Citations

Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is the most common leukaemia type. In 2020, there were an estimated 207,463 people living with CLL, with an annual incidence of approximately 4.9 per 100,000 in the United States (US). Zanubrutinib is a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is FDA-approved and an NCCN preferred and recommended treatment of CLL. In the phase 3 ALPINE trial (NCT03734016), zanubrutinib elicited a significantly higher overall response rate and significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than ibrutinib. This study aimed to compare zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) CLL by calculating the number needed to treat (NNT) to avoid one progression or death and associated incremental costs. Methods:A health-economic model was developed to evaluate the number of R/R CLL patients needed to be treated to avoid a progression or death from the US payer perspective. Payer blend was assumed with 40% Commercial and 60% Medicare payer mix. Clinical efficacy data were extracted from the ALPINE trial. Final analysis result of 24-month PFS (79.5% for zanubrutinib and 67.3% for ibrutinib) was used for the base-case analysis in the model. Treatment, adverse event management, other medical resource use, and subsequent treatment costs were considered in the model. The NNT, incremental cost per treated patient, and incremental cost per additional patient with progression or death were captured. Deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess parameter uncertainties and explore key model drivers. Scenario analyses were conducted to test the impact of different PFS estimates. Results: The base-case results fromthe NNT model showed that for every 8 patients treated with zanubrutinib, 1 event of progression or death would be avoided compared to using ibrutinib. The total costs per patient treated with zanubrutinib and ibrutinib are $370,558 and $430,150, respectively, with a cost savings of $59,593 associated with using zanubrutinib (Table). Drug costs and PFS have the greatest impact on the incremental cost per patient. Varying the PFS scenarios, including adjustment with drug interruption, COVID death, or treatment discontinuation, change the NNT from 8 to 12, and are associated with cost savings of $58,179 to $67,153 per zanubrutinib-treated patient in a 24-month time frame. Applying the model result to a hypothetical scenario of a clinical practice of 100 patients treated with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib suggest that approximately 13 patients will avoid disease progression events or death. Conclusions: The NNT model suggests thatusing zanubrutinib to treat R/R CLL patients, compared to ibrutinib, will result in more favorable clinical and economic outcomes in the US.

Abstract Radiation therapy (RT) is an important non-surgical clinical treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) and brain metastases, but inherent radio-resistance can limit the efficacy in many patients. The Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) protein critically regulates radiotherapy-mediated DNA damage repair pathways, and defects in this kinase can lead to profound radiosensitivity. In this study, the efficacy of the highly potent ATM inhibitor WSD0628 was evaluated in GBM and melanoma brain metastasis patient derived xenografts (PDXs). In short term explant cultures of three PDXs, WSD0628 robustly suppressed RT-induced autophosphorylation of ATM at serine 1981 and ATM-mediated phosphorylation of Chk2 at threonine-68 and KAP1 at serine-824, with maximal inhibition at 100 nM. Similarly, RT-induced gH2AX foci were significantly reduced when combined with WSD0628 in the GBM43 cells. Consistent with the importance of ATM in the DNA damage response after radiation, WSD0628 significantly increased the radiosensitivity of U251 cells in clonogenic survival assays (0nM vs. 30nM at 5Gy, p<0.01). To evaluate the optimal duration of drug exposure, WSD0628 was removed from U251 cells at various intervals following irradiation with 5 Gy. Using clonogenic survival as a readout, a 10-fold increase in cytotoxicity was observed with an 8 hour drug exposure, with progressively increasing cytotoxicity gains with exposures up to 24 hours. In vivo efficacy of WSD0628 was evaluated in multiple intracranial PDX models. In an initial dose-ranging study, robust radiosensitization was observed in GBM43 treated with 2 Gy x 5 fractions combined with 5 mg/kg WSD0628 (20 day survival extension) or 10mg/kg WSD0628 (39 day with 10 mg/kg; p<0.01 for both dose levels). Moreover, a single dose of 12.5 Gy combined with 10 mg/kg WSD0628 had profound impact on treatment efficacy in the melanoma brain metastasis M12 PDX: at 180 days post-treatment, all mice in the combination group were electively euthanized, while median survival for sham or RT alone was 17d and 49d, respectively. Histologic analysis identified large intracranial tumors in all sham and RT-only treated mice, but only a small accumulation of melanotic cells without obvious tumor in the combination-treated mice. Immunohistochemical staining of NeuN and GFAP in the combination-treated mice showed preserved neuronal density at the 180-post treatment timepoint and minimal reactive gliosis within the ‘tumor scar’. An ongoing study is comparing this single-fraction 12.5 Gy regimen to a 2.4 Gy x 10 fraction regimen alone or in combination with WSD0628. Collectively, this study demonstrates the potential for profound radiosensitizing effects of WSD0628 in combination without obvious neuronal toxicity and has provided the scientific rational for the first-in-man study of this combination in recurrent GBM (NCT05917145) at Mayo Clinic. Citation Format: Zhiyi Xue, Ann C. Mladek, Sneha Rathi, Danielle M. Burgenske, Shiv K. Gupta, Brett L. Carlson, Zeng Hu, Lauren L Ott, Katrina K. Bakken, Rachael A. Vaubel, William F Elmquist, Wei Zhong, Jann N Sarkaria. The radiosensitizing effects of the novel brain penetrant and potent ATM inhibitor WSD0628 in glioblastoma and melanoma patient derived xenografts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A148.

