Citations

SummaryBackgroundReliable tools for patient selection are critical for clinical drug trials.AimTo evaluate a consensus‐based, standardised magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) protocol for selecting patients for inclusion in Crohn's disease (CD) multicenter clinical trials.MethodsThis study recruited 20 patients [Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores: <150 (n = 8); 150–220 (n = 4); 220–450 (n = 8)], to undergo ileocolonoscopy and two MREs (with and without colonic contrast) within a 14‐day period. Procedures were scored centrally using, Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRIA), and both Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) and Simplified Endoscopic Score (SES‐CD).Results37 MREs were acquired. Both MREs were evaluable in 16 patients for calculation of test–retest and inter‐reader reliability scores. The MaRIA scores for the terminal ileum had excellent test–retest and inter‐reader reliability, with correlations >0.9. The proximal ileum showed strong within‐reader agreement (0.90–0.96), and fair between‐reader agreement (0.59–0.72). MRE procedures were tolerable. MaRIA scores correlated with CDEIS and SES‐CD (0.63 and 0.71), but not with CDAI (0.34). MRE identified 3 patients with intra‐abdominal complications, who would otherwise have been included in clinical trials. Furthermore, both MRE and ileocolonoscopy identified active bowel wall inflammation in 2 patients with CDAI <150, and none in 1 patient with CDAI > 220. Data quality was good/excellent in 85% of scans, and fair or better in 96%.ConclusionsMagnetic resonance enterography of high‐quality and reproducibility was feasible in a global multi‐ centre setting, with evidence for improved selectivity over CDAI and ileocolonoscopy in identifying appropriate CD patients for inclusion in therapeutic intervention trials.

Objectives: The objectives of this paper are to compare in a multicenter setting patterns of regional cortical thickness in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and cognitive impairment (CI) and those cognitively preserved (CP), and explore the relationship between cortical thinning and cognitive performance. Methods: T1-weighted isotropic brain scans were collected at 3T from seven European centers in 60 RRMS patients and 65 healthy controls (HCs). Patients underwent clinical and neuropsychological examinations. Cortical thickness (CTh) measures were calculated using FreeSurfer (failing in four) and both lobar and vertex-based general linear model (GLM) analyses were compared between study groups. Results: Twenty (36%) MS patients were classified as CI. Mean global CTh was smaller in RRMS patients compared to HCs (left 2.43 vs. 2.53 mm, right 2.44 vs. 2.54 mm, p < 0.001). Multivariate GLM regional analysis showed significantly more temporal thinning in CI compared to CP patients. Verbal memory scores correlated to regional cortical thinning in the insula whereas visual memory scores correlated to parietal thinning. Conclusions: This multicenter study showed mild global cortical thinning in RRMS. The extent of thinning is less pronounced than previously reported. Only subtle regional differences between CI and CP patients were observed, some of which related to specific cognitive domains.

Previously, the biological factors were weighed by the expert opinions. In this paper, we evaluate the risk factors proposed by the expert opinions. We use fuzzy logic techniques for predicting risk for development of carotid intima–medial thickness (CIMT) using expert opinion and various factors associated with CIMT in recently menopausal women. Study participants were enrolled in the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS), a four-year study where participants were assigned to either oral or transdermal hormone treatments or to placebo. We use preference modeling techniques to determine the consensus winner of the causal factors. We use a measure to determine the degree to which one factor is preferred to another. We also determine the extent to which a factor is preferred to another by "most" experts. We determine the degree to which the experts agree. We consider a model concerning social networks and the effects of these networks on persons' opinions.

Objective Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), cardiac resynchronisation therapy pacemakers (CRT-P) and the combination therapy (CRT-D) have been shown to reduce all-cause mortality compared with medical therapy alone in patients with heart failure and reduced EF. Our aim was to synthesise data from major randomised controlled trials to estimate the comparative mortality effects of these devices and how these vary according to patients’ characteristics. Methods Data from 13 randomised trials (12 638 patients) were provided by medical technology companies. Individual patient data were synthesised using network meta-analysis. Results Unadjusted analyses found CRT-D to be the most effective treatment (reduction in rate of death vs medical therapy: 42% (95% credible interval: 32–50%), followed by ICD (29% (20–37%)) and CRT-P (28% (15–40%)). CRT-D reduced mortality compared with CRT-P (19% (1–33%)) and ICD (18% (7–28%)). QRS duration, left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology, age and gender were included as predictors of benefit in the final adjusted model. In this model, CRT-D reduced mortality in all subgroups (range: 53% (34–66%) to 28% (−1% to 49%)). Patients with QRS duration ≥150 ms, LBBB morphology and female gender benefited more from CRT-P and CRT-D. Men and those <60 years benefited more from ICD. Conclusions These data provide estimates for the mortality benefits of device therapy conditional upon multiple patient characteristics. They can be used to estimate an individual patient's expected relative benefit and thus inform shared decision making. Clinical guidelines should discuss age and gender as predictors of device benefits.

