Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

2094 citation(s) found for "Xu, Vincent".

ULK4 and CDKN2A polymorphisms influence the risk of developing monoclona
Macauda, A., Cabrera-Serrano, Antonio José , Thomsen, Hauke, Güler, Murat, Guelpen, Bethany Van , Landi, S., Chattopadhyay, Subhayan , Unal, P., Ruiz‐Durán, Lucía, Casabonne, Delphine , Goldschmidt, Hartmut, Carretero‐Fernández, María, Cabezudo, Elena Duque, Norman, A., García‐Sánz, Ramón , Pettersson‐Kymmer, Ulrika, Jiménez‐Romera, Francisco, Rajkumar, S. Vincent, Weinhold, Niels , Vodickova, Ludmila, Langer, C., Stein, Angelika, Karismaz, Abdulkadir, Jöckel, K‐H, Martínez‐López, Joaquín, Kumar, Shaji K., Gutiérrez‐Bautista, Juan Francisco , Basso, Daniela, Späth, Florentin , Benavente, Yolanda , Hildebrandt, Michelle A. T., Schmidt, Börge, Reis, Rui Manuel , Li, Yang, Netea, M. G. , Campa, Daniele, Clay‐Gilmour, Alyssa, Hemminki, Kari, Vachon, Celine M, Martínez‐López, Joaquín , Landi, Stefano , Thomsen, Hauke , Van Guelpen, Bethany , Landi, Stefano , Casabonne, Delphine , Moreno, Victor , Tavano, Francesca , Hildebrandt, Michelle A T , Schmidt, Börge , Reis, Rui Manuel , Campa, Daniele , Försti, Asta , Canzian, Federico , Sainz, Juan , Garcia-Sanz, Ramon , Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin , Thomsen, Hauke , Carretero-Fernández, María , Sánchez‐Maldonado, José Manuel , Macauda, Angelica , Horst, Rob ter , Vodička, Pavel , Ruiz-Durán, Lucía , Goldschmidt, Hartmut , Serin, İstemi , Reyes‐Zurita, Fernando J. , Norman, Aaron D. , Capurso, Gabriele , Hoffmann, Per , Petterson-Kymmer, Ulrika, Jiménez-Romera, Francisco, Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Vodičková, Ľudmila , Karışmaz, Abdülkadir , Moreno, Vı́ctor , Nöthen, Markus M. , Tavano, Francesca , Kumar, Shaji , Basso, Daniela , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Ševčíková, Tereza , López‐Nevot, Miguel Ángel , Clay‐Gilmour, Alyssa , Slager, Susan L. , Hemminki, Kari, Försti, Asta , Canzian, Federico , Sáinz, Juan

International Journal of Cancer | March 12, 2026 | Volume: 159 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 410-422

10.1002/ijc.70427 | PMID 41813586 Get It

Abstract Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a necessary precursor condition to multiple myeloma (MM). Given the role of autophagy in modulating MM risk, we investigated whether genetic variation in autophagy‐related genes influences susceptibility to MGUS. We analyzed the association of 34,042 common autophagy‐related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with MGUS across six independent cohorts, five from Europe and one from North America, comprising 2317 MGUS cases and 282,358 controls. We also assessed their impact on immune parameters, including absolute counts of 91 blood‐derived immune cell subsets and 103 circulating immunological proteins. Meta‐analysis revealed a genome‐wide significant association between the ULK4 rs6599175C allele and increased MGUS risk ( p = 3.35 × 10 −8 ). Carriers of this allele showed reduced counts of memory B cell subsets (IgM+CD38+CD27+ and IgD+IgM+CD27+; p = .0038 and p = .0056, respectively) and natural effector B cells (CD24+CD38+IgD+IgM+ cells; p = .0060). Although these associations were not statistically significant after multiple testing correction, they suggest a role of ULK4 in early B‐cell differentiation. Additionally, the CDKN2A rs2811710 variant showed a suggestive association with MGUS risk ( p = 2.17 × 10 −4 ), affecting transcription factor binding involved in B‐cell proliferation and differentiation, although it lacked association with immune markers. In conclusion, we confirm a genome‐wide significant association of the ULK4 locus and MGUS risk, supporting its role in early B‐cell differentiation, and identify CDKN2A as a candidate susceptibility locus warranting further investigation.
Mutant KRAS Heterogeneity Shapes Nuclear Architecture During Pancreatic Cancer Initiation
Pollin, Gareth , Leverence, Elise, Assuncao, Thiago M. de , Iovanna, Juan, Hong, Johnny C. , Zimmermann, Michael T. , Urrutia, Raúl , Lomberk, Gwen , Mathison, Angela J , Zimmermann, Michael T , Urrutia, Raul , Lomberk, Gwen L , Mathison, Angela , Iovanna, Juan

