Citations

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain malignancy in adults. Standard of care (SOC) for suspected GBM begins with maximal safe resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and temozolomide, and maintenance temozolomide. Imvax has developed the Goldspire™ platform to create IGV-001, an autologous biologic-device combination product for the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM (ndGBM). IGV-001 consists of autologous GBM tumor cells and an antisense oligonucleotide against IGF-1R mRNA (IMV-001), irradiated and administered via biodiffusion chambers implanted in the abdomen. Together, these components stimulate immunogenic cell death and antigen release. IGV-001 was well tolerated and multiple efficacy signals were observed in a Phase 1b study in patients with ndGBM, including significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic evidence of tumor response, and changes in immune response biomarkers. A Phase 2b randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study has been initiated to assess the safety and efficacy of IGV-001 in patients with ndGBM (NCT04485949). After surgical resection, patients will be treated with IGV-001 or placebo followed by SOC. 25 US sites have been selected with a target enrollment of 93 patients (2:1 randomization) and the study is open to enrollment. Key inclusion criteria are 18 to 70 years of age, Karnofsky performance status score ≥ 70, diagnosis of GBM based on the treating neurosurgeon's best clinical judgement, confirmed measurable disease pre-operatively, tumor located in the supratentorial compartment, and adequate bone marrow and organ function. Key exclusion criteria include bihemispheric disease, multicentric disease, or treatment with Tumor Treating Fields prior to documented progression. The primary outcome is PFS, defined as the time from randomization to first progression, as determined by blinded central radiology review, or death. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, and safety.

Abstract Clinical research networks conduct important studies that would not otherwise be performed by other entities. In the case of the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG), such studies include diagnostic studies using master protocols, controlled phage intervention trials, and studies that evaluate treatment strategies or dynamic interventions, such as sequences of empiric and definitive therapies. However, the value of a clinical research network lies not only in the results from these important studies but in the creation of new approaches derived from collaborative thinking, carefully examining and defining the most important research questions for clinical practice, recognizing and addressing common but suboptimal approaches, and anticipating that the standard approaches of today may be insufficient for tomorrow. This results in the development and implementation of new methodologies and tools for the design, conduct, analyses, and reporting of research studies. These new methodologies directly impact the studies conducted within the network and have a broad and long-lasting impact on the field, enhancing the scientific value and efficiency of generations of research studies. This article describes innovations from the ARLG in diagnostic studies, observational studies, and clinical trials evaluating interventions for the prevention and treatment of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections.

AbstractDeveloping and implementing the scientific agenda of the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG) by soliciting input and proposals, transforming concepts into clinical trials, conducting those trials, and translating trial data analyses into actionable information for infectious disease clinical practice is the collective role of the Scientific Leadership Center, Clinical Operations Center, Statistical and Data Management Center, and Laboratory Center of the ARLG. These activities include shepherding concept proposal applications through peer review; identifying, qualifying, training, and overseeing clinical trials sites; recommending, developing, performing, and evaluating laboratory assays in support of clinical trials; and designing and performing data collection and statistical analyses. This article describes key components involved in realizing the ARLG scientific agenda through the activities of the ARLG centers.

AbstractIn this overview, we describe important contributions from the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG) to patient care, clinical trials design, and mentorship while outlining future priorities. The ARLG research agenda is focused on 3 key areas: gram-positive infections, gram-negative infections, and diagnostics. The ARLG has developed an innovative approach to clinical trials design, the desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR), which uses an ordinal measure of global outcome to assess both benefits and harms. DOOR was initially applied to observational studies to determine optimal dosing of vancomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylcococcus aureus bacteremia and the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam versus colistin for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infection. DOOR is being successfully applied to the analysis of interventional trials and, in collaboration with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for use in registrational trials. In the area of diagnostics, the ARLG developed Master Protocol for Evaluating Multiple Infection Diagnostics (MASTERMIND), an innovative design that allows simultaneous testing of multiple diagnostic platforms in a single study. This approach will be used to compare molecular assays for the identification of fluoroquinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae (MASTER GC) and to compare rapid diagnostic tests for bloodstream infections. The ARLG has initiated a first-in-kind randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in participants with cystic fibrosis who are chronically colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa to assess the pharmacokinetics and antimicrobial activity of bacteriophage therapy. Finally, an engaged and highly trained workforce is critical for continued and future success against antimicrobial drug resistance. Thus, the ARLG has developed a robust mentoring program targeted to each stage of research training to attract and retain investigators in the field of antimicrobial resistance research.