Several studies have demonstrated that the amino acid residues flanking the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequence of high-affinity ligands modulate their specificity of interaction with integrin complexes. Because of the absence of structural data for integrin complexes with bound ligand, the molecular basis for this specificity modulation remains obscure. In a previous paper [Rahman, Lu, Kakkar and Authi (1995) Biochem. J. 312, 223-232] we demonstrated that two genetically distinct venom-derived RGD proteins, kistrin and dendroaspin (both containing the sequence PRGDMP), were simple competitors, indicating the recognition of an identical binding site on the αIIbβ3 complex. Furthermore, both kistrin and dendroaspin inhibited the binding of the disintegrin elegantin (containing the sequence ARGDNP) via a non-competitive mechanism, suggesting that the binding of elegantin to the αIIbβ3 complex was at a remote site and down-regulated via an allosteric mechanism. Here we present further evidence for distinct RGD ligand recognition sites on the αIIbβ3 complex that exhibit a negative allosteric relationship. A panel of well-characterized recombinant dendroaspin and elegantin derivatives were employed for this study. These recombinant molecules were constructed as glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins with either an Ala or Pro residue N-terminal to the RGD sequence in combination with either a Met or an Asn residue immediately C-terminal. Equilibrium competition experiments showed that elegantin binding to ADP-treated platelets was inhibited by derivatives Eleg. AM (ARGDMP) and Eleg. PM (PRGDMP) via an allosteric competitive mechanism, providing direct evidence that modulation of the RGD motif can alter competitive behaviour. In addition, recombinant kistrin and dendroaspin both inhibited elegantin binding via a non-competitive mechanism, confirming our previous observations. Further evidence for distinct binding sites employing an independent approach was obtained by analysing the binding of the panel of venom proteins to the functionally defective heterodimer αIIbβ3 Ser123 → Ala expressed on Chinese hamster ovary cells. These studies demonstrated that simple competitors kistrin and dendroaspin bound with high affinity to the variant integrin complex. In contrast, the binding of elegantin and most significantly, recombinant Dendro. PN (PRGDNP) and Dendro. AN (ARGDNP) were abolished. These observations, taken together, are consistent with a model depicting the presence of distinct sites of RGD ligand recognition on the αIIbβ3 complex that show the preferential recognition of specific RGD motifs. Competition experiments demonstrate a negative allosteric relationship between these RGD recognition sites.

Abstract Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of multiple myeloma (MM) in Northern Europeans have identified seven novel risk loci (2p23.3, 3p22.1, 3q26.2, 6p21.33, 7p15.3, 17p11.2, 22q13.1). We performed a multiethnic meta-analysis of these regions in 1,274 MM patients and 1,486 controls of European ancestry (EA) and 1,049 MM patients and 7,080 controls of African ancestry (AA), leveraging the differential linkage-disequilibrium of these populations in order to better localize the putative functional variants. We observed directionally consistent effects for all seven index SNPs in both populations, with four significantly associated (p&lt;0.05) with risk in EAs (3p22.1, 7p15.3, 17p11.2, 22q13.1), and two significantly associated with risk in AAs (7p15.3 and 22q13.1). In a fixed effects meta-analysis of six regions (excluding the HLA region on chromosome 6), variation in five of the regions (2p33.3, 3p22.1, 7p15.3, 17p11.2, 22q13.1) had statistically significant associations with risk (Table 1). In one region, the index variant had the strongest association [rs4487645 at 7p15.3, (OR = 1.30, p = 8.7×10−8)]. Five of the six most significantly associated variants identified in the multiethnic analyses overlapped with biologically relevant features indicating regulatory activity based on CD20+ (B lymphocyte) cells, showing evidence of potential function; those included a missense variant in (17p11.2, rs34562254, Pro251Leu) in TNFRSF13B, which encodes a lymphocyte-specific protein in the tumor necrosis factor receptor family that interacts with the NF-kb pathway. Our study shows that these regions are important in MM risk across ethnicities and further supports the use of multiple ethnic groups in genetic studies to enhance identification of risk variants. Table 1.Most significant associations for each region in the multiethnic meta-analysis.Individuals of European AncestryIndividuals of African AncestryMulitethnic Metar2 with IndexcCHRSNPRAaFreqbORP-valueFreqbORP-valueORP-valueP-het2rs732075G0.591.222.0×10−30.621.122.0×10−21.162.6×10−40.280.09/0.283rs73069394A0.191.243.0×10−30.621.181.5×10−21.201.3×10−50.550.77/0.963rs12637184G0.761.136.0×10−20.921.192.7×10−11.151.0×10−20.640.94/1.007rs4487645C0.671.237.0×10−40.891.485.5×10−51.308.7×10−80.07-d17rs34562254A0.121.452.4×10−50.131.212.2×10−31.312.5×10−60.120.33/0.9022rs139400T0.491.224.0×10−40.531.172.1×10−31.191.2×10−60.630.63/0.96aRisk allelebFrequency of the risk allele in European and African ancestry studiescr2 metrics based on 1000 Genomes Project AFR/EUR populationsdIndex SNP Citation Format: Kristin A. Rand, Chi Song, Eric Dean, Daniel Serie, Karen Curtin, Dennis Hazelett, Amie E. Hwang, Xin Sheng, Alex Stram, David J. Van Den Berg, Carol Ann Huff, Leon Bernal-Mizrachi, Michael H. Tomasson, Sikander Ailawadhi, Anneclaire De Roos, Seema Singhal, Karen Pawlish, Edward Peters, Catherine Bock, David V. Conti, Graham Colditz, Todd Zimmerman, Scott Huntsman, John Graff, African Ancestry Prostate Cancer GWAS Consortium,African Ancestry Breast Cancer GWAS Consortium, Stephen J. Chanock, Michael Lieber, Jayesh Mehta, Eric A. Klein, Nalini Janakiraman, Richard K. Severson, Angela R. Brooks-Wilson, Vincent Rajkumar, Elizabeth E. Brown, Laurence Kolonel, Susan Slager, Brian E. Henderson, Graham G. Giles, John J. Spinelli, Brian Chiu, Kenneth C. Anderson, Jeffrey Zonder, Robert Z. Orlowski, Sagar Lonial, Nicola Camp, Celine Vachon, Elad Ziv, Dan O. Stram, Christopher A. Haiman, Wendy Cozen. Multiple myeloma susceptibility loci examined in African and European ancestry populations. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4629. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4629