Citations

Abstract Introduction: Epcoritamab (epcor) was the first CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody approved for treatment of R/R DLBCL in May 2023 based on its efficacy and safety in EPCORE NHL-1. Patients (pts) enrolled in clinical trials are highly selected, and those with high-risk features, such as primary refractory disease, early post-CAR T relapse, poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), and CD20+ status are often underrepresented or excluded. As epcor use expands in more heterogeneous, real-world populations, there is increasing interest in understanding pt characteristics and response outcomes associated with its use outside of clinical trials. In particular, pts with DLBCL that is resistant to, or relapse soon after, CAR T are left with limited treatment options and often present with rapidly progressive, resistant disease, making them especially challenging to manage. Generating real-world evidence is critical for informing optimal use of epcor in routine practice. Methods: Real-EPCOR is a multicenter US retrospective chart review study at >8 academic and community oncology centers designed to evaluate the real-world use of epcor. Eligible pts are adults (≥18 years) with R/R DLBCL and ≥2 prior lines of therapy (LOT) who initiated epcor outside of a clinical trial after 5/19/23. Pt demographic, clinical, and treatment data were collected, including ECOG PS, refractory status, prior CAR T, and CD20+ status. Overall response rate (ORR) was evaluated during epcor treatment and defined as the proportion of pts achieving complete response (CR) or partial response among pts with ≥1 evaluable response assessment or who died due to disease progression before response assessment. ORR and CR rate were calculated for the entire cohort, for pts receiving ≥2 cycles of epcor (full cycle is 28 days), and for pts who received prior CAR T. Results: This interim analysis included 34 pts from 2 centers. Data collection and analysis is ongoing and updated results with additional pts and longer follow-up may be included at time of presentation. Median age was 67 years; 68% pts were male and 85% were White. Median time from DLBCL diagnosis to initiation of epcor was 15.5 months. The most common comorbidities were cardiovascular disease (59%) and diabetes mellitus (29%). ECOG PS was ≥2 in 29% of pts, and 85% of pts had Ann Arbor stage 3-4 disease. Nearly all (97%) had CD20+ DLBCL. High-risk features were common at time of epcor initiation, including 53% with International Prognostic Index (IPI) ≥3, 26% with double-hit, and 24% with non-GCB subtype. Among pts who received ≥2 cycles of epcor (n=15), 20% had ECOG PS ≥2 and 33% had IPI ≥3; in post-CAR T pts, 22% had ECOG PS ≥2 and 57% had IPI ≥3. Median number of prior LOT was 3 (range: 2–9); 44% of pts initiated epcor as 3L therapy. Prior to epcor, 41% had primary refractory disease. Following their most recent therapy, 72% had refractory disease, and 43% had DLBCL that was refractory to all prior LOT in those with known refractory status. Most pts (68%) received prior CAR T, with a median interval of 4.6 months from infusion to epcor initiation, and 23% initiated epcor ≤2 months from CAR T. 15 pts (44%) received CAR T in the LOT immediately prior to epcor, 9 (60%) of whom were refractory to CAR T. The ORR was 50% and CR rate was 29% in the overall evaluable population (n=24). 10 pts were not evaluable, as they did not undergo a response assessment either because they remained alive without assessment or experienced a non-progression-related event. Among pts who received ≥2 cycles of epcor, ORR was 85% and CR rate was 54% in the evaluable population (n=13). Among 23 post-CAR T pts, ORR was 53% and CR rate was 33% in the evaluable population (n=15). Conclusion: In this real-world interim analysis, pts with R/R DLBCL treated with epcor had a high proportion of CD20+ disease, higher-risk clinical features, greater comorbidity burden, and more complex treatment histories, including a substantial proportion with prior CAR T, compared to pts in EPCORE NHL-1. Therefore, the ORR remains highly meaningful in the overall cohort despite being lower than the trial. Encouraging ORRs among those who received ≥2 cycles of epcor or had prior CAR T suggest that epcor monotherapy may provide clinical benefit even in difficult-to-treat pts in the real-world setting. Ongoing real-world survival analyses will inform the optimal use of epcor within the evolving treatment landscape of R/R DLBCL.

