersen, Ronald C. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Carrasquillo, Minerva M. , Guetta‐Baranes, Tamar , Burgess, Jeremy D. , Dickson, Dennis W. , Chappell, Sally , Morgan, Kevin

Alzheimer's & Dementia | October 17, 2016 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 7S_Part_17 | Pages: No page available

10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.1751 Get It

Recommendations for the diagnosis and initial evaluation of patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia: A Task Force from the 8th International Workshop on Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia
Castillo, Jorge J. , García‐Sánz, Ramón , Hatjiharissi, Evdoxia , Kyle, Robert A. , Leleu, Xavier , McMaster, Mary L. , Merlini, Giampaolo , Morra, Enrica, Owen, Roger G., Poulain, Stéphanie , Stone, Marvin J., Tam, Constantine S. , Varettoni, Marzia , Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Kastritis, Efstathios , Minnema, Monique C , Treon, Steven P. , Merlini, Giampaolo , Dimopoulos, Meletios A , Tam, Constantine S , Kastritis, Efstathios , Garcia-Sanz, Ramon , Castillo, Jorge J , Varettoni, Marzia

British Journal of Haematology | July 5, 2016 | Volume: 175 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 77-86

10.1111/bjh.14196 | PMID 27378193 Get It

SummaryThe diagnosis of Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM) can be challenging given the variety of signs and symptoms patients can present. Furthermore, once the diagnosis of WM is established, the initial evaluation should be thorough as well as appropriately directed. During the 8th International Workshop for WM in London, United Kingdom, a multi‐institutional task force was formed to develop consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and initial evaluation of patients with WM. In this document, we present the results of the deliberations that took place to address these issues. We provide recommendations for history‐taking and physical examination, laboratory studies, bone marrow aspiration and biopsy analysis and imaging studies. We also provide guidance on the initial evaluation of special situations, such as anaemia, hyperviscosity, neuropathy, Bing‐Neel syndrome and amyloidosis. We hope these recommendations serve as a practical guidance to clinicians taking care of patients with a suspected or an established diagnosis of WM.