Citations

Key Points Genetic testing in CKD showed diagnostic and clinical utility in the year following reporting of test results. Genetic testing was helpful for or changed management in 86% of patients with a positive finding and 42% with a negative finding. Clinical utility was seen across 12 clinical cohorts, including CKD of unknown etiology and hypertension or diabetes-related nephropathy. Background CKD is a significant public health burden, affecting >800 million people worldwide with significant cost to the health care system. CKD is a disease process with substantial genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity that can obscure a definitive diagnosis, resulting in suboptimal management. Recent guidelines support greater adoption of genetic testing in CKD. We assessed the diagnostic and clinical utility in the year following broad-panel CKD genetic testing. Methods The Renasight Clinical Application, Review, and Evaluation (RenaCARE) study (NCT05846113) was a single-arm, interventional, prospective, multicenter study evaluating the utility of genetic testing with a 385-gene panel on the diagnosis and management of CKD. Clinical history was collected before testing, and nephrologists responded to questionnaires at both 1 month and 1 year after testing. The impact of genetic testing on CKD diagnosis and management were assessed in active study patients at the 1-year time point. Results In a cohort of 1388 CKD patients with 13 pretest clinical categories of CKD, 335 (24%) patients had a positive genetic finding; 1174 had a questionnaire completed at 1 year and were included in the analysis. Genetic testing was reported helpful for clinical management and/or led to a change in management in 86% of patients with a positive test finding and 42% of patients with a negative test finding. In addition, genetic testing resulted in a change in the physician estimation of the 5-year prognosis for 55% of patients with a positive test finding and 18% of those with a negative test finding. Conclusions Supporting the previous results of the RenaCARE study at 1 month, this report demonstrated that genetic testing was helpful in the clinical management and estimated prognosis of patients with CKD. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05846113.

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a transformative treatment for hematological malignancies, yet its potential to drive lymphomagenesis poses significant clinical concerns. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms underlying CAR T-cell–associated lymphomagenesis in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract on a single case, focusing specifically on the role of integrin α4β7 expression and a predisposing somatic SH2B3 mutation. We observed oligoclonal CAR T cells homing to, and clonally expanding in, the GI tract, with the dominant expanded clone harboring both a pathogenic SH2B3 mutation and a CAR transgene integration within a TFCP2 locus. The clonal CAR T cells subsequently transitioned beyond the GI tract into the peripheral blood, suggesting a potential pathway for systemic dissemination. We found clinical, histological, and molecular evidence demonstrating the efficacy of cyclosporine in reducing the expanded malignant clone and achieving durable clinical remission for more than a year. Our findings highlight the complex interplay between CAR T-cell therapy, preexisting genetic vulnerabilities, and the GI microenvironment, emphasizing the need for vigilant monitoring and tailored therapeutic strategies to address the risks associated with CAR T-cell lymphomagenesis.

Background Recent studies suggest that general surgery (GS) residents perform more operations related to their future specialty compared with their peers. In this multi-institutional study, we examined the process of early specialization among GS residents pursuing a career in vascular surgery (VS). Methods Data from the US Resident OPerative Experience (ROPE) Consortium, comprising 20 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited GS residency programs across the United States, were queried. Case volume and type were compared between GS residents pursuing vs fellowship and all other residents. Effect size was evaluated using Cohen’s d statistic. Effect size was considered large if d > 0.8, moderate if 0.5 ≤ d < 0.8, small if 0.2 ≤ d < 0.5, and inconsequential if d < 0.2. Results A total of 1343 GS residents graduated from 2010-2020 across all programs participating in ROPE, of which 135 (10.1%) pursued vs fellowship. Total major vascular case volume was significantly greater among residents pursuing vs fellowship (138 [100-207] vs 100 [80-139], P < 0.0001) with a large effect size (d = 1.81). Vascular cases reported in a surgeon chief role (27 [9-53] vs 10 [2-29], P < 0.0001, d = 0.76, moderate effect) and surgeon junior role (107 [79-154] vs 88 [62-118], P < 0.0001, d = 1.00, large effect) were also greater among GS residents pursing a vs specialty. Nearly all vascular operative categories demonstrated similar trends ( P < 0.01 each). Conclusions GS residents pursuing a vs fellowship perform more vascular cases compared with their peers. Given the differences in both surgeon chief and surgeon junior roles, career focus may begin as early as the junior resident years.