Abstract Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), accounting for approximately 30% of all NHL cases. DLBCL diagnosis relies on histologic examination, immunophenotyping, molecular and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis to differentiate it from similar NHL subtypes with overlapping morphological features, including more high-grade lymphomas like double-hit lymphoma. Because FISH is performed in a panel of single- or dual-target test format and analyzed through microscopy and manual image analysis, assessment of multiple target biomarkers can be cumbersome and expensive. As additional biomarkers for diagnosis, subtyping, prognosis, and therapeutic decision-making become available, target panels will become larger, posing additional challenges to clinical laboratories. Patients and Methods In this study, Hi-C sequencing of FFPE samples was performed to identify all genomic rearrangements by a single sequencing analysis for an unselected DLBCL case series of 159 patients, and the results were compared to FISH for the detection of clinically important variants. Results Hi-C sequencing showed superior performance compared to FISH: standard FISH for DLBCL includes testing for MYC, BCL2, and BCL6. Between FISH and Hi-C, these biomarkers were detected 105 times, of which, FISH detected 80/105 (76%) and Hi-C detected 102/105 (97%). The cohort included 4 double-hit lymphomas by FISH but Hi-C sequencing detected five. Besides DLBCL diagnostic biomarkers (MYC, BCL2, BCL6), many additional biomarkers were detected by Hi-C sequencing including variants not tested by FISH because the clinical suspicion was ambiguous and the relevant FISH probes were not used, and those not tested because the biomarkers were not thought to be common and, hence, left out of the FISH panel. In total, Hi-C sequencing detected additional biomarkers in 42 (26%) cases, including (1) variants targeted by FISH (i.e. MYC, BCL2, BCL6) but negative, (2) classification biomarkers for other lymphomas (CCND1, MALT, IRF4), and (3) those not tested because the biomarkers are not common and not included in the FISH panel. These additional biomarkers were supportive of suspected diagnosis of DLBCL versus double-hit lymphoma (24 cases), prompted reconsideration of a different diagnosis that may have led to different treatments (6 cases, e.g. mantle cell lymphoma), or biomarkers such as PDL1, ALK, and ATM which have implications for targeted therapies and/or inclusion in clinical trials (5 cases). Conclusion The Hi-C FFPE sequencing technology has the potential to improve the workflow of pathology labs for detection of a wide range of structural variants informing precision diagnosis and treatment for lymphomas.

Abstract Introduction CAR T cell treatment is the standard of care for patients (pts) with primary refractory and relapsed large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) within the first 12 months of chemoimmunotherapy, or for those unfit for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) regardless of timing of relapse. Consequently, the role of ASCT is limited to pts with late relapse (>12 months) who achieve a complete or partial response (CR or PR) to salvage therapy and are deemed eligible for ASCT based on comorbidities and performance status. In this report, we evaluated post-ASCT outcomes in this population of pts. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using publicly available data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). Adult pts (age ≥18 years) with DLBCL, NOS, and high-grade large B-cell lymphomas (HGBL) who relapsed after having responded to initial treatment and who remained on response for at least 12 months since diagnosis were selected. We considered for this analysis only pts who achieved a CR or PR after salvage treatment at the time of relapse, documented on pre-ASCT CT or PET scan (per the 2014 Lugano definition). CIBMTR databases used for this study included pts who received ASCT from 2013 to 2021. We compared baseline characteristics between ASCT in CR vs PR using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and the Pearson's χ2 test for categorical variables after ignoring missing data. Primary endpoints included Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse rate were among the secondary endpoints. Results 182 were included in the analysis: 100 were in CR and 82 in PR before ASCT. The median age at ASCT was 60 years (range, 26-79). Race distribution was similar across CR and PR pts. Advanced-stage disease at diagnosis (stage III–IV) was seen in 61% of CR pts and 55% of PR pts. High-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements was similar in the CR and PR groups (7% vs 4%). The median number of lines of treatment before ASCT were identical in CR and PR pts (N=2). BEAM was the most frequently used transplant conditioning regimen in both groups (80%). Median follow-up after ASCT was 34 months (range, 1–95): it was 37 months (range 1-95) in the CR group and 26 months (range 1-79) in the PR group For the entire cohort, OS at 3 years was 67.6% and PFS was 50.6%. NRM was 1.7% at 100 days and 3.4% at 1 year. Cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years was 43.9%. The NRM analysis showed no statistically significant difference between pts in CR and PR. The 3-year OS for CR pts was 73.9%% compared to 59.4% for PR pts (95% CI, 0.334-0.99; p=.044). The 3-year PFS for CR pts was 59.8%, compared to 38.6% for PR pts (95% CI, 0.321-0.784; p=.001). The median PFS for CR pts was 52.01 months, compared to 14.05 months for PR pts. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years in CR and PR pts was 35.2% vs 55.7%, respectively (95% CI, 0.311-0.811; p=.003.). Higher age (HR 1.03; p=.026) and number of previous lines of treatment (HR 1.43; p=.002) were associated with inferior OS. For PFS, no variables showed any significant impact in univariable analysis. The stepwise multivariable analysis showed that only the number of previous treatments had a significant impact on the OS (p=.009), while undergoing ASCT on a PR was the only factor significantly associated with shorter PFS (HR 1.41; 95% CI, 1.09-1.82; p=.029). Conclusion This dataset supports that ASCT provides high efficacy in pts experiencing late relapses (after 12 months) achieving CR following pre-transplant savage and validates the value of achieving CR. Outcomes for PR are inferior, and this analysis provides a benchmark for future investigations. At this time, until convincing on other non-transplant treatment show superior outcomes in this setting, ASCT remains a standard of care for fit pts with chemo-sensitive late relapsed DLBCL. In this group of patients, who have a better prognosis compared to patients who relapse within a year the major hurdle is achieving a remission pre-ASCT.

