Citations

Introduction Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is known to be associated with high rates of mortality and lifelong disability. In the past few years, two clinical trials (the BEST and the BASICS trials) investigated the benefits and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for BAO and did not provide evidence to support the efficacy of MT in BAO patients. Given the recent positive results from the ATTENTION and the BAOCHE clinical trials, we conducted this meta‐analysis to provide updated collective evidence regarding the benefits of MT in patients with BAO. Methods We searched for eligible papers till June 1st, 2021, in five databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases using keywords and/or medical subject (MeSH) terms. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with no restrictions on publication date, data, or language of the included studies to avoid missing any relevant papers. All data were analyzed using R software. We computed the pooled risk ratios (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), using a random‐effect model or fixed‐effect model depending on heterogeneity among the included studies. Heterogeneity was assessed with Q statistics and the I2 test considering it significant with I2 value > 50% or P‐value < 0.05. Results Four trials were included in this meta‐analysis, namely the BEST, the BASICS, the BAOCHE, and the ATTENTION trials. The four trials recruited a total of 988 patients. The MT group achieved a significantly higher rate of modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0–3 was as compared to the best medical treatment (BMT) one (RR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.16‐2.04; P‐value = 0.002). Similarly, the mRS 0–2 rate was significantly higher in the MT group as compared to the BMT group (RR = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.09‐2.95; P‐value = 0.022). Nevertheless, heterogeneity was noticed amongst the included studies. Moreover, there was a significant reduction in the 90‐day mortality in the MT group as compared to the BMT group (RR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.65‐0.89; P‐value = 0.002). On the other hand, there was a significantly higher rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) in the MT group compared to the BMT group (RR = 7.48; 95% CI = 2.27‐24.61; P‐value< 0.001). There with no heterogeneity observed in both outcomes of mortality and sICH. Noted that there were no significant differences in overall parenchymal hemorrhage (PH) and type I PH rates, yet type II PH was more prevalent in the MT group compared to the BMT one (RR = 5.53; 95% CI = 1.47‐20.84; P‐value = 0.011). Conclusions The current evidence favors MT for basilar artery occlusions over the conservative approach in terms of achieving higher rates of good functional outcomes and decreasing mortality rates. Further large‐scale trials of different populations are needed to corroborate these results and also to ensure generalizability.

Introduction Dual antiplatelet therapy has long been established as the preferred treatment option for patients with intracranial or extracranial stenting. Anticoagulation is the preferred treatment option for patients at high risk of stroke with embolic risk factors. There is no data currently available analyzing patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke on anticoagulation who require an intracranial and or extracranial stent (IC/EC), requiring DAPT and anticoagulation with mechanical thrombectomy. Our objective is toinvestigate differences in recanalization and outcomes as well as safety of DAPT and AC in the setting of AIS post MT with stenting when compared to patients without AC. Methods A retrospective search at a large comprehensive stroke center was conducted and data was analyzed from 2013 to 2022. Patients presenting with AIS on AC who had MT and required IC/EC stent were selected and compared to patients not on AC. Outcomes were measured as symptomatic ICH and mortality. Patient demographics, stroke risk factors and stroke severity were abstracted amongst other variables. Results There were 301 patients out of 917 (42.9% Female) who presented with anticoagulation use prior to mechanical thrombectomy requiring ic/ec stent placement and DAPT therapy. See Table 1 for baseline demographics. Symptomatic ICH was seen in 24 (7.9%) compared to 50 (8.1%), Odds ratio 0.86/ p‐value = 0.573, Mortality was seen in 51 (16.9%) patients who received DAPT and a/c compared to 129 (20.9%) (OR 0.67) p = 0.028. Logistic regression model did not show any significant difference (See Table 2). Conclusions There was no statistical difference in symptomatic ICH in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy and acute stenting on anticoagulation when compared to those without anticoagulation. There was statistical difference in mortality and DAPT/AC actually had lower mortality rates. This data suggests that performing intracranial and extracranial stenting in the acute stroke setting while on anticoagulation and adding DAPT is safe. A larger multicenter study with longer follow up is needed to further confirm these findings.