Epigenomes | March 10, 2026 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 19

10.3390/epigenomes10010019 | PMID 41892368 Get It

Background/Objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) arises predominantly from activating KRAS mutations, yet individual genetic variants differ markedly in signaling output and clinical impact. G12D, the most prevalent variant, strongly drives oncogenic programs, whereas G12R signals less efficiently through the AKT and ERK pathways and is associated with longer patient survival than G12D-driven PDAC. Methods: To elucidate how these differences influence early cellular transformation, we expressed a panel of KRAS mutants in non-cancerous pancreatic ductal epithelial cells as a model of early PDAC initiation and profiled transcriptional and phospho-proteomic responses. We next examined whether epigenetic differences translate into mutation-specific changes in nuclear organization using quantitative imaging of G12D- and G12R-expressing nuclei at 24 and 48 h. Results: Each variant established a unique regulatory program enriched for chromatin remodelers, histone modifiers, and nuclear structural factors, indicating that variant-specific KRAS signaling rapidly develops divergent epigenetic states. Integrated transcriptomic and phospho-proteomic analyses identified G12D and G12R as the most divergent variants. G12D induced pronounced nuclear remodeling, including increased nuclear size, irregular morphology, and reorganization of the nucleolus and spliceosome, consistent with extensive chromatin and transcriptional reprogramming. In contrast, G12R elicited a weaker response, with minimal or delayed structural changes. Conclusions: Together, these findings demonstrate that KRAS mutational context in pancreatic ductal epithelial cells shapes early transcriptional reprogramming that actively remodels nuclear architecture and nuclear sub-compartments. This work establishes nuclear structural remodeling as a structural state of KRAS-driven epigenetic dysregulation during PDAC initiation.
An automated plasma‐based proteotyping immunoassay for APOE ε4 zygosity classification in Alzheimer's disease
Levin, Scott , Engel, Brian, Carlson, Corey M., Hinson, Jeremiah, Holland, Mark D. , Figdore, Dan, Tiers, Laurent, Bhatt, Kinal , Schlichtmann, Ben, Hoffmann, Katie, Bae, Ye Eun, Szabo, Miklos, Um, Yoo Hyun , Algeciras-Schimnich, Alicia, Hinson, Jeremiah S. , Figdore, Daniel J. , Lim, Hyun Kook , Schlichtmann, Benjamin W. , Lehmann, Sylvain , Algeciras‐Schimnich, Alicia