Abstract Introduction: Axi-cel, an autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy has shown high and durable response rates and a manageable safety profile among R/R FL pts in the ZUMA-5 trial (Jacobson et al. 2022; Neelapu et al. 2024). Evidence from real-world data showed favorable early outcomes in a broader population using CIBMTR data, with comparable outcomes by ZUMA-5 eligibility, age, lines of therapy (LOT), and prior bendamustine (benda) use (Jacobson et al. 2023). This study investigated long-term outcomes and the association between age, performance status, comorbidities, and therapies given prior to infusion among R/R FL pts treated with axi-cel. Methods: Pts with R/R FL who received commercial axi-cel between 03/2021–10/2023 in the US were identified from the CIBMTR® registry; pts without consent, with prior non-transplant cellular therapy, and FL grade 3B or 3A/3B unspecified or unknown were excluded. Descriptive analyses were done among all pts and by age at infusion (<65 vs ≥65 y), Karnofsky performance score (KPS), presence of hepatic, cardiovascular (CV), or moderate to severe pulmonary comorbidities, prior treatments (benda pre-leukapheresis, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant [autoHSCT]), and lymphodepletion (LD) therapy. Multivariable (MV) Cox and logistic regression were used to adjust for confounders. Results: In total, 238 pts from 68 centers were included (data cut-off October 2024). Median age at infusion was 61 yr (range, 29-83; ≥65 yr, 38%), and 79% were non-Hispanic White. KPS of pts was ≤70% (11%), 80% (35%), or 90-100% (54%); 2% had ECOG ≥2. Most (75%) had ≥1 clinically significant comorbidity (hepatic, 6%; CV, 15%; pulmonary, 18%). Median (min, max) prior LOT was 4 (1,13); 74% received benda pre-leukapheresis, and 6% had benda LD therapy. At a median follow-up of 24.1 months, objective response rate (ORR) was 96% (complete response [CR] rate, 91%). The 2-yr (95% CI) DOR, PFS, and OS were 70% (63-77), 64% (57-71), and 84% (78-89) respectively. Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in 4% and 18% of pts (any grade, 74% and 42%), respectively. Prolonged cytopenias by day 30 occurred in 14% of pts (neutropenia [10%] and thrombocytopenia [8%]) while 29% had clinically significant infections at 6 months. Second primary malignancies occurred in 16 pts (7%), with 7 (2%) being therapy-related myeloid neoplasm. The leading primary causes of death (n=34) were relapse/progression (10; 29%), organ failure (7; 21%), and infection 5 (15%). Cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality at 2-yr was 9%. Outcomes were generally comparable among age, autoHSCT, and comorbidity subgroups. However, effectiveness outcomes differed by prior benda use (Yes vs No): ORR (95% vs 98%); CR (88% vs 98%); DOR (65% vs 89%), PFS (58% vs 84%), and OS (82% vs 91%) at 2 years. By LD therapy (single agent benda vs cyclophosphamide + fludarabine [Cy + Flu]): the ORR was 93% vs 96%; CR rate was 57% vs 93%. On MV analysis, prior benda use was associated with (OR/HR [95% CI]): worse CR (0.02 [<0.01-0.43]), DOR (3.69 [1.51-9.02], and PFS (2.21 [1.12-4.38]). Pts given benda LD therapy had (OR/HR [95% CI]): worse CR rate (0.02 [<0.01-0.16]), DOR (7.59 [2.33-24.72]), and PFS (4.89 [1.79-13.39]) compared to those who received Cy + Flu. CRS and ICANS were lower among those with prior benda use (Yes vs No): any-grade CRS (70% vs 87%); Grade ≥3 CRS (3% vs 8%); any-grade ICANS (36% vs 61%); and grade ≥3 ICANS (17% vs 25%). By LD therapy (single agent benda vs Cy + Flu): the Grade ≥3 CRS and ≥3 ICANS were 0% vs 5% and 7% vs 19% respectively. Any-grade ICANS was higher among those aged ≥ 65 yr vs <65 yr (53% vs 35%). On MV analysis, pts who had prior benda use were less likely to have any-grade CRS (0.30 [0.12-0.75]), and any-grade ICANS (0.23 [0.11-0.50]. Pts ≥ 65 yr had higher any-grade ICANS (2.31 [1.18 – 4.50]). Summary/Conclusion: This long-term follow up of axi-cel in R/R FL shows durable responses and manageable safety similar to ZUMA-5. Outcomes among the elderly and those with comorbidities were generally comparable to the overall R/R FL population. Although benda use pre-leukapheresis was associated with less durable responses, we were unable to determine whether this association is limited to use close to axi-cel infusion, as data on timing of use was unavailable. The associations for benda LD should be interpreted with caution given the small sample size.