Introduction Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the gold standard for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). Although >70% of patients in the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of MT for AIS‐LVO had successful recanalization, only up to 27% were free of disability according to the 90‐day modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. It is suggested that microcirculation disruption distal to the LVO might contribute to futile recanalization. Hence, combining intra‐arterial (IA) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) with MT was investigated in a few studies in an attempt to reduce the burden of distal microthrombi and microcirculation disruption. We conducted this meta‐analysis to provide collective evidence in this regard. Methods We performed this meta‐analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analyses statement recommendations. We aimed to include all original studies investigating the benefits of IA tPA in AIS patients undergoing MT.All screening and extraction stages were conducted by two authors, with a third author resolving any conflicts. Using R software, we calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). A fixed‐effect model was adopted to pool all data due to the absence of significant heterogeneity among the included studies. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q statistics and the I2test, where I2> 50% or P‐value < 0.05 were considered significant. Results Following the database search, a manual search of references, and different screening phases, we included 5 studies (2,686 patients) satisfying the predefined inclusion criteria. Successful recanalization rates were comparable between both groups. The 90‐day functional independence was reported in 4 studies (2,474 patients), with comparable rates between both groups (OR = 1.25; 95%CI = 0.92‐1.70; P‐value = 0.154). Mortality was reported in 3 studies (368 patients), with comparable rates between both groups (OR = 0.73; 95%CI = 0.44‐1.23; P‐value = 0.240). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was reported in 5 studies (2,678 patients) with no significant difference between the two groups (OR = 0.66; 95%CI = 0.34‐1.26; P‐value = 0.304). Conclusions The current evidence does not show any significant differences between MT alone versus MT plus IA tPA in terms of 90‐day functional independence, mortality, and sICH. With the limited number of studies and included patients, more studies are needed to investigate the benefits and safety of the combined MT and IA tPA.

Introduction Various clinical trials addressing large core acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are ongoing from multiple international groups. Future development of clinical guidelines depends on meta‐analyses of these trials calling for a degree of homogeneity of elements across the different studies. The aim of this common data element study was to provide an overview of the key features of pertinent large core infarct trials. Methods PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were screened for published and ongoing clinical trials assessing mechanical thrombectomy in patients with AIS with large core infarct. Nested Knowledge AutoLit living review platform was utilized to categorize primary and secondary outcomes as well as inclusion and exclusion criteria for patient selection in the clinical trials. Results The most reported data element was ASPECTS score, but with varied definitions of what compromises large core. Non‐utility‐weighted modified Rankin Score (mRS) was reported in 6/7 studies as the primary outcome, while the utility‐weighted mRS was the outcome of interest in the TESLA trial, all of them at the 3‐months mark, with only LASTE looking for mRS shift at the 6‐months mark. Secondary outcomes had more variations. Mortality is reported separately only in 4/7 trials, all at the 3‐month mark. Additionally, the TENSION trial reports the frequency of serious adverse events, including mortality, at the 1‐week and 12‐month mark. Conclusions In the published and the ongoing large core trials, there is a large degree of variability in the collected data elements. Differences in definition and timepoints renders reaching a unified standard difficult, which hinders high quality meta‐analyses and cohesive evidence‐driven synthesis.