Alzheimer's & Dementia | March 8, 2026 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.71143 | PMID 41789706 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Determining apolipoprotein E ( APOE ) ε4 allele status, a key genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD), requires molecular genotyping infrastructure not widely accessible beyond specialized centers. METHODS A fully automated high‐throughput apoE E4 proteotyping immunoassay was evaluated for clinical performance (460 participants across three cohorts) and analytical validity. Concordance with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐based genotyping and measures of analytical validity were reported. RESULTS The apoE E4 immunoassay demonstrated 99.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98.4% to 99.9%) concordance with PCR‐based APOE ε4 genotype results across the pooled clinical cohort; 100.0% (95% CI: 97.1% to 100.0%) in those with AD ( N = 127) and 99.4% (95% CI: 97.8% to 99.8%) in those without AD (333). The assay met analytical validity criteria for E4 isoform specificity, interference, precision, and stability. DISCUSSION The apoE E4 immunoassay demonstrated high concordance with PCR‐based genotyping and robust analytical validity, offering an accessible alternative for APOE ε4 zygosity assessment. Highlights A novel high‐throughput plasma‐based proteotyping immunoassay for APOE ε4 zygosity classification was developed and evaluated for clinical performance and analytical validity. The apoE E4 immunoassay demonstrated high concordance (99.6%) with PCR‐based APOE ε4 genotyping across a diverse international cohort, and a robust analytical profile. An apoE E4 immunoassay may offer a more cost‐effective and accessible alternative to DNA genotyping approaches currently used for AD risk evaluation and anti‐amyloid treatment decisions.
Gene Portals: A Framework for Integrating Clinical, Functional, and Structural Evidence into Rare Disease Variant Classification
Brünger, Tobias , Krey, Ilona , Kim, Suyeon, Klöckner, Chiara , Myers, Scott J, Johannesen, Katrine M. , Stefanski, Arthur , Taylor, Gary, Macnee, Marie , Dahl, Rebekka S., Yuan, Hongjie, Kim, Sukhan, Helbig, Ingo, Pan, Jen, Kurganov, Erkin , Baez, David, Zuberi, Sameer M., Lerche, Holger, May, Patrick, Ivaniuk, Alina, Meskis, Mary Anne , Hood, Veronica , Schust, Leah F., Freed, Amber, Froelich, Steven, Deng, Alexander T., Bouman, Arjan , Hajianpour, M.J. , Pal, Deb K. , Danvoye, Leslie, Lederer, Damien , BALCI, TUĞÇE, Hagebeuk, Eveline , Heidlebaugh, Alexis R. , Oetjens, Kathryn F., Striano, Pasquale, Williams, Sarah Drewes, Engelen, Kalene van , Howell, Katherine B. , Khoury, Jean , Benke, Tim A., Strehlow, Vincent , Platzer, Konrad, Ramsey, Amy J, Manaster, Lisa, Malepati, Sunitha, Fox, Pangkong M., Noebels, Jeffrey, Chung, Wendy, Poduri, Annapurna, Stripe, Laina Lusk, Ruggiero, Sarah M., Cohen, Stacey, Wilmarth, Olivia, Prentice, Anna Jenne, Cha, Esther, Budnik, Nikita , Kramer, Audra A. , Gh, Zhang, Palotie, Aarno, Daly, Mark J., Møller, R., Lemke, Johannes R., Lal, Dennis , Møller, Rikke S. , May, Patrick , Bruenger, Tobias , Pan, Jen Q , Farrant, Mark , Wyllie, David J A , Bosselmann, Christian , Mantegazza, Massimo , May, Patrick , Ivaniuk, Alina , Goodspeed, Kimberly , Trinidad, Marena , Aledo-Serrano, Ángel , Pal, Deb K , Platzer, Konrad , Ruggiero, Sarah M , Daly, Mark J. , George, Alfred L , Brunklaus, Andreas , Møller, Rikke S , Myers, Scott J. , Taylor, Gary, Pérez‐Palma, Eduardo , Schorge, Stéphanie , Dahl, Rebekka S. , Perszyk, Riley E. , Bajaj, Sunanjay , Helbig, Ingo , Wollmuth, Lonnie P. , Báez-Nieto, David , Zuberi, Sameer M. , Boßelmann, Christian M. , Mantegazza, Massimo , Cestèle, Sandrine , Ivaniuk, Alina , Kang, Jing‐Qiong , Gati, Cornelius , Montanucci, Ludovica , Wüster, Arthur , Deng, Alexander T. , Borovikov, Artem O. , Sharkov, Artem A. , Bouman, Arjan , Hoffman, Trevor L. , Howell, Katherine B. , Benke, Tim A. , Platzer, Konrad , Ramsey, Amy J. , Fox, Pangkong , Noebels, Jeffrey L. , Chung, Wendy K. , Poduri, Annapurna , Lusk, Laina G. , Cohen, Stacey , Smith, Lacey A. , Boesch, Sylvia , Prentice, Anna Jenne , Hommersom, Marina P. , Vanoye, Carlos G. , Nothnagel, Michael , Palotie, Aarno V. , George, Alfred L. , Zárate, Yuri A. , Brunklaus, Andreas , Traynelis, Stephen F. , Lemke, Johannes R.