Abstract Introduction: CD20xCD3 bispecific antibodies (BsAb) have been approved for use in relapsed/refractory (RR) large B-Cell lymphomas (LBCLs) with manageable toxicities. The main adverse events of clinical interest are cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). The risk factors for CRS and ICANS are not well understood. Knowledge of variables that contribute to increased risk may help clinicians identify and tailor management for high-risk patients (pts) and increase the comfort level for providers using these therapies in community practices. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study at 21 US centers evaluating pts with RR LBCLs receiving commercially available epcoritamab (epco) or glofitamab (glofit) between 2023 and 2025. We obtained baseline characteristics, safety and efficacy outcomes. Univariate analysis was performed to identify associations between CRS, ICANS, and clinical variables of interest. Results: As of May 31, 2025, a total of 312 pts with RR LBCLs were treated with BsAb, Epco n=193 (62%), Glofit n= 119 (38%); median age 68; 63% male; 70% ECOG PS 0-1. Most common histologic type was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL, NOS) (n=239, 84%) followed by high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) (n=46, 16%). 179 pts (57%) were previously treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, with 47% receiving CAR-T <6 months (mo) prior to BsAb. Among pts with prior CAR-T, CRS with CAR-T therapy of any grade occurred in 63%, with 26% ≥ grade 2. ICANS of any grade (G) occurred in 25% of pts (9.4% ≥ G3). Overall and complete response (ORR and CR) rates to BsAb were 51% and 29%, respectively. With a median follow up of 5 mo, median progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS) were 2.3 and 7.3 mo, respectively. With BsAb treatment, CRS of any grade occurred in 117 (39%) patients: 24% G1, 8.7% G2, 4% G3, 1% G4 and 1% G5. The max grade CRS occurred most frequently after the third dose of epco (35%) and the first dose of glofit (23%). CRS was managed with additional steroids in 24% of pts and tocilizumab in 22%. 13% of pts experienced ICANS: 5.8% G1, 3.4% G2, 2% G3, 1% G4 and 0.3% G5. Factors that increased the risk for any grade CRS included: bulky disease ≥ 7.5 cm at time of BsAb treatment (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.17 – 3.55, p = 0.012), elevated LDH (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.45– 4.76, p = 0.002) and treatment with epco compared to glofit (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.04- 2.77, p = 0.036). As G ≥2 CRS generally requires inpatient monitoring and management, we next compared the risk factors between pts with no CRS or G1 CRS and G ≥2 CRS. Factors associated with increased risk for high grade CRS included: bone marrow involvement by lymphoma (OR 3.47, 95% CI 0.97 – 11.3, p = 0.043), platelet count ≤ 75 (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.21 – 4.87, p = 0.011), ≥ 2 extra nodal sites (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.07 – 3.97, p = 0.032) and ≥G2 CRS with prior CAR-T (OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.13 – 9.97, p = 0.027). Factors that increased the risk for ICANS included: bulky disease (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.28 – 5.49, p = 0.008), elevated Cr ≥ 1.5x ULN (OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.25 – 10.4, p = 0.012), elevated AST/ALT ≥ 3x ULN (OR 4.65, 95% CI 0.92 – 19.9, p = 0.042), low albumin (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.49 - 5.5, p = 0.002), and co-occurrence of CRS with BsAb (OR 9.1, 95% CI 3.85- 25, p < 0.001). No other clinical variables including older age, histologic subtype, ECOG PS, B symptoms, IPI score, cell of origin or histologic subtype, baseline labs such as ALC, CRP, fibrinogen or D-dimer were significantly associated with CRS or ICANS risk. There was no difference in ORR or CR rates in patients who experienced CRS or ICANS. Conclusions: Our analysis of pts treated with commercial BsAb for LBCL shows an increased risk for CRS and ICANs based on clinical variables that are routinely obtained at baseline including tumor bulk, sites of disease, laboratory parameters, and history of prior CRS with CAR-T therapy. Differences in baseline populations receiving epco and glofit treatments in this real-world analysis have been previously reported (Brooks et al, Blood 2025) and the comparative risk for CRS between these treatments remains unclear. Future plans including multivariable analysis may allow for development of a predictive model to identify pts at high risk of CRS and ICANS with BsAb treatment, potentially leading to prospective clinical trials evaluating prophylactic interventions for high-risk pts.