Background The relationship between mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNA CN) and cardiovascular disease remains elusive. Methods and Results We performed cross‐sectional and prospective association analyses of blood‐derived mtDNA CN and cardiovascular disease outcomes in 27 316 participants in 8 cohorts of multiple racial and ethnic groups with whole‐genome sequencing. We also performed Mendelian randomization to explore causal relationships of mtDNA CN with coronary heart disease (CHD) and cardiometabolic risk factors (obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia). P <0.01 was used for significance. We validated most of the previously reported associations between mtDNA CN and cardiovascular disease outcomes. For example, 1‐SD unit lower level of mtDNA CN was associated with 1.08 (95% CI, 1.04–1.12; P <0.001) times the hazard for developing incident CHD, adjusting for covariates. Mendelian randomization analyses showed no causal effect from a lower level of mtDNA CN to a higher CHD risk (β=0.091; P =0.11) or in the reverse direction (β=−0.012; P =0.076). Additional bidirectional Mendelian randomization analyses revealed that low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol had a causal effect on mtDNA CN (β=−0.084; P <0.001), but the reverse direction was not significant ( P =0.059). No causal associations were observed between mtDNA CN and obesity, diabetes, and hypertension, in either direction. Multivariable Mendelian randomization analyses showed no causal effect of CHD on mtDNA CN, controlling for low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol level ( P =0.52), whereas there was a strong direct causal effect of higher low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol on lower mtDNA CN, adjusting for CHD status (β=−0.092; P <0.001). Conclusions Our findings indicate that high low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol may underlie the complex relationships between mtDNA CN and vascular atherosclerosis.

Background: Due to lacking evidence on surveillance for gastric cancer (GC), this study aimed to determine the optimal postsurgical surveillance strategy for pathological stage (pStage) II/III GC patients and compare its cost-effectiveness with traditional surveillance strategies. Methods: Prospectively collected data from stage II/III GC patients (n=1661) who underwent upfront surgery at a large-volume tertiary cancer center in China (FJMUUH cohort) between January 2010 and October 2015. For external validation, two independent cohorts were included, which were composed of 380 stage II/III GC patients at an tertiary cancer center in U.S.A (Mayo cohort) between July 1991 and July 2012 and 270 stage II/III GC patients at another tertiary cancer center in China (QUAH cohort) between May 2010 and October 2014. Random forest models were used to predict dynamic recurrence hazards and to construct individual surveillance strategies for stage II/III GC. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by the Markov model. Results: The median follow-up period of the FJMUUH, the Mayo, and QUAH cohorts were 55, 158, and 70 months, respectively. In the FJMUUH cohort, the 5-year recurrence risk was higher in pStage III compared with pStage II GC patients (P<0.001). Our novel individual surveillance strategy achieved optimal cost-effectiveness for pStage II GC patients (ICER =$490/QALY). The most intensive NCCN surveillance guideline was more cost-effective (ICER =$983/QALY) for pStage III GC patients. The external validations confirmed our results. Conclusion: For patients with pStage II GC, individualized risk-based surveillance outperformed the JGCTG and NCCN surveillance guidelines. However, the NCCN surveillance guideline may be more suitable for patients with pStage III GC. Even though our results are limited by the retrospective study design, the authors believe that our findings should be considered when recommending postoperative surveillance for stage II/III GC with upfront surgery in the absence of a randomized clinical trial.