No container title available | March 6, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.03.05.26347086 | PMID 41822692 Get It

Abstract Rare Mendelian disorders affect 300-400 million people globally. Although genetic testing has become widely adopted, gene-specific evidence for tailored variant interpretation remains scattered across resources. We present Gene Portals, a framework for gene-centered multimodal knowledge bases that co-localize expert-harmonized clinical data, functional assays, population variation, structural annotations and gene-specific ACMG/AMP specifications within a single resource. A modular interface integrates this unified evidence with VCEP-refined ACMG specifications to enable automated gene-specific variant classification, infer molecular mechanisms, and support cross-gene analyses. We demonstrate the framework’s utility across five Gene portals spanning eleven neurodevelopmental disorder-associated genes, integrating data from 4,423 individuals with 2,838 unique variants, 36,149 ClinVar submissions, and 1,044 expert-curated molecular readouts. By organizing evidence that is otherwise dispersed across multiple sources into a unified, queryable framework, the SCN, GRIN, CACNA1A, SATB2 and SLC6A1 Gene Portals became widely used community resources and provide an extensible template for standardized rare-disease variant interpretation and mechanism-aware discovery.
End-of-life care preferences in penile cancer patients: Shifting patterns and disparities over two decades.
Chahal, Rutvi, Ammakola, Yagnapriya, Pustake, Manas, Kakarala, Chandra , Batra, Nitya, Mishra, Rahul, Kumar, Madhan Srinivasan, Krishnan, Jayasree, Sukaina, Mahnoor , Chahal, Rutvi, Khosla, Atulya Aman , Ammakola, Yagnapriya, Pustake, Manas Vaibhav , Mishra, Rahul, Ghose, Aruni , Krishnan, Jayasree , Ganiyani, Mohammad Arfat , Singh, Rohit , Garje, Rohan , Jatwani, Karan

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 2, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 7_suppl | Pages: 5-5