Abstract Addressing the treatment and prevention of antibacterial-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections is a priority area of the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG). The ARLG has conducted a series of observational studies to define the clinical and molecular global epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant and ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, with the goal of optimizing the design and execution of interventional studies. One ongoing ARLG study aims to better understand the impact of fluoroquinolone-resistant gram-negative gut bacteria in neutropenic patients, which threatens to undermine the effectiveness of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in these vulnerable patients. The ARLG has conducted pharmacokinetic studies to inform the optimal dosing of antibiotics that are important in the treatment of drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria, including oral fosfomycin, intravenous minocycline, and a combination of intravenous ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam. In addition, randomized clinical trials have assessed the safety and efficacy of step-down oral fosfomycin for complicated urinary tract infections and single-dose intravenous phage therapy for adult patients with cystic fibrosis who are chronically colonized with P. aeruginosa in their respiratory tract. Thus, the focus of investigation in the ARLG has evolved from improving understanding of drug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections to positively affecting clinical care for affected patients through a combination of interventional pharmacokinetic and clinical studies, a focus that will be maintained moving forward.

Abstract The advancement of infectious disease diagnostics, along with studies devoted to infections caused by gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, is a top scientific priority of the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG). Diagnostic tests for infectious diseases are rapidly evolving and improving. However, the availability of rapid tests designed to determine antibacterial resistance or susceptibility directly in clinical specimens remains limited, especially for gram-negative organisms. Additionally, the clinical impact of many new tests, including an understanding of how best to use them to inform optimal antibiotic prescribing, remains to be defined. This review summarizes the recent work of the ARLG toward addressing these unmet needs in the diagnostics field and describes future directions for clinical research aimed at curbing the threat of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections.