Abstract Introduction: Epcoritamab (epco) and glofitamab (glofit) are bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with multiply relapsed or refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Though response rates are relatively high, most patients (pts) eventually experience progression of disease (POD). We sought to investigate the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes following POD post-BsAb for r/r LBCL Pts, as this has not previously been described. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study including 21 US centers evaluating pts with r/r LBCL receiving commercially available epco or glofit between 2023 and 2025. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were extracted from medical records. Efficacy and survival outcomes were assessed by site investigators and included overall response rate (ORR), complete and partial response (CR, PR) rates, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method. Results: As of May 15, 2025, a total of 312 pts with r/r LBCLs were treated with BsAb, of whom a total of 168 (53.8%) pts experienced POD [104 of 193 (53.8%) treated with prior epco and 64 of 119 (53.8%) treated with prior glofit]. Pts with POD had a median age at BsAb start of 67 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58-76), most were male (68.4%), and the most common histology was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (n=122 [71.8%]). Sixty-seven of 168 pts (39.9%) with POD after BsAb had experienced primary refractory disease defined as failure to achieve PR or CR to frontline therapy. A total of 102 (60.7%) pts with POD to BsAb had received chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy prior to BsAbs, with 33.3% of these pts being refractory to CAR T and 30.4% progressing within 6 months of CAR T-cell infusion. The median time to progression following BsAb start was 48 days. Following POD, 70 pts received no further anti-lymphoma therapy. Among 98 pts receiving subsequent therapy, 85 initially received systemic therapy and 13 initially received local therapy with radiation (concurrently with systemic therapy in 8 pts). The most commonly-used next line of systemic therapies included: loncastuximab tesirine in 19 pts (ORR 16.7%, all PR); commercial CAR T in 11 pts (ORR 50% [CR 36.4%, PR 18.2%); tafasitamab with lenalidomide in 7 (no responses); and other chemotherapy in 46 pts (ORR 27.6% [CR 24.1%]). The median follow-up time from POD was 9.2 months among survivors (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.8-13.3). Among those who initiated subsequent-line therapy following BsAbs, the median progression-free survival (PFS2) was 1.9 months (95% CI 1.5-2.4) and median overall survival (OS) from initiation of subsequent-line therapy was 3.9 months (95% CI 2.4-5.5). The estimated 1-year OS following initiation of next therapy was 12%. Conclusions: We report the outcomes of largest cohort of pts with POD post-BsAbs in r/r LBCL. Progression events occurred early after initiation of single agent BsAbs, and almost half of pts who progressed did not receive subsequent therapy. For those who received standard subsequent-line therapy after POD, response rates and survival outcomes were poor. Pts with POD after BsAB should be strongly considered for clinical trials of novel therapeutics or combination therapies.

Abstract Background: Social determinants of health (SDOH) are critical drivers of cancer care access and outcomes. In multiple myeloma (MM), access to cellular therapies including autologous stem cell transplantation and CAR-T therapy often depends on formal or informal caregiver support. Traditional SDOH measures (e.g., race, income, or education) are often used as proxies for access to care; however, these measures may overlook individual realities pertaining to cellular therapies where a caregiver is generally required. In response to feedback from a HealthTree Patient Advisory Board questioning the practice of inferring caregiver support, this study evaluated a simple survey question by a large cross-sectional survey. Methods: After development of a dedicated single-question (“What best describes your current caregiving support?”) through iterative feedback from the Patient Advisory Board and MM experts, four key answers were settled on: (1) cohabitation with dedicated caregiver(s) to support care (“family support”); (2) presence of non-cohabiting caregiver(s) to provide dedicated support (“external support”); (3) lack of dedicated caregiver, hence support is arranged when needed (“arrangeable support ”); or (4) lack of dedicated caregiver, hence finding any support is a struggle (“inadequate support”). We deployed this new demographic question from February through July 2025 through HealthTree. Responses were analyzed across SDOH variables using Fisher exact or chi square tests, and random forest classifiers were employed for predictive modeling. Results: Of 1231 respondents, 71% had dedicated caregivers (68%, n=839, with family support, and 3%, n=41, with external support). In contrast, 23% (n=287) of patients routinely arranged support while 5% (n=64) had inadequate support (struggle to find support). The inadequate-support group had significant demographic differences from the sample as a whole: a higher proportion were women (78% vs 56%, p = 0.04), Black (9% vs 4%, p < 0.01), lived >50 miles from their treatment center (17% vs 6%, p < 0.01), and had an annual income <$50,000 (17% vs 6%, p = 0.02). This group had a numerically higher proportion of patients whose employment status was disabled (12% vs 5%, p=0.08) as well. No proportion difference in age (67 ± 9 yr), military status, or severity of diagnosis - precursor disease (17%) v. multiple myeloma (81%). Rates of inadequate support were overall low in patients who lived with only their spouse (1%) or lived with their spouse & children (3%). In contrast, rates of inadequate support were higher (than 5%) in patients who lived alone (21%), divorced (20%), lived with adult children (14%), lived with friends (13%), separated (11%), or widowed (9%) (p < 0.001). However, the arrangeable-support group comprised 12% of patients who lived only with their spouse, 19% of patients who lived with their spouse and children, and 61% of patients who lived with their adult children (p < 0.001). Finally, a random forest classifier failed to identify any individual in the inadequate-support category, suggesting that unmeasured or more complex patterns may underlie this classification. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest analysis of caregiver support and its relationship with other SDOH in patients with MM to date. Despite the importance of caregiving to transplantation and CAR-T therapy, we found that 5% of patients with MM struggle to find caregiver support; this figure likely underestimates the true prevalence, given potential selection bias among patients who are digitally engaged through the HealthTree platform. Even among patients who lived with their spouses, an additional 10-20% of patients routinely had to arrange caregiving support on a visit-by-visit basis; for patients who lived with their adult children, this proportion was over 60%. The requirement to arrange caregiving support can create time toxicity and financial toxicity for patients, although these factors were not directly queried in our study. Finally, caregiver availability cannot be routinely inferred from traditional SDOH variables. Our data highlight the importance of including caregiver status as a standard demographic question in clinical and research settings. Further interventions are needed to improve caregiver support for vulnerable patients with MM as well as to reduce the duration of caregiver requirements for procedures such as CAR-T therapy.