Importance The prevalence of cardiovascular disease differs substantially across neighborhoods. However, few studies have examined the contribution of neighborhood-level structural racism to inequities in cardiovascular health. Objective To investigate the association between neighborhood-level manifestations of structural racism and the prevalence of cardiovascular clinical and behavioral risk factors and cardiovascular diseases. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study consisted of 71 915 US census tracts. The Structural Racism Effect Index (SREI) was appended to the 2020 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s PLACES dataset. Race and ethnicity were self-reported and obtained from the 2019 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. Data analysis was conducted from June 2024 to October 2024. Exposure The SREI is a composite score of census tract measures within 9 domains affected by structural racism (built environment, criminal justice, education, employment, housing, income and poverty, social cohesion, transportation, and wealth). The SREI scores were categorized into distribution-based quintiles, where higher quintiles represented greater neighborhood structural racism. Main Outcomes and Measures Neighborhood-level prevalence of cardiovascular clinical (high blood pressure, high cholesterol, obesity, and diabetes) and behavioral (current cigarette smoking and no leisure-time physical activity) risk factors and cardiovascular disease (coronary heart disease and stroke). Multilevel-linear mixed models, adjusting for confounders, were used to estimate adjusted prevalence rate ratios (aPRR). Results Among 71 915 census tracts, neighborhoods in the highest quintiles of structural racism were more likely than neighborhoods in the lowest quintile to be in the southern region (quintile 1, 19.9% vs quintile 5, 56.8%). The proportion of the population that was Black was largest in neighborhoods in the highest quintile of structural racism (quintile 1, 2.2% vs quintile 5, 23.0%). After adjustment, compared with the lowest quintile of structural racism, the highest quintile had significantly higher prevalence rates of cardiovascular clinical risk factors, including high blood pressure (aPRR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.37-1.38), obesity (aPRR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.39-1.40), and diabetes (aPRR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.79-1.81). Similarly, for cardiovascular behavioral risk factors, the highest quintile of structural racism had significantly higher prevalence rates of current cigarette smoking (aPRR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.83-1.85) and no leisure-time physical activity (aPRR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.87-1.89). Additionally, for cardiovascular diseases, the highest quintile of structural racism had higher prevalence rates of coronary heart disease (aPRR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.79-1.82) and stroke (aPRR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.98-2.00). Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study, structural racism was associated with inequities in neighborhood cardiovascular health, highlighting opportunities for place-based prevention efforts.

ABSTRACT Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for developing recurrent clinically significant cytomegalovirus infections (csCMVi) in heart transplant recipients. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving adult heart transplant recipients at three large transplant centers in the United States between January 2011 and March 2019. All patients with a history of csCMVi, defined as CMV disease or CMV infection requiring preemptive therapy, were followed from the date of treatment completion for the primary csCMVi episode. Outcomes of interest were recurrent csCMVi and all‐cause mortality. Results Among 98 heart transplant recipients with csCMVi, 22 (22.4%) episodes of recurrent csCMVi occurred. Median time‐to‐recurrent csCMVi was 31.5 (IQR 21.3–59.8) days following treatment completion. A preceding episode of CMV disease (versus infection) was associated with a lower risk of recurrent csCMVi (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.08–0.98; p = 0.047). Patients with lymphopenia had higher rates of recurrent csCMVi without statistical significance (HR 2.13, 95% CI 0.88–5.13; p = 0.093). Seroconversion by the end‐of‐therapy among CMV D+/R− mismatched patients was associated with a reduced risk of csCMVi recurrence (HR 0.07, 95% CI 0.02–0.30; p < 0.001). Overall, 17 (17.3%) patients died during follow‐up, which was not significantly higher among those with recurrent csCMVi (HR 2.13, 95% CI 0.78–5.79; p = 0.141). Conclusions About one in five heart recipients with csCMVi developed post‐treatment recurrence. A preceding episode of CMV disease and seroconversion was protective against recurrence. Lymphopenia may be a practical biomarker to stratify recurrence risk. Overall, recurrent csCMVi was not significantly associated with mortality.

