Citations

Abstract Introduction Sedation is routinely administered to facilitate comfort and tolerance of life support for critically ill adults dependent on invasive mechanical ventilation. Isoflurane, a widely used anesthetic during surgery, has properties that may also benefit ICU patients requiring continuous sedation. However, efficacy as a sedative and safety in this population is not well established. Methods We conducted two identically designed multicenter randomized trials, INSPIRE ICU1 and INSPIRE ICU2, at hospitals across the US. Ventilator-dependent adults were randomly assigned in a 1.5:1 ratio to receive either inhaled isoflurane or intravenous propofol as the first-line sedative for up to 48 ± 6 hours, targeting a sedation depth between Richmond agitation-sedation scale (RASS) -1 (drowsy) to -4 (responsive only to physical stimuli). Isoflurane was administered via an anesthetic conserving device (Sedaconda ACD-S). In both arms, opioids were permitted at the lowest dose required to achieve freedom from pain. The primary outcome was the percentage of time at target sedation level, assessed as a noninferiority outcome with pre-specified margin of 15%. Secondary outcomes included opioid exposure, wake-up time after end of treatment, time to extubation, and proportion of time with spontaneous breathing effort. Results A total of 470 combined participants were included in the two trials. In each trial, 142 patients were randomly assigned to isoflurane and 93 to propofol. In INSPIRE ICU1, percentage of time within target sedation depth was 77.1 [53.2, 89.9] % with isoflurane and 80.9 [58.2, 96.4] % with propofol (difference -1.5 [-8.9, >99] %; p < 0.01 for noninferiority). In INSPIRE ICU2, percentage of time within target sedation depth was 72.6 [66.4, 78.9] % with isoflurane and 74.5 [67.5, 81.5] % with propofol (difference -1.9 [-9.4, >99] %; p < 0.01 for noninferiority). In both trials, patients assigned to isoflurane received significantly less opioid, measured as fentanyl equivalents, during the treatment period. In INSPIRE ICU2, participants receiving isoflurane were significantly likelier to exhibit spontaneous breathing efforts, but this finding was not replicated in INSPIRE ICU1. There were no significant differences in time to wake-up or time to extubation between groups in either trial. No episodes of malignant hyperthermia or propofol infusion syndrome were reported. Adverse events were comparable in type and frequency between groups. Conclusions In two US multicenter trials, isoflurane was noninferior to propofol for maintaining target sedation depth in adults undergoing invasive ventilation, and was associated with significantly lower opioid exposure. (NCT05327296, NCT05312385) This abstract is funded by: Sedana Medical