Abstract Recent updates to the monocyte count thresholds for diagnosing chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) have recognized oligomonocytic CMML (OM-CMML) as an early stage within the CMML spectrum. However, the clinical validity of these revised criteria remains uncertain without considering biological factors and might misclassify myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with mild monocytosis as CMML. To characterize the genomic landscape of OM-CMML, we evaluated OM-CMML (n=249), MDS (n=304) and myelodysplastic CMML (MD-CMML, n=358) patients (pts) treated at three academic institutions. Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed on bone marrow (BM) at initial diagnosis or first referral. OM-CMML was characterized by lower frequencies of biallelic TET2 (biTET2) and RAS pathway (RASp) gene mutations (BRAF, CBL, KRAS, NF1, NRAS and PTPN11) compared to MD-CMML (p<0.001) but higher frequencies than MDS (p<0.001). BM monocyte frequencies, assessed morphologically, were higher in OM-CMML than in MDS (p<0.001) but lower than in MD-CMML (p<0.001), indicating that OM-CMML is a heterogenous group including true CMML and distinct MDS subsets. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on genomic alterations across all cases (n=911) identified three distinct clusters: 1) TP53 alterations (predominantly multihit TP53) and complex karyotype (TP53-complex); 2) biTET2 or TET2-SRSF2 co-mutation (biTET2/SRSF2); 3) a heterogenous group lacking these features (not otherwise specifiable [NOS]). Among OM-CMML pts, 11%, 34% and 55% belonged to these clusters, respectively. Model-based unsupervised clustering further identified 9 unique clusters that could be consolidated into 6 groups: 1) TP53-complex; 2) biTET2/SRSF2; 3) SF3B1 (without biTET2 or SRSF2); 4) SRSF2 without TET2 and frequent IDH2 mutations (SRSF2-IDH2); 5) ASXL1 and U2AF1 mutations and copy number alterations (CNA-ASXL1/U2AF1); 6) no somatic mutations (No mutation). biTET2/SRSF2 group exhibited monocytic bias with higher AMC, PB and BM monocyte % even among OM-CMML cases. This bias was not attributed to higher RAS pathway mutation frequencies, as biTET2/SRSF2 cases had similar RASp mutation frequencies but lower median variant allele frequencies for RASp mutations compared to NOS cases (9% vs. 21%, p=0.029). PB monocyte partitioning using flow cytometry (FC) in a subset of OM-CMML pts (n=50) demonstrated higher frequency of classical monocytosis (>94% CD14+/CD16- monocytes) in biTET2/SRSF2 vs other OM-CMML. To further determine if biTET2/SRSF2 genotype defines a distinct biological subgroup, we performed RNA-sequencing of BM CD34+ cells from healthy donors (n=15) and pts with OM-CMML (n=12), MD-CMML (n=14) and MDS (n=55). Unsupervised clustering based on gene expression profiles revealed that biTET2/SRSF2 clustered irrespective of their diagnostic group with greater dispersion being observed based on diagnosis. MDS and CMML with biTET2/SRSF2 had less differentially expressed genes compared to MDS and CMML with biTET2/SRSF2 relative to other MDS and CMML genotypes. Among 138 OM-CMML pts in whom progression to overt CMML was evaluable, 37 (27%) progressed to overt CMML of which 26 (70%) belonged to the biTET2/SRSF2 group. Competing risk analysis confirmed higher cumulative incidence and shorter time to CMML progression among biTET2/SRSF2 OM-CMML. Using ElasticNet regression we identified BM monocytosis and 14 genomic variables (including biTET2 and TET2-SRSF2) as predictors of overt CMML progression among OM-CMML. We developed a score-based model able to predict progression with high reliability (AUC 0.805, sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.76). Model accuracy was confirmed by optimism-corrected bootstrap internal validation (AUC 0.668). Monocytic bias, BM classical monocytosis (>94% CD16- monocytes) and higher overt CMML progression in biTET2/SRSF2 was confirmed in a validation cohort (28, 66 and 22 pts with OM-CMML, MDS and MD-CMML, respectively). BM monocytosis of biTET2/SRSF2 was confirmed in this cohort with morphologic and FC monocyte frequency quantification having high concordance (r=0.737, p<0.001). Genomic subgroup analysis discriminated survival outcomes more reliably than diagnostic categories alone. Our findings suggest that the presence of biTET2 or TET2-SRSF2 co-mutations, combined with BM monocytosis, can more reliably identify true CMML cases within the OM-CMML spectrum. Integrating genomic determinants into the CMML diagnostic framework enhances diagnostic accuracy.