Abstract The SNF2 family chromatin remodeler HELLS has emerged as an important regulator of cell proliferation, genome stability, and several cancer pathways. Significant upregulation of HELLS has been reported in 33 human cancer types. While HELLS has been implicated in DNA damage response, its function in DNA repair is poorly understood. Here, we report a new regulatory link between HELLS and single-strand break (SSB) repair in cellular responses to DNA alkylation damage. We found that loss of HELLS impairs SSB repair and selectively sensitizes cells to DNA alkylating agents and PARP inhibitors (PARPi). Our data reveal non-epistatic interactions between HELLS and PARP1 and suggest that HELLS functionally compensates for PARP1 deficiency in promoting cell survival in response to DNA alkylation damage. Furthermore, we found that HELLS is co-expressed with PARP1 in cancer cells, and its loss is synthetic lethal with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). This work unveils new functions of HELLS in modulating SSB repair and responses to clinically relevant DNA alkylation damage, thus offering new insights into the potential therapeutic value of targeting HELLS in cancer.

Despite efforts to improve donor heart allocation policies, geographic disparities, logistical challenges and patient criteria limit organ availability. However, recent surgical innovations offer potential solutions. These include partial heart transplantation and xenotransplantation. Partial heart transplantation is a new procedure with the potential to address several clinical challenges in treating congenital heart defects. Cardiac xenotransplantation involves the transplantation of genetically modified porcine hearts into humans, offering a potential solution to the shortage of donor organs. Although immunologic barriers and ethical concerns remain, ongoing research aims to mitigate the risks and optimize outcomes, providing hope for patients in need. These innovative surgical approaches offer promising avenues for addressing the critical shortage of donor hearts and with ongoing research, may hold the potential to revolutionize heart transplantation, and improve outcomes for patients facing terminal heart failure.

55 Background: Prior authorization (PA) processes are known to create administrative burdens and delays in care, but little is known about how these challenges impact rural oncology patients and practice settings. Methods: To understand the broad impact of prior authorization on rural oncology patients and practices, we conducted this study across three community oncology practices serving majority rural patient populations with distinct geography, healthcare infrastructure, and models of care. Sites included one critical access hospital system located in a highly-rural community (Lakewood Health System; Staples, Minnesota), a community-based hub-and-spoke hospital system-based practice located in a mid-sized community (Mayo Clinic Health System – Northfield; Northfield, Minnesota), and a standalone referral level III trauma center serving a highly rural patient base (Self Regional Healthcare; Greenwood, South Carolina). This retrospective cohort study examined all intravenous and subcutaneous cancer-directed therapy plans (no oral therapy) that required PA submission at these locations over a three-month period from October 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024. Results: 129 PA submissions were required during the study period. 82 were due to cancer-directed therapy agents (of which 14 were immunotherapy agents), and 47 were due to adjunctive therapies (of which 22, 16, and 9 were due to granulocyte stimulation, bone preservation, and anti-emesis agents, respectively). All 129 PA submissions ultimately resulted in approval of the desired medication or formulary-approved biosimilar. Delays from PA submission to approval ranged from 0 to 18 days. A total of 209 patient-days were delayed due to PA during the study period, which did not ultimately result in change of care or denial of care in any instance. Conclusions: At all sites included in this study, all PA submissions were eventually authorized. The PA process was found to introduce inconsistent and potentially avoidable delays for hundreds of patients and their care teams. These findings highlight the inefficiency of current PA processes among rural cancer populations and the practices that care for them, underscoring the need for ongoing efforts directed at state and federal PA reform.