Abstract Rationale Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is an epithelial alarmin chiefly implicated in T2 airway inflammation, though it may also participate in broader (non-T2) inflammatory processes. The utility of airway epithelial gene expression of TSLP and its specific receptor subunit, cytokine receptor-like factor 2 (CRLF2), as biomarkers of downstream inflammation and clinical outcomes remains unclear. Methods We analyzed RNA sequencing data from bronchial airway brushing obtained in phase 1 of the SPIROMICS bronchoscopy sub-study (N = 161: 23 never-smokers, 67 ever-smokers with COPD, 71 ever-smokers without COPD). We related airway TSLP and CRLF2 expression to clinical, hematologic/sputum measures, and gene-expression signatures of T2/eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation, including to our published T2 signature and to eosinophil and neutrophil signatures derived from single-cell atlas data. Associations used Spearman correlations and linear models adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, COPD status, smoking status, and pack-years. Results CRLF2 expression correlated with gene-expression evidence of both T2/eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation: T2 signature (ρ = 0.26, p < 0.001), eosinophil signature (ρ = 0.44, p < 0.001), and neutrophil signature (ρ = 0.39, p < 0.001). CRLF2 was positively associated with log sputum neutrophil count (ρ = 0.24, p = 0.024) and blood neutrophil count (ρ = 0.036, p < 0.001), but not with sputum or blood eosinophil counts. Higher CRLF2 related to worse baseline lung function, particularly among current smokers, (lower post-bronchodilator FEV1: ρ = −0.21, p = 0.008), as well as greater 5-year FEV1 decline across current and former smokers (ρ = −0.22, p = 0.007). Significant findings persisted after covariate adjustment. In contrast, TSLP expression, although strongly correlated with expression of the epithelial alarmin IL33 (ρ = 0.53, p < 0.001), was negatively correlated with CRLF2 (ρ = −0.24, p = 0.002) and with eosinophil and neutrophil gene-expression signatures (ρ = −0.26 and −0.33, both p < 0.001). TSLP expression showed no association with sputum or blood cell counts. Conclusions In bronchial epithelium from SPIROMICS, gene expression of CRLF2, but not of TSLP, tracked with downstream alarmin-relevant inflammatory programs, consistent with a regulatory role in TSLP signaling through TSLPR, as well as with clinically meaningful outcomes. CRLF2 expression was associated with evidence of both T2/eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation, and with lower baseline FEV1 and accelerated FEV1 decline, suggesting engagement of a broader, clinically relevant inflammatory milieu. By contrast, epithelial TSLP transcript levels mirrored IL33 gene expression but were not associated with cellular or transcriptomic inflammation. These findings position CRLF2, rather than TSLP expression itself, as a potential airway biomarker of TSLP-axis activity and disease impact with potential implications for patient stratification as well as strategic approaches for TSLP-pathway-targeted therapies. This abstract is funded by: SPIROMICS was supported by contracts from the NIH/NHLBI (HHSN268200900013C, HHSN268200900014C, HHSN268200900015C, HHSN268200900016C, HHSN268200900017C, HHSN268200900018C, HHSN268200900019C, HHSN268200900020C, 75N92024D00012), grants from the NIH/NHLBI (U01HL137880, U24HL141762, R01HL182622, R01HL144718, and R01HL093081), and supplemented by contributions made through the Foundation for the NIH and the COPD Foundation from Amgen; AstraZeneca/MedImmune; Bayer; Bellerophon Therapeutics; Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb; Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.; Forest Research Institute, Inc.; Genentech; GlaxoSmithKline; Grifols Therapeutics, Inc.; Ikaria, Inc.; MGC Diagnostics; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Nycomed GmbH; Polarean; ProterixBio; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Sanofi; Sunovion; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; Theravance Biopharma; Verona; and Mylan/Viatris.

Abstract Introduction Inhaled corticosteroid/fast-acting beta2-agonist combinations are recommended over albuterol-alone as rescue in asthma due to superior exacerbation reduction. In adults with asthma, BATURA and MANDALA demonstrated as-needed albuterol-budesonide 180/160 μg reduced the risk of severe exacerbation by 46% in mild and 28% in moderate-to-severe asthma for patients aged ≥18 years versus albuterol 180 μg. However, albuterol is the long-held rescue therapy standard for treatment of bronchoconstriction. In the ALbuterol-budesonide Treatment in Acute Airway Obstruction (ALTA) (NCT05555290) study, repetitive albuterol-budesonide 180/160 ug versus albuterol 180 ug treatment resulted in equally rapid improvement in lung function over 60 minutes and provided enhanced bronchodilation at 480 minutes post-mannitol challenge: least squares mean/LSM(standard error/SE) [95%CI] difference in ΔFEV1=91.2 (27.4) [36.7-145.7] mL. This post-hoc analysis of ALTA evaluated whether baseline lung function affects treatment response. Methods ALTA was a Phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 2-period, crossover study evaluating efficacy of repetitive albuterol-budesonide 180/160 μg vs albuterol 180 μg in adults with mild asthma experiencing ≥15% fall in FEV1 with cumulative mannitol exposure ≤635 mg. Inclusion criteria included use of short-acting beta2-agonist as the only pre-enrollment therapy for ≥4 weeks and pre-challenge FEV1 ≥1.500 L and 60%-<90% of predicted. Participants received albuterol-budesonide or albuterol at end-mannitol challenge (time 0) and 20, 40, and 60 minutes thereafter. FEV1 was assessed starting pre-mannitol challenge (-30 minutes) and over 480 minutes post-challenge. For participants with baseline FEV1 60%-<80% and 80%-<90% predicted, LSM(SE) [95%CI] difference between treatment arms in ΔFEV1 from time 0 min at 480 minutes was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model. Results 88 randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study drug were included: mean(SD) age=44.5(13.7) years; 56.8% female; mean(SD) FEV1=2.462(0.540) L (76.7[7.7]% predicted). 56 participants had baseline FEV1 ≥60%-<80% predicted; 32 had baseline FEV1 80%-<90% predicted. Percent fall in FEV1 post-challenge was similar between lung function subgroups. Improvement in FEV1 post-mannitol (time 0 min) at 480 min was greater with albuterol-budesonide vs albuterol treatment for both FEV1 subgroups: LSM(SE) [95%CI] difference 71.0(29.8) [11.0-131.0] mL, p = 0.021 in the lower and 114.0(55.1) [1.0-227.0] mL, p = 0.048 in the higher baseline FEV1 participants (Figure). There was no significant difference in the treatment by subgroup interaction, suggesting consistent treatment efficacy between subgroups. Conclusions Albuterol-budesonide relieves acute obstruction better than albuterol over time in mild asthma whether or not baseline lung function falls within a normal range. This abstract is funded by: AstraZeneca