10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.5 Get It

5 Background: Penile cancer (PC) is often diagnosed late, which leads to advanced disease. Studies have reported that less than 18% of individuals with metastatic PC receive any kind of palliative therapy. Place of Death (PoD) is a crucial determinant of patient and caregiver preferences and the cost of caregiving at the end of life (EOL). We aimed to evaluate the trends in PoD for patients with PC in the U.S. from 2003 to 2023 based on the CDC WONDER (Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research) database. Methods: We analyzed data from January 01, 2003, to December 31, 2023. The data for deaths due to PC were pooled using the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision code as C60 for malignant neoplasm of the penis. The inclusion criteria included patients aged > 25 years. PoD is defined as deaths at home and hospice (H&H) versus medical facilities. Average annual percentage change (AAPC) was calculated using the Joinpoint Regression Program, version 5.0.2. Results: The analysis demonstrated a total of n = 6,074 deaths from PC. A total of 52.1% of deaths, n = 3,167, were reported at H&H. The trend analysis demonstrates an exponential rise in H&H utilization from 34.4% in 2003 to 57.5% in 2023, AAPC [5.4284, CI (4.7-6.10, p < 0.000001]. A significant increase in the utilization of H&H is notable in both African Americans (AA), AAPC [2.8514, CI (1.0-4.7), p = 0.004], and the White population, AAPC [5.3497, CI (4.6-6.0); p < 0.000001]. However, a racial disparity is also noted, with 45.4% in AA, while the White population is at 52.5% deaths in H&H-based care. PC mortality in medical facilities has a 29.7% decline from 2003 to 2023. On age stratification, there was a significant increase in utilizing H&H as PoD for the 45-64 years cohort AAPC [4.29, CI (3.2, 5.2), p < 0.000001], similarly, with the older age group 65+ cohorts AAPC [6.26, CI (5.4, 7.0), p < 0.000001]. In contrast, the younger cohort deduced no significant trend AAPC [2.92, CI (-1.5, 7.6), p = 0.14]. Conclusions: This is the first study to our knowledge providing valuable insights into the evolving PoD preferences among PC patients in the U.S.The age-related trends underscore the importance of tailoring end-of-life care strategies to specific age cohorts. The findings emphasize the importance of policies promoting and supporting H&H care for PC patients. Targeted efforts are warranted to address notable disparities in PoD preferences among racial and age groups.
Trial design and objectives for prostate cancer: Recommendations from the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 4 (PCWG4).
Armstrong, Andrew J., Morris, Michael J., Antonarakis, Emmanuel S., Beltran, Himisha, Halabi, Susan, Herrmann, Ken, Hofman, Michael S., Hope, MD Thomas A., Liu, Glenn X., McKay, Rana R., Morgans, Alicia K., Stadler, Walter M., Sternberg, Cora N., Yu, Evan Y., Scher, Howard I., Investigators, PCWG4, Halabi, Susan , Armstrong, Andrew J. , Halabi, Susan , Armstrong, Andrew J , Morris, Michael J. , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Bryce, Alan H. , Emmett, Louise , Hermann, Ken , Hofman, Michael S. , Lang, Joshua M. , Liu, Glenn , McKay, Rana R. , Morgans, Alicia K. , Paller, Channing J. , Stadler, Walter M. , Sternberg, Cora N , Szmulewitz, Russell Z , Yu, Evan Y , Scher, Howard I.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 2, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 7_suppl | Pages: 162-162