Abstract Introduction: Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy is feasible with an acceptable safety profile in older patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (RR) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) (Tun et al, AJH 2024). However, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is a frequent and challenging toxicity in older pts, and its characteristics and associated risk factors are not well defined. Methods: Seven centers participated in this retrospective study. Pts aged ≥65 years (yrs) with RR LBCL treated with a commercial CART product were included. Baseline characteristics, treatment, CART toxicity, and outcomes were collected. ICANS was graded by the ASTCT criteria in most pts. Cumulative incidences of ICANS were estimated using deaths/progressions as competing risks, and associations between incidences and variables were assessed by Gray's test. A 30-day landmark was set after infusion to reduce immortal time bias. Progression-free survival (PFS; time from the landmark to disease progression or death) and overall survival (OS; time from the landmark to death) were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analyses were done in JMP v18. Results: A total of 224 pts were included. Median age at infusion was 71 yrs (range 65–89; ≥80 yrs, 12%. 142 (63%) were male and 27 (13%) had an ECOG PS scale of ≥2. The median HCT CI was 1 (range 0–6). LDH was elevated in 110 (51%) pts, 23 (19%) had bulky disease ≥7 cm, 176 (82%) had advanced-stage, and 145 (71%) had extranodal disease. Median number of prior treatments was 2 (range 1–8), and 44 (20%) had prior bendamustine. Prior stem cell therapy was done in 47 (21%) pts (autologous stem cell transplant [SCT], n = 45; allogeneic SCT, n=2). Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) was most frequently used (58%; n=131) followed by lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) (16%, n=36) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) (25%, n=57). Median duration of ICANS was 6 days (interquartile range [IQR] 3–11; range 1–303). Median time to ICANS onset was 6 days (IQR 3.8–8.0; range 0–24). The 30-day cumulative incidence of all grade ICANS was 50.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 44.7–57.9) and grade ≥3 ICANS was 29.8% (95% CI 24.0–37.0). There was no significant difference in incidence of all grade (P=0.39) and grade ≥3 (P=0.49) ICANS as well as duration of ICANS (≥14 vs <14 days; P=0.08) according to the age groups (≥65–69 vs ≥70–74 vs ≥75–79 vs ≥80–89). In contrast, pts with an ECOG PS scale of ≥2 were associated with a higher incidence of all grade (30-day estimate, 66.7% vs 47.0%; P=0.02) and grade ≥3 ICANS (30-day estimate, 53.8% vs 25.6%; P=0.002). In addition, pts with an elevated LDH level had a higher incidence of grade ≥3 ICANS than those without (30-day estimate, 37.5% vs 18.8%;P=0.004). The incidence of ICANS varied among various CART products, with 30-day estimates of 64.9% vs 33.3% vs 29.8% (P<0.0001) for all grades and 40.1% vs 13.2% vs 18.0% (P=0.004) for grade ≥3 ICANS in pts treated with axi-cel vs tisa-cel vs liso-cel, respectively. A trend toward higher grade ≥3 ICANS was seen in pts treated with ≥3 prior lines than those treated with 2 or 1 (30-day estimate, 35.7% vs 28.1% vs 10.5%; P = 0.07). ICANS was managed with steroids in 47 (41%) pts, levetiracetam +/- other agents in 46 (40%) pts, biologic agents +/- other drugs in 15 (13%) pts, and supportive care in 6 (5%) pts. Median follow-up from the 30-day landmark post-infusion was 17.2 months (95% CI 14.2–22.4). Median PFS was 10.5 months (95% CI 5.7–18.2) and OS was 18.2 months (95% CI 13.3 vs 27.5). There was no difference in PFS and OS in pts who experienced ICANS vs no ICANS (median PFS 14.7 vs 10.1 months; P=0.65 and median OS 18.2 vs 24.7 months; P=0.49). However, there was a trend toward inferior PFS and OS in pts who experienced high-grade ICANS compared to those who had grade 0-2 ICANS (median PFS 9.2 vs 21.2; P=0.14 and median OS 11.7 =vs 22.9; P=0.39). Conclusions: This large study of older pts with RR LBCL demonstrated acceptable risks of ICANS, comparable to that in pivotal registration trials, with a relatively higher rate of grade ≥3 ICANS. The risks of ICANS were similar regardless of patient age, including those aged ≥80 yrs, but different among CART products. Similar to younger pts, high tumor burden disease and poor performance status at CART infusion were associated with higher risks of ICANS. A comprehensive neurologic and frailty assessment is warranted to identify suitable CART candidates.