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate freedom from tumor progression and clinical outcomes in older adults with small- to medium-sized vestibular schwannoma (VS) managed by observation versus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to better inform optimal management in this patient population. METHODS In this international multicenter study, patients aged ≥ 60 years with Koos grade I or II VS managed by observation or SRS were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching was conducted using patient characteristics, tumor size, and hearing assessments. Outcome measures of freedom from tumor progression, serviceable hearing preservation (SHP), and neurological function (tinnitus, vestibulopathy, House-Brackmann grade, and trigeminal nerve function) were assessed for both groups. RESULTS The observation and SRS groups each comprised 51 matched patients (median age 68 years for both). Ipsilateral serviceable hearing was observed at presentation for 35 patients in each group. The median follow-up duration was 39 months in the observation group versus 27 months in the SRS group (p = 0.5). Tumor progression was significantly lower with SRS than with observation (2% vs 52.9%, p < 0.001). The rate of 5-year freedom from tumor progression was 100% in the SRS group versus 43% (95% CI 29%–64%) in the observation group. The rate of 10-year freedom from tumor progression was 90% (95% CI 73%–100%) in the SRS group versus 20% (95% CI 8.5%–49%) in the observation group. At the last follow-up, hearing loss occurred in 42.9% of the observation group and 51.4% of those who underwent SRS (p = 0.5). The 3-year SHP rate was 68% (95% CI 53%–88%) versus 65% (95% CI 49%–85%) (p = 0.8), and the 5-year SHP rate was 53% in both groups (95% CI 36%–78% in the observation group and 95% CI 35%–79% in the SRS group, p = 0.8). The composite endpoint of tumor progression and/or worsened neurological outcome, including hearing loss, tinnitus, vestibulopathy, facial nerve dysfunction (House-Brackmann grade), or trigeminal dysfunction, demonstrated a significantly lower rate in the SRS group (17.6%) compared with the observation group (66.7%) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS SRS in older patients for management of Koos grade I or II VS resulted in significantly superior rates of freedom from tumor progression, comparable hearing preservation rates, and significantly higher rates of favorable overall radiographic and neurological outcomes than observation alone. Compared with observation, SRS might be the preferred management option in this patient population.

Introduction The WHO/UNICEF Nurturing Care Framework (NCF) features five domains necessary for child development—physical/mental health, responsive caregiving, adequate nutrition, security and safety and opportunities for early learning. We explored caregiver perspectives on the NCF in two African settings. Methods Between November 2023 and July 2024, 14 focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with caregivers living with and without HIV; eight with mothers in Gaborone, Botswana, and six with mothers and fathers in Nairobi, Kenya. FGDs were stratified by country, sex, HIV status and partnership status. Semi-structured interviews with interactive activities elicited caregiver perspectives on the NCF to identify the most ‘important’, ‘easiest’ and ‘challenging’ domains to fulfil. Thematic analyses identified key themes and compared perspectives. Results Our qualitative study included 101 caregivers, 55 from Kenya (30 mothers, 25 fathers) and 46 mothers from Botswana. Overall, caregivers identified physical/mental health as the ‘most important’ domain to fulfil for children and caregivers, noting how closely tied they were (“ If you have pain, that pain affects your child” ). The ‘most challenging’ domain was adequate nutrition in Botswana and security and safety in Kenya. The ‘easiest’ domains were responsive caregiving in Botswana and opportunities for early learning in Kenya. Kenyan caregivers noted that spiritual nourishment was also critical for well-being but missing from the NCF. Caregivers emphasised the importance of receiving social support with childcare. Caregivers living with HIV expressed similar views compared with caregivers without HIV, but mentioned that social isolation, stigma and treatment disruption impact their ability to provide adequate nurturing care. Conclusions Caregivers face unique parenting challenges depending on cultural environment. HIV disrupts caregivers’ health, which has important implications for raising children within families affected by HIV. Interventions that support caregivers’ abilities to fulfil all NCF domains and address challenges are essential to ensure children reach their developmental potential.