10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.162 Get It

162 Background: Clinical trial conduct in advanced prostate cancer has changed dramatically with the continued development of new imaging approaches, molecular phenotypes and genetic subtypes, prognosis assessments, and effective therapies across a range of disease states. This created a need to redefine terminology and best practices for clinical trials. Methods: We convened PCWG4, an international expert committee of multidisciplinary working groups, between 2016 and 2025 to update and expand PCWG2-3 recommendations based on emerging evidence and clinical trial data in an innovative biomarker and imaging context to provide guidance for clinical trial design, eligibility, and endpoint assessments. Results: PCWG4 redefines terminology around disease states and prior therapies in a patient-centric context, considering imaging modalities, with a particular focus on PET-defined disease. New recommendations are provided for disease state terminology, defining eligibility criteria, imaging and non-imaging-based responses. We define delay/prevent endpoints including responses by pathology, ctDNA, circulating tumor cells, and PSA declines, and specify intervals for re-assessments including imaging, biomarker assessments, and patient reported outcomes. We propose new imaging-specific rPFS criteria including guidance with serial PSMA PET/CT imaging (Table). We provide recommendations in a biomarker-based context for the indication, reflective of patient benefit for specific interventions. We emphasize the need for development of validated PET imaging and molecular and phenotypic criteria as well as trial designs to appropriately risk stratify patients, predict and assess benefit, and measure post-treatment outcomes reliably in a trial framework. Conclusions: PCWG4 expands guidance on patient and tumor profiling, as well as therapy development, to include both androgen deprivation therapy sensitive and resistant settings, reflecting today’s more heterogeneous and diverse patient population to optimize outcomes. PCWG4-defined radiographic progression by imaging modality for patients with metastatic disease. Pretreatment Scan On-treatment Scan #1(≥week 8) On-treatment Scan #2 All Subsequent Scans Bone scintigraphy Comparator Comparator for subsequent scansPOD never called here POD:PCWG3 criteria (2+2 additional new lesions) POD:≤5 new lesions: PCWG3 criteria 2 new lesions confirmed≥6 new lesions CT/MRI Any measurable disease Comparator PCWG3/RECIST PCWG3/RECIST PCWG3/RECIST PSMA PET Bones, and lymph nodes and lung metastases (non-RECIST qualifying by + on PET only) Comparator POD:≤5 new lesions: 2 new lesions confirmed on a subsequent scan≥6 new lesions Same as prior Same as prior Liver and non-pulmonary viscera Comparator POD:Any single new lesion that represents disease Same as prior Same as prior
Trial Design and Objectives for Patients With Prostate Cancer: Recommendations From the Prostate Cancer Working Group 4
Armstrong, Andrew J., Morris, M., Abida, Wassim , Aggarwal, Rahul R., Antonarakis, Emmanuel S., Attard, Gerhardt , Beltran, Himisha, Bryce, Alan H. , Carducci, Michael A. , Cheng, Heather H., Dahut, William L. , Emmett, Louise , Fizazi, Karim, Gafita, Andrei, George, Daniel J., Hermann, Ken, Hofman, Michael S., Hope, MD Thomas A., Hussain, Maha, Kelly, W. Kevin, Kuo, Phillip H. , Liu, Glenn X., Morgans, Alicia K., McKay, Rana R., Nanus, David, Nelson, P., Reichert, Zachery R. , Ryan, Charles J. , Sartor, A. Oliver, Schwartz, Lawrence H., Sharifi, Nima , Stadler, Walter M., Stein, M., Sternberg, Cora N., Szmulewitz, Russell Z., Tagawa, Scott T., Sokolova, Alexandra O., Wyatt, Alex, Yu, Evan Y., Halabi, S., Scher, Howard I., Group, for the PCWG4 Writing, Alumkal, Joshi J. , Aparicio, Ana, Barata, Pedro C., Drake, Charles G., Hamid, Anis , Heath, Elisabeth I. , Nauseef, Jones, Lage, Daniel E. , Mallak, Nadine , Patnaik, Akash, Prepelica, Kristofer, Rowe, Steven P., Slovin, Susan F. , Taplin, Mary‐Ellen , Zorko, Nicholas, Carducci, Michael A. , Halabi, Susan , Cheng, Heather H. , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Morris, Michael J. , Armstrong, Andrew J. , Nauseef, Jones T. , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Zorko, Nicholas A. , Armstrong, Andrew J , Morris, Michael J , Aggarwal, Rahul , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Beltran, Himisha , Bryce, Alan H , Cheng, Heather H , Chen, Delphine L , Chi, Kim N , Childs, Daniel S , Dahut, William , Emmett, Louise , Fizazi, Karim , Gafita, Andrei , George, Daniel J , Hermann, Ken , Hofman, Michael S , Hope, Thomas A , Hussain, Maha H A , Kelly, W Kevin , Kessler, Elizabeth , Lang, Joshua M , Liu, Glenn , Marshall, Catherine H , Morgans, Alicia K , McKay, Rana R , Nelson, Peter S , Paller, Channing J , Reichert, Zachery R , Sartor, A Oliver , Schöder, Heiko , Sharifi, Nima , Stadler, Walter M , Stein, Mark , Sternberg, Cora N , Szmulewitz, Russell Z , Tagawa, Scott T , Sokolova, Alexandra O , Wyatt, Alexander , Yamoah, Kosj , Yu, Evan Y , Halabi, Susan , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Zorko, Nicholas A , Nauseef, Jones T , N., Kim , Childs, Daniel S. , Fizazi, Karim , Gafita, Andrei , George, Daniel J. , Hofman, Michael S. , Lang, Joshua M. , Liu, Glenn , Marshall, Catherine H. , Morgans, Alicia K. , McKay, Rana R. , Paller, Channing J. , Sartor, Oliver , Schöder, Heiko , Schwartz, Lawrence H., Stadler, Walter M. , Tagawa, Scott T. , Scher, Howard I. , Aparicio, Ana, Barata, Pedro C. , Drake, Charles G. , Graff, Julie Nicole , Patnaik, Akash , Rathkopf, Dana E , Rettig, Matthew B.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 26, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 1249-1265