Abstract Background: Prolonged cytopenias are a well-recognized complication following CAR-T therapy, leading to increased morbidity and healthcare utilization. Autologous SCB offers a potential strategy to promote hematologic recovery. We conducted a retrospective multi-institutional analysis across 18 centers comparing outcomes of SCB versus supportive care alone in RRMM patients who experienced prolonged cytopenias >30 days after CAR-T infusion. Methods: Patients were included if they received SCB within 1 year after commercial CAR-T between 6/2021 and 3/2024. To identify matched controls, we reviewed other CAR-T recipients from the same consortium and selected those with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of <0.72x109/L and platelet count of <21K at day 30 post-infusion-thresholds representing the 75th percentile of cytopenia severity in the SCB cohort. These criteria ensured control patients had comparable hematologic toxicity but without SCB. Hematologic recovery in the SCB cohort was assessed using the CIBMTR engraftment criteria. For the non-SCB (nSCB) group, cell counts were analyzed cross-sectionally at day 90 post-CAR-T and compared to the SCB cohort with Kruskal Wallis tests. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan Meier methods. Results: Of the 590 CAR-T recipients, 91 patients (15.4%) developed prolonged cytopenias; 39 patients received SCB and 52 did not. SCB patients more frequently had ISS stage III disease (23.1% vs. 11.5%), exrtamedullary disease (59% vs. 46.2%) and penta-refractory status (43.6% vs. 34.6%). The median number of prior lines of therapy was 6 in both cohorts. Thirteen patients (33.3%) in the SCB and 11 (21.2%) in the nSCB received high intensity infusional chemotherapy (DCEP/PACE/HyperCVAD). Pre-CAR-T cytopenias tended to be less frequent in the SCB vs. nSCB cohort: ANC <1000 in 5.1% vs. 13.5%, Hgb <8 in 23.1% vs. 21.2%, and platelets <50K in 28.2% vs. 40.4%. Median plasmacytosis in the bone marrow prior to CAR-T in the SCB group was 35% and 47.5% in the nSCB group. In the SCB cohort, 2 patients harbored DNMT3A mutations, one of whom had CCUS. Ide-cel was administered in 64.8% and cilta-cel in 35.2% of all patients. The rates and grades of cytokine release syndrome did not differ between groups. Six patients (15.4%) had HLH in the SCB group vs. none in the control group. All (100%) SCB patients received growth factor support; 58% also received TPO agonists. In the nSCB group, 43 patients (82.7%) received growth factor, and 16 patients (30.8%) received TPO agonists. Out of 24 pre-SCB bone marrow biopsies available, only 1 patient had relapsed MM while the remainder had hypocellular marrows. Median CD34+ cell dose was 2.93 million/kg (range: 1.76-23.55) administered at a median of 53 days post-CAR-T (range 24-265). All but one patient (97.4%) in the SCB group achieved hematologic recovery; median time to recovery was 24 days (range 9-87). No new toxicities attributable to SCB were observed. On day 90 post CAR-T infusion, SCB patients had higher median ANC (2.12 vs. 1.59x109/L, p=0.277), Hgb (10.6 vs. 8.7g/dL, p=0.002), and platelet counts (135 vs. 35K/L (p<0.001). Minimal residual disease negativity was achieved in 82.4% (SCB) vs. 83.3% (nSCB). Infections occured in 53.8% and 48.1% of SCB and nSCB cohorts. All serious infections occurred prior to SCB. There were 12 deaths in the SCB group (7 from disease progression, 2 from infection, 1 from neurotoxicity (NT), and 1 unknown) and 27 in the nSCB group (22 from progression, 3 from infection, 1 from HLH, 1 from NT). After a median follow-up period of 12.6 months in the SCB cohort and 11.6 months in the nSCB arm, the mPFS was 11.0 months and 8.2 months, respectively. The mPFS was 10.6 months (SCB) and 5.8 months (nSCB) (p=0.216), and 11.0 months (SCB) and 10.9 months (nSCB), for ide-cel and cilta-cel treated-patients, respectively. Median OS was not reached vs.12.3 months in the SCB vs. nSCB groups, respectively. Conclusion: Overall, SCB was safe and effective in promoting rapid hematologic recovery in nearly all patients. Compared to controls, SCB recipeints had significantly higher Hgb and platelet levels by day 90 post-CAR-T infusion. SCB was associated wih a near doubling of PFS in patients who received ide-cel, though interpretation is limited by non-randomized design and small sample size. Further study is needed to optimize paient selection, timing, and integration of SCB into CAR-T care.