ABSTRACT Background and Purpose White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are a core neuroimaging marker of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). Sleep apnoea (SA) is a recognized vascular risk factor, but its associations with regional WMH burden, short‐interval WMH change and cognitive performance in population‐based cohorts remain incompletely defined. We examined these associations in the UK Biobank imaging cohort. Methods We conducted cross‐sectional analyses with an exploratory longitudinal subset in propensity score–matched cohorts excluding major neurologic and cerebrovascular disease before imaging. SA was identified from hospital records and self‐reports prior to brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Head‐size–normalized WMH volumes were analysed on the log1p scale using multivariable linear regression with robust standard errors. Total WMH was the primary outcome; periventricular WMH (PWMH), deep WMH (DWMH) and cognitive measures were secondary outcomes. Mediation analyses evaluated WMH as a mediator of SA–cognition associations. Results In cross‐sectional analyses ( N = 12,890; mean age, 67.4 years; 27.2% women), SA was associated with greater WMH burden. Total WMH volume was 10.7% higher among participants with SA (95% CI, 5.0%–16.6%; p < 0.001). PWMH and DWMH volumes were 10.0% (95% CI, 4.7%–15.7%; q < 0.001) and 15.7% (95% CI, 7.1%–25.1%; q < 0.001) higher, respectively. SA was associated with modestly worse cognitive performance, with effect estimates attenuated after adjustment for WMH burden and cardiometabolic conditions. Mediation analyses indicated that WMH burden, particularly PWMH, mediated associations between SA and cognitive performance. In the longitudinal subset ( N = 698; median follow‐up, 2.26 years), no significant between‐group differences were observed in annualized WMH change. Conclusions In this large population‐based imaging cohort, SA was associated with higher WMH burden, a key neuroimaging marker of CSVD. Cognitive differences were modest, but WMH burden, particularly PWMH, consistently mediated associations between SA and cognitive performance. Longer term studies are needed to clarify temporal relationships and potential treatment effects.

Importance Current risk prediction guidelines for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy predict only sudden cardiac death and are imperfect, leading to avoidable deaths and unnecessary implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Objective To combine prospectively collected clinical history, imaging, genetic, and biomarker data to improve risk prediction of adverse events in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Design, Setting, and Participants A total of 2750 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were prospectively enrolled in the registry-based study from 44 sites in North America and Europe with expertise in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Participants were enrolled from April 1, 2014, to April 7, 2017. Exposures Patients underwent a health history questionnaire, blood sampling for biomarkers and genotyping, and contrast-enhanced CMR. Patients were followed up yearly by telephone and through records review regarding event documentation. Main Outcomes and Measures The predefined composite adjudicated primary end point was time to first event for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy–related deaths; nonfatal sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) requiring cardioversion or defibrillation; and left ventricular (LV) assist device implant or heart transplant. A secondary end point was a composite of sudden cardiac death and nonfatal VA events. The elastic-net method identified the most important predictors. Cox proportional hazards regression assessed associations with time to the first end point. Results Of the 2750 prospectively enrolled patients, 2698 (98%) had analyzable data after 9 were excluded because they had hypertrophic cardiomyopathy phenocopies and 43 withdrew. Of these remaining patients, 1919 (71%) were male, mean age was 50 years (SD, 11 years), and 423 (16%) were from underrepresented racial and minority groups. The mean follow-up was 6.9 years (SD, 2.1 years). The primary event model in 104 patients included LV scar as a percentage of LV mass by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.58-2.20; P &amp;lt; .001), LV mass index (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17; P = .03), LV end-systolic volume index (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.12-1.46; P &amp;lt; .001 ), all per 10-unit increase, history of heart failure at study entry (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.75-4.77; P &amp;lt; .001), and log N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.17-1.70; P &amp;lt; .001) level per log unit, (C index for all, 0.77). An LGE percentage of the LV mass of 9% or higher substantially increased the primary composite event rate ( P = .001). The secondary sudden cardiac death and VA risk factor model (in 69 patients) included LGE%, LV mass index, LV ejection fraction, and log(NT-proBNP) (C index, 0.76). Conclusions and Relevance These results provide prospective evidence for incorporating cardiac magnetic resonance and NT-proBNP in the evaluation of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01915615