10.1200/jco-25-02834 | PMID 41744290 Get It

PURPOSE The continuous development of new imaging approaches, molecular phenotyping, genetic subtypes, prognosis assessments, and effective therapies across a range of disease states has created a need to redefine terminology and best practices for clinical trial conduct in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Methods We convened an international expert committee of diverse working groups, the Prostate Cancer Working Group 4 (PCWG4), between 2016 and 2025. Our objective was to formulate updated criteria based on emerging evidence and clinical trial data in a biomarker context to provide guidance for clinical trial design, eligibility, and end point assessments for patients with advanced prostate cancer. RESULTS PCWG4 redefines terminology around the disease state and previous therapies in a patient-centric context and terminology focused on androgen pathway modulation. We consider imaging, with a particular focus on positron emission tomography (PET)–defined disease. New recommendations are provided for disease state terminology, defining eligibility criteria, response and delay/prevent end points, intervals for reassessments including imaging, and patient-reported outcome determination. We provide recommendations in a biomarker-based context of use for the intended indication, reflective of patient benefit for specific interventions. We emphasize the need for development of validated PET imaging and molecular and phenotypic criteria as well as trial designs to appropriately risk stratify patients, predict and assess benefit, and measure post-treatment outcomes reliably in a trial framework. CONCLUSION PCWG4 updates recommendations on patient and tumor characterization, therapy development, and imaging criteria and extends guidance into earlier androgen pathway modulator–naïve/sensitive disease states to reflect an evolving, heterogeneous, and diverse patient population to optimize treatment benefits for all patients.
Streptococcus intermedius Septic Arthritis of the Acromioclavicular Joint with Periarticular Abscesses in an Elderly Man with Diabetes and Recent Canine Exposure: A Case Report and Literature Review
Godart, Gabriel A. , Yadav, Vidit , Wellings, Elizabeth P. , Zummo, Vincent C, Springer, Bryan D. , Durvasula, R, Elwasila, Sammer M., Godart, Gabriel , Stanborough, Rupert O. , Elwasila, Sammer M

Infectious Disease Reports | February 26, 2026 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 21

10.3390/idr18020021 | PMID 41874144 Get It

Background/Objectives: Streptococcus intermedius, a member of the Streptococcus anginosus group, is characterized by a marked propensity for abscess formation but only rarely causes native-joint septic arthritis. Involvement of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint is particularly uncommon. We describe a case of native AC joint septic arthritis due to S. intermedius in a patient with multiple predisposing factors and highlight diagnostic and management considerations. Methods: We report the clinical course of a 72-year-old man with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus who presented with progressive right shoulder pain, erythema, and swelling following recurrent minor skin abrasions from a newly adopted dog. Initial management for presumed inflammatory shoulder pathology included brief systemic corticosteroids and an ultrasound-guided intra-articular ketorolac injection. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed after symptom progression. The patient underwent operative irrigation and debridement with collection of synovial fluid and deep tissue cultures. Blood cultures and transthoracic echocardiography were obtained to evaluate for systemic involvement. Results: MRI demonstrated multiloculated periarticular abscesses and osteolysis centered on the AC joint. Operative cultures yielded high colony counts of S. intermedius from synovial fluid and deep tissues. Blood cultures and echocardiography were negative. The patient required multiple operative debridements with irrigation, adjunctive local antibiotic therapy, and prolonged targeted β-lactam treatment. Clinical and radiographic improvement was achieved following surgical source control and antimicrobial therapy. Conclusions: Native AC joint septic arthritis due to S. intermedius is rare. Older age, uncontrolled diabetes, recent intra-articular intervention, and possible zoonotic inoculation from canine wound licking may represent contributory risk factors. Early imaging, prompt surgical source control, and guideline-concordant antimicrobial therapy are essential when bone and soft tissue involvement is present.