(1) Background: COVID-19 caused the worst international public health crisis, accompanied by major global economic downturns and mass-scale job losses, which impacted the psychosocial wellbeing of the worldwide population, including Saudi Arabia. Evidence of the high-risk groups impacted by the pandemic has been non-existent in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, this study examined factors associated with psychosocial distress, fear of COVID-19 and coping strategies among the general population in Saudi Arabia. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in healthcare and community settings in the Saudi Arabia using an anonymous online questionnaire. The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10), Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) and Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS) were used to assess psychological distress, fear and coping strategies, respectively. Multivariate logistic regressions were used, and an Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) was reported. (3) Results: Among 803 participants, 70% (n = 556) were females, and the median age was 27 years; 35% (n = 278) were frontline or essential service workers; and 24% (n = 195) reported comorbid conditions including mental health illness. Of the respondents, 175 (21.8%) and 207 (25.8%) reported high and very high psychological distress, respectively. Factors associated with moderate to high levels of psychological distress were: youth, females, non-Saudi nationals, those experiencing a change in employment or a negative financial impact, having comorbidities, and current smoking. A high level of fear was reported by 89 participants (11.1%), and this was associated with being ex-smokers (3.72, 1.14–12.14, 0.029) and changes in employment (3.42, 1.91–6.11, 0.000). A high resilience was reported by 115 participants (14.3%), and 333 participants (41.5%) had medium resilience. Financial impact and contact with known/suspected cases (1.63, 1.12–2.38, 0.011) were associated with low, medium, to high resilient coping. (4) Conclusions: People in Saudi Arabia were at a higher risk of psychosocial distress along with medium-high resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic, warranting urgent attention from healthcare providers and policymakers to provide specific mental health support strategies for their current wellbeing and to avoid a post-pandemic mental health crisis.

Background Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is frequently used in treating cerebral aneurysms with flow diverters (FDs), whereas single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) is used mostly with coated FDs and in ruptured aneurysms. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the safety profile of SAPT in FDs. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Embase, OVID Medline, and Scopus were searched to 1st November 2022. Outcomes of interest included ischemic and hemorrhagic complications, conversion to DAPTs, and in-stent stenosis rates under long-term SAPT. SAPT is divided into aspirin (ASA) vs. non-ASA group (ticagrelor or prasugrel). Subgroup analysis was performed for ruptured vs. non-ruptured aneurysms and coated vs. non-coated FDs. All data were analyzed using R software version 4.2.2. Results Twelve studies with 240 total patients (43 patients in the ASA group and 197 patients in the non-ASA group) were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled ischemic occlusion rate was 9.8% (95% CI = 4.87−18.95: p-value = 0.09) for SAPTs. The ASA group had significantly higher ischemic complication rates compared to the non-ASA group (20.8% vs. 6.3%, respectively, p-value = 0.02). The pooled hemorrhagic complication rate was 3.5% (95% CI = 1.38−8.81: p-value > 0.99). The hemorrhagic rates of ASA group were 9.3%% (95% CI = 3.54−22.30) over the non-ASA group 2.1% (95% CI = 0.58−7.54) ( p-value > 0.99). The overall in-stent stenosis rate was 2.3% (95% CI = 1.06−5.14: p-value > 0.99). The ischemic complication rates were comparable between coated vs non-coated FDs (10.7% vs. 5.5% p-value = 0.39). In stent stenosis rate were 1.9% (95% CI = 0.72−4.96) in coated FDs over 4.4% (95% CI = 1.11−16.11) ( p-value = 0.32). The ruptured and non-ruptured groups also showed comparable results in terms of ischemic (17.6% vs. 7.1% respectively, p-value = 0.24) and hemorrhagic complications (9.8% vs. 1.1%, respectively, p-value = 0.08). Conclusions Flow diverter treatment under ASA monotherapy resulted in relatively high ischemic complication rates. However, SAPT with prasugrel or ticagrelor monotherapy is promising for coated FDs and ruptured aneurysm treatments. Given the overall small sample size and also the likely presence of known and unknown biases regarding choice of antiplatelet therapy between groups, larger cohort studies are needed to evaluate SAPT treatment outcomes.