Abstract Background The Global Bipolar Cohort (GBC) was established to identify existing bipolar disorder (BD) cohorts worldwide and foster collaborations focused on descriptive and analytic outcomes relevant to BD. A distributed analytic framework has been implemented to engage multiple sites without the need for central data pooling. This report describes the GBC endeavor and global functional impairment patterns. Cross-cohort comparisons of functional correlates are limited by heterogeneous measures and data-sharing constraints. Large, culturally diverse comparisons are needed to distinguish broadly reproducible correlates from cohort-specific effects. Participating sites completed a 28-item descriptive survey covering diagnostic methods, cognition, genetics, treatment, functioning, and follow-up strategies. We implemented a harmonized local logistic regression model of dichotomized functional outcome and shared summary statistics only. Results We identified 69 cohorts across five continents. Thirty-seven cohorts contributed functional outcome analyses from 17,130 participants. Outcome measures included clinician-rated disability scales and social indicators such as employment and marital status. The proportion classified with poor functioning ranged from 16% to 77% (mean 50%). In 32 of 37 cohorts, the overall regression model significantly explained variance in functioning. Current depressive symptoms were the most robust and reproducible correlate of poor functional outcome: they were assessed in 29 cohorts, significant in 22 (75.8%), ranked among the top three correlates in 22, and were the top-ranked correlates in 19. Associations between depressive burden and poor functioning were observed across clinician-rated disability scales and work or social indicators, and across geographically diverse cohorts. Comorbid substance use disorder and medication-related variables were associated with poorer functioning in subsets of cohorts, whereas sex, ancestry, bipolar subtype, psychosis history, and premorbid IQ showed weak or inconsistent associations. Cognitive measures, available in a minority of regression models, showed modest and non-uniform effects. Conclusions Across heterogeneous international cohorts, current depressive symptom burden emerged as the most consistent correlate of poor functioning in bipolar disorder. These findings replicate earlier multisite work at a larger scale, show that protocol-based distributed analyses can identify reproducible clinical signals without sharing individual-level data, and support prioritizing detection and treatment of depressive symptoms when aiming to improve real-world functioning. Future work should expand longitudinal harmonization and representation of under-studied populations.

Abstract Introduction Narcolepsy type 2 (NT2) is characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness, heterogeneous symptom severity, and typically normal endogenous orexin levels. The Vibrance-2 phase 2 study evaluated alixorexton, a selective orexin 2 receptor agonist, in patients with NT2. Methods Vibrance-2 was a placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase 2 study. After a 2-week washout from current narcolepsy medications, adults with NT2 meeting ICSD-3-TR diagnostic criteria were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive placebo or alixorexton once daily at doses of 10, 14, or 18mg for 8 weeks, followed by an optional 5-week open-label extension. Dual primary endpoints were the change from baseline to week 8 in mean sleep latency (MSL) on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) and on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Safety evaluation included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). P-values were adjusted for multiplicity. Results Ninety-three patients were randomized to placebo (n=24) or alixorexton (10mg, n=23; 14mg, n=22; 18mg, n=24); 90 completed double-blind treatment. At baseline, patients had severe symptoms (MWT: 5.6 minutes; ESS: 17.4). The study met its dual primary endpoints. At week 8, MSL on MWT increased 9.3, 6.7, and 6.7 minutes at 10, 14, and 18mg, respectively, from baseline versus placebo, with statistically significant differences observed for the 14 and 18mg doses (adjusted p&lt; 0.05). ESS improved by -2.1, -3.2, and -3.6 points from baseline versus placebo at week 8 for the 10, 14, and 18mg groups, respectively, with statistical significance observed for the 18mg dose (adjusted p&lt; 0.05), where more than 70% of patients achieved normalization. TEAEs in 10% of all alixorexton-treated patients through week 8 were pollakiuria, insomnia, micturition urgency, dizziness, and headache. Most TEAEs were mild-to-moderate with no serious TEAEs. Conclusion Vibrance-2 was the first large clinical trial in patients with NT2 to demonstrate positive results with an orexin 2 receptor agonist. Alixorexton resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in wakefulness and daytime sleepiness at Week 8 and was generally well tolerated. These results support phase 3 clinical development of alixorexton as a treatment for NT2. Support (if any) Alkermes, Inc.