Abstract Disclosure: S.H. Johnson: None. C. Zhang: None. P.T. Hangge: None. T.W. Yen: None. T. Shaik: None. K. Doffek: None. J.W. Findling: None. T.B. Carroll: None. D.B. Evans: None. S. Dream: None. T.S. Wang: None. Background: Secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI) may occur in patients after unilateral adrenalectomy for adrenal-dependent hypercortisolism (HC) and/or primary aldosteronism (PA). Perioperative protocols include routine glucocorticoid replacement (GR) or selective GR based on postoperative day 1 (POD1) basal cortisol levels or cosyntropin stimulation testing (CST). This study aimed to assess if a POD1 basal cortisol level alone was predictive of an abnormal CST and the need for GR in patients following unilateral adrenalectomy for HC and/or PA. Methods: This is a single institution retrospective review of consecutive unilateral adrenalectomies performed for HC and/or PA from 9/2014-10/2022. Patients were grouped as overt hypercortisolism (OH;n=42), mild autonomous cortisol excretion (MACE;n=70), mixed PA/HC (n=22) or PA (n=73); 22 patients with PA did not have preoperative evaluation for HC. Preoperative morning cortisol after low-dose dexamethasone suppression testing (DST), was used to define MACE (1.8-4.9 µg/dL) and OH (≥5.0). POD1 CST was performed for all patients with HC and prior to 2021, all patients with PA. SAI was defined as basal cortisol ≤5 or stimulated ≤14 (≤18 before 4/2017). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP) of cutoffs within the range of observed basal cortisol levels in predicting an abnormal CST and need for GR. Results: Of 207 patients, 152 had POD1 CST (93% OH, 96% MACE, 73% PA/HC, 41% PA). Of these, 80 (53%) had SAI (67% OH, 55% MACE, 44% PA/HC, and 33% PA). Of the 10 patients with PA and SAI, 5 did not have preoperative testing for HC. Overall, 81 patients were discharged on GR. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration of GR was 246 (127,557), 55 (38,207), 74 (16,185), and 26 (15,36) days in patients with OH, MACE, PA/HC, and PA, respectively. At a median follow-up of 142 days (IQR 42,617), 12 patients (5 OH, 6 MACE, 1 PA/HC) remained on GR. The SN/SP of a basal cortisol ≤10 in predicting GR was 92%/77% in patients with OH and 94%/73% of patients with MACE. Compared to initiation of GR based on basal cortisol ≤10, CST identified 4 patients with SAI in the combined OH and MACE cohorts who would not have received GR, and 11 in the combined cohort who did not require GR. For patients with PA and PA/HC, a basal cortisol ≤10 had SN of 100% and SP of 85% and 67%, respectively. The optimal basal cortisol for predicting SAI in patients with PA/HC was ≤5 (SN,SP 100%). Area under the curve for all ROC curves was >0.9. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that in patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy for HC, PA, or mixed PA/HC, POD1 CST improved identification of patients at risk for SAI compared to basal cortisol levels alone. While basal cortisol levels alone may be considered in patients with PA or mixed HC/PA, all other patients with HC should have POD1 CST to determine need for postoperative GR. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023

Abstract Background Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAb) is 1 of the most problematic antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. We sought to elucidate the international epidemiology and clinical impact of CRAb. Methods In a prospective observational cohort study, 842 hospitalized patients with a clinical CRAb culture were enrolled at 46 hospitals in five global regions between 2017 and 2019. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days from the index culture. The strains underwent whole-genome analysis. Results Of 842 cases, 536 (64%) represented infection. By 30 days, 128 (24%) of the infected patients died, ranging from 1 (6%) of 18 in Australia-Singapore to 54 (25%) of 216 in the United States and 24 (49%) of 49 in South-Central America, whereas 42 (14%) of non-infected patients died. Bacteremia was associated with a higher risk of death compared with other types of infection (40 [42%] of 96 vs 88 [20%] of 440). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, bloodstream infection and higher age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index were independently associated with 30-day mortality. Clonal group 2 (CG2) strains predominated except in South-Central America, ranging from 216 (59%) of 369 in the United States to 282 (97%) of 291 in China. Acquired carbapenemase genes were carried by 769 (91%) of the 842 isolates. CG2 strains were significantly associated with higher levels of meropenem resistance, yet non-CG2 cases were over-represented among the deaths compared with CG2 cases. Conclusions CRAb infection types and clinical outcomes differed significantly across regions. Although CG2 strains remained predominant, non-CG2 strains were associated with higher mortality. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03646227.

A large number of variants identified through clinical genetic testing in disease susceptibility genes are of uncertain significance (VUS). Following the recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), the frequency in case-control datasets (PS4 criterion) can inform their interpretation. We present a novel case-control likelihood ratio-based method that incorporates gene-specific age-related penetrance. We demonstrate the utility of this method in the analysis of simulated and real datasets. In the analysis of simulated data, the likelihood ratio method was more powerful compared to other methods. Likelihood ratios were calculated for a case-control dataset of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) and compared with logistic regression results. A larger number of variants reached evidence in favor of pathogenicity, and a substantial number of variants had evidence against pathogenicity—findings that would not have been reached using other case-control analysis methods. Our novel method provides greater power to classify rare variants compared with classical case-control methods. As an initiative from the ENIGMA Analytical Working Group, we provide user-friendly scripts and preformatted Excel calculators for implementation of the method for rare variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, and other high-risk genes with known penetrance.