Background Federal research funding is highly sought after but may be challenging to attain. A clear understanding of funding for specific diseases, such as cerebrovascular disorders, might help researchers regarding which National Institutes of Health (NIH) institutes fund research into specific disorders and grant types. Objective To examine the current scope of NIH grant funding for cerebrovascular conditions. Methods The NIH-developed RePORTER was used to extract active NIH-funded studies related to cerebrovascular diseases through January 2023. Duplicate studies were removed, and projects were manually screened and labeled in subcategories as clinical and basic science and as research subcategories. Extracted data included total funding, grant types, institutions that received funding, and diseases studied. Python (version 3.9) and SciPy library were used for statistical analyses. Results We identified 1232 cerebrovascular projects across seven diseases with US$699 952 926 in total funding. The cerebrovascular diseases with the greatest number of grants were ischemic stroke (705, or 57.2% of all funded projects), carotid disease (193, or 15.7%), and hemorrhagic stroke (163, or 13.2%). R01 grants were the most common mechanism of funding (632 grants, or 51.3%). The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) funded the most projects (504 projects; US$325 536 405), followed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (376 projects; US$216 784 546). Conclusion Cerebrovascular disease receives roughly US$700 million in NIH funding. Ischemic stroke accounts for the majority of NIH-funded cerebrovascular projects, and R01 grants are the most common funding mechanism. Notably, NHLBI provides a large proportion of funding, in addition to NINDS.

Background The MIVI Q aspiration catheters have been shown to achieve significantly greater flow rates than other intracranial aspiration catheters in vitro. We describe our initial real-world experience with the MIVI Q catheter in emergent acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by distal and medium vessel occlusions (DMVO). Methods Data was collated from a prospectively maintained database which included patients from October 2019 to December 2022. Occlusion demographics, thrombectomy technique, reperfusion scoring, procedural complications and disposition were assessed. The primary outcome of interest was rate of successful reperfusion defined as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score 2b-3. Secondary outcomes included rate of first pass effect (FPE) and complications. Results We included 64 target occlusions in 51 patients. The Q catheter successfully reached the DMVO in all occlusions. Successful reperfusion was achieved in 49/64 (76.6%) occlusions, and TICI scores were similar for primary and secondary DMVOs (P value = 0.41). FPE was achieved in 39/64 (60.9%) occlusions and did not differ between primary and secondary DMVOs (P value = 0.13). Reperfusion hemorrhage occurred in 3/64 (4.7%) cases, small volume subarachnoid hemorrhage in 3/64 (4.7%) cases, and small hemorrhagic transformation in 1/64 (1.6%) cases; the rate of complications did not differ based on primary versus secondary DMVO (P value = 0.29). Conclusion The MIVI Q catheter is both safe and effective. Our real-world experience supports the superior flow rates demonstrated in vitro and translates into high rates of successful reperfusion in AIS caused by DMVO in clinical practice.

Background Funding may impact the quality and findings of systematic reviews (SRs). We aimed to compare the methodological quality of funded and non-funded SRs that investigated the outcomes in ischemic stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. Methods We conducted a comprehensive search strategy in different databases, including Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline (including epub ahead of print, in-process & other non-indexed citations), PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection to retrieve all relevant SRs. Random sequence generation matched each funded SR with a non-funded one. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)-2 tool was used to assess the bias and quality of the included SRs. We also used uni- and multivariate analysis to perform our analysis, and results were expressed in odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results We retrieved 150 articles, which were randomized and matched into 100 SRs, including 50 funded and 50 non-funded studies. By multivariate analysis, we found that including randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (OR: 5.7; 95% CI: 1.8–17.8; p = 0.003) and reporting conflict of interests (OR: 5.2; 95 CI: 1.1–24; p = 0.036) were the only significant differences between funded and non-funded SRs. No significant differences were found regarding the overall confidence for low-quality (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.09–3.2; p = 0.49) and moderate/high-quality SRs (OR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.02–1.87; p = 0.14). Conclusion Funded studies tend to include RCTs more often and report conflict of interests with no significant impact on overall confidence.