Dicpinigaitis, Alis J.

Background Acute ischemic stroke attributed to basilar artery occlusion is known to be associated with high rates of mortality and disability. However, the previous clinical trials did not provide evidence to support the efficacy of endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with basilar artery occlusion. The purpose of this study was to provide updated evidence about EVT's benefits and safety profile with the recent update from both the Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion (ATTENTION) and the Basilar Artery Occlusion Chinese Endovascular Trial (BAOCHE) trials. Methods We searched for eligible articles from inception to November 1, 2022, in 5 databases and included all randomized controlled trials with no restrictions on the publication date or language. Meta‐analysis statistics were performed using R software version 4.2.1. Results The rate of modified Rankin scale score of 0 to 3 was significantly higher in the EVT group compared with best medical treatment (risk ratio [RR], 1.54 [95% CI, 1.16–2.04]; P value = 0.002), and the same was observed for the rate of modified Rankin scale score 0 to 2 (RR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.08–3.08]; P value = 0.024). Moreover, there was a significant reduction in the 90‐day mortality in the EVT group (RR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.65–0.89]; P value = 0.002). However, there was a significantly higher rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in the EVT group compared with best medical treatment (RR, 7.48 [95% CI, 2.27–24.61]; P value <0.001). Conclusions EVT may confer a clinical benefit to patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by basilar artery occlusion. Because of the small number of included studies and because all of them were conducted in the Chinese population, further trials might be needed to confirm and further investigate the generalizability of these results.

Introduction Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is known to be associated with high rates of mortality and lifelong disability. In the past few years, two clinical trials (the BEST and the BASICS trials) investigated the benefits and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for BAO and did not provide evidence to support the efficacy of MT in BAO patients. Given the recent positive results from the ATTENTION and the BAOCHE clinical trials, we conducted this meta‐analysis to provide updated collective evidence regarding the benefits of MT in patients with BAO. Methods We searched for eligible papers till June 1st, 2021, in five databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases using keywords and/or medical subject (MeSH) terms. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with no restrictions on publication date, data, or language of the included studies to avoid missing any relevant papers. All data were analyzed using R software. We computed the pooled risk ratios (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), using a random‐effect model or fixed‐effect model depending on heterogeneity among the included studies. Heterogeneity was assessed with Q statistics and the I2 test considering it significant with I2 value > 50% or P‐value < 0.05. Results Four trials were included in this meta‐analysis, namely the BEST, the BASICS, the BAOCHE, and the ATTENTION trials. The four trials recruited a total of 988 patients. The MT group achieved a significantly higher rate of modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0–3 was as compared to the best medical treatment (BMT) one (RR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.16‐2.04; P‐value = 0.002). Similarly, the mRS 0–2 rate was significantly higher in the MT group as compared to the BMT group (RR = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.09‐2.95; P‐value = 0.022). Nevertheless, heterogeneity was noticed amongst the included studies. Moreover, there was a significant reduction in the 90‐day mortality in the MT group as compared to the BMT group (RR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.65‐0.89; P‐value = 0.002). On the other hand, there was a significantly higher rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) in the MT group compared to the BMT group (RR = 7.48; 95% CI = 2.27‐24.61; P‐value< 0.001). There with no heterogeneity observed in both outcomes of mortality and sICH. Noted that there were no significant differences in overall parenchymal hemorrhage (PH) and type I PH rates, yet type II PH was more prevalent in the MT group compared to the BMT one (RR = 5.53; 95% CI = 1.47‐20.84; P‐value = 0.011). Conclusions The current evidence favors MT for basilar artery occlusions over the conservative approach in terms of achieving higher rates of good functional outcomes and decreasing mortality rates. Further large‐scale trials of different populations are needed to corroborate these results and also to ensure generalizability.

ObjectiveTo evaluate clinical outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) using population‐level data from the United States.MethodsWeighted discharge data from the National Inpatient Sample were queried to identify adult patients with acute BAO during the period of 2015 to 2019 treated with EVT or medical management only. Complex samples statistical methods and propensity‐score adjustment using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed to assess clinical endpoints.ResultsAmong 3,950 BAO patients identified, 1,425 (36.1%) were treated with EVT [mean age 66.7 years, median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 22]. On unadjusted analysis, 155 (10.9%) EVT patients achieved favorable functional outcomes (discharge disposition to home without services), while 515 (36.1%) experienced in‐hospital mortality, and 20 (1.4%) developed symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Following propensity‐score adjustment by IPTW accounting for age, stroke severity, and comorbidity burden, EVT was independently associated with favorable functional outcome [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07, 1.46; p = 0.004], but not with in‐hospital mortality or sICH. In an IPTW‐adjusted sub‐group analysis of patients with NIHSS scores >20, EVT was associated with both favorable functional outcome (discharge disposition to home or to acute rehabilitation) (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.24, 1.94; p < 0.001) and decreased mortality (aOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69, 0.89; p < 0.001), but not with sICH.InterpretationThis retrospective population‐based analysis using a large national registry provides real‐world evidence of a potential benefit of EVT in acute BAO patients